Filters:
NameProjectTypeCompare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Munich, Harthof district PED Case Study Uncompare
Lublin MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Findhorn, the Park InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities PED Case Study Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Aalborg East PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Ankara, Çamlık District PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Trenčín MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Uncompare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Zaragoza, Actur NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins PED Case Study Compare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Uncompare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Espoo, Kera SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Freiburg, Waldsee PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district PED Case Study Compare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe PED Case Study Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district PED Case Study Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark PED Case Study Compare
Évora, Portugal POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Groningen, PED South MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Groningen, PED North MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Lab Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT PED Lab Compare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Uncompare
Salzburg, Gneis district Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Tartu, City centre area SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab PED Lab Uncompare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Kifissia, Energy community SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study
TitleKifissia, Energy community
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka
Vantaa, Aviapolis
Munich, Harthof district
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium
City of Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED LabKifissia, Energy communityIzmir, District of KarşıyakaVantaa, AviapolisMunich, Harthof districtKladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter StadiumCity of Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva blockBorlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential PortfolioBarcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case studynoyesyesyesnoyesnono
PED relevant case studyyesnoyesnoyesnoyesno
PED Lab.nonoyesnonononoyes
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutralitynoyesyesyesyesnoyesno
Annual energy surplusnoyesnoyesyesnoyesno
Energy communityyesnonoyesyesnoyesyes
Circularitynonoyesnonononono
Air quality and urban comfortyesyesnononononono
Electrificationyesnononoyesnoyesyes
Net-zero energy costnoyesnononononono
Net-zero emissionnononononononoyes
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)nononononononoyes
Maximise self-sufficiencynoyesnononoyesyesno
Othernononononononoyes
Other (A1P004)Green IT
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED LabPlanning PhasePlanning PhasePlanning PhaseImplementation PhasePlanning PhaseIn operationPlanning PhaseIn operation
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date10/2201/2301/23202206/1801/2011
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date10/2512/2712/2703/2202/2013
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability
  • Monitoring data available within the districts
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • General statistical datasets
  • General statistical datasets
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards
  • General statistical datasets
A1P009: OtherOther
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
    • M. Hukkalainen, F. Zarrin, K. Klobut, O. Lindholm, M. Ranta, P. Hajduk, T. Vainio-Kaila, E. Wanne, J. Tartia, H. Horn, K. Kontu, J. Juhmen, S. Santala, R. Turtiainen, J. Töyräs, T. Koljonen. (2020). Deliverable D3.1 Detailed plan of the Espoo smart city lighthouse demonstrations. Available online: https://www.sparcs.info/sites/default/files/2020-09/SPARCS_D3.1_Detailed_plan_Espoo.pdf,
    • Hukkalainen, Zarrin Fatima, Krzysztof Klobut, Kalevi Piira, Mikaela Ranta, Petr Hajduk, Tiina Vainio-Kaila , Elina Wanne, Jani Tartia, Angela Bartel, Joni Mäkinen, Mia Kaurila, Kaisa Kontu, Jaano Juhmen, Merja Ryöppy, Reetta Turtiainen, Joona Töyräs, Timo Koljonen (2021) Deliverable 3.2 Midterm report on the implemented demonstrations of solutions for energy positive blocks in Espoo. Available online: https://www.sparcs.info/sites/default/files/2022-02/SPARCS_D3.2.pdf,
    • www.lippulaiva.fi
      A1P011: Geographic coordinates
      X Coordinate (longitude):23.81458827.11004924.95882111.56962505994760414.0929624.654315.3944952.1
      Y Coordinate (latitude):38.07734938.49605460.30548848.2043626127515250.1371560.149160.48660941.3
      A1P012: Country
      A1P012: CountryGreeceTurkeyFinlandGermanyCzech RepublicFinlandSwedenSpain
      A1P013: City
      A1P013: CityMunicipality of KifissiaİzmirVantaaMunichKladnoEspooBorlängeBarcelona and Tarragona
      A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
      A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).CsaCsaDfbCfbCfbDfbDsbCsa
      A1P015: District boundary
      A1P015: District boundaryVirtualGeographicGeographicGeographicGeographicGeographicGeographicVirtual
      OtherThe energy will be produced by a PV plant installed on the terrace of a municipal building. Members of the energy community (that is under formation) will benefit from the energy produced via virtual net metering. PV instalment and the buildings (owned by the members of the community) will be within the boundaries of the Municipality but not necessary in the same area/district/neighbourhoodV1* (ca 8 buildings)
      A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
      A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:PrivateMixedMixedMixedPrivateMixedPublic
      A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
      A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:Multiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersSingle OwnerSingle OwnerSingle Owner
      A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
      A1P018: Number of buildings in PED2112689100
      A1P019: Conditioned space
      A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]1027952061120003700
      A1P020: Total ground area
      A1P020: Total ground area [m²]3260038810005601650009945
      A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
      A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area03000100
      A1P022: Financial schemes
      A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estatenonoyesnoyesyesnono
      A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO schemenonononoyesnonono
      A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Othernonoyesnonononono
      A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural fundingnonononoyesnonono
      A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National fundingnononononononono
      A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional fundingnononononononono
      A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal fundingnonoyesyesyesnonono
      A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Othernononononononono
      A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EUnoyesyesyesyesyesnono
      A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]1193355308875
      A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Nationalnoyesnonoyesnonono
      A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regionalnononononononono
      A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Othernononononononono
      A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022: OtherMultiple different funding schemes depending on the development site within the District and Lab.
      A1P023: Economic Targets
      A1P023: Economic Targets
      • Positive externalities,
      • Boosting local and sustainable production
      • Positive externalities,
      • Boosting local businesses,
      • Boosting local and sustainable production
      • Job creation,
      • Positive externalities
      • Job creation,
      • Positive externalities,
      • Boosting local businesses
      • Positive externalities,
      • Boosting local businesses,
      • Boosting consumption of local and sustainable products
      • Job creation,
      • Boosting local and sustainable production
      A1P023: Other
      A1P024: More comments:
      A1P024: More comments:The Espoonlahti district is located on the south-western coast of Espoo. With 56,000 inhabitants, it is the second largest of the Espoo city centres. The number of inhabitants is estimated to grow to 70,000 within the next 10 years. Espoonlahti will be a future transit hub of the south-western Espoo, along the metro line, and the increasing stream of passengers provides a huge potential for retail, business and residential developments. E-mobility solutions and last-mile services have strong potential in the area when subway extension is finished and running. The extensive (re)development of the Lippulaiva blocks make a benchmark catering to the everyday needs of residents. The completely new shopping centre is a state-of-the-art cross point with 20,000 daily customers and 10,000 daily commuters (3.5 million/year). The new underground metro line and station, and feeder line bus terminal, are fully integrated. Residential housing of approximately 550 new apartments will be built on top. Lippulaiva is a large traffic hub, directly connected to public transport and right next to the Länsiväylä highway and extensive cycle paths. Lippulaiva offers diverse, mixed-use services, such as a shopping mall, public services, a day care centre, residential apartment buildings, and underground parking facilities. Lippulaiva received the LEED Gold environmental certificate and Smart Building Gold certificate. • Flagship of sustainability • Cooling and heating demand from geothermal energy system (on-site) with energy storage system, 4 MW • PV panels: roof and façade, 630 kWp • Smart control strategies for electricity and thermal energy, smart microgrid-system and battery storage • Charging capacity for 134 EVsSemi-Virtual Energy Integration Laboratory (SEILAB) The Energy Smart Lab is an infrastructure conceived as a flexible and versatile platform for innovative technological developments for both industry and competitive R+D projects. The areas of expertise of this laboratory pivot around the following technologies: – Power Electronics for the integration and control of the elements within a building or community: Renewable Energy Sources (RES), Energy Storage Systems and Electric Vehicles (EV) – ICT Platform for smart communications and energy management of systems, building, networks and communities. – Energy System Integration technologies for smart and flexible buildings and grids including RES and EV. The laboratory operation is based on the hardware emulation approach, which allows for real physical equipment to be operated under a broad range of scenarios without depending on the real occurrence of the boundary conditions suitable for the experimental validation. The laboratory is pioneer in addressing the concept and implementation of Microgrids and aims to become a leading experimental facility for improving the optimal development of Flexible Energy Buildings and Flexibility Aggregation.
      A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
      A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]
      Contact person for general enquiries
      A1P026: NameArtemis Giavasoglou, Kleopatra KalampokaOzlem SenyolEira LinkoStefan SynekDavid ŠkorňaElina EkelundJingchun ShenDr. Jaume Salom, Dra. Cristina Corchero
      A1P027: OrganizationMunicipality of Kifissia – SPARCS local teamKarsiyaka MunicipalityCity of VantaaCity of MunichMěsto KladnoCitycon OyjHögskolan DalarnaIREC
      A1P028: AffiliationMunicipality / Public BodiesMunicipality / Public BodiesMunicipality / Public BodiesMunicipality / Public BodiesMunicipality / Public BodiesSME / IndustryResearch Center / UniversityResearch Center / University
      A1P028: OtherAndreas Bärnreuther
      A1P029: Emailgiavasoglou@kifissia.grozlemkocaer2@gmail.comeira.linko@vantaa.fistefan.synek@muenchen.dedavid.skorna@mestokladno.czElina.ekelund@citycon.comjih@du.seJsalom@irec.cat
      Contact person for other special topics
      A1P030: NameStavros Zapantis - vice mayorHasan Burak CavkaStefan SynekMichal KuzmičElina EkelundXingxing Zhang
      A1P031: Emailstavros.zapantis@gmail.comhasancavka@iyte.edu.trstefan.synek@muenchen.demichal.kuzmic@cvut.czElina.ekelund@citycon.comxza@du.se
      Pursuant to the General Data Protection RegulationYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
      A2P001: Fields of application
      A2P001: Fields of application
      • Energy production
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.)
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
      • Digital technologies,
      • Construction materials,
      • Other
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Digital technologies,
      • Construction materials
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Digital technologies,
      • Indoor air quality
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Digital technologies
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Construction materials
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Digital technologies
      A2P001: Other
      A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
      A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fieldsMethods involve studying the feasibility of digital PED references for the case cities about their energy, environmental, and economic performance by EnergyPlus tool. In case of insufficient energy data and the need of high resolution data, ‘Gaussian mixture model and expectation-maximization algorithm’ and ‘time-series decomposition-recombination’ method will be used to supplement data to EnergyPlus. The feasibility results will be returned to stakeholders for iterative discussion, and the iterative results will be used to update digital references. Replication plans are developed based on such a cooperation process for strategies to implement PEDs. If a PED is demonstrated during the project period, the measured data will be used to verify the feasibility model to optimize previous results (WP7– R3 & R4). In the MAKING-CITY project, the overall PED design method is developed, which will be further optimised in this project. In addition, PED-ACT will use the methods and knowledge, including how to choose a suitable PED in a city, energy balance calculation, and technologies available for PED. The RUGGEDISED project outputs the governance model into the replication plan in PED-ACT. Its ‘smart city open-data decision platform’ will illustrate an excellent example for the database in PED-ACT. The IEA EBC Annex 83 and Cost Action 19126 create the basis for data collection, developing existing PED databases, characterization of PED, and review of regulations of PED, as well as development of simulation tools. The UBEM project further enables a detailed high-resolution energy balance calculation of PED.Pilot collaboration with landowners. Carbon footprint assessment and planning guidelines in zoning planning. Green infrastructure requirements. Examples of considered energy solutions: waste heat recovery and utilization, geothermal, air-water heat pumps, district heating return water, photovoltaics, A-class energy efficiency, smart control and monitoring, energy storages, E-mobility above national requirements, coolingTrnsys, PV modelling tools, CADEnergy efficiency: - eliminating waste energy utilizing smart energy system - utilizing excess heat from grocery stores Energy flexibility: - A battery energy storage system (1,5 MW/1,5MWh); Active participation in Nordpool electricity market (FCR-N) Energy production: - heating and cooling from geothermal heat pump system; 171 energy wells (over 51 km); heat capacity 4 MW - installation of new photovoltaic (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; Estimation of annual production is about 540 MWh (630 kWp) E-mobility - Installation of charging stations for electric vehicles (for 134 EVs) - e-bike services (warm storage room, charging cabinets for e-bikes) Digital technologies: - Building Analytics system by Schneider ElectricLoad calculation and system optimisation: City Energy Analyst Identification of stranded assets for asset owners and investors to understand the carbon risks: CRREMEnergy SmartLab capacities - Building simulation model: thermal inertia and thermal loads of a building or community can be co-simulated with a building model. – System Operator and Aggregator simulation models: the interaction with remote control actions carried out by electricity System Operators or flexibility Aggregators can be simulated as well. – Grid simulation model: the physical interaction of the building with the grid power supply can be simulated enabling the experimental validation of flexibility services to the network. Energy SmartLab systems - SAFT Li-ion battery: maximum stored energy 20000 Wh, rated power 150 kW, rated discharge current 200 A, rated charge current 34 A, operating voltage 189 V – 227 V – 254 V, capacity 82 Ah. – Ultracapacitors: maximum stored energy 57 Wh, rated power 10 kW, rated current 20 A, peak current (<1s) 200 Apk, operating voltage 250 V – 500 V, capacity 1,65 F. – Electric vehicle second life battery: maximum stored energy 23300 Wh, rated power 40 kW, rated current 150 A, operating voltage 240 V – 400 V, capacity 32 Ah - 5 microgrid emulators (emulated power 5.5 kVA, max generation connected 10kVA, max consumption connected 10 kVA) - 1 grid emulator (Rated power: 200 kVA, Rated current per phase: 350 A, Rated current per neutral conductor: 35)
      A2P003: Application of ISO52000
      A2P003: Application of ISO52000YesNoNoYesNo
      A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
      A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balanceYesYesYesYesYesYes
      A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
      A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoNoNoNoNoYes
      A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
      A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculationMobility is not included in the calculations.The calculation of the energy balance will be further developed and specified under the Neutralpath-project. Mobility related emissions are taken into account in the carbon footprint calculation of each zoning plan in the development area.Not yet included.Mobility is not included in the energy model.– Electric vehicle second life battery: maximum stored energy 23300 Wh, rated power 40 kW, rated current 150 A, operating voltage 240 V – 400 V, capacity 32 Ah
      A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
      A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]3.8621.45.50.6777
      A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
      A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]1.2260.35.80.03656
      A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
      A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]0
      A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
      A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]0
      A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
      A2P011: PVyesyesyesyesyesyesnoyes
      A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]1.0281.10.54
      A2P011: Windnononononononono
      A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Hydronononononononono
      A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Biomass_elnononononononono
      A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Biomass_peat_elnononononononono
      A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: PVT_elnonononononoyesno
      A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.01818
      A2P011: Othernononononononono
      A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
      A2P012: Geothermalnonoyesnonoyesnono
      A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]5
      A2P012: Solar Thermalnononoyesnononono
      A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Biomass_heatnononononononono
      A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Waste heat+HPnonoyesnoyesnonono
      A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]1.7
      A2P012: Biomass_peat_heatnononononononono
      A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: PVT_thnonononononoyesno
      A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.0825
      A2P012: Biomass_firewood_thnononononononono
      A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Othernononononononono
      A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
      A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notesWaste heat from cooling the ice rink.
      A2P014: Annual energy use
      A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]5.0882.111.30.318
      A2P015: Annual energy delivered
      A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]5.760.2055
      A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
      A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]00
      A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
      A2P017: Gasnoyesnoyesnononoyes
      A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
      A2P017: Coalnononononononono
      A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
      A2P017: Oilnononoyesnononono
      A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
      A2P017: Othernonononononoyesno
      A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
      A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
      A2P018: PVnoyesyesyesnononono
      A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]0.707
      A2P018: Windnonoyesyesnononono
      A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Hydrononoyesnonononono
      A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Biomass_elnonoyesyesnononono
      A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Biomass_peat_elnononoyesnononono
      A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: PVT_elnononoyesnononono
      A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Othernononononoyesyesno
      A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]5.260.187
      A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
      A2P019: Geothermalnononoyesnononono
      A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Solar Thermalnononononononono
      A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Biomass_heatnonoyesyesnononono
      A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Waste heat+HPnonoyesyesnononono
      A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Biomass_peat_heatnononononononono
      A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: PVT_thnononononononono
      A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Biomass_firewood_thnononononononono
      A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Othernonononononoyesno
      A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0
      A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
      A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary01.45403111739750001.05323193916350.538395721925130
      A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
      A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]-10406.93
      A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
      A2P022: Safety & Securitynone
      A2P022: Healththermal comfort diagram
      A2P022: Educationnone
      A2P022: Mobilitynone
      A2P022: EnergyEnergyEnergy demand (heating and hot water), Energy demand (cooling), Cooling demand, Distributin losses, PV production, RES production, OER, Primafry Non-renewable energy balance, AMR, HMR, CO2 balanceOn-site energy rationormalized CO2/GHG & Energy intensity
      A2P022: Water
      A2P022: Economic developmentInvestment cost, Caputal cost, Operation cost, payback period, NPV, cummulated cash flow, savings, Life cycle, ROI, SROIcost of excess emissions
      A2P022: Housing and Community
      A2P022: Waste
      A2P022: Other
      A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
      A2P023: Photovoltaicsnoyesyesyesyesyesyesyes
      A2P023: Solar thermal collectorsnonononononoyesno
      A2P023: Wind Turbinesnononononononono
      A2P023: Geothermal energy systemnonoyesyesnoyesyesno
      A2P023: Waste heat recoverynonoyesnoyesyesyesno
      A2P023: Waste to energynonoyesnonononono
      A2P023: Polygenerationnonoyesnonononono
      A2P023: Co-generationnononononononono
      A2P023: Heat Pumpnoyesyesyesyesnoyesno
      A2P023: Hydrogennononononononono
      A2P023: Hydropower plantnononononononono
      A2P023: Biomassnonoyesnonononono
      A2P023: Biogasnononononononono
      A2P023: OtherThe technological solutions can vary within the PED Lab area and will be specified case by case.
      A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
      A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)nonoyesyesyesyesyesyes
      A2P024: Energy management systemnonoyesyesyesyesnoyes
      A2P024: Demand-side managementnonoyesnoyesnonono
      A2P024: Smart electricity gridnonoyesnonoyesnoyes
      A2P024: Thermal Storagenonoyesyesnoyesyesno
      A2P024: Electric Storagenonoyesyesnoyesnoyes
      A2P024: District Heating and Coolingnonoyesyesyesnoyesno
      A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systemsnonoyesyesyesnonono
      A2P024: P2P – buildingsnononononononono
      A2P024: OtherThe technological solutions can vary within the PED Lab area and will be specified case by case.
      A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
      A2P025: Deep Retrofittingnoyesnoyesyesnoyesno
      A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildingsnononononononono
      A2P025: High-performance new buildingsnonoyesnonoyesnono
      A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)nononononoyesnono
      A2P025: Urban data platformsnononoyesyesnonono
      A2P025: Mobile applications for citizensnononononononono
      A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)noyesyesnoyesyesyesyes
      A2P025: Smart irrigationnononononononono
      A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposalnononononononono
      A2P025: Smart surveillancenononononononono
      A2P025: OtherThe technological solutions can vary within the PED Lab area and will be specified case by case.
      A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
      A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)nonoyesnonononoyes
      A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)nonoyesnonoyesnono
      A2P026: e-Mobilitynonoyesyesnoyesnono
      A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutionsnonoyesyesnononono
      A2P026: Car-free areanononononononono
      A2P026: OtherLocal transportation hub with direct connection to metro & bus terminal; parking spaces for 1,400 bicycles and for 1,300 cars Promoting e-Mobility: 134 charging stations, A technical reservation for expanding EV charging system 1400 bicycle racks and charging cabinets for 10 e-bicycle batteries
      A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
      A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
      A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
      A2P028: Energy efficiency certificatesNoYesYesYesYesNo
      A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesEnergy Performance Certificate - in Greece it is mandatory in order to buy or rent a house or a dwellingNational standards apply.Energy Performance Certificate => Energy efficiency class B (2018 version)
      A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
      A2P029: Any other building / district certificatesNoNoYesNo
      A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesLEED (Core & Shell, v4) GOLD certification, Smart Building certification (GOLD)
      A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
      A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
      • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
      • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC)
      • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
      • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
      • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
      • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
      • New development strategies,
      • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
      • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
      • Smart cities strategies,
      • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
      • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
      • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
      • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
      • New development strategies,
      • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
      • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
      • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
      • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract)
      • Smart cities strategies,
      • New development strategies
      A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
      A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategyKarşıyaka Municipality is the first local government in Turkey to sign the Covenant of Mayors in 2011. During this period, the greenhouse gas inventory of the district was carried out three times and reduction targets were set for 2020 and 2030. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan prepared as of the end of 2021, Karşıyaka Municipality has targeted a 40% reduction in its emissions for 2030 compared to the base year 2018. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan, Karşıyaka Municipality aims to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions from 3.96 tCO2e / person in 2018 to 2.37 tCO2e / person in 2030. System solutions such as the use of renewable energy sources, air, ground or water source heat pump, cogeneration and microcogeneration are analysed by designers in order to fully or partially meet the energy requirements for heating, cooling, ventilation, hot water, electricity and lighting for all buildings with a floor area of less than 20,000 square metres. If at least 50% of the building's total energy consumption costs are covered by one or more of these applications, the points are taken in the assessment table in the Building and housing estate business certification guide of 2023.Carbon-Neutral Vantaa by 2030 (min. 80 % reduction of yearly emissions, capture or compensation os the residual 20 %),City wide climate neutrality by 2035, city administration climate neutrality by 2030Carbon neutrality 2050Relevant city strategies behind PED development in Espoo include the following: - The Espoo Story: Sustainability is heavily included within the values and goals of the current Espoo city strategy, also known as the Espoo Story, running from 2021 to 2025. For example, the strategy names being a responsible pioneer as one of the main values of the city and has chosen achieving carbon neutrality by 2030 as one of the main goals of the current council term. In addition to the Espoo story, four cross-administrative development programmes act as cooperation platforms that allow the city, together with its partners, to develop innovative solutions through experiments and pilot projects in line with the Espoo Story. The Sustainable Espoo development programme is one of the four programmes, thus putting sustainability on the forefront in city development work. - EU Mission: 100 climate-neutral and smart cities by 2030: Cities selected for the Mission commit to achieving carbon-neutrality in 2030. A key tool in the Mission is the Climate City Contract. Each selected city will prepare and implement its contracts in collaboration with local businesses as well as other stakeholders and residents. - Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy: Espoo is committed to the Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy, under which the signatories commit to supporting the European Union’s 40% greenhouse gas emission reduction goal by 2030. The Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan (SECAP) is a key instrument for implementing the agreement. The Action Plan outlines the key measures the city will take to achieve its carbon neutrality goal. The plan also includes a mapping of climate change risks and vulnerabilities, adaptation measures, emission calculations, emission reduction scenarios and impact estimations of measures. The SECAP of the City of Espoo is available here (only available in Finnish). - UN Sustainable development Goals: The city of Espoo has committed to becoming a forerunner and achieving the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) by 2025. The goal is to make Espoo financially, ecologically, socially, and culturally sustainable. - The Circular Cities Declaration: At the end of 2020, Espoo signed the Europe-wide circular economy commitment Circular Cities Declaration. The ten goals of the declaration promote the implementation of the city’s circular economy. - Espoo Clean Heat: Fortum and the City of Espoo are committed to producing carbon-neutral district heating in the network operating in the areas of Espoo, Kauniainen and Kirkkonummi during the 2020s. The district heating network provides heating to some 250,000 end-users in homes and offices. Coal will be completely abandoned in the production of district heating by 2025. The main targets related to PED development included in the noted city strategies are the following: - Espoo will achieve carbon neutrality by 2030. To be precise, this carbon neutrality goal is defined as an 80% emission reduction from the 1990 level by the year 2030. The remaining 20% share can be absorbed in carbon sinks or compensated by other means. - District heating in Espoo will be carbon-neutral by 2029, and coal-based production will be phased out from district heating by 2025. - Espoo aims to end the use of fossil fuels in the heating of city-owned buildings by 2025. - Quantitative goals within the Espoo SECAP report: - Espoo aims to reduce total energy consumption within the municipal sector by 7.5% by the end of 2025 in comparison to the 2015 level. The social housing company Espoon Asunnot OY aims to meet the same target. - Espoo aims to cover 10% of the energy consumption of new buildings via on-site production. - Espoo aims to raise the modal split of cycling to 15% by 2024. - Espoo aims to raise the modal split of public transport by 1.1% yearly. - Espoo aims to reduce the emissions of bus transport by 90% by the end of 2025, when compared to 2010 levels.The study aligns closely with the decarbonisation and energy reduction pathways of residential multi family buildings with 1.5°C global warming target in Sweden. This study will also contribute to the achievement of the carbon neturality of whole Borlänge city by 2030.
      A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
      A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
      • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
      • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
      • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
      A3P003: Other
      A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
      A3P004: Identification of needs and prioritiesAccording to the model developed for the district, the electrification of heating and cooling is necessary.Therefore, there needs to be the implementation of a heat pump. The building-integrated photovoltaic panelsshould follow. Through net-metering practices, the district is expected to reach energy positivity throughthis scenario.- Citycon (developer and owner of Lippulaiva) aims to be carbon neutral in its energy use by 2030 - Lippulaiva is a unique urban centre with state-of-the-art energy concept. The centre has a smart managing system, which allows for example the temporary reduction of power used in air conditioning and charging stations when energy consumption is at its peak. In addition, a backup generator and a large electric battery will balance the operation of the electricity network. - Lippulaiva is also an important mobility hub for the people of Espoo. Espoonlahti metro station is located under the centre, and the West Metro started to operate to Espoonlahti in December 2022. Lippulaiva also has a bus terminal, which serves the metro’s feeder traffic in the Espoonlahti major district.In our project, we carried out a comprehensive exploration of strategies to achieve positive energy districts in a Swedish residential portfolio. The focus on urban energy transitions necessitates a holistic approach that integrates building retrofit, solar technology exploration, and heating supply optimisation. Exploration of Local Solar Sources: The analysis reveals varying solar irradiance resources throughout the year, emphasizing the importance of strategic placement. Integration of combined photovoltaic and thermal panels into building envelopes demonstrates the potential to cover a significant portion of the energy demand even in Sweden. Heating Supply Optimisation with Solar Technologies: Despite the surplus energy production from on-site solar technology, challenges arise due to temporal energy asymmetry. The introduction of heat pumps emerges as a feasible solution to balance energy gaps, utilising both rejected and free heat. Optimisation scenarios, utilising a combination of geothermal heat pumps, water source heat pumps, and PVT, showcase remarkable reductions in emissions and primary energy consumption. Urban Form and Energy Infrastructure Design: We realised the importance of returning to urban form and energy infrastructure design to optimise future residential portfolio potential. Building layout design, influenced by zoning regulations and innovative typologies, plays a crucial role in achieving district level energy efficiency. Future challenges, including demographic shifts, e-mobility, and climate change, necessitate a more holistic approach to energy infrastructure design, addressing not only heating and electricity demands but also cooling requirements.-Allows for real physical equipment to be operated under a broad range of scenarios without depending on the real occurrence of the boundary conditions suitable for the experimental validation -Pioneer in addressing the concept and implementation of Microgrids and aims to become a leading experimental facility for improving the optimal development of Flexible Energy Buildings and Flexibility Aggregation.
      A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
      A3P005: Sustainable behaviourFor Citycon, it was important to engage local people within the Lippulaiva project. During the construction period as well as after opening of the shopping center, citizens have been engaged in multiple ways, such as informing local citizens of the progress of construction, engaging young people in the design processes of the shopping centre and long-term commitment of youngsters with Lippulaiva Buddy class initiative. Users’ engagement activities are conducted in close co-operation with SPARCS partners.While our investigation primarily centres on technical optimisation within Positive Energy District (PED) development, it is essential to acknowledge the broader scope encompassing social and governance dimensions. Specifically, understanding stakeholders' willingness to embrace technical recommendations upon project completion is important. Several potential influencing factors merit exploration, including economic considerations, technical optimisation-associated embodied carbon balance, the general public's technical perceptions, and operational feasibility. Evaluating these aspects holistically not only enhances the efficacy of PED initiatives but also fosters greater acceptance and participation within the communities they serve.-Improving the development of Net Zero Energy Buildings and Flexible Energy buildings.
      A3P006: Economic strategies
      A3P006: Economic strategies
      • Innovative business models,
      • PPP models,
      • Life Cycle Cost,
      • Circular economy models
      • Open data business models
      • Innovative business models,
      • PPP models,
      • Existing incentives
      • Innovative business models
      • Open data business models,
      • Life Cycle Cost,
      • Circular economy models,
      • Local trading
      • Demand management Living Lab
      A3P006: Other
      A3P007: Social models
      A3P007: Social models
      • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
      • Affordability
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
      • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
      • Citizen Social Research,
      • Policy Forums,
      • Quality of Life,
      • Strategies towards social mix,
      • Affordability,
      • Prevention of energy poverty,
      • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance,
      • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
      • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
      • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
      • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance,
      • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
      • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
      • Affordability
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies
      • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
      • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
      • Social incentives,
      • Affordability,
      • Digital Inclusion
      • Digital Inclusion,
      • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
      A3P007: Other
      A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
      A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
      • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
      • District Energy plans,
      • SECAP Updates
      • Strategic urban planning,
      • SECAP Updates
      • Strategic urban planning,
      • City Vision 2050,
      • SECAP Updates
      • Building / district Certification
      • Strategic urban planning,
      • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
      • District Energy plans,
      • Building / district Certification
      A3P008: Other
      A3P009: Environmental strategies
      A3P009: Environmental strategies
      • Energy Neutral,
      • Low Emission Zone,
      • Pollutants Reduction
      • Net zero carbon footprint,
      • Life Cycle approach,
      • Greening strategies,
      • Nature Based Solutions (NBS)
      • Net zero carbon footprint
      • Other
      • Low Emission Zone,
      • Net zero carbon footprint,
      • Life Cycle approach,
      • Sustainable Urban drainage systems (SUDS)
      • Energy Neutral,
      • Low Emission Zone,
      • Pollutants Reduction,
      • Greening strategies
      A3P009: OtherCarbon free in terms of energy
      A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
      A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspectsdecision by the Munich City Council in 2019 to become climate neutral by 2030 / 2035- Energy efficiency regulations (Directive 2006/32/EC and 2009/72/EC) - EU directive 2010/31/EU on the energy performance of buildings => all new buildings should be “nearly zero-energy buildings” (nZEB) from 2021- European Commission has legislated on Energy Community (‘Renewable energy’ directive - 2018/2001/EU and ‘Common rules for the internal electricity market’ directive- 2019/944/EU). - Spanish building certification is regulated through Royal Decree 235/2013.
      B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
      B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definitionThe pilot area was selected on the basis of several criteria: its location within areas prioritised by Karşıyaka Municipality for combating climate change, compliance with the building regulations set out in the Green Building-Site-Operation (2023) guide, which are in line with Municipality's energy policy, the presence of open spaces that allow various applications for renewable energy, proximity to public facilities such as schools and municipal services, the availability of data on energy consumption (e.g. electricity and natural gas bills) and architectural features, the potential for community building, the suitability for solar energy systems, considering orientation and roof structure, and the potential for future building renovations. The aim of the initiative is to explore the feasibility of transforming the district into a Positive Energy District (PED).Neutralpath-project is working with the cocept of PCEDs = Positive and Clean Energy Districts (energy-efficient and energy-flexible districts with net zero greenhouse gas emissions and a surplus of renewable energy). Aviapolis Climate-Neutral Lab will work with both PCED and PCED relevant cases within the district.Munich as demonstrator together with Lyon in ASCEND projectOnsite Energy Ratio > 1Lippulaiva is a project with high level goal in terms of energy efficiency, energy flexibility and energy production.The Rymdgatan's Residential Portfolio in Sweden presents a compelling case study for its classification as a PED-related research, given its alignment with sustainable behaviours and overarching PED development principles as follows: Inclusivity and Social Equity: The residential portfolio situated in Rymdgatan caters primarily to a low-income community. By focusing on this demographic, the project addresses critical aspects of social equity within sustainable urban development. Ensuring access to energy-efficient housing and amenities for economically disadvantaged populations not only fosters social cohesion but also mitigates energy poverty, a pressing concern in many urban contexts. Multifamily Residential Building: The inclusion of multifamily residential buildings within the portfolio underscores a commitment to density and efficient land use, both essential components of sustainable urban design. Such developments promote resource optimisation by consolidating housing units, thereby reducing per capita energy consumption and infrastructure demands. Moreover, multifamily dwellings often facilitate community engagement and shared resource management, fostering a culture of sustainability among residents. Low Carbon Retrofitting and Transition: The overarching initiative to transition the entire Jakobsgårdarna district. The included Rymdgatan portfolio, towards low carbon retrofitting, represents a significant example of decarbonization and climate resilience. By integrating energy-efficient technologies and renewable energy solutions into existing infrastructure, the project not only reduces carbon emissions but also serves as a blueprint for revitalising old urban environments sustainably. This holistic approach to retrofitting demonstrates a systemic commitment to environmental stewardship and long-term sustainability. Climate Adaptation and Renewable Energy Integration: Despite Sweden's climatic challenges, including lower solar resources during winter months, the Rymdgatan project leverages its geographical context to optimize renewable energy utilization. Sweden's greater solar resource availability during summer and geothermal potentials complement the design's emphasis on seasonal energy planning, where surplus energy generated during peak periods can be stored or redistributed efficiently. By embracing climate-responsive design strategies, the project demonstrates resilience in the face of climate variability while harnessing renewable energy potential effectively.
      B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
      B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project developmentAccording to Vantaa city strategy 2021-2025 Aviapolis area aims to become the greenest airport city in Europe. The district is transforming from a logistics and business focused area to a lively urban district which gives an opportunity to rethink the areas energy solutions. With Neutralpath-project Vantaa aims to support the development of the district's energy system and explore innovative, energy efficient and fossil free district energy solutions.speed and scale of PEDsStrategic, economic- Citycon’s (developer and owner of Lippulaiva) target is to be carbon neutral by 2030 - Increasing sustainability requirements from the financing, tenants, cities, other stakeholdersBorlänge city has committed to become the carbon-neutral city by 2030.
      B1P003: Environment of the case study area
      B2P003: Environment of the case study areaUrban areaUrban areaUrban areaUrban areaUrban areaUrban area
      B1P004: Type of district
      B2P004: Type of district
      • Renovation
      • New construction,
      • Renovation
      • Renovation
      • New construction,
      • Renovation
      • New construction
      • Renovation
      B1P005: Case Study Context
      B1P005: Case Study Context
      • Retrofitting Area
      • Re-use / Transformation Area,
      • New Development
      • Retrofitting Area
      • New Development,
      • Retrofitting Area
      • Re-use / Transformation Area,
      • New Development
      • Re-use / Transformation Area,
      • Retrofitting Area
      B1P006: Year of construction
      B1P006: Year of construction200520221990
      B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
      B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential6100
      B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
      B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential6100
      B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
      B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential6
      B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
      B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential6
      B1P011: Population density before intervention
      B1P011: Population density before intervention00000000
      B1P012: Population density after intervention
      B1P012: Population density after intervention0000.010714285714286000.0106586224233280
      B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
      B1P013: Residentialnoyesyesyesyesnoyesno
      B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]1027954360
      B1P013: Officenonoyesnoyesnonono
      B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Industry and Utilitynonoyesnonononono
      B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Commercialnonoyesnonoyesnono
      B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Institutionalnonoyesnonononono
      B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Natural areasnononononoyesnono
      B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Recreationalnonoyesnoyesnonono
      B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Dismissed areasnonoyesnonononono
      B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Othernonononononoyesno
      B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]706
      B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
      B1P014: Residentialnoyesyesyesyesyesyesno
      B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]1027954360
      B1P014: Officenonoyesnoyesnonono
      B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Industry and Utilitynonoyesnonononono
      B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Commercialnonoyesnonoyesnono
      B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Institutionalnonoyesnonononono
      B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Natural areasnononononononono
      B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Recreationalnonoyesnoyesnonono
      B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Dismissed areasnononononononono
      B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Othernonononononoyesno
      B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]706
      B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
      B2P001: PED Lab concept definitionNeutralpath-project is working with the cocept of PCEDs = Positive and Clean Energy Districts (energy-efficient and energy-flexible districts with net zero greenhouse gas emissions and a surplus of renewable energy). Aviapolis Climate-Neutral Lab will work with both PCED and PCED relevant cases within the district.addressing the concept and implementation of Microgrids and aims to become a leading experimental facility for improving the optimal development of Flexible Energy Buildings and Flexibility Aggregation
      B2P002: Installation life time
      B2P002: Installation life time
      B2P003: Scale of action
      B2P003: ScaleDistrictVirtual
      B2P004: Operator of the installation
      B2P004: Operator of the installationThe City of Vantaa manages the lab, working closely with landowners and other stakeholders such as energy companies, solution providers, universities and citizens.IREC
      B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
      B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
      B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
      B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?No
      B2P006: Other
      B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
      B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
      • Strategic
      • Strategic,
      • Private
      B2P007: Other
      B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
      B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED LabMunicipalityResearch center/University
      B2P008: Other
      B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
      B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
      • Academia,
      • Private,
      • Industrial,
      • Citizens, public, NGO
      B2P009: Other
      B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
      B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
      B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
      B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
      • Demand-side management,
      • Energy storage,
      • Energy networks,
      • Efficiency measures,
      • Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)
      B2P011: Other
      B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
      B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
      • Monitoring and evaluation infrastructure,
      • Tools for prototyping and modelling,
      • Tools, spaces, events for testing and validation
      B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
      B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
      B2P014: Monitoring measures
      B2P014: Monitoring measures
      • Equipment
      B2P015: Key Performance indicators
      B2P015: Key Performance indicators
      • Energy,
      • Environmental,
      • Social,
      • Economical / Financial
      • Energy,
      • Environmental
      B2P016: Execution of operations
      B2P016: Execution of operations
      B2P017: Capacities
      B2P017: Capacities- Building simulation model: thermal inertia and thermal loads of a building or community can be co-simulated with a building model. – System Operator and Aggregator simulation models: the interaction with remote control actions carried out by electricity System Operators or flexibility Aggregators can be simulated as well. – Grid simulation model: the physical interaction of the building with the grid power supply can be simulated enabling the experimental validation of flexibility services to the network.
      B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
      B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
      B2P019: Available tools
      B2P019: Available tools
      • Energy modelling
      • Energy modelling
      B2P019: Available tools
      B2P020: External accessibility
      B2P020: External accessibilityTo follow the lab and Vantaa's activities in Neutralpath, fill in the following form: https://neutralpath.eu/fi/tayta-lomake-liittyaksesi-cn-labiin/
      C1P001: Unlocking Factors
      C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
      C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
      C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important
      C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important
      C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important
      C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)5 - Very important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
      C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important
      C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important
      C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important
      C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)Real-estate market situationCollaboration with the local partners
      C1P002: Driving Factors
      C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important
      C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important
      C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important
      C1P002: Economic growth need2 - Slightly important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important
      C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important
      C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)
      C1P003: Administrative barriers
      C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important
      C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Lack of public participation3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
      C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important
      C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important
      C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement4 - Important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
      C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important
      C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)3 - Moderately important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
      C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important4 - Important
      C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)Fragmented financial support; lack of experimental budget for complex projects, etc.
      C1P004: Policy barriers
      C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important
      C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)Different priorities; overall problematic system od decentralization powers; non-fuctioning model of local development funding, etc.
      C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
      C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important4 - Important5 - Very important
      C1P005: Regulatory instability3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important
      C1P005: Non-effective regulations4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important
      C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important2 - Slightly important4 - Important4 - Important
      C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies4 - Important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important4 - Important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important
      C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
      C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important
      C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
      C1P006: Environmental barriers
      C1P006: Environmental barriers- Climate Variability: 5 - Topographical Constraints: 4 - Sunlight Availability: 5 - Environmental Regulations: 3 - Zoning Restrictions: 2 - Air and Water Pollution: 2 - Natural Disasters: 1 - Water Scarcity: 12 - Slightly important
      C1P007: Technical barriers
      C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important
      C1P007: Deficient planning3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important
      C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Lack of well-defined process4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important
      C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important
      C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important
      C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)Inadequate regulation towards energy transition
      C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
      C1P008: Inertia4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important
      C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important
      C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
      C1P008: Rebound effect4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important
      C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism5 - Very important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
      C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
      C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
      C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
      C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important
      C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors4 - Important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
      C1P010: Financial barriers
      C1P010: Hidden costs4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P010: Economic crisis5 - Very important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important
      C1P010: Risk and uncertainty4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives5 - Very important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
      C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
      C1P011: Market barriers
      C1P011: Split incentives5 - Very important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important
      C1P011: Energy price distortion5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important
      C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
      C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
      C1P012: Stakeholders involved
      C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
      • Planning/leading
      • None
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Research & Innovation
      • Design/demand aggregation
      • None
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation
      • Planning/leading
      C1P012: Financial/Funding
      • None
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation
      • None
      C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data
      • Design/demand aggregation
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • None
      C1P012: Business process management
      • Design/demand aggregation
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation
      • None
      C1P012: Urban Services providers
      • Planning/leading
      • Design/demand aggregation
      • None
      • None
      C1P012: Real Estate developers
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Planning/leading
      • Design/demand aggregation
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Design/demand aggregation
      C1P012: Design/Construction companies
      • Construction/implementation
      • Design/demand aggregation
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation
      • None
      C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • None
      • Design/demand aggregation
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce
      • Construction/implementation
      • Planning/leading
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • None
      C1P012: Other
      C1P012: Other (if any)
      Summary

      Authors (framework concept)

      Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

      Contributors (to the content)

      Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

      Implemented by

      Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
      Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)