Filters:
NameProjectTypeCompare
Trondheim, Svartlamon OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Savona, The University of Genova, Savona Campus OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Torres Vedras, Encosta de São Vicente COPPER PED Lab Compare
Malmö, Stadium area (Stadionområdet) PED StepWise PED Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Utrecht Science Park PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Kriegerheimstätten PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, 16. District, Leben am Wilhelminenberg HeatCOOP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Laxenburgerstraße AH HeatCOOP PED Lab Compare
Tartu, Annelinn V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Kanaleneiland V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aveiro, Aradas district V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau PED Relevant Case Study Compare
SmartEnCity, Lecce SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study Compare
STARDUST, Trento STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö PED Relevant Case Study Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki PED Relevant Case Study Compare
REPLICATE (pilot action in the Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings), Firenze PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna PED Case Study Compare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento PED Case Study Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna PED Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Võru +CityxChange PED Case Study Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Furuset project, Oslo ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights PED Case Study Compare
Ydalir project ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fornebu, Bærum ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou PED Case Study Compare
Smart Energy Åland PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Munich, Harthof district PED Case Study Compare
Lublin MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Findhorn, the Park InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities PED Case Study Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Aalborg East PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Ankara, Çamlık District PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Trenčín MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Uncompare
Uden, Loopkantstraat Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Zaragoza, Actur NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins PED Case Study Compare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Uncompare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Espoo, Kera SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Freiburg, Waldsee PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district PED Case Study Uncompare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Graz, Reininghausgründe PED Case Study Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Oulu, Kaukovainio MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district PED Case Study Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark PED Case Study Compare
Évora, Portugal POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Groningen, PED South MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Groningen, PED North MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Lab Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT PED Lab Compare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Uncompare
Salzburg, Gneis district Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Tartu, City centre area SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab PED Lab Uncompare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Kifissia, Energy community SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study
TitleKifissia, Energy community
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal
Freiburg, Waldsee
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab
Oslo, Verksbyen
City of Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED LabKifissia, Energy communityInnsbruck, Campagne-ArealFreiburg, WaldseeStor-Elvdal, Campus EvenstadIzmir, District of KarşıyakaBarcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLabOslo, VerksbyenCity of Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case studynonoyesnoyesnoyesyes
PED relevant case studyyesyesnoyesnononono
PED Lab.nononononoyesnono
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutralitynoyesyesyesyesnoyesno
Annual energy surplusnononoyesyesnoyesno
Energy communityyesnoyesnonoyesnono
Circularitynononononononono
Air quality and urban comfortyesnononoyesnoyesno
Electrificationyesnoyesnonoyesnono
Net-zero energy costnonononoyesnonono
Net-zero emissionnoyesyesnonoyesyesno
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)nononononoyesnono
Maximise self-sufficiencynonononoyesnonoyes
Othernononoyesnoyesnono
Other (A1P004)Energy-flexibilityGreen IT
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED LabPlanning PhaseCompletedPlanning PhaseIn operationPlanning PhaseIn operationImplementation PhaseIn operation
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date04/1611/2101/1310/2201/201107/1806/18
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date04/2211/2412/2410/2502/201308/2403/22
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability
  • Monitoring data available within the districts
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Meteorological open data
  • Monitoring data available within the districts
  • General statistical datasets
  • General statistical datasets
A1P009: OtherOther
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
    • Data from the local energy provider available (restricted usage for some data points because of data security reasons,
    • renewable energy potential,
    • own calculations based on publicly available data,
    • Some data can be found in https://geoportal.freiburg.de/freigis/
    • M. Hukkalainen, F. Zarrin, K. Klobut, O. Lindholm, M. Ranta, P. Hajduk, T. Vainio-Kaila, E. Wanne, J. Tartia, H. Horn, K. Kontu, J. Juhmen, S. Santala, R. Turtiainen, J. Töyräs, T. Koljonen. (2020). Deliverable D3.1 Detailed plan of the Espoo smart city lighthouse demonstrations. Available online: https://www.sparcs.info/sites/default/files/2020-09/SPARCS_D3.1_Detailed_plan_Espoo.pdf,
    • Hukkalainen, Zarrin Fatima, Krzysztof Klobut, Kalevi Piira, Mikaela Ranta, Petr Hajduk, Tiina Vainio-Kaila , Elina Wanne, Jani Tartia, Angela Bartel, Joni Mäkinen, Mia Kaurila, Kaisa Kontu, Jaano Juhmen, Merja Ryöppy, Reetta Turtiainen, Joona Töyräs, Timo Koljonen (2021) Deliverable 3.2 Midterm report on the implemented demonstrations of solutions for energy positive blocks in Espoo. Available online: https://www.sparcs.info/sites/default/files/2022-02/SPARCS_D3.2.pdf,
    • www.lippulaiva.fi
    A1P011: Geographic coordinates
    X Coordinate (longitude):23.81458811.4243467381402567.88585713584291711.07877077353174627.1100492.110.98617335443299224.6543
    Y Coordinate (latitude):38.07734947.27147078672910447.98653520708004561.4260442039911238.49605441.359.2242971664204660.1491
    A1P012: Country
    A1P012: CountryGreeceAustriaGermanyNorwayTurkeySpainNorwayFinland
    A1P013: City
    A1P013: CityMunicipality of KifissiaInnsbruckFreiburg im BreisgauEvenstad, Stor-Elvdal municipalityİzmirBarcelona and TarragonaFredrikstadEspoo
    A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
    A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).CsaDfbCfbDwcCsaCsaCfbDfb
    A1P015: District boundary
    A1P015: District boundaryVirtualGeographicVirtualGeographicGeographicVirtualGeographicGeographic
    OtherThe energy will be produced by a PV plant installed on the terrace of a municipal building. Members of the energy community (that is under formation) will benefit from the energy produced via virtual net metering. PV instalment and the buildings (owned by the members of the community) will be within the boundaries of the Municipality but not necessary in the same area/district/neighbourhood
    A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
    A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:MixedMixedPublicPrivatePublicPrivatePrivate
    A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
    A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:Multiple OwnersMultiple OwnersSingle OwnerMultiple OwnersSingle OwnerSingle OwnerSingle Owner
    A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
    A1P018: Number of buildings in PED429412221029
    A1P019: Conditioned space
    A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]22277284070100001027953550112000
    A1P020: Total ground area
    A1P020: Total ground area [m²]11351492000032600165000
    A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
    A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area02003001
    A1P022: Financial schemes
    A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estatenonononononoyesyes
    A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO schemenononononononono
    A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Othernononononononono
    A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural fundingnononononononono
    A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National fundingnononoyesnononono
    A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional fundingnononononononono
    A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal fundingnonoyesnonononono
    A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Othernononononononono
    A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EUnonoyesnoyesnonoyes
    A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]1193355308875
    A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Nationalnoyesyesyesyesnonono
    A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regionalnononononononono
    A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Othernononononononono
    A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022: Other
    A1P023: Economic Targets
    A1P023: Economic Targets
    • Job creation,
    • Other
    • Boosting local businesses,
    • Boosting local and sustainable production
    • Positive externalities,
    • Boosting local and sustainable production
    • Job creation,
    • Boosting local and sustainable production
    • Job creation,
    • Positive externalities,
    • Boosting local businesses
    A1P023: OtherCreate affordable appartments for the citizens
    A1P024: More comments:
    A1P024: More comments:Owners are two local social housing companies. The complete district will consist 4 building blocks, from which only the first one with 4 building is ready built and occupied. At the end, it would be a district of ca. 1100 flats in 16 buildings with 78000 m2Semi-Virtual Energy Integration Laboratory (SEILAB) The Energy Smart Lab is an infrastructure conceived as a flexible and versatile platform for innovative technological developments for both industry and competitive R+D projects. The areas of expertise of this laboratory pivot around the following technologies: – Power Electronics for the integration and control of the elements within a building or community: Renewable Energy Sources (RES), Energy Storage Systems and Electric Vehicles (EV) – ICT Platform for smart communications and energy management of systems, building, networks and communities. – Energy System Integration technologies for smart and flexible buildings and grids including RES and EV. The laboratory operation is based on the hardware emulation approach, which allows for real physical equipment to be operated under a broad range of scenarios without depending on the real occurrence of the boundary conditions suitable for the experimental validation. The laboratory is pioneer in addressing the concept and implementation of Microgrids and aims to become a leading experimental facility for improving the optimal development of Flexible Energy Buildings and Flexibility Aggregation.The total development consists of more than 1500 dwellings, a kindergarten, a school, and commercial buildings. Two of the residential blocks are included as demonstration projects in syn.ikia. The two blocks have 20 dwellings in each and are 6 stories high.The Espoonlahti district is located on the south-western coast of Espoo. With 56,000 inhabitants, it is the second largest of the Espoo city centres. The number of inhabitants is estimated to grow to 70,000 within the next 10 years. Espoonlahti will be a future transit hub of the south-western Espoo, along the metro line, and the increasing stream of passengers provides a huge potential for retail, business and residential developments. E-mobility solutions and last-mile services have strong potential in the area when subway extension is finished and running. The extensive (re)development of the Lippulaiva blocks make a benchmark catering to the everyday needs of residents. The completely new shopping centre is a state-of-the-art cross point with 20,000 daily customers and 10,000 daily commuters (3.5 million/year). The new underground metro line and station, and feeder line bus terminal, are fully integrated. Residential housing of approximately 550 new apartments will be built on top. Lippulaiva is a large traffic hub, directly connected to public transport and right next to the Länsiväylä highway and extensive cycle paths. Lippulaiva offers diverse, mixed-use services, such as a shopping mall, public services, a day care centre, residential apartment buildings, and underground parking facilities. Lippulaiva received the LEED Gold environmental certificate and Smart Building Gold certificate. • Flagship of sustainability • Cooling and heating demand from geothermal energy system (on-site) with energy storage system, 4 MW • PV panels: roof and façade, 630 kWp • Smart control strategies for electricity and thermal energy, smart microgrid-system and battery storage • Charging capacity for 134 EVs
    A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
    A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]
    Contact person for general enquiries
    A1P026: NameArtemis Giavasoglou, Kleopatra KalampokaGeorgios DermentzisDr. Annette SteingrubeÅse Lekang SørensenOzlem SenyolDr. Jaume Salom, Dra. Cristina CorcheroTonje Healey TrulsrudElina Ekelund
    A1P027: OrganizationMunicipality of Kifissia – SPARCS local teamUniversity of InnsbruckFraunhofer Institute for solar energy systemsSINTEF / The Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods (ZEN) in Smart CitiesKarsiyaka MunicipalityIRECNorwegian University of Science and technology (NTNU)Citycon Oyj
    A1P028: AffiliationMunicipality / Public BodiesResearch Center / UniversityResearch Center / UniversityResearch Center / UniversityMunicipality / Public BodiesResearch Center / UniversityResearch Center / UniversitySME / Industry
    A1P028: Other
    A1P029: Emailgiavasoglou@kifissia.grGeorgios.Dermentzis@uibk.ac.atAnnette.Steingrube@ise.fraunhofer.dease.sorensen@sintef.noozlemkocaer2@gmail.comJsalom@irec.cattonje.h.trulsrud@ntnu.noElina.ekelund@citycon.com
    Contact person for other special topics
    A1P030: NameStavros Zapantis - vice mayorHasan Burak CavkaElina Ekelund
    A1P031: Emailstavros.zapantis@gmail.comhasancavka@iyte.edu.trElina.ekelund@citycon.com
    Pursuant to the General Data Protection RegulationYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
    A2P001: Fields of application
    A2P001: Fields of application
    • Energy production
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy production,
    • Indoor air quality
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Waste management
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Digital technologies,
    • Construction materials
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.)
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Digital technologies
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
    • Digital technologies,
    • Indoor air quality
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Digital technologies
    A2P001: Other
    A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
    A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fieldsThe buildings are designed based on Passive House standards and dynamic building and system simulations are performed to optimise the HVAC systems, that are a ground-water heat pump for space heating and district heating for domestic hot water preparation. Photovoltaic systems are installed in the available roof spaces, however, more renewable sources are required due to very large number of apartments (very high density) to reach PED, and thus, simulation studies are performed.Energy system modelingCampus Evenstad is a small department at Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, with 220 students. The vision for Campus Evenstad is an energy-flexible Campus Evenstad in an emission-free Europe. The area consists of approx. 20 buildings managed and owned by Statsbygg; the Norwegian government’s building commissioner, property manager and developer. The oldest building is from the 1700-century and the newest is the administration centre (2017) which is a Zero Emission Building (ZEB) with the highest ambitions (ZEB-COM). Their concept has been to realize Campus Evenstad as an energy pilot, where innovative energy solutions are demonstrated, showing how local areas can become more self-sufficient in energy. The energy system at Evenstad consists of several innovative energy solutions that are new in a Norwegian and European context. They are combined in local infrastructure for electricity and heat, which has led to new knowledge and learning about how the solutions work together, and how the interaction is between the local and the national energy system. The solutions consist of solar cells (PV), solar collectors, combined heat and power plant (CHP) based on wood chips, biofuel boiler, electric boiler, grid connection, district heating, heat storage, stationary battery and bidirectional electric vehicle (EV) charging (V2G). Statsbygg has gained a lot of operational experience from Campus Evenstad - both from individual technologies and from the interaction between these, which benefits Statsbygg's 2,200 buildings and 3 million m2 around Norway. Sharing of experiences is central. Campus Evenstad is a pilot in the Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods (ZEN) in Smart Cities were several of the solutions has been developed and studied.Methods involve studying the feasibility of digital PED references for the case cities about their energy, environmental, and economic performance by EnergyPlus tool. In case of insufficient energy data and the need of high resolution data, ‘Gaussian mixture model and expectation-maximization algorithm’ and ‘time-series decomposition-recombination’ method will be used to supplement data to EnergyPlus. The feasibility results will be returned to stakeholders for iterative discussion, and the iterative results will be used to update digital references. Replication plans are developed based on such a cooperation process for strategies to implement PEDs. If a PED is demonstrated during the project period, the measured data will be used to verify the feasibility model to optimize previous results (WP7– R3 & R4). In the MAKING-CITY project, the overall PED design method is developed, which will be further optimised in this project. In addition, PED-ACT will use the methods and knowledge, including how to choose a suitable PED in a city, energy balance calculation, and technologies available for PED. The RUGGEDISED project outputs the governance model into the replication plan in PED-ACT. Its ‘smart city open-data decision platform’ will illustrate an excellent example for the database in PED-ACT. The IEA EBC Annex 83 and Cost Action 19126 create the basis for data collection, developing existing PED databases, characterization of PED, and review of regulations of PED, as well as development of simulation tools. The UBEM project further enables a detailed high-resolution energy balance calculation of PED.Energy SmartLab capacities - Building simulation model: thermal inertia and thermal loads of a building or community can be co-simulated with a building model. – System Operator and Aggregator simulation models: the interaction with remote control actions carried out by electricity System Operators or flexibility Aggregators can be simulated as well. – Grid simulation model: the physical interaction of the building with the grid power supply can be simulated enabling the experimental validation of flexibility services to the network. Energy SmartLab systems - SAFT Li-ion battery: maximum stored energy 20000 Wh, rated power 150 kW, rated discharge current 200 A, rated charge current 34 A, operating voltage 189 V – 227 V – 254 V, capacity 82 Ah. – Ultracapacitors: maximum stored energy 57 Wh, rated power 10 kW, rated current 20 A, peak current (<1s) 200 Apk, operating voltage 250 V – 500 V, capacity 1,65 F. – Electric vehicle second life battery: maximum stored energy 23300 Wh, rated power 40 kW, rated current 150 A, operating voltage 240 V – 400 V, capacity 32 Ah - 5 microgrid emulators (emulated power 5.5 kVA, max generation connected 10kVA, max consumption connected 10 kVA) - 1 grid emulator (Rated power: 200 kVA, Rated current per phase: 350 A, Rated current per neutral conductor: 35)Energy efficiency: energy-efficient buildings that comply with the Norwegian Passive House standard. Energy Flexibility: sharing of PV energy between the dwellings Energy production: BIPV on the roof and facades, and a ground source heat pump for thermal energy. E-mobility: EV charging Urban comfort: a large green park in the neighbourhood with a small lake and recreational areas Digital technologies: Smart Home Systems for lighting, heating and ventilation Indoor air quality: balanced ventilationEnergy efficiency: - eliminating waste energy utilizing smart energy system - utilizing excess heat from grocery stores Energy flexibility: - A battery energy storage system (1,5 MW/1,5MWh); Active participation in Nordpool electricity market (FCR-N) Energy production: - heating and cooling from geothermal heat pump system; 171 energy wells (over 51 km); heat capacity 4 MW - installation of new photovoltaic (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; Estimation of annual production is about 540 MWh (630 kWp) E-mobility - Installation of charging stations for electric vehicles (for 134 EVs) - e-bike services (warm storage room, charging cabinets for e-bikes) Digital technologies: - Building Analytics system by Schneider Electric
    A2P003: Application of ISO52000
    A2P003: Application of ISO52000NoYesNoYesYesYes
    A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
    A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balanceYesYesYesYesYesNoYes
    A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
    A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoYesYesNoYesNoNo
    A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
    A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculationAll energy demands are included in energy balance, either fuel demands or electrical demand of transport sector; Projection is made of future share of electric mobilty, rest is covered with synthetic fuels to achieve climate neutralityAt Campus Evenstad there is infrastructure for EV charging and bidirectional charging (V2G). EV charging is included in the energy balance.Mobility is not included in the calculations.– Electric vehicle second life battery: maximum stored energy 23300 Wh, rated power 40 kW, rated current 150 A, operating voltage 240 V – 400 V, capacity 32 AhMobility is not included in the energy model.
    A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
    A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]0.39135.7150.773.8620.165.5
    A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
    A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]0.65531.760.761.2260.0535.8
    A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
    A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]0
    A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
    A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
    A2P011: PVyesyesnoyesyesyesyesyes
    A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.420.0651.0280.180.54
    A2P011: Windnononononononono
    A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Hydronononononononono
    A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Biomass_elnononoyesnononono
    A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.050
    A2P011: Biomass_peat_elnononononononono
    A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: PVT_elnononononononono
    A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Othernononononononono
    A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
    A2P012: Geothermalnononononononoyes
    A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]5
    A2P012: Solar Thermalnononoyesnononono
    A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.045
    A2P012: Biomass_heatnononoyesnononono
    A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.35
    A2P012: Waste heat+HPnononononononono
    A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Biomass_peat_heatnononononononono
    A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: PVT_thnononononononono
    A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Biomass_firewood_thnononononononono
    A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Othernononononononono
    A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
    A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes53 MW PV potential in all three quarters; no other internal renewable energy potentials knownListed values are measurements from 2018. Renewable energy share is increasing.
    A2P014: Annual energy use
    A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]0.96132.51.5005.08811.3
    A2P015: Annual energy delivered
    A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]-215.76
    A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
    A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
    A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
    A2P017: Gasnonononoyesyesnono
    A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
    A2P017: Coalnononononononono
    A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
    A2P017: Oilnononononononono
    A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
    A2P017: Othernononononononono
    A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
    A2P018: PVnonononoyesnonono
    A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]0.707
    A2P018: Windnononononononono
    A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Hydronononononononono
    A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Biomass_elnononononononono
    A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Biomass_peat_elnononononononono
    A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: PVT_elnononononononono
    A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Othernononononononoyes
    A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]5.26
    A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
    A2P019: Geothermalnononononononono
    A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Solar Thermalnononononononono
    A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Biomass_heatnononononononono
    A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Waste heat+HPnononononononono
    A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Biomass_peat_heatnononononononono
    A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: PVT_thnononononononono
    A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Biomass_firewood_thnononononononono
    A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Othernononononononono
    A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
    A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary00001.4540311173975001.0532319391635
    A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
    A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]-6.0350
    A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
    A2P022: Safety & SecurityPersonal Safety
    A2P022: Healthindoor air quility (indoor CO2 concentration) - measured on the extract air of the mechanical ventilation system. Relative humidity to avoid mold.Healthy community + Indoor Evironmental Quality (indoor air quality, thermal comfort, lighting and visual comfort)
    A2P022: Education
    A2P022: MobilityyesSustainable mobility
    A2P022: EnergySpace heating demand, thermal energy delivered by district heating, electricity of the heat pump, thermal losses of the pipes, and PV production.yesEnergy and environmental performance (non-renewable primary energy balance, renewable energy ratio, grid purchase factor, load cover factor/self-generation, supply cover factor/ self-consumption, net energy/net power. peak delivered(peak exported power, connection capacity credit, total greenhouse gas emissionsOn-site energy ratio
    A2P022: Water
    A2P022: Economic developmentEconomic Performance: capital costs, operational costs, overall performance
    A2P022: Housing and Communityyesdemopraphic composiiton, diverse community, social cohesion access to amenities, access to services, afordability of energy, affordability of shousing, living conditions, universal design, energy consciousness
    A2P022: Waste
    A2P022: OtherSmartness and Flexibility
    A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
    A2P023: Photovoltaicsnoyesyesyesyesyesyesyes
    A2P023: Solar thermal collectorsnonoyesyesnononono
    A2P023: Wind Turbinesnononononononono
    A2P023: Geothermal energy systemnonoyesnononoyesyes
    A2P023: Waste heat recoverynonoyesnonononoyes
    A2P023: Waste to energynonoyesnonononono
    A2P023: Polygenerationnononononononono
    A2P023: Co-generationnonoyesyesnononono
    A2P023: Heat Pumpnoyesyesnoyesnoyesno
    A2P023: Hydrogennonoyesnonononono
    A2P023: Hydropower plantnonoyesnonononono
    A2P023: Biomassnonoyesyesnononono
    A2P023: Biogasnonoyesnonononono
    A2P023: OtherThe Co-generation is biomass based.
    A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
    A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)nonoyesyesnoyesyesyes
    A2P024: Energy management systemnonoyesyesnoyesyesyes
    A2P024: Demand-side managementnonoyesyesnonoyesno
    A2P024: Smart electricity gridnonoyesnonoyesnoyes
    A2P024: Thermal Storagenoyesyesyesnononoyes
    A2P024: Electric Storagenonoyesyesnoyesnoyes
    A2P024: District Heating and Coolingnoyesyesyesnononono
    A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systemsnonoyesyesnonoyesno
    A2P024: P2P – buildingsnoyesyesnonononono
    A2P024: OtherBidirectional electric vehicle (EV) charging (V2G)
    A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
    A2P025: Deep Retrofittingnonoyesnoyesnonono
    A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildingsnonoyesnonononono
    A2P025: High-performance new buildingsnoyesnoyesnonoyesyes
    A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)nononononononoyes
    A2P025: Urban data platformsnonoyesnonononono
    A2P025: Mobile applications for citizensnononononononono
    A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)noyesnonoyesyesyesyes
    A2P025: Smart irrigationnononononononono
    A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposalnononononononono
    A2P025: Smart surveillancenononononononono
    A2P025: Other
    A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
    A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)nonoyesnonoyesnono
    A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)nonoyesnonononoyes
    A2P026: e-Mobilitynonoyesyesnononoyes
    A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutionsnonoyesnonononono
    A2P026: Car-free areanononononononono
    A2P026: OtherLocal transportation hub with direct connection to metro & bus terminal; parking spaces for 1,400 bicycles and for 1,300 cars Promoting e-Mobility: 134 charging stations, A technical reservation for expanding EV charging system 1400 bicycle racks and charging cabinets for 10 e-bicycle batteries
    A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
    A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
    A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
    A2P028: Energy efficiency certificatesYesNoYesNoYesYes
    A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesEnergy Performance Certificate - in Greece it is mandatory in order to buy or rent a house or a dwellingTwo buildings are certified "Passive House new build"Passive house (2 buildings, 4 200 m2, from 2015)NS3700 Norwegian Passive HouseEnergy Performance Certificate => Energy efficiency class B (2018 version)
    A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
    A2P029: Any other building / district certificatesNoNoYesNoYes
    A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesZero Emission Building (ZEB) with the highest ambitions (ZEB-COM) (admin building, 1 141 m2, 2016)LEED (Core & Shell, v4) GOLD certification, Smart Building certification (GOLD)
    A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
    A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
    • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
    • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC)
    • Smart cities strategies
    • Smart cities strategies
    • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
    • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    • Smart cities strategies,
    • New development strategies
    • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
    • New development strategies,
    • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
    A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategyClimate neutrality by 2035Karşıyaka Municipality is the first local government in Turkey to sign the Covenant of Mayors in 2011. During this period, the greenhouse gas inventory of the district was carried out three times and reduction targets were set for 2020 and 2030. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan prepared as of the end of 2021, Karşıyaka Municipality has targeted a 40% reduction in its emissions for 2030 compared to the base year 2018. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan, Karşıyaka Municipality aims to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions from 3.96 tCO2e / person in 2018 to 2.37 tCO2e / person in 2030. System solutions such as the use of renewable energy sources, air, ground or water source heat pump, cogeneration and microcogeneration are analysed by designers in order to fully or partially meet the energy requirements for heating, cooling, ventilation, hot water, electricity and lighting for all buildings with a floor area of less than 20,000 square metres. If at least 50% of the building's total energy consumption costs are covered by one or more of these applications, the points are taken in the assessment table in the Building and housing estate business certification guide of 2023.Relevant city strategies behind PED development in Espoo include the following: - The Espoo Story: Sustainability is heavily included within the values and goals of the current Espoo city strategy, also known as the Espoo Story, running from 2021 to 2025. For example, the strategy names being a responsible pioneer as one of the main values of the city and has chosen achieving carbon neutrality by 2030 as one of the main goals of the current council term. In addition to the Espoo story, four cross-administrative development programmes act as cooperation platforms that allow the city, together with its partners, to develop innovative solutions through experiments and pilot projects in line with the Espoo Story. The Sustainable Espoo development programme is one of the four programmes, thus putting sustainability on the forefront in city development work. - EU Mission: 100 climate-neutral and smart cities by 2030: Cities selected for the Mission commit to achieving carbon-neutrality in 2030. A key tool in the Mission is the Climate City Contract. Each selected city will prepare and implement its contracts in collaboration with local businesses as well as other stakeholders and residents. - Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy: Espoo is committed to the Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy, under which the signatories commit to supporting the European Union’s 40% greenhouse gas emission reduction goal by 2030. The Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan (SECAP) is a key instrument for implementing the agreement. The Action Plan outlines the key measures the city will take to achieve its carbon neutrality goal. The plan also includes a mapping of climate change risks and vulnerabilities, adaptation measures, emission calculations, emission reduction scenarios and impact estimations of measures. The SECAP of the City of Espoo is available here (only available in Finnish). - UN Sustainable development Goals: The city of Espoo has committed to becoming a forerunner and achieving the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) by 2025. The goal is to make Espoo financially, ecologically, socially, and culturally sustainable. - The Circular Cities Declaration: At the end of 2020, Espoo signed the Europe-wide circular economy commitment Circular Cities Declaration. The ten goals of the declaration promote the implementation of the city’s circular economy. - Espoo Clean Heat: Fortum and the City of Espoo are committed to producing carbon-neutral district heating in the network operating in the areas of Espoo, Kauniainen and Kirkkonummi during the 2020s. The district heating network provides heating to some 250,000 end-users in homes and offices. Coal will be completely abandoned in the production of district heating by 2025. The main targets related to PED development included in the noted city strategies are the following: - Espoo will achieve carbon neutrality by 2030. To be precise, this carbon neutrality goal is defined as an 80% emission reduction from the 1990 level by the year 2030. The remaining 20% share can be absorbed in carbon sinks or compensated by other means. - District heating in Espoo will be carbon-neutral by 2029, and coal-based production will be phased out from district heating by 2025. - Espoo aims to end the use of fossil fuels in the heating of city-owned buildings by 2025. - Quantitative goals within the Espoo SECAP report: - Espoo aims to reduce total energy consumption within the municipal sector by 7.5% by the end of 2025 in comparison to the 2015 level. The social housing company Espoon Asunnot OY aims to meet the same target. - Espoo aims to cover 10% of the energy consumption of new buildings via on-site production. - Espoo aims to raise the modal split of cycling to 15% by 2024. - Espoo aims to raise the modal split of public transport by 1.1% yearly. - Espoo aims to reduce the emissions of bus transport by 90% by the end of 2025, when compared to 2010 levels.
    A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
    A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
    • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
    • Other
    • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
    • Biogas,
    • Hydrogen
    • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
    A3P003: OtherDistrict heating based mainly on heat pumps and renewable sources
    A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
    A3P004: Identification of needs and prioritiesThe priority was to eliminate the CO2 emissions by optimizing the building envelope and the heating systems.Freiburg has ambitious goals and wants to achieve climate neutrality until 2035, the PED concept could help to develop suitable strategies on district levelAccording to the model developed for the district, the electrification of heating and cooling is necessary.Therefore, there needs to be the implementation of a heat pump. The building-integrated photovoltaic panelsshould follow. Through net-metering practices, the district is expected to reach energy positivity throughthis scenario.-Allows for real physical equipment to be operated under a broad range of scenarios without depending on the real occurrence of the boundary conditions suitable for the experimental validation -Pioneer in addressing the concept and implementation of Microgrids and aims to become a leading experimental facility for improving the optimal development of Flexible Energy Buildings and Flexibility Aggregation.- Citycon (developer and owner of Lippulaiva) aims to be carbon neutral in its energy use by 2030 - Lippulaiva is a unique urban centre with state-of-the-art energy concept. The centre has a smart managing system, which allows for example the temporary reduction of power used in air conditioning and charging stations when energy consumption is at its peak. In addition, a backup generator and a large electric battery will balance the operation of the electricity network. - Lippulaiva is also an important mobility hub for the people of Espoo. Espoonlahti metro station is located under the centre, and the West Metro started to operate to Espoonlahti in December 2022. Lippulaiva also has a bus terminal, which serves the metro’s feeder traffic in the Espoonlahti major district.
    A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
    A3P005: Sustainable behaviourEnergy efficiency by renovation measures for buildings and measures for saving electricity; electrification by installation of heat pumps and photovoltaics and switching to electric cars, additional measures not directly related to PED like sustainable diet and sharing economy-Improving the development of Net Zero Energy Buildings and Flexible Energy buildings.For Citycon, it was important to engage local people within the Lippulaiva project. During the construction period as well as after opening of the shopping center, citizens have been engaged in multiple ways, such as informing local citizens of the progress of construction, engaging young people in the design processes of the shopping centre and long-term commitment of youngsters with Lippulaiva Buddy class initiative. Users’ engagement activities are conducted in close co-operation with SPARCS partners.
    A3P006: Economic strategies
    A3P006: Economic strategies
    • Demand management Living Lab,
    • Local trading,
    • Existing incentives
    • Demand management Living Lab
    • Innovative business models
    A3P006: Other
    A3P007: Social models
    A3P007: Social models
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Social incentives,
    • Affordability,
    • Prevention of energy poverty,
    • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
    • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
    • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance,
    • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
    • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
    • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour),
    • Other
    • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Affordability
    • Digital Inclusion,
    • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies
    A3P007: OtherCampus Evenstad is a small department at Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, with 220 students. Sharing knowledge is essential: Evenstad has regular visits from Politicians, decision-makers, researchers, environmental organizations, and energy- and building companies.
    A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
    A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
    • Strategic urban planning,
    • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
    • District Energy plans
    • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
    • District Energy plans,
    • SECAP Updates
    • Building / district Certification
    A3P008: Other
    A3P009: Environmental strategies
    A3P009: Environmental strategies
    • Energy Neutral,
    • Low Emission Zone
    • Low Emission Zone
    • Energy Neutral,
    • Low Emission Zone,
    • Pollutants Reduction
    • Energy Neutral,
    • Low Emission Zone,
    • Pollutants Reduction,
    • Greening strategies
    • Other
    A3P009: OtherCarbon free in terms of energy
    A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
    A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspectsCampus Evenstad became a prosumer in 2016, as the first with DSO Eidsiva. Evenstad is also one of the first three PV systems in Norway to receive green certificates.- European Commission has legislated on Energy Community (‘Renewable energy’ directive - 2018/2001/EU and ‘Common rules for the internal electricity market’ directive- 2019/944/EU). - Spanish building certification is regulated through Royal Decree 235/2013.- Energy efficiency regulations (Directive 2006/32/EC and 2009/72/EC) - EU directive 2010/31/EU on the energy performance of buildings => all new buildings should be “nearly zero-energy buildings” (nZEB) from 2021
    B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
    B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definitionExtremely low building energy demand, the electric energy of the heat pump used for space heating is significantly lower compared to thermal energy for the domestic hot water preparation.Assessment methods for this ped (and for germany) is defined in this project at the moment and will be tested at that case studyThe biggest impact is the demonstration of several new energy solutions for local communities. Statsbygg/Campus Evenstad contributes to the development of innovations, pushing technological development through purchasing and demonstration of the solutions. This is a benefit for both end users, energy service providers and society at large. Evenstad also contribute to developing the local business community. For example, local biomass chip production for CHP, development of V2G-software etc. Several key solutions have been important when aiming to achieve the goals of reduced emissions, increased self-sufficiency in energy, and an energy-flexible campus. Example Vehicle-to-grid (V2G): We realized bidirectional EV charging at Campus Evenstad in 2019, demonstrating V2G for the first time in Norway. The experiences from Evenstad provide increased knowledge and practical experience from purchasing, installing and operating the V2G solution, and can contribute to creating new solutions within the energy system. With the equipment installed, the batteries in EVs can supply power back to buildings or the power grid. Example solar cells (PV): We installed PV in 2013 when there were only a few grid-connected PV systems in Norway. The PV system was an important piece in changing the view on solar energy in Norway, where businesses, the public sector and private individuals started seeing the potential for solar energy also this far north. In 2022, the PV system was expanded with PV cells on the facade of the energy center. Example Solar collector system: Covers 100m2 of the roof surface of dormitories and supplies supplies 117 dormitories with all the hot water they need (4000m2 floor area. The solar collector system is connected to the district heating system, where the main heat source is bioenergy. Solar energy and bioenergy complement each other at different times of the year. Example battery bank: Among the 5 largest electrical batteries in Norway connected to the grid. Example CHP: First of its kind in Norway, generating heat and electricity from biomass. Already in 2010, fossil fuels were phased out by converting from oil to wood-chip heating.The pilot area was selected on the basis of several criteria: its location within areas prioritised by Karşıyaka Municipality for combating climate change, compliance with the building regulations set out in the Green Building-Site-Operation (2023) guide, which are in line with Municipality's energy policy, the presence of open spaces that allow various applications for renewable energy, proximity to public facilities such as schools and municipal services, the availability of data on energy consumption (e.g. electricity and natural gas bills) and architectural features, the potential for community building, the suitability for solar energy systems, considering orientation and roof structure, and the potential for future building renovations. The aim of the initiative is to explore the feasibility of transforming the district into a Positive Energy District (PED).The case study follows the concept of syn.ikia with sustainable plus energy neighbourhoods (SPEN) and aims to reach a plus energy balance based on EPB uses on an annual basis.Lippulaiva is a project with high level goal in terms of energy efficiency, energy flexibility and energy production.
    B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
    B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project developmentSince it is an urban area, with high building and apartment density, the need for CO2 reduction is quite relevant and thus, in new built, the minimization of CO2 emissions is crucial.City is interested in transforming the quarter, as many buildings are old, have private owner structures and have decentralised heating systems. As the city wants to become climate neutral by 2035 action is needed now. In the research project PED urban the idea is to focus on the future energy system of the quarter and use it as a case study to develop a common assessment method for PEDs in alignment with european efforts in that regardIn line with the EU's vision of "local energy communities", Campus Evenstad demonstrates energy actions that contribute to the clean energy transition. The campus has been developed over several years, demonstrating several innovative and sustainable technologies and energy solutions in a microgrid, e.g. vehicle to grid (V2G), biomass-based combined heat and power (CHP), solar energy, energy storage and zero emission buildings. It shows how to use new technology to enable zero emissions areas. Dedicated professionals, both Statsbygg's operating staff and researchers from FME ZEN have been central to the realization, together with dedicated management at the University campus, who have shown a great willingness to implement new solutions.The developers call their concept for Future Living, where the neighbourhood consist of highly energy-efficient buildings, is supplied with renewable energy onsite and includes green areas for well-being.- Citycon’s (developer and owner of Lippulaiva) target is to be carbon neutral by 2030 - Increasing sustainability requirements from the financing, tenants, cities, other stakeholders
    B1P003: Environment of the case study area
    B2P003: Environment of the case study areaUrban areaSuburban areaRuralUrban areaSuburban areaUrban area
    B1P004: Type of district
    B2P004: Type of district
    • New construction
    • Renovation
    • New construction,
    • Renovation
    • Renovation
    • New construction
    • New construction
    B1P005: Case Study Context
    B1P005: Case Study Context
    • Re-use / Transformation Area,
    • New Development
    • Retrofitting Area
    • Retrofitting Area
    • Retrofitting Area
    • New Development
    • Re-use / Transformation Area,
    • New Development
    B1P006: Year of construction
    B1P006: Year of construction202220052022
    B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
    B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential5898
    B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
    B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential7805898
    B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
    B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
    B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
    B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
    B1P011: Population density before intervention
    B1P011: Population density before intervention00000000
    B1P012: Population density after intervention
    B1P012: Population density after intervention00.0687164126508680.001198780487804900000
    B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
    B1P013: Residentialnonoyesnoyesnonono
    B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]102795
    B1P013: Officenonoyesnonononono
    B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Industry and Utilitynonoyesnononoyesno
    B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]whole site was used for idustry and excavation
    B1P013: Commercialnonoyesnonononoyes
    B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Institutionalnonoyesnonononono
    B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Natural areasnonoyesnonononoyes
    B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Recreationalnonoyesnonononono
    B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Dismissed areasnononononononono
    B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Othernononononononono
    B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
    B1P014: Residentialnoyesyesnoyesnoyesyes
    B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]102795
    B1P014: Officenonoyesnonononono
    B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Industry and Utilitynonoyesnonononono
    B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Commercialnoyesyesnonononoyes
    B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Institutionalnoyesyesnonononono
    B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Natural areasnonoyesnonononono
    B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Recreationalnoyesyesnonononono
    B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Dismissed areasnononononononono
    B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Othernononononononono
    B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
    B2P001: PED Lab concept definitionaddressing the concept and implementation of Microgrids and aims to become a leading experimental facility for improving the optimal development of Flexible Energy Buildings and Flexibility Aggregation
    B2P002: Installation life time
    B2P002: Installation life time
    B2P003: Scale of action
    B2P003: ScaleVirtual
    B2P004: Operator of the installation
    B2P004: Operator of the installationIREC
    B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
    B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
    B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
    B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?No
    B2P006: Other
    B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
    B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
    • Strategic,
    • Private
    B2P007: Other
    B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
    B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED LabResearch center/University
    B2P008: Other
    B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
    B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
    B2P009: Other
    B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
    B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
    B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
    B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
    • Demand-side management,
    • Energy storage,
    • Energy networks,
    • Efficiency measures,
    • Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)
    B2P011: Other
    B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
    B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
    • Monitoring and evaluation infrastructure,
    • Tools for prototyping and modelling,
    • Tools, spaces, events for testing and validation
    B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
    B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
    B2P014: Monitoring measures
    B2P014: Monitoring measures
    • Equipment
    B2P015: Key Performance indicators
    B2P015: Key Performance indicators
    • Energy,
    • Environmental
    B2P016: Execution of operations
    B2P016: Execution of operations
    B2P017: Capacities
    B2P017: Capacities- Building simulation model: thermal inertia and thermal loads of a building or community can be co-simulated with a building model. – System Operator and Aggregator simulation models: the interaction with remote control actions carried out by electricity System Operators or flexibility Aggregators can be simulated as well. – Grid simulation model: the physical interaction of the building with the grid power supply can be simulated enabling the experimental validation of flexibility services to the network.
    B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
    B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
    B2P019: Available tools
    B2P019: Available tools
    • Energy modelling
    B2P019: Available tools
    B2P020: External accessibility
    B2P020: External accessibility
    C1P001: Unlocking Factors
    C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
    C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock5 - Very important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration2 - Slightly important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)5 - Very important2 - Slightly important4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important
    C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)
    C1P002: Driving Factors
    C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important
    C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Economic growth need2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important
    C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important
    C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)
    C1P003: Administrative barriers
    C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities4 - Important2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P003: Lack of public participation3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)
    C1P004: Policy barriers
    C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)
    C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
    C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important
    C1P005: Regulatory instability3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P005: Non-effective regulations4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important4 - Important
    C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
    C1P006: Environmental barriers
    C1P006: Environmental barriersUrban area very high buildings (and apartment) density and thus, less available space for renewable sources.- Climate Variability: 5 - Topographical Constraints: 4 - Sunlight Availability: 5 - Environmental Regulations: 3 - Zoning Restrictions: 2 - Air and Water Pollution: 2 - Natural Disasters: 1 - Water Scarcity: 1
    C1P007: Technical barriers
    C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel4 - Important2 - Slightly important4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P007: Deficient planning3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P007: Lack of well-defined process4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)Energy management systems of different new technologies does not "talk together" (e.g. solar inverter, V2G inverter). This creates challenges.
    C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
    C1P008: Inertia4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Rebound effect4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
    C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
    C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important
    C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)Different interests - Grid/energy stakeholders and building stakeholders
    C1P010: Financial barriers
    C1P010: Hidden costs1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P010: Economic crisis4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P010: Risk and uncertainty1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important
    C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
    C1P011: Market barriers
    C1P011: Split incentives1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P011: Energy price distortion1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
    C1P012: Stakeholders involved
    C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
    • Planning/leading
    • Planning/leading
    • Planning/leading
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    C1P012: Research & Innovation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation
    C1P012: Financial/Funding
    • Planning/leading,
    • Construction/implementation
    • None
    • Construction/implementation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • None
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Business process management
    • None
    • Planning/leading
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    C1P012: Urban Services providers
    • Construction/implementation
    • None
    • None
    C1P012: Real Estate developers
    • Planning/leading
    • None
    • Planning/leading,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Design/Construction companies
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    • Construction/implementation
    • Construction/implementation
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs
    • Planning/leading
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • None
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • None
    • Construction/implementation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Other
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    C1P012: Other (if any)
    Summary

    Authors (framework concept)

    Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

    Contributors (to the content)

    Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

    Implemented by

    Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
    Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)