Search
Close this search box.
Search
Map View
Table View
Projects
Filters:
Clear Filters Export All Entries (CSV)
NameProjectTypeCompare
Örebro-Vivalla JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Tiurberget, Kongsvinger JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Texel JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hällefors, Sweden JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cerdanyola del Valles, School of Engineering, Campus Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Bucharest, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies (ASE) PED Lab OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Pamplona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Trondheim, Svartlamon OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Savona, The University of Genova, Savona Campus OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Torres Vedras, Encosta de São Vicente COPPER PED Lab Compare
Malmö, Stadium area (Stadionområdet) PED StepWise PED Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Utrecht Science Park PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Kriegerheimstätten PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Vienna, 16. District, Leben am Wilhelminenberg HeatCOOP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Laxenburgerstraße AH HeatCOOP PED Lab Compare
Tartu, Annelinn V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Utrecht, Kanaleneiland V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aveiro, Aradas district V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau PED Relevant Case Study Compare
SmartEnCity, Lecce SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study Compare
STARDUST, Trento STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö PED Relevant Case Study Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki PED Relevant Case Study Compare
REPLICATE (pilot action in the Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings), Firenze PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna PED Case Study Compare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento PED Case Study Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna PED Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Võru +CityxChange PED Case Study Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Furuset project, Oslo ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights PED Case Study Compare
Ydalir project ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fornebu, Bærum ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou PED Case Study Compare
Smart Energy Åland PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Munich, Harthof district PED Case Study Compare
Lublin MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Findhorn, the Park InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities PED Case Study Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Aalborg East PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Ankara, Çamlık District PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Trenčín MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Zaragoza, Actur NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins PED Case Study Uncompare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Uncompare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Espoo, Kera SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Freiburg, Waldsee PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district PED Case Study Uncompare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe PED Case Study Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district PED Case Study Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark PED Case Study Compare
Évora, Portugal POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Groningen, PED South MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Groningen, PED North MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Lab Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT PED Lab Compare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Uncompare
Salzburg, Gneis district Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Tartu, City centre area SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab PED Lab Compare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Kifissia, Energy community SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study
TitleKifissia, Energy community
Freiburg, Waldsee
«×»
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city
«×»
Tartu, Annelinn
«×»
Vienna, Kriegerheimstätten
«×»
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka
«×»
City of Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block
«×»
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED LabKifissia, Energy communityFreiburg, WaldseeRiga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student cityTartu, AnnelinnVienna, KriegerheimstättenIzmir, District of KarşıyakaCity of Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case studynoyesyesnonoyesyes
PED relevant case studyyesnonoyesyesnono
PED Lab.nonononononono
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutralitynoyesyesyesyesyesno
Annual energy surplusnononononoyesno
Energy communityyesyesyesyesnonono
Circularitynonononononono
Air quality and urban comfortyesnononoyesyesno
Electrificationyesyesnoyesyesnono
Net-zero energy costnononononoyesno
Net-zero emissionnoyesnonononono
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)nonoyesnononono
Maximise self-sufficiencynonoyesnonoyesyes
Othernonononononono
Other (A1P004)
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED LabPlanning PhasePlanning PhasePlanning PhasePlanning PhasePlanning PhasePlanning PhaseIn operation
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date11/2101/2412/2301/2310/2206/18
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date11/2412/2611/2612/3010/2503/22
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Meteorological open data,
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts
  • General statistical datasets
A1P009: OtherOther
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
    • Data from the local energy provider available (restricted usage for some data points because of data security reasons,
    • renewable energy potential,
    • own calculations based on publicly available data,
    • Some data can be found in https://geoportal.freiburg.de/freigis/
        • M. Hukkalainen, F. Zarrin, K. Klobut, O. Lindholm, M. Ranta, P. Hajduk, T. Vainio-Kaila, E. Wanne, J. Tartia, H. Horn, K. Kontu, J. Juhmen, S. Santala, R. Turtiainen, J. Töyräs, T. Koljonen. (2020). Deliverable D3.1 Detailed plan of the Espoo smart city lighthouse demonstrations. Available online: https://www.sparcs.info/sites/default/files/2020-09/SPARCS_D3.1_Detailed_plan_Espoo.pdf,
        • Hukkalainen, Zarrin Fatima, Krzysztof Klobut, Kalevi Piira, Mikaela Ranta, Petr Hajduk, Tiina Vainio-Kaila , Elina Wanne, Jani Tartia, Angela Bartel, Joni Mäkinen, Mia Kaurila, Kaisa Kontu, Jaano Juhmen, Merja Ryöppy, Reetta Turtiainen, Joona Töyräs, Timo Koljonen (2021) Deliverable 3.2 Midterm report on the implemented demonstrations of solutions for energy positive blocks in Espoo. Available online: https://www.sparcs.info/sites/default/files/2022-02/SPARCS_D3.2.pdf,
        • www.lippulaiva.fi
        A1P011: Geographic coordinates
        X Coordinate (longitude):23.8145887.88585713584291724.0816833926.748116.47541627.11004924.6543
        Y Coordinate (latitude):38.07734947.98653520708004556.9524595658.370848.23401138.49605460.1491
        A1P012: Country
        A1P012: CountryGreeceGermanyLatviaEstoniaAustriaTurkeyFinland
        A1P013: City
        A1P013: CityMunicipality of KifissiaFreiburg im BreisgauRigaTartuViennaİzmirEspoo
        A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
        A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).CsaCfbCfbDfbCfbCsaDfb
        A1P015: District boundary
        A1P015: District boundaryVirtualVirtualGeographicGeographicGeographicGeographicGeographic
        OtherThe energy will be produced by a PV plant installed on the terrace of a municipal building. Members of the energy community (that is under formation) will benefit from the energy produced via virtual net metering. PV instalment and the buildings (owned by the members of the community) will be within the boundaries of the Municipality but not necessary in the same area/district/neighbourhood
        A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
        A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:MixedPublicPublicPrivatePrivatePrivate
        A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
        A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:Multiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersSingle OwnerMultiple OwnersSingle Owner
        A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
        A1P018: Number of buildings in PED294115219
        A1P019: Conditioned space
        A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]284070170000102795112000
        A1P020: Total ground area
        A1P020: Total ground area [m²]4920000119264540000012400032600165000
        A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
        A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area0010031
        A1P022: Financial schemes
        A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estatenonononononoyes
        A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO schemenonononononono
        A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Othernonononoyesnono
        A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural fundingnonononononono
        A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National fundingnononoyesnonono
        A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional fundingnonononononono
        A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal fundingnoyesnonononono
        A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Othernonononononono
        A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EUnoyesyesnonoyesyes
        A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]75000001193355308875
        A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Nationalnoyesnononoyesno
        A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regionalnonononononono
        A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Othernonononononono
        A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022: Other
        A1P023: Economic Targets
        A1P023: Economic Targets
        • Boosting local businesses,
        • Boosting local and sustainable production
        • Positive externalities,
        • Boosting local and sustainable production
        • Job creation,
        • Positive externalities,
        • Boosting local businesses
        A1P023: Other
        A1P024: More comments:
        A1P024: More comments:The Espoonlahti district is located on the south-western coast of Espoo. With 56,000 inhabitants, it is the second largest of the Espoo city centres. The number of inhabitants is estimated to grow to 70,000 within the next 10 years. Espoonlahti will be a future transit hub of the south-western Espoo, along the metro line, and the increasing stream of passengers provides a huge potential for retail, business and residential developments. E-mobility solutions and last-mile services have strong potential in the area when subway extension is finished and running. The extensive (re)development of the Lippulaiva blocks make a benchmark catering to the everyday needs of residents. The completely new shopping centre is a state-of-the-art cross point with 20,000 daily customers and 10,000 daily commuters (3.5 million/year). The new underground metro line and station, and feeder line bus terminal, are fully integrated. Residential housing of approximately 550 new apartments will be built on top. Lippulaiva is a large traffic hub, directly connected to public transport and right next to the Länsiväylä highway and extensive cycle paths. Lippulaiva offers diverse, mixed-use services, such as a shopping mall, public services, a day care centre, residential apartment buildings, and underground parking facilities. Lippulaiva received the LEED Gold environmental certificate and Smart Building Gold certificate. • Flagship of sustainability • Cooling and heating demand from geothermal energy system (on-site) with energy storage system, 4 MW • PV panels: roof and façade, 630 kWp • Smart control strategies for electricity and thermal energy, smart microgrid-system and battery storage • Charging capacity for 134 EVs
        A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
        A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]
        Contact person for general enquiries
        A1P026: NameArtemis Giavasoglou, Kleopatra KalampokaDr. Annette SteingrubeJudith StiekemaDr. Gonçalo Homem De Almeida Rodriguez CorreiaGerhard Hofer (e7 GmbH)Ozlem SenyolElina Ekelund
        A1P027: OrganizationMunicipality of Kifissia – SPARCS local teamFraunhofer Institute for solar energy systemsOASCDelft University of Technologye7 GmbHKarsiyaka MunicipalityCitycon Oyj
        A1P028: AffiliationMunicipality / Public BodiesResearch Center / UniversityOtherResearch Center / UniversitySME / IndustryMunicipality / Public BodiesSME / Industry
        A1P028: Othernot for profit private organisation
        A1P029: Emailgiavasoglou@kifissia.grAnnette.Steingrube@ise.fraunhofer.dejudith@oascities.orgg.correia@tudelft.nlgerhard.hofer@e-sieben.atozlemkocaer2@gmail.comElina.ekelund@citycon.com
        Contact person for other special topics
        A1P030: NameStavros Zapantis - vice mayorQiaochu FanHasan Burak CavkaElina Ekelund
        A1P031: Emailstavros.zapantis@gmail.comq.fan-1@tudelft.nlhasancavka@iyte.edu.trElina.ekelund@citycon.com
        Pursuant to the General Data Protection RegulationYesYesYesYesYesYes
        A2P001: Fields of application
        A2P001: Fields of application
        • Energy production
        • Energy efficiency,
        • Energy flexibility,
        • Energy production,
        • E-mobility,
        • Waste management
        • Energy efficiency,
        • Energy flexibility,
        • Energy production,
        • E-mobility,
        • Digital technologies
        • Energy efficiency,
        • Energy flexibility,
        • E-mobility,
        • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
        • Digital technologies
        • Energy efficiency,
        • Energy flexibility,
        • Energy production,
        • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
        • Other
        • Energy efficiency,
        • Energy flexibility,
        • Energy production,
        • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.)
        • Energy efficiency,
        • Energy flexibility,
        • Energy production,
        • E-mobility,
        • Digital technologies
        A2P001: OtherReducing CO2eq Emissions
        A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
        A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fieldsEnergy system modelingA suite of replicable modeling tools will enable stakeholders to analyze planning actions towards positive energy in a cost-effective fashion, aiding their evidence based decision-making process. The tools will be able to model the district’s energy production and demand, optimize for flexibility and simulate mobility and transport. By employing gamification and co-creation approaches, the project will enhance public awareness and engagement in energy efficiency. The project will culminate in the publication of practical guidelines, reusable models, algorithms, and training materials to aid other cities to replicate the digital twin for their districts, fostering widespread adoption of sustainable energy practices.Methods involve studying the feasibility of digital PED references for the case cities about their energy, environmental, and economic performance by EnergyPlus tool. In case of insufficient energy data and the need of high resolution data, ‘Gaussian mixture model and expectation-maximization algorithm’ and ‘time-series decomposition-recombination’ method will be used to supplement data to EnergyPlus. The feasibility results will be returned to stakeholders for iterative discussion, and the iterative results will be used to update digital references. Replication plans are developed based on such a cooperation process for strategies to implement PEDs. If a PED is demonstrated during the project period, the measured data will be used to verify the feasibility model to optimize previous results (WP7– R3 & R4). In the MAKING-CITY project, the overall PED design method is developed, which will be further optimised in this project. In addition, PED-ACT will use the methods and knowledge, including how to choose a suitable PED in a city, energy balance calculation, and technologies available for PED. The RUGGEDISED project outputs the governance model into the replication plan in PED-ACT. Its ‘smart city open-data decision platform’ will illustrate an excellent example for the database in PED-ACT. The IEA EBC Annex 83 and Cost Action 19126 create the basis for data collection, developing existing PED databases, characterization of PED, and review of regulations of PED, as well as development of simulation tools. The UBEM project further enables a detailed high-resolution energy balance calculation of PED.Energy efficiency: - eliminating waste energy utilizing smart energy system - utilizing excess heat from grocery stores Energy flexibility: - A battery energy storage system (1,5 MW/1,5MWh); Active participation in Nordpool electricity market (FCR-N) Energy production: - heating and cooling from geothermal heat pump system; 171 energy wells (over 51 km); heat capacity 4 MW - installation of new photovoltaic (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; Estimation of annual production is about 540 MWh (630 kWp) E-mobility - Installation of charging stations for electric vehicles (for 134 EVs) - e-bike services (warm storage room, charging cabinets for e-bikes) Digital technologies: - Building Analytics system by Schneider Electric
        A2P003: Application of ISO52000
        A2P003: Application of ISO52000YesNoYesYes
        A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
        A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balanceYesYesYesYes
        A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
        A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balanceYesYesNoNo
        A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
        A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculationAll energy demands are included in energy balance, either fuel demands or electrical demand of transport sector; Projection is made of future share of electric mobilty, rest is covered with synthetic fuels to achieve climate neutralityThe university operates a fleet of 13 electric vehicles (EV) (61kW power each). There are 5 EV charging stations on campus.Mobility is not included in the calculations.Mobility is not included in the energy model.
        A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
        A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]135.71580004.973.8625.5
        A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
        A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]31.7650000.751.2265.8
        A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
        A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]
        A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
        A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]
        A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
        A2P011: PVyesnonononoyesyes
        A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]1.0280.54
        A2P011: Windnonoyesnononono
        A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P011: Hydrononononononono
        A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P011: Biomass_elnonononononono
        A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P011: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
        A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P011: PVT_elnonoyesnononono
        A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P011: Othernonononononono
        A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
        A2P012: Geothermalnonononononoyes
        A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]5
        A2P012: Solar Thermalnonononononono
        A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P012: Biomass_heatnonoyesnononono
        A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P012: Waste heat+HPnonononononono
        A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P012: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
        A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P012: PVT_thnonononononono
        A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P012: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
        A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P012: Othernonononononono
        A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
        A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes53 MW PV potential in all three quarters; no other internal renewable energy potentials knownConventional power generation: The university’s heat supply is designed as a local centralized heat supply system. Electrical power, generated in combined heat and power (CHP) units, is delivered to the distribution network and sold to energy traders as regulated by local legislation and norms. There are two natural gas burners acting as heat sources (3MW and 6MW capacity), and two CHP units (1.6MW and 0.45MW thermal capacity). All heating is supplied from the CHP plants. Renewable Energy Sources (RES): a wind turbine (3.6 kW) and PV panels (11.7 kW) are connected to the faculty microgrid. In the future it is planned to power the campus entirely from local RES.
        A2P014: Annual energy use
        A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]132.55.08811.3
        A2P015: Annual energy delivered
        A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]5.76
        A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
        A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
        A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
        A2P017: Gasnonoyesnonoyesno
        A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
        A2P017: Coalnonononononono
        A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
        A2P017: Oilnonononononono
        A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
        A2P017: Othernonononononono
        A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
        A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
        A2P018: PVnononononoyesno
        A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]0.707
        A2P018: Windnonononononono
        A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
        A2P018: Hydrononononononono
        A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
        A2P018: Biomass_elnonononononono
        A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
        A2P018: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
        A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
        A2P018: PVT_elnonononononono
        A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
        A2P018: Othernonononononoyes
        A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]5.26
        A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
        A2P019: Geothermalnonononononono
        A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P019: Solar Thermalnonononononono
        A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P019: Biomass_heatnonononononono
        A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P019: Waste heat+HPnonononononono
        A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P019: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
        A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P019: PVT_thnonononononono
        A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P019: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
        A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P019: Othernonononononono
        A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
        A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary000001.45403111739751.0532319391635
        A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
        A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]0
        A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
        A2P022: Safety & Security
        A2P022: Health
        A2P022: Education
        A2P022: MobilityyesImproved accessibility to V2G-related transport options, focusing on inclusivity and equitable adoption in urban districts
        A2P022: EnergyyesTarget zero greenhouse gas emissions through the adoption of EVs with V2G capabilities, aiming to reduce reliance on fossil fuels and enhance local grid stabilityYesOn-site energy ratio
        A2P022: Water
        A2P022: Economic developmentDevelopment of viable business models for V2G that allow decentralized energy markets to integrate with the grid, enhancing local economic resilience
        A2P022: Housing and Communityyes
        A2P022: Waste
        A2P022: Other
        A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
        A2P023: Photovoltaicsnoyesnoyesyesyesyes
        A2P023: Solar thermal collectorsnoyesnonoyesnono
        A2P023: Wind Turbinesnononoyesnonono
        A2P023: Geothermal energy systemnoyesnonoyesnoyes
        A2P023: Waste heat recoverynoyesnonononoyes
        A2P023: Waste to energynoyesnonononono
        A2P023: Polygenerationnonononononono
        A2P023: Co-generationnoyesnonononono
        A2P023: Heat Pumpnoyesnonoyesyesno
        A2P023: Hydrogennoyesnonononono
        A2P023: Hydropower plantnoyesnonononono
        A2P023: Biomassnoyesnonononono
        A2P023: Biogasnoyesnonononono
        A2P023: Other
        A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
        A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)noyesyesnononoyes
        A2P024: Energy management systemnoyesyesyesnonoyes
        A2P024: Demand-side managementnoyesyesyesnonono
        A2P024: Smart electricity gridnoyesyesyesnonoyes
        A2P024: Thermal Storagenoyesyesnoyesnoyes
        A2P024: Electric Storagenoyesyesyesnonoyes
        A2P024: District Heating and Coolingnoyesyesnoyesnono
        A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systemsnoyesyesnononono
        A2P024: P2P – buildingsnoyesnonononono
        A2P024: Other
        A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
        A2P025: Deep Retrofittingnoyesnoyesnoyesno
        A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildingsnoyesnonononono
        A2P025: High-performance new buildingsnonononononoyes
        A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)nononoyesnonoyes
        A2P025: Urban data platformsnoyesyesyesnonono
        A2P025: Mobile applications for citizensnonoyesnononono
        A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)nonoyesnonoyesyes
        A2P025: Smart irrigationnonononononono
        A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposalnonononononono
        A2P025: Smart surveillancenonononononono
        A2P025: Other
        A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
        A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)noyesnoyesnonono
        A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)noyesnoyesnonoyes
        A2P026: e-Mobilitynoyesnoyesnonoyes
        A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutionsnoyesnonononono
        A2P026: Car-free areanonononononono
        A2P026: OtherLocal transportation hub with direct connection to metro & bus terminal; parking spaces for 1,400 bicycles and for 1,300 cars Promoting e-Mobility: 134 charging stations, A technical reservation for expanding EV charging system 1400 bicycle racks and charging cabinets for 10 e-bicycle batteries
        A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
        A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
        A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
        A2P028: Energy efficiency certificatesNoNoNoYes
        A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesEnergy Performance Certificate - in Greece it is mandatory in order to buy or rent a house or a dwellingEnergy Performance Certificate => Energy efficiency class B (2018 version)
        A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
        A2P029: Any other building / district certificatesNoNoNoYes
        A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesLEED (Core & Shell, v4) GOLD certification, Smart Building certification (GOLD)
        A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
        A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
        • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
        • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC)
        • Smart cities strategies
        • Smart cities strategies,
        • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
        • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
        • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
        • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
        • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
        • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
        • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
        • New development strategies,
        • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
        • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
        A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
        A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategyClimate neutrality by 2035Karşıyaka Municipality is the first local government in Turkey to sign the Covenant of Mayors in 2011. During this period, the greenhouse gas inventory of the district was carried out three times and reduction targets were set for 2020 and 2030. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan prepared as of the end of 2021, Karşıyaka Municipality has targeted a 40% reduction in its emissions for 2030 compared to the base year 2018. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan, Karşıyaka Municipality aims to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions from 3.96 tCO2e / person in 2018 to 2.37 tCO2e / person in 2030. System solutions such as the use of renewable energy sources, air, ground or water source heat pump, cogeneration and microcogeneration are analysed by designers in order to fully or partially meet the energy requirements for heating, cooling, ventilation, hot water, electricity and lighting for all buildings with a floor area of less than 20,000 square metres. If at least 50% of the building's total energy consumption costs are covered by one or more of these applications, the points are taken in the assessment table in the Building and housing estate business certification guide of 2023.Relevant city strategies behind PED development in Espoo include the following: - The Espoo Story: Sustainability is heavily included within the values and goals of the current Espoo city strategy, also known as the Espoo Story, running from 2021 to 2025. For example, the strategy names being a responsible pioneer as one of the main values of the city and has chosen achieving carbon neutrality by 2030 as one of the main goals of the current council term. In addition to the Espoo story, four cross-administrative development programmes act as cooperation platforms that allow the city, together with its partners, to develop innovative solutions through experiments and pilot projects in line with the Espoo Story. The Sustainable Espoo development programme is one of the four programmes, thus putting sustainability on the forefront in city development work. - EU Mission: 100 climate-neutral and smart cities by 2030: Cities selected for the Mission commit to achieving carbon-neutrality in 2030. A key tool in the Mission is the Climate City Contract. Each selected city will prepare and implement its contracts in collaboration with local businesses as well as other stakeholders and residents. - Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy: Espoo is committed to the Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy, under which the signatories commit to supporting the European Union’s 40% greenhouse gas emission reduction goal by 2030. The Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan (SECAP) is a key instrument for implementing the agreement. The Action Plan outlines the key measures the city will take to achieve its carbon neutrality goal. The plan also includes a mapping of climate change risks and vulnerabilities, adaptation measures, emission calculations, emission reduction scenarios and impact estimations of measures. The SECAP of the City of Espoo is available here (only available in Finnish). - UN Sustainable development Goals: The city of Espoo has committed to becoming a forerunner and achieving the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) by 2025. The goal is to make Espoo financially, ecologically, socially, and culturally sustainable. - The Circular Cities Declaration: At the end of 2020, Espoo signed the Europe-wide circular economy commitment Circular Cities Declaration. The ten goals of the declaration promote the implementation of the city’s circular economy. - Espoo Clean Heat: Fortum and the City of Espoo are committed to producing carbon-neutral district heating in the network operating in the areas of Espoo, Kauniainen and Kirkkonummi during the 2020s. The district heating network provides heating to some 250,000 end-users in homes and offices. Coal will be completely abandoned in the production of district heating by 2025. The main targets related to PED development included in the noted city strategies are the following: - Espoo will achieve carbon neutrality by 2030. To be precise, this carbon neutrality goal is defined as an 80% emission reduction from the 1990 level by the year 2030. The remaining 20% share can be absorbed in carbon sinks or compensated by other means. - District heating in Espoo will be carbon-neutral by 2029, and coal-based production will be phased out from district heating by 2025. - Espoo aims to end the use of fossil fuels in the heating of city-owned buildings by 2025. - Quantitative goals within the Espoo SECAP report: - Espoo aims to reduce total energy consumption within the municipal sector by 7.5% by the end of 2025 in comparison to the 2015 level. The social housing company Espoon Asunnot OY aims to meet the same target. - Espoo aims to cover 10% of the energy consumption of new buildings via on-site production. - Espoo aims to raise the modal split of cycling to 15% by 2024. - Espoo aims to raise the modal split of public transport by 1.1% yearly. - Espoo aims to reduce the emissions of bus transport by 90% by the end of 2025, when compared to 2010 levels.
        A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
        A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
        • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
        • Biogas,
        • Hydrogen
        • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
        A3P003: Other
        A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
        A3P004: Identification of needs and prioritiesFreiburg has ambitious goals and wants to achieve climate neutrality until 2035, the PED concept could help to develop suitable strategies on district levelAccording to the model developed for the district, the electrification of heating and cooling is necessary.Therefore, there needs to be the implementation of a heat pump. The building-integrated photovoltaic panelsshould follow. Through net-metering practices, the district is expected to reach energy positivity throughthis scenario.- Citycon (developer and owner of Lippulaiva) aims to be carbon neutral in its energy use by 2030 - Lippulaiva is a unique urban centre with state-of-the-art energy concept. The centre has a smart managing system, which allows for example the temporary reduction of power used in air conditioning and charging stations when energy consumption is at its peak. In addition, a backup generator and a large electric battery will balance the operation of the electricity network. - Lippulaiva is also an important mobility hub for the people of Espoo. Espoonlahti metro station is located under the centre, and the West Metro started to operate to Espoonlahti in December 2022. Lippulaiva also has a bus terminal, which serves the metro’s feeder traffic in the Espoonlahti major district.
        A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
        A3P005: Sustainable behaviourEnergy efficiency by renovation measures for buildings and measures for saving electricity; electrification by installation of heat pumps and photovoltaics and switching to electric cars, additional measures not directly related to PED like sustainable diet and sharing economyFor Citycon, it was important to engage local people within the Lippulaiva project. During the construction period as well as after opening of the shopping center, citizens have been engaged in multiple ways, such as informing local citizens of the progress of construction, engaging young people in the design processes of the shopping centre and long-term commitment of youngsters with Lippulaiva Buddy class initiative. Users’ engagement activities are conducted in close co-operation with SPARCS partners.
        A3P006: Economic strategies
        A3P006: Economic strategies
        • Demand management Living Lab,
        • Local trading,
        • Existing incentives
        • Open data business models,
        • Innovative business models,
        • Demand management Living Lab
        • Innovative business models,
        • Local trading,
        • Existing incentives
        • Innovative business models
        • Innovative business models
        A3P006: Other
        A3P007: Social models
        A3P007: Social models
        • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
        • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
        • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
        • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance,
        • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
        • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
        • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies
        • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
        • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
        • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
        • Social incentives,
        • Prevention of energy poverty,
        • Digital Inclusion
        • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
        • Affordability,
        • Prevention of energy poverty
        • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
        • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
        • Affordability
        • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies
        A3P007: Other
        A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
        A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
        • Strategic urban planning,
        • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
        • District Energy plans
        • Digital twinning and visual 3D models
        • Strategic urban planning,
        • District Energy plans
        • Strategic urban planning,
        • District Energy plans
        • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
        • District Energy plans,
        • SECAP Updates
        • Building / district Certification
        A3P008: Other
        A3P009: Environmental strategies
        A3P009: Environmental strategies
        • Energy Neutral
        • Energy Neutral,
        • Low Emission Zone,
        • Nature Based Solutions (NBS)
        • Low Emission Zone,
        • Carbon-free
        • Energy Neutral,
        • Low Emission Zone,
        • Pollutants Reduction
        • Other
        A3P009: OtherCarbon free in terms of energy
        A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
        A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects- Energy efficiency regulations (Directive 2006/32/EC and 2009/72/EC) - EU directive 2010/31/EU on the energy performance of buildings => all new buildings should be “nearly zero-energy buildings” (nZEB) from 2021
        B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
        B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definitionAssessment methods for this ped (and for germany) is defined in this project at the moment and will be tested at that case studyExPEDite aims at creating and deploying a novel digital twin, allowing for real-time monitoring, visualization and management of district-level energy flows. Cities consume 65% of the world’s energy supply and are responsible for 70% of the CO² emissions, hence sharing a lot of the responsibility for climate change. We are faced with the challenge of redesigning our existing cities to make them more sustainable, resilient, inclusive and safe. Developing Positive Energy Districts (PEDs), is a breakthrough way to deal with the issue of urban emissions and applying adaptation and mitigation strategies to climate change, while ensuring that these urban areas generate an annual surplus of renewable energy and net zero greenhouse gas emissions. PEDs must address environmental, economic and social issues, providing solutions to energy consumption, production, emissions, transport & mobility and livability. By constantly monitoring and evaluating parameters through existing and/or novel sensor systems (e.g., renewable energy production/supply, transport conditions, air quality, energy demand, meteorological conditions, etc.), unconventional techniques may be applied to provide more sustainable options for the district’s needs.The pilot area was selected on the basis of several criteria: its location within areas prioritised by Karşıyaka Municipality for combating climate change, compliance with the building regulations set out in the Green Building-Site-Operation (2023) guide, which are in line with Municipality's energy policy, the presence of open spaces that allow various applications for renewable energy, proximity to public facilities such as schools and municipal services, the availability of data on energy consumption (e.g. electricity and natural gas bills) and architectural features, the potential for community building, the suitability for solar energy systems, considering orientation and roof structure, and the potential for future building renovations. The aim of the initiative is to explore the feasibility of transforming the district into a Positive Energy District (PED).Lippulaiva is a project with high level goal in terms of energy efficiency, energy flexibility and energy production.
        B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
        B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project developmentCity is interested in transforming the quarter, as many buildings are old, have private owner structures and have decentralised heating systems. As the city wants to become climate neutral by 2035 action is needed now. In the research project PED urban the idea is to focus on the future energy system of the quarter and use it as a case study to develop a common assessment method for PEDs in alignment with european efforts in that regardExpected outcome 1 Increased number of (tangible) city planning actions for positive clean energy districts using the (proto-)PED design, development and management digital twin tools (based on pre-market research learnings) using open-standards based components which can be reused elsewhere. 2 Increased integration of existing smaller scale management systems (e.g. Building management systems) with open-standards based operational city platforms using sectorial data (e.g. building data, mobility, urban planning, etc.). 3 Enhanced data gathering approaches with identification of relevant multidimensional data sets (e.g. meteorological, load profile, social, geo-spatial, etc.) high-resolution real-time data streams (e.g. renewable energy production, energy consumption), and relevant forecasting data, drawing also on the work of common European data spaces. 4 Increased number of city planning departments / approaches using common data and (replicable) elements and processes. 5 Consolidated city sensor network specifications, complemented by appropriate data gathering approaches for soft data. 6 Improved performance of AI based self-learning systems for optimization of positive clean energy districts and bottom-up complex models. 7 Enhanced innovation capacity of local/regional administrations and accelerated uptake of shared, smart and sustainable zero emission solutions.- Citycon’s (developer and owner of Lippulaiva) target is to be carbon neutral by 2030 - Increasing sustainability requirements from the financing, tenants, cities, other stakeholders
        B1P003: Environment of the case study area
        B2P003: Environment of the case study areaSuburban areaUrban areaUrban areaUrban area
        B1P004: Type of district
        B2P004: Type of district
        • Renovation
        • Renovation
        • New construction
        B1P005: Case Study Context
        B1P005: Case Study Context
        • Retrofitting Area
        • Retrofitting Area
        • Re-use / Transformation Area,
        • New Development
        B1P006: Year of construction
        B1P006: Year of construction20052022
        B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
        B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential5898
        B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
        B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential5898
        B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
        B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
        B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
        B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
        B1P011: Population density before intervention
        B1P011: Population density before intervention0000000
        B1P012: Population density after intervention
        B1P012: Population density after intervention00.001198780487804900000
        B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
        B1P013: Residentialnoyesnononoyesno
        B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]102795
        B1P013: Officenoyesnonononono
        B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P013: Industry and Utilitynoyesnonononono
        B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P013: Commercialnoyesnonononoyes
        B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P013: Institutionalnoyesnonononono
        B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P013: Natural areasnoyesnonononoyes
        B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P013: Recreationalnoyesnonononono
        B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P013: Dismissed areasnonononononono
        B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P013: Othernonononononono
        B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
        B1P014: Residentialnoyesnononoyesyes
        B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]102795
        B1P014: Officenoyesnonononono
        B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Industry and Utilitynoyesnonononono
        B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Commercialnoyesnonononoyes
        B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Institutionalnoyesnonononono
        B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Natural areasnoyesnonononono
        B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Recreationalnoyesnonononono
        B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Dismissed areasnonononononono
        B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Othernonononononono
        B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
        B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
        B2P002: Installation life time
        B2P002: Installation life time
        B2P003: Scale of action
        B2P003: Scale
        B2P004: Operator of the installation
        B2P004: Operator of the installation
        B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
        B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
        B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
        B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?
        B2P006: Other
        B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
        B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
        B2P007: Other
        B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
        B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
        B2P008: Other
        B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
        B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
        B2P009: Other
        B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
        B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
        B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
        B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
        B2P011: Other
        B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
        B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
        B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
        B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
        B2P014: Monitoring measures
        B2P014: Monitoring measures
        B2P015: Key Performance indicators
        B2P015: Key Performance indicators
        B2P016: Execution of operations
        B2P016: Execution of operations
        B2P017: Capacities
        B2P017: Capacities
        B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
        B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
        B2P019: Available tools
        B2P019: Available tools
        B2P019: Available tools
        B2P020: External accessibility
        B2P020: External accessibility
        C1P001: Unlocking Factors
        C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important
        C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials4 - Important2 - Slightly important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits4 - Important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important
        C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important
        C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts2 - Slightly important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important
        C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important
        C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important
        C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important
        C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
        C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders4 - Important2 - Slightly important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)
        C1P002: Driving Factors
        C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important
        C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important
        C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
        C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
        C1P002: Economic growth need2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important
        C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
        C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important
        C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important
        C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)
        C1P003: Administrative barriers
        C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important
        C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
        C1P003: Lack of public participation3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
        C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement4 - Important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important
        C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)
        C1P004: Policy barriers
        C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)
        C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
        C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important
        C1P005: Regulatory instability3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
        C1P005: Non-effective regulations4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important
        C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important
        C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important
        C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important4 - Important2 - Slightly important
        C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation4 - Important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
        C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
        C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
        C1P006: Environmental barriers
        C1P006: Environmental barriers- Climate Variability: 5 - Topographical Constraints: 4 - Sunlight Availability: 5 - Environmental Regulations: 3 - Zoning Restrictions: 2 - Air and Water Pollution: 2 - Natural Disasters: 1 - Water Scarcity: 1
        C1P007: Technical barriers
        C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
        C1P007: Deficient planning3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important
        C1P007: Lack of well-defined process4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important
        C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
        C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
        C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)
        C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
        C1P008: Inertia4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies5 - Very important2 - Slightly important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
        C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P008: Rebound effect4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
        C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
        C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
        C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important
        C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
        C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
        C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
        C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
        C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important
        C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important
        C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
        C1P010: Financial barriers
        C1P010: Hidden costs2 - Slightly important4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important4 - Important2 - Slightly important
        C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
        C1P010: Economic crisis3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important
        C1P010: Risk and uncertainty4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important
        C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important4 - Important4 - Important
        C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
        C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
        C1P011: Market barriers
        C1P011: Split incentives2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
        C1P011: Energy price distortion3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
        C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
        C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
        C1P012: Stakeholders involved
        C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
        • Planning/leading
        • Planning/leading
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation
        C1P012: Research & Innovation
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation
        C1P012: Financial/Funding
        • None
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation
        C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data
        • None
        • Planning/leading,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        C1P012: Business process management
        • None
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation
        C1P012: Urban Services providers
        • None
        • Planning/leading,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • None
        C1P012: Real Estate developers
        • None
        • Construction/implementation
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        C1P012: Design/Construction companies
        • Construction/implementation
        • Construction/implementation
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation
        C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
        • Planning/leading,
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • Design/demand aggregation
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • Design/demand aggregation
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation
        C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce
        • None
        • Construction/implementation
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        C1P012: Other
        C1P012: Other (if any)
        Summary

        Authors (framework concept)

        Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

        Contributors (to the content)

        Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

        Implemented by

        Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
        Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)

        Join the Action

        PED-EU-NET is an open, interdisciplinary and growing network welcoming academics, practitioners and relevant stakeholders to contribute to the activities of the work plan.
        Join Now

        COST

        COST is an EU funding programme that enables researchers to set up their interdisciplinary research networks in Europe and beyond. We provide funds for organising conferences, meetings, training schools, short scientific exchanges or other networking activities in a wide range of scientific topics. By creating open spaces where people and ideas can grow, we unlock the full potential of science.

        PED-EU-NET

        The COST Action Positive Energy Districts European Network (PED-EU-NET) aims to mobilise researchers and other relevant stakeholders across different domains and sectors to drive the deployment of Positive Energy Districts (PEDs) in Europe through open sharing of knowledge, exchange of ideas, pooling of resources, experimentation of new methods and co-creation of novel solutions.

        Action Details

        Grant Holder
        Department of Planning, Design, Technology of Architecture, Sapienza University of Rome

        Start of Action: 10 September 2020
        End of Action: 09 September 2024
        CSO approval date: 24/03/2020

        © 2021-2023 PED-EU-NET COST Action CA19126. All rights reserved.