Filters:
NameProjectTypeCompare
Tartu, Estonia V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Utrecht, the Netherlands (District of Kanaleneiland) V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aveiro, Portugal V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau PED Relevant Case Study Compare
SmartEnCity, Lecce SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study Compare
STARDUST, Trento STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö PED Relevant Case Study Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki PED Relevant Case Study Compare
REPLICATE (pilot action in the Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings), Firenze PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna PED Case Study Compare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento PED Case Study Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna PED Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Võru +CityxChange PED Case Study Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Furuset project, Oslo ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights PED Case Study Compare
Ydalir project ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fornebu, Bærum ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou PED Case Study Compare
Smart Energy Åland PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Munich, Harthof district PED Case Study Uncompare
Lublin MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Uncompare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Findhorn, the Park InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities PED Case Study Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Aalborg East PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Ankara, Çamlık District PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Trenčín MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Vantaa, Aviapolis NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Zaragoza, Actur NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins PED Case Study Compare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Uncompare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Espoo, Kera SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Freiburg, Waldsee PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district PED Case Study Compare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe PED Case Study Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district PED Case Study Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark PED Case Study Compare
Évora, Portugal POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Groningen, PED South MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Groningen, PED North MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Lab Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT PED Lab Compare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Uncompare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Salzburg, Gneis district Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Tartu, City centre area SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab PED Lab Compare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Kifissia, Energy community SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study
TitleKifissia, Energy community
Luxembourg, Betzdorf
Munich, Harthof district
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga
Lublin
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED LabKifissia, Energy communityLuxembourg, BetzdorfMunich, Harthof districtIstanbul, Kadikoy district, CaferagaLublinIzmir, District of KarşıyakaBorlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case studynonoyesyesyesyesno
PED relevant case studyyesyesnonononoyes
PED Lab.nonononononono
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutralitynoyesyesyesyesyesyes
Annual energy surplusnoyesyesnoyesyesyes
Energy communityyesyesyesyesyesnoyes
Circularitynoyesnonoyesnono
Air quality and urban comfortyesyesnonoyesyesno
Electrificationyesyesnonononoyes
Net-zero energy costnonononoyesyesno
Net-zero emissionnonononoyesnono
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)nonononoyesnono
Maximise self-sufficiencynonononoyesyesyes
Othernonononononono
Other (A1P004)
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED LabPlanning PhaseImplementation PhaseImplementation PhasePlanning PhasePlanning PhasePlanning PhasePlanning Phase
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date06/2301/2301/2010/22
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date04/2612/2712/2210/25
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Meteorological open data,
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets,
  • Vehicle registration datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards
A1P009: OtherOther
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
    • Alpagut, B., Lopez Romo, A., Hernández, P., Tabanoğlu, O., & Hermoso Martinez, N. (2021). A GIS-Based Multicriteria Assessment for Identification of Positive Energy Districts Boundary in Cities. Energies, 14(22), 7517.
      A1P011: Geographic coordinates
      X Coordinate (longitude):23.8145886.36160211.56962505994760429.0263195268751722.568427.11004915.394495
      Y Coordinate (latitude):38.07734949.68277448.2043626127515240.9884139524746151.246538.49605460.486609
      A1P012: Country
      A1P012: CountryGreeceLuxembourgGermanyTurkeyPolandTurkeySweden
      A1P013: City
      A1P013: CityMunicipality of KifissiaBetzdorfMunichIstanbulLublinİzmirBorlänge
      A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
      A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).CsaCfbCfbCsbCfbCsaDsb
      A1P015: District boundary
      A1P015: District boundaryVirtualGeographicGeographicGeographicGeographicGeographicGeographic
      OtherThe energy will be produced by a PV plant installed on the terrace of a municipal building. Members of the energy community (that is under formation) will benefit from the energy produced via virtual net metering. PV instalment and the buildings (owned by the members of the community) will be within the boundaries of the Municipality but not necessary in the same area/district/neighbourhood
      A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
      A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:PublicMixedMixedPrivatePrivateMixed
      A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
      A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:Single OwnerMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersSingle Owner
      A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
      A1P018: Number of buildings in PED241261352110
      A1P019: Conditioned space
      A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]173.820611605221664.731027953700
      A1P020: Total ground area
      A1P020: Total ground area [m²]560115172772833.47326009945
      A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
      A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area0000030
      A1P022: Financial schemes
      A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estatenonononononono
      A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO schemenonononononono
      A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Othernonononononono
      A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural fundingnonononononono
      A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National fundingnonononononono
      A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional fundingnonononononono
      A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal fundingnonoyesnononono
      A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Othernoyesnonononono
      A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EUnonoyesyesnoyesno
      A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]1193355
      A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Nationalnononononoyesno
      A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regionalnonononononono
      A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Othernonononononono
      A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022: Other
      A1P023: Economic Targets
      A1P023: Economic Targets
      • Other
      • Job creation,
      • Positive externalities,
      • Other
      • Job creation,
      • Positive externalities,
      • Boosting local businesses,
      • Boosting local and sustainable production,
      • Boosting consumption of local and sustainable products
      • Positive externalities,
      • Boosting local and sustainable production
      • Positive externalities,
      • Boosting local businesses,
      • Boosting consumption of local and sustainable products
      A1P023: OtherBoosting new investors to the area, - Increasing the touristic value of area and urban mobility at the area, - Increasing the regional value (housing price, etc.), - Providing economic advantages by switching to positive energy production
      A1P024: More comments:
      A1P024: More comments:Lublin PED Area is geographically bounded and the ambition is to reach Self-Sufficiency. There is a shopping centre with a large rooftop area for solar generation and there are also an empty lot (just on the east side of the building) and a carpark area (on the north side) next to the commercial centre. These areas can also be evaluated for on-site (on the ground – or canopies for cars) energy generation. There are also new built (mainly in 2012) residential blocks with high efficiency and this district is so-called an “eco-district”. Thanks to the District Heating Grid (DHN), all buildings are connected to each other the network has potential for sharing mechanisms in the PED Area. Another opportunity for renewable energy is that these buildings are connected to more or less the end point of DHN and for this reason, a waste heat potential from the return pipe may also be considered. There are also small size residentials, that are not connected to the DHN, around the PED area and this enlightened the technical team for exporting energy from PED to these areas with a new infrastructure.
      A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
      A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]
      Contact person for general enquiries
      A1P026: NameArtemis Giavasoglou, Kleopatra KalampokaJulien BertucciStefan SynekMr. Dogan UNERIDorota Wolińska-PietrzakOzlem SenyolJingchun Shen
      A1P027: OrganizationMunicipality of Kifissia – SPARCS local teamSNHBMCity of MunichMunicipality of KadikoyLublin MunicipalityKarsiyaka MunicipalityHögskolan Dalarna
      A1P028: AffiliationMunicipality / Public BodiesMunicipality / Public BodiesMunicipality / Public BodiesMunicipality / Public BodiesMunicipality / Public BodiesMunicipality / Public BodiesResearch Center / University
      A1P028: OtherAndreas Bärnreuther
      A1P029: Emailgiavasoglou@kifissia.grjulien.bertucci@snhbm.lustefan.synek@muenchen.dedogan.uneri@kadikoy.bel.trdwolinska@lublin.euozlemkocaer2@gmail.comjih@du.se
      Contact person for other special topics
      A1P030: NameStavros Zapantis - vice mayorStefan SynekMrs. Damla MUHCU YILMAZHasan Burak CavkaXingxing Zhang
      A1P031: Emailstavros.zapantis@gmail.comstefan.synek@muenchen.dedamla.muhcu@kadikoy.bel.trhasancavka@iyte.edu.trxza@du.se
      Pursuant to the General Data Protection RegulationYesYesYesYesYesYes
      A2P001: Fields of application
      A2P001: Fields of application
      • Energy production
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
      • Digital technologies,
      • Water use,
      • Indoor air quality,
      • Construction materials
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Digital technologies,
      • Construction materials
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
      • Digital technologies
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
      • Digital technologies,
      • Indoor air quality
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.)
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Construction materials
      A2P001: Other
      A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
      A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fieldsSEE: D4.1 - Methodology and Guidelines for PED design https://makingcity.eu/results/#1551708358627-aefa76ef-66b2Methods involve studying the feasibility of digital PED references for the case cities about their energy, environmental, and economic performance by EnergyPlus tool. In case of insufficient energy data and the need of high resolution data, ‘Gaussian mixture model and expectation-maximization algorithm’ and ‘time-series decomposition-recombination’ method will be used to supplement data to EnergyPlus. The feasibility results will be returned to stakeholders for iterative discussion, and the iterative results will be used to update digital references. Replication plans are developed based on such a cooperation process for strategies to implement PEDs. If a PED is demonstrated during the project period, the measured data will be used to verify the feasibility model to optimize previous results (WP7– R3 & R4). In the MAKING-CITY project, the overall PED design method is developed, which will be further optimised in this project. In addition, PED-ACT will use the methods and knowledge, including how to choose a suitable PED in a city, energy balance calculation, and technologies available for PED. The RUGGEDISED project outputs the governance model into the replication plan in PED-ACT. Its ‘smart city open-data decision platform’ will illustrate an excellent example for the database in PED-ACT. The IEA EBC Annex 83 and Cost Action 19126 create the basis for data collection, developing existing PED databases, characterization of PED, and review of regulations of PED, as well as development of simulation tools. The UBEM project further enables a detailed high-resolution energy balance calculation of PED.Load calculation and system optimisation: City Energy Analyst Identification of stranded assets for asset owners and investors to understand the carbon risks: CRREM
      A2P003: Application of ISO52000
      A2P003: Application of ISO52000YesNoYesNo
      A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
      A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoYesNoYesYesYes
      A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
      A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoNoNoNoNo
      A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
      A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculationMobility is not included in the calculations.
      A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
      A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]0.943.8620.6777
      A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
      A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]0.101.2260.03656
      A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
      A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]0
      A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
      A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]0
      A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
      A2P011: PVyesnoyesyesnoyesno
      A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.511.028
      A2P011: Windnonononononono
      A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Hydrononononononono
      A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Biomass_elnonononononono
      A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
      A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: PVT_elnonononononoyes
      A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.01818
      A2P011: Othernonononononono
      A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
      A2P012: Geothermalnonononononono
      A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Solar Thermalnonoyesyesnonono
      A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.08
      A2P012: Biomass_heatnonononononono
      A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Waste heat+HPnonononononono
      A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
      A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: PVT_thnonononononoyes
      A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.0825
      A2P012: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
      A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Othernonononononono
      A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
      A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notesTwo scenarios are conducted regarding Kadikoy PED energy generation. For the second scenario, just 0.53GWh/annum PV production is proposed.
      A2P014: Annual energy use
      A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]0.745.0880.318
      A2P015: Annual energy delivered
      A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]0.490.2055
      A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
      A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]00
      A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
      A2P017: Gasnonoyesnonoyesno
      A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
      A2P017: Coalnonononononono
      A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
      A2P017: Oilnonoyesnononono
      A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
      A2P017: Othernonononononoyes
      A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
      A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
      A2P018: PVnonoyesyesnoyesno
      A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]-0.260.707
      A2P018: Windnonoyesnononono
      A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Hydrononononononono
      A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Biomass_elnonoyesnononono
      A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Biomass_peat_elnonoyesnononono
      A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: PVT_elnonoyesnononono
      A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Othernonononononoyes
      A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]0.187
      A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
      A2P019: Geothermalnonoyesnononono
      A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Solar Thermalnonononononono
      A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Biomass_heatnonoyesnononono
      A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Waste heat+HPnonoyesnononono
      A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
      A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: PVT_thnonononononono
      A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
      A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Othernonononononoyes
      A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0
      A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
      A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary000-2.269230769230801.45403111739750.53839572192513
      A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
      A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]6.93
      A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
      A2P022: Safety & Securitynone
      A2P022: Healththermal comfort diagram
      A2P022: Educationnone
      A2P022: Mobilitynone
      A2P022: EnergyEnergynormalized CO2/GHG & Energy intensity
      A2P022: Water
      A2P022: Economic developmentcost of excess emissions
      A2P022: Housing and Community
      A2P022: Waste
      A2P022: Other
      A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
      A2P023: Photovoltaicsnonoyesyesyesyesyes
      A2P023: Solar thermal collectorsnononoyesnonoyes
      A2P023: Wind Turbinesnonononononono
      A2P023: Geothermal energy systemnonoyesnononoyes
      A2P023: Waste heat recoverynonononononoyes
      A2P023: Waste to energynonononononono
      A2P023: Polygenerationnonononononono
      A2P023: Co-generationnonononononono
      A2P023: Heat Pumpnonoyesyesyesyesyes
      A2P023: Hydrogennonononoyesnono
      A2P023: Hydropower plantnonononononono
      A2P023: Biomassnonononononono
      A2P023: Biogasnonononononono
      A2P023: Other
      A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
      A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)noyesyesnoyesnoyes
      A2P024: Energy management systemnoyesyesnoyesnono
      A2P024: Demand-side managementnonononoyesnono
      A2P024: Smart electricity gridnonononoyesnono
      A2P024: Thermal Storagenonoyesnoyesnoyes
      A2P024: Electric Storagenoyesyesnoyesnono
      A2P024: District Heating and Coolingnonoyesnoyesnoyes
      A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systemsnonoyesnoyesnono
      A2P024: P2P – buildingsnonononononono
      A2P024: Other
      A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
      A2P025: Deep Retrofittingnonoyesnoyesyesyes
      A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildingsnonononoyesnono
      A2P025: High-performance new buildingsnoyesnonoyesnono
      A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)nonononoyesnono
      A2P025: Urban data platformsnonoyesnoyesnono
      A2P025: Mobile applications for citizensnonononoyesnono
      A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)noyesnonoyesyesyes
      A2P025: Smart irrigationnonononononono
      A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposalnonononononono
      A2P025: Smart surveillancenonononononono
      A2P025: Other
      A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
      A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)nonononoyesnono
      A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)nonononoyesnono
      A2P026: e-Mobilitynoyesyesnoyesnono
      A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutionsnonoyesnononono
      A2P026: Car-free areanonononononono
      A2P026: Other
      A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
      A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
      A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
      A2P028: Energy efficiency certificatesYesYesNoNoNoNo
      A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesEnergy Performance Certificate - in Greece it is mandatory in order to buy or rent a house or a dwelling
      A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
      A2P029: Any other building / district certificatesYesNoNoNoNo
      A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes
      A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
      A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
      • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
      • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC)
      • Urban Renewal Strategies,
      • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
      • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
      • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
      • Smart cities strategies,
      • Urban Renewal Strategies,
      • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
      • New development strategies,
      • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
      • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
      • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
      • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
      • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
      • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
      • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
      • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract)
      A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
      A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategyCity wide climate neutrality by 2035, city administration climate neutrality by 2030Karşıyaka Municipality is the first local government in Turkey to sign the Covenant of Mayors in 2011. During this period, the greenhouse gas inventory of the district was carried out three times and reduction targets were set for 2020 and 2030. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan prepared as of the end of 2021, Karşıyaka Municipality has targeted a 40% reduction in its emissions for 2030 compared to the base year 2018. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan, Karşıyaka Municipality aims to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions from 3.96 tCO2e / person in 2018 to 2.37 tCO2e / person in 2030. System solutions such as the use of renewable energy sources, air, ground or water source heat pump, cogeneration and microcogeneration are analysed by designers in order to fully or partially meet the energy requirements for heating, cooling, ventilation, hot water, electricity and lighting for all buildings with a floor area of less than 20,000 square metres. If at least 50% of the building's total energy consumption costs are covered by one or more of these applications, the points are taken in the assessment table in the Building and housing estate business certification guide of 2023.The study aligns closely with the decarbonisation and energy reduction pathways of residential multi family buildings with 1.5°C global warming target in Sweden. This study will also contribute to the achievement of the carbon neturality of whole Borlänge city by 2030.
      A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
      A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
      • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
      • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
      • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
      • Electrification of Cooking Methods
      • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
      • Other
      • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
      A3P003: OtherHeating Grid
      A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
      A3P004: Identification of needs and prioritiesAccording to the model developed for the district, the electrification of heating and cooling is necessary.Therefore, there needs to be the implementation of a heat pump. The building-integrated photovoltaic panelsshould follow. Through net-metering practices, the district is expected to reach energy positivity throughthis scenario.In our project, we carried out a comprehensive exploration of strategies to achieve positive energy districts in a Swedish residential portfolio. The focus on urban energy transitions necessitates a holistic approach that integrates building retrofit, solar technology exploration, and heating supply optimisation. Exploration of Local Solar Sources: The analysis reveals varying solar irradiance resources throughout the year, emphasizing the importance of strategic placement. Integration of combined photovoltaic and thermal panels into building envelopes demonstrates the potential to cover a significant portion of the energy demand even in Sweden. Heating Supply Optimisation with Solar Technologies: Despite the surplus energy production from on-site solar technology, challenges arise due to temporal energy asymmetry. The introduction of heat pumps emerges as a feasible solution to balance energy gaps, utilising both rejected and free heat. Optimisation scenarios, utilising a combination of geothermal heat pumps, water source heat pumps, and PVT, showcase remarkable reductions in emissions and primary energy consumption. Urban Form and Energy Infrastructure Design: We realised the importance of returning to urban form and energy infrastructure design to optimise future residential portfolio potential. Building layout design, influenced by zoning regulations and innovative typologies, plays a crucial role in achieving district level energy efficiency. Future challenges, including demographic shifts, e-mobility, and climate change, necessitate a more holistic approach to energy infrastructure design, addressing not only heating and electricity demands but also cooling requirements.
      A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
      A3P005: Sustainable behaviourWhile our investigation primarily centres on technical optimisation within Positive Energy District (PED) development, it is essential to acknowledge the broader scope encompassing social and governance dimensions. Specifically, understanding stakeholders' willingness to embrace technical recommendations upon project completion is important. Several potential influencing factors merit exploration, including economic considerations, technical optimisation-associated embodied carbon balance, the general public's technical perceptions, and operational feasibility. Evaluating these aspects holistically not only enhances the efficacy of PED initiatives but also fosters greater acceptance and participation within the communities they serve.
      A3P006: Economic strategies
      A3P006: Economic strategies
      • Open data business models
      • Innovative business models,
      • PPP models,
      • Circular economy models,
      • Demand management Living Lab,
      • Local trading
      • Open data business models,
      • Life Cycle Cost,
      • Circular economy models,
      • Local trading
      A3P006: Other
      A3P007: Social models
      A3P007: Social models
      • Affordability
      • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
      • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
      • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance,
      • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
      • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
      • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
      • Citizen Social Research,
      • Prevention of energy poverty,
      • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
      • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies
      • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
      • Affordability
      • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
      • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
      • Social incentives,
      • Affordability,
      • Digital Inclusion
      A3P007: Other
      A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
      A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
      • Building / district Certification
      • Strategic urban planning,
      • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
      • District Energy plans,
      • City Vision 2050,
      • SECAP Updates
      • City Vision 2050,
      • SECAP Updates
      • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
      • District Energy plans,
      • SECAP Updates
      • Strategic urban planning,
      • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
      • District Energy plans,
      • Building / district Certification
      A3P008: Other
      A3P009: Environmental strategies
      A3P009: Environmental strategies
      • Energy Neutral,
      • Low Emission Zone,
      • Net zero carbon footprint
      • Energy Neutral,
      • Low Emission Zone,
      • Net zero carbon footprint,
      • Carbon-free,
      • Life Cycle approach,
      • Greening strategies,
      • Nature Based Solutions (NBS)
      • Energy Neutral,
      • Low Emission Zone,
      • Pollutants Reduction
      • Low Emission Zone,
      • Net zero carbon footprint,
      • Life Cycle approach,
      • Sustainable Urban drainage systems (SUDS)
      A3P009: Other
      A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
      A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspectsdecision by the Munich City Council in 2019 to become climate neutral by 2030 / 2035
      B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
      B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definitionMunich as demonstrator together with Lyon in ASCEND projectThe pilot area was selected on the basis of several criteria: its location within areas prioritised by Karşıyaka Municipality for combating climate change, compliance with the building regulations set out in the Green Building-Site-Operation (2023) guide, which are in line with Municipality's energy policy, the presence of open spaces that allow various applications for renewable energy, proximity to public facilities such as schools and municipal services, the availability of data on energy consumption (e.g. electricity and natural gas bills) and architectural features, the potential for community building, the suitability for solar energy systems, considering orientation and roof structure, and the potential for future building renovations. The aim of the initiative is to explore the feasibility of transforming the district into a Positive Energy District (PED).The Rymdgatan's Residential Portfolio in Sweden presents a compelling case study for its classification as a PED-related research, given its alignment with sustainable behaviours and overarching PED development principles as follows: Inclusivity and Social Equity: The residential portfolio situated in Rymdgatan caters primarily to a low-income community. By focusing on this demographic, the project addresses critical aspects of social equity within sustainable urban development. Ensuring access to energy-efficient housing and amenities for economically disadvantaged populations not only fosters social cohesion but also mitigates energy poverty, a pressing concern in many urban contexts. Multifamily Residential Building: The inclusion of multifamily residential buildings within the portfolio underscores a commitment to density and efficient land use, both essential components of sustainable urban design. Such developments promote resource optimisation by consolidating housing units, thereby reducing per capita energy consumption and infrastructure demands. Moreover, multifamily dwellings often facilitate community engagement and shared resource management, fostering a culture of sustainability among residents. Low Carbon Retrofitting and Transition: The overarching initiative to transition the entire Jakobsgårdarna district. The included Rymdgatan portfolio, towards low carbon retrofitting, represents a significant example of decarbonization and climate resilience. By integrating energy-efficient technologies and renewable energy solutions into existing infrastructure, the project not only reduces carbon emissions but also serves as a blueprint for revitalising old urban environments sustainably. This holistic approach to retrofitting demonstrates a systemic commitment to environmental stewardship and long-term sustainability. Climate Adaptation and Renewable Energy Integration: Despite Sweden's climatic challenges, including lower solar resources during winter months, the Rymdgatan project leverages its geographical context to optimize renewable energy utilization. Sweden's greater solar resource availability during summer and geothermal potentials complement the design's emphasis on seasonal energy planning, where surplus energy generated during peak periods can be stored or redistributed efficiently. By embracing climate-responsive design strategies, the project demonstrates resilience in the face of climate variability while harnessing renewable energy potential effectively.
      B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
      B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project developmentspeed and scale of PEDsBorlänge city has committed to become the carbon-neutral city by 2030.
      B1P003: Environment of the case study area
      B2P003: Environment of the case study areaRuralUrban areaUrban areaUrban areaUrban area
      B1P004: Type of district
      B2P004: Type of district
      • New construction,
      • Renovation
      • Renovation
      • Renovation
      • Renovation
      • Renovation
      B1P005: Case Study Context
      B1P005: Case Study Context
      • New Development
      • Retrofitting Area
      • Re-use / Transformation Area,
      • Retrofitting Area
      • Retrofitting Area
      • Re-use / Transformation Area,
      • Retrofitting Area
      B1P006: Year of construction
      B1P006: Year of construction20051990
      B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
      B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential623.379100
      B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
      B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential6100
      B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
      B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential6
      B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
      B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential6
      B1P011: Population density before intervention
      B1P011: Population density before intervention0000000
      B1P012: Population density after intervention
      B1P012: Population density after intervention000.0107142857142860000.010658622423328
      B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
      B1P013: Residentialnonoyesyesnoyesyes
      B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]1027954360
      B1P013: Officenononoyesnonono
      B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Industry and Utilitynonononononono
      B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Commercialnononoyesnonono
      B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Institutionalnonononononono
      B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Natural areasnonononononono
      B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Recreationalnonononononono
      B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Dismissed areasnonononononono
      B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Othernononoyesnonoyes
      B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]Cultural Center, Sports Center / Total building and land use data of neigborhood 13,878 residential, 4,441 commercial using before intervention. For project area & 49 building area m2706
      B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
      B1P014: Residentialnonoyesyesnoyesyes
      B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]1027954360
      B1P014: Officenononoyesnonono
      B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Industry and Utilitynonononononono
      B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Commercialnononoyesnonono
      B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Institutionalnonononononono
      B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Natural areasnonononononono
      B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Recreationalnonononononono
      B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Dismissed areasnonononononono
      B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Othernononoyesnonoyes
      B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]706
      B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
      B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
      B2P002: Installation life time
      B2P002: Installation life time
      B2P003: Scale of action
      B2P003: ScaleDistrict
      B2P004: Operator of the installation
      B2P004: Operator of the installation
      B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
      B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
      B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
      B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?Yes
      B2P006: Other
      B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
      B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
      • Strategic
      B2P007: Other
      B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
      B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED LabMunicipality
      B2P008: Other
      B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
      B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
      • Academia,
      • Private,
      • Industrial,
      • Citizens, public, NGO
      B2P009: Other
      B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
      B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
      B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
      B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
      • Buildings,
      • Demand-side management,
      • Prosumers,
      • Renewable generation,
      • Efficiency measures,
      • Waste management,
      • Water treatment,
      • Lighting,
      • E-mobility,
      • Green areas,
      • Circular economy models
      B2P011: Other
      B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
      B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
      • Monitoring and evaluation infrastructure
      B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
      B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
      B2P014: Monitoring measures
      B2P014: Monitoring measures
      • Available data
      B2P015: Key Performance indicators
      B2P015: Key Performance indicators
      • Energy
      B2P016: Execution of operations
      B2P016: Execution of operations
      B2P017: Capacities
      B2P017: Capacities
      B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
      B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
      B2P019: Available tools
      B2P019: Available tools
      B2P019: Available tools
      B2P020: External accessibility
      B2P020: External accessibility
      C1P001: Unlocking Factors
      C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important
      C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important
      C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important
      C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important
      C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important
      C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important
      C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important
      C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important
      C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important
      C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important
      C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important
      C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)
      C1P002: Driving Factors
      C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
      C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important
      C1P002: Economic growth need2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important
      C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important
      C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)
      C1P003: Administrative barriers
      C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important
      C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important
      C1P003: Lack of public participation3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
      C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important
      C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
      C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important
      C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important
      C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)
      C1P004: Policy barriers
      C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important
      C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important
      C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)
      C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
      C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important
      C1P005: Regulatory instability3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important
      C1P005: Non-effective regulations4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important
      C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important
      C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important
      C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important
      C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
      C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important
      C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
      C1P006: Environmental barriers
      C1P006: Environmental barriers- Climate Variability: 5 - Topographical Constraints: 4 - Sunlight Availability: 5 - Environmental Regulations: 3 - Zoning Restrictions: 2 - Air and Water Pollution: 2 - Natural Disasters: 1 - Water Scarcity: 12 - Slightly important
      C1P007: Technical barriers
      C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important
      C1P007: Deficient planning3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important
      C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important
      C1P007: Lack of well-defined process4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important
      C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important
      C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important
      C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
      C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
      C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)
      C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
      C1P008: Inertia4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important
      C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important
      C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important
      C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P008: Rebound effect4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important
      C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
      C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
      C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important
      C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
      C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
      C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
      C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
      C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important
      C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important
      C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important
      C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
      C1P010: Financial barriers
      C1P010: Hidden costs1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important
      C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
      C1P010: Economic crisis1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P010: Risk and uncertainty1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important
      C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important
      C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
      C1P011: Market barriers
      C1P011: Split incentives1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important
      C1P011: Energy price distortion1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important
      C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
      C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
      C1P012: Stakeholders involved
      C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
      • None
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation
      • Planning/leading
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Research & Innovation
      • None
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation
      • Design/demand aggregation
      • Planning/leading
      C1P012: Financial/Funding
      • None
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation
      • None
      • None
      C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • None
      • None
      C1P012: Business process management
      • Design/demand aggregation
      • None
      • None
      • None
      C1P012: Urban Services providers
      • Planning/leading
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation
      • None
      • None
      C1P012: Real Estate developers
      • Planning/leading
      • None
      • None
      • Design/demand aggregation
      C1P012: Design/Construction companies
      • Design/demand aggregation
      • Construction/implementation
      • None
      • None
      C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
      • None
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • None
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation
      • None
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce
      • Planning/leading
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • None
      • None
      C1P012: Other
      • None
      C1P012: Other (if any)
      Summary

      Authors (framework concept)

      Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

      Contributors (to the content)

      Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

      Implemented by

      Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
      Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)