Search
Close this search box.
Search
Map View
Table View
Projects
Filters:
Clear Filters Export All Entries (CSV)
NameProjectTypeCompare
Tartu, Estonia V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Utrecht, the Netherlands (District of Kanaleneiland) V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aveiro, Portugal V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau PED Relevant Case Study Compare
SmartEnCity, Lecce SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study Compare
STARDUST, Trento STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö PED Relevant Case Study Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki PED Relevant Case Study Compare
REPLICATE (pilot action in the Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings), Firenze PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna PED Case Study Compare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento PED Case Study Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna PED Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Võru +CityxChange PED Case Study Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Furuset project, Oslo ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights PED Case Study Compare
Ydalir project ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fornebu, Bærum ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou PED Case Study Compare
Smart Energy Åland PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Munich, Harthof district PED Case Study Compare
Lublin MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Findhorn, the Park InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities PED Case Study Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Aalborg East PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Uncompare
Ankara, Çamlık District PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Trenčín MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Vantaa, Aviapolis NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Zaragoza, Actur NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins PED Case Study Compare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Espoo, Kera SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Freiburg, Waldsee PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district PED Case Study Compare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe PED Case Study Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district PED Case Study Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark PED Case Study Compare
Évora, Portugal POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Uncompare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Groningen, PED South MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Uncompare
Groningen, PED North MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Lab Uncompare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT PED Lab Compare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Salzburg, Gneis district Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Tartu, City centre area SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab PED Lab Uncompare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Kifissia, Energy community SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study
TitleKifissia, Energy community
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing
«×»
Évora, Portugal
«×»
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab
«×»
Groningen, PED South
«×»
Luxembourg, Betzdorf
«×»
Aalborg East, Aalborg Municipality, Region of Northern Jutland, Denmark
«×»
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED LabKifissia, Energy communityMaia, Sobreiro Social HousingÉvora, PortugalBarcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLabGroningen, PED SouthLuxembourg, BetzdorfAalborg East, Aalborg Municipality, Region of Northern Jutland, Denmark
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case studynonononononono
PED relevant case studyyesnoyesnonoyesyes
PED Lab.noyesyesyesyesnoyes
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutralitynoyesnonoyesyesyes
Annual energy surplusnonoyesnoyesyesno
Energy communityyesnoyesyesyesyesno
Circularitynonononoyesyesno
Air quality and urban comfortyesnonononoyesno
Electrificationyesnonoyesnoyesno
Net-zero energy costnonononononono
Net-zero emissionnononoyesyesnono
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)nononoyesnonono
Maximise self-sufficiencynoyesnonononoyes
Othernononoyesnonono
Other (A1P004)Green IT
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED LabPlanning PhasePlanning PhaseImplementation PhaseIn operationImplementation PhaseImplementation PhasePlanning Phase
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date10/2110/1901/201112/1806/2311/22
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date10/2409/2402/201312/2304/2611/25
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • Meteorological open data,
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards
  • General statistical datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • GIS open datasets
A1P009: Other
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
      • TNO, Hanze, RUG,
      • Ped noord book
      A1P011: Geographic coordinates
      X Coordinate (longitude):23.814588-8.373557-7.9093772.16.5906556.36160210.007
      Y Coordinate (latitude):38.07734941.13580438.57080441.353.20408749.68277457.041028
      A1P012: Country
      A1P012: CountryGreecePortugalPortugalSpainNetherlandsLuxembourgDenmark
      A1P013: City
      A1P013: CityMunicipality of KifissiaMaiaÉvoraBarcelona and TarragonaGroningenBetzdorfAalborg
      A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
      A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).CsaCsbCsaCsaCfaCfbDfb
      A1P015: District boundary
      A1P015: District boundaryVirtualVirtualGeographicVirtualFunctionalGeographicVirtual
      OtherThe energy will be produced by a PV plant installed on the terrace of a municipal building. Members of the energy community (that is under formation) will benefit from the energy produced via virtual net metering. PV instalment and the buildings (owned by the members of the community) will be within the boundaries of the Municipality but not necessary in the same area/district/neighbourhood
      A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
      A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:PublicMixedPublicMixedPublicPublic
      A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
      A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:Multiple OwnersMultiple OwnersSingle OwnerMultiple OwnersSingle OwnerMultiple Owners
      A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
      A1P018: Number of buildings in PED220424
      A1P019: Conditioned space
      A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]7.86173.8
      A1P020: Total ground area
      A1P020: Total ground area [m²]45.09331308000
      A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
      A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area0000000
      A1P022: Financial schemes
      A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estatenonononoyesnono
      A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO schemenonononononono
      A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Othernoyesnonoyesnono
      A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural fundingnonononononono
      A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National fundingnoyesnonoyesnono
      A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional fundingnoyesnonononono
      A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal fundingnonononoyesnono
      A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Othernononononoyesno
      A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EUnoyesyesnoyesnono
      A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]19998275
      A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Nationalnonononononoyes
      A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regionalnonononononono
      A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Othernonononononono
      A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022: Other
      A1P023: Economic Targets
      A1P023: Economic Targets
      • Positive externalities,
      • Boosting local and sustainable production
      • Job creation,
      • Boosting local and sustainable production
      • Boosting local businesses,
      • Boosting local and sustainable production
      • Other
      • Positive externalities,
      • Boosting local businesses,
      • Boosting local and sustainable production
      A1P023: Other
      A1P024: More comments:
      A1P024: More comments:Semi-Virtual Energy Integration Laboratory (SEILAB) The Energy Smart Lab is an infrastructure conceived as a flexible and versatile platform for innovative technological developments for both industry and competitive R+D projects. The areas of expertise of this laboratory pivot around the following technologies: – Power Electronics for the integration and control of the elements within a building or community: Renewable Energy Sources (RES), Energy Storage Systems and Electric Vehicles (EV) – ICT Platform for smart communications and energy management of systems, building, networks and communities. – Energy System Integration technologies for smart and flexible buildings and grids including RES and EV. The laboratory operation is based on the hardware emulation approach, which allows for real physical equipment to be operated under a broad range of scenarios without depending on the real occurrence of the boundary conditions suitable for the experimental validation. The laboratory is pioneer in addressing the concept and implementation of Microgrids and aims to become a leading experimental facility for improving the optimal development of Flexible Energy Buildings and Flexibility Aggregation.
      A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
      A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]
      Contact person for general enquiries
      A1P026: NameArtemis Giavasoglou, Kleopatra KalampokaAdelina RodriguesJoão Bravo DiasDr. Jaume Salom, Dra. Cristina CorcheroJasper Tonen, Elisabeth KoopsJulien BertucciKristian Olesen
      A1P027: OrganizationMunicipality of Kifissia – SPARCS local teamMaia Municipality (CM Maia) – Energy and Mobility divisionEDP LabelecIRECMunicipality of GroningenSNHBMAalborg University
      A1P028: AffiliationMunicipality / Public BodiesMunicipality / Public BodiesSME / IndustryResearch Center / UniversityMunicipality / Public BodiesMunicipality / Public BodiesResearch Center / University
      A1P028: Other
      A1P029: Emailgiavasoglou@kifissia.grdscm.adelina@cm-maia.ptjoao.bravodias@edp.ptJsalom@irec.catJasper.tonen@groningen.nljulien.bertucci@snhbm.luKristian@plan.aau.dk
      Contact person for other special topics
      A1P030: NameStavros Zapantis - vice mayorCarolina Gonçalves (AdEPorto)Alex Søgaard Moreno
      A1P031: Emailstavros.zapantis@gmail.comcarolinagoncalves@adeporto.euasm@aalborg.dk
      Pursuant to the General Data Protection RegulationYesYesYesYesYesYes
      A2P001: Fields of application
      A2P001: Fields of application
      • Energy production
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
      • Digital technologies
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Digital technologies,
      • Waste management,
      • Construction materials
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Digital technologies
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
      • Waste management
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
      • Digital technologies,
      • Water use,
      • Indoor air quality,
      • Construction materials
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
      • Digital technologies
      A2P001: Other
      A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
      A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fieldsEnergy production: - installation of photovoltaic systems for renewable on-site energy production; - installation of a BIPV demonstrator for the City Hall building. Energy flexibility: - implementation of an energy community through an active citizens involvement process. Digital technologies: - smart-meters installation in some dwellings in order to monitor consumption and suggest more sustainable energy behaviours. [PCP] Through https://balcaodigital.e-redes.pt/consumptions/history “Espaço Municipal” (https://www.espacomunicipal.pt/pt/) might access history of consumption up to midnight of the previous day. E-mobility: - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; Urban comfort and air quality: - Monitoring units for air pollutants concentration (PM2.5, PM10, NO2) [PCP] Currently we are monitoring CO, O3, NO2, SO2, noise, PM2.5 and PM10 at a point 267 m east from the four buildings southeast of Sobreiro area:Energy SmartLab capacities - Building simulation model: thermal inertia and thermal loads of a building or community can be co-simulated with a building model. – System Operator and Aggregator simulation models: the interaction with remote control actions carried out by electricity System Operators or flexibility Aggregators can be simulated as well. – Grid simulation model: the physical interaction of the building with the grid power supply can be simulated enabling the experimental validation of flexibility services to the network. Energy SmartLab systems - SAFT Li-ion battery: maximum stored energy 20000 Wh, rated power 150 kW, rated discharge current 200 A, rated charge current 34 A, operating voltage 189 V – 227 V – 254 V, capacity 82 Ah. – Ultracapacitors: maximum stored energy 57 Wh, rated power 10 kW, rated current 20 A, peak current (<1s) 200 Apk, operating voltage 250 V – 500 V, capacity 1,65 F. – Electric vehicle second life battery: maximum stored energy 23300 Wh, rated power 40 kW, rated current 150 A, operating voltage 240 V – 400 V, capacity 32 Ah - 5 microgrid emulators (emulated power 5.5 kVA, max generation connected 10kVA, max consumption connected 10 kVA) - 1 grid emulator (Rated power: 200 kVA, Rated current per phase: 350 A, Rated current per neutral conductor: 35)Energy efficiency: - buildings energy retrofit supported by tax bonuses - replacing heat supply technologies Energy production: - installation of new (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; - presence of a large PV plant in the South East (2 solar parks: 12MW and 107MW) and North area (0,4 MW) Energy flexibility: - energy storage solutions, battery storage and possible hydrogen production - GRID balancing services E-mobility - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; Urban Management - make use of the organizational structure Waste Management - circular use of municipal waste streamsStakeholder engagement, expert energy system analysis, future scenarios
      A2P003: Application of ISO52000
      A2P003: Application of ISO52000NoNoNoNo
      A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
      A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balanceYesYesYesNoNoNo
      A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
      A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoYesYesNoNoNo
      A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
      A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation– Electric vehicle second life battery: maximum stored energy 23300 Wh, rated power 40 kW, rated current 150 A, operating voltage 240 V – 400 V, capacity 32 AhMobility, till now, is not included in the energy model.Large combined industrial, residential, and commercial area with complex flows of in- and outgoing traffic.
      A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
      A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]1.86218
      A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
      A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]1.45148
      A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
      A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]
      A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
      A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
      A2P011: PVyesyesnoyesnonono
      A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Windnonononononoyes
      A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Hydrononononononono
      A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Biomass_elnonononononono
      A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
      A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: PVT_elnonononononono
      A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Othernonononononoyes
      A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
      A2P012: Geothermalnonononoyesnono
      A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Solar Thermalnoyesnonoyesnono
      A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Biomass_heatnonononoyesnono
      A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Waste heat+HPnonononoyesnoyes
      A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]300
      A2P012: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
      A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: PVT_thnonononoyesnono
      A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
      A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Othernonononononono
      A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
      A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notesGeothermal heatpump systems, Waste heat from data centersVery little wind production currently exists in the area. The electricity production of the waste incineration plant will be included at a later date. Aalborg East is partly a remarkable area for hosting a Portland cement factory that accounts for a substantial share of Denmark’s total CO2 emissions. In turn, it also provides waste heat to the district heating grid for all of Aalborg city and some of the smaller towns that are connected to the same DH grid.
      A2P014: Annual energy use
      A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]620
      A2P015: Annual energy delivered
      A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]399
      A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
      A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
      A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
      A2P017: Gasnononoyesnonono
      A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
      A2P017: Coalnonononononono
      A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
      A2P017: Oilnonononononono
      A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
      A2P017: Othernonononononoyes
      A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]300
      A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
      A2P018: PVnonononononono
      A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Windnonononononono
      A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Hydrononononononono
      A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Biomass_elnonononononono
      A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
      A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: PVT_elnonononononono
      A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Othernonononononono
      A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
      A2P019: Geothermalnonononononono
      A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Solar Thermalnonononononono
      A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Biomass_heatnonononononono
      A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Waste heat+HPnonononononono
      A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
      A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: PVT_thnonononononono
      A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
      A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Othernonononononono
      A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
      A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary0000000
      A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
      A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]
      A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
      A2P022: Safety & Security
      A2P022: Health
      A2P022: Education
      A2P022: Mobility
      A2P022: Energy
      A2P022: Water
      A2P022: Economic development
      A2P022: Housing and Community
      A2P022: Waste
      A2P022: Other
      A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
      A2P023: Photovoltaicsnoyesyesyesyesnoyes
      A2P023: Solar thermal collectorsnoyesyesnoyesnoyes
      A2P023: Wind Turbinesnonononononono
      A2P023: Geothermal energy systemnonononoyesnono
      A2P023: Waste heat recoverynonononoyesnoyes
      A2P023: Waste to energynonononoyesnoyes
      A2P023: Polygenerationnonononononono
      A2P023: Co-generationnonononononono
      A2P023: Heat Pumpnoyesnonoyesnoyes
      A2P023: Hydrogennonononononono
      A2P023: Hydropower plantnonononononono
      A2P023: Biomassnonononononoyes
      A2P023: Biogasnonononononono
      A2P023: Other
      A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
      A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)noyesyesyesyesyesno
      A2P024: Energy management systemnoyesyesyesyesyesyes
      A2P024: Demand-side managementnonononononoyes
      A2P024: Smart electricity gridnonoyesyesnonoyes
      A2P024: Thermal Storagenonoyesnoyesnoyes
      A2P024: Electric Storagenoyesyesyesyesyesyes
      A2P024: District Heating and Coolingnonononoyesnoyes
      A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systemsnoyesyesnoyesnoyes
      A2P024: P2P – buildingsnonoyesnononono
      A2P024: Other
      A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
      A2P025: Deep Retrofittingnoyesnonononoyes
      A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildingsnonoyesnoyesnono
      A2P025: High-performance new buildingsnonononoyesyesno
      A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)noyesnonoyesnono
      A2P025: Urban data platformsnonoyesnoyesnono
      A2P025: Mobile applications for citizensnonoyesnononono
      A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)noyesyesyesnoyesno
      A2P025: Smart irrigationnonononononono
      A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposalnoyesyesnononono
      A2P025: Smart surveillancenonoyesnononoyes
      A2P025: Other
      A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
      A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)noyesnoyesnonono
      A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)nonononononono
      A2P026: e-Mobilitynoyesyesnoyesyesno
      A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutionsnonoyesnononono
      A2P026: Car-free areanonononononono
      A2P026: Other
      A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
      A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
      A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
      A2P028: Energy efficiency certificatesYesNoYesYesYes
      A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesEnergy Performance Certificate - in Greece it is mandatory in order to buy or rent a house or a dwellingThe Municipal Buildings have an energy certificate, according to the Portuguese legislation.Energy Performance Certificate
      A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
      A2P029: Any other building / district certificatesNoNoYesNo
      A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes
      A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
      A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
      • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
      • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC)
      • Urban Renewal Strategies,
      • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
      • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
      • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract)
      • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
      • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
      • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
      • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
      • Smart cities strategies,
      • New development strategies
      • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
      • New development strategies,
      • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
      • Smart cities strategies,
      • Urban Renewal Strategies,
      • New development strategies,
      • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
      A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
      A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategyReduction of 1018000 tons CO2 by 2030
      A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
      A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
      • Other
      • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
      • Electrification of Cooking Methods,
      • Biogas
      • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
      • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
      • Biogas
      A3P003: OtherAt a national level there are some studies regarding the decarbonization of the gas grid, but no concrete strategies so far.
      A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
      A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities-Allows for real physical equipment to be operated under a broad range of scenarios without depending on the real occurrence of the boundary conditions suitable for the experimental validation -Pioneer in addressing the concept and implementation of Microgrids and aims to become a leading experimental facility for improving the optimal development of Flexible Energy Buildings and Flexibility Aggregation.Decarbonize part of Aalborg city as a way of working incrementally towards being a zero-emission city.
      A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
      A3P005: Sustainable behaviour-Improving the development of Net Zero Energy Buildings and Flexible Energy buildings.In Groningen we are working with different sustainable behaviours approaches and also developed the Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA). Currently, there are two different approaches in use in the municipality of Groningen: the District energy approach (Wijkgerichte aanpak, developed by the Municipality of Groningen) and the Cooperative approach (Coöperative Aanpak, developed by Grunneger Power). Based upon those approaches and knowledge that is gained through social research executed by TNO and HUAS the new Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA) has been developed.- Stakeholder engagement; - Focus on implementing renewable energy production where possible; - Rretrofitting and energy optimization of existing buildings.
      A3P006: Economic strategies
      A3P006: Economic strategies
      • Innovative business models,
      • PPP models,
      • Existing incentives
      • Demand management Living Lab
      • Innovative business models,
      • Blockchain
      • Life Cycle Cost,
      • Circular economy models
      A3P006: Other
      A3P007: Social models
      A3P007: Social models
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
      • Prevention of energy poverty,
      • Digital Inclusion,
      • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance,
      • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
      • Digital Inclusion,
      • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
      • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
      • Citizen Social Research,
      • Prevention of energy poverty,
      • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
      • Affordability
      • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
      • Policy Forums,
      • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
      A3P007: Other
      A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
      A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
      • City Vision 2050,
      • SECAP Updates,
      • Building / district Certification
      • Strategic urban planning,
      • District Energy plans,
      • City Vision 2050,
      • SECAP Updates
      • Building / district Certification
      • Strategic urban planning,
      • District Energy plans
      A3P008: Other
      A3P009: Environmental strategies
      A3P009: Environmental strategies
      • Energy Neutral,
      • Net zero carbon footprint,
      • Pollutants Reduction
      • Energy Neutral,
      • Low Emission Zone,
      • Pollutants Reduction,
      • Greening strategies
      • Energy Neutral
      • Energy Neutral,
      • Net zero carbon footprint
      A3P009: Other
      A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
      A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects- European Commission has legislated on Energy Community (‘Renewable energy’ directive - 2018/2001/EU and ‘Common rules for the internal electricity market’ directive- 2019/944/EU). - Spanish building certification is regulated through Royal Decree 235/2013.At national/regional/local level a legislation on PEDs development is not yet available in the Netherlands. There will be a new Environmental Act and Heat Act in the nearby future. We are working on a paper about the current legal barriers, which are in short for Groningen:  Lack of legal certainty and clarity with regard to the energy legislation.  Lack of coherence between policy and legislation from different ministries.  The planned revision of the Dutch Heat Law prevents Groningen from effectively realizing sustainable heat transition plans and goals.  Lack of capacity on the distribution grid for electricityCurrent energy tariffs disincentivize both individual and collective PV systems – meaning energy communities are not economically feasible, housing associations and public buildings struggle with finding a secure RoI for solar panels, and citizens and local industry lack an incentive to install solar panels on their own
      B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
      B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definitionThe PED main objective is to achieve the energy transition while preserving cultural heritage and improving citizen’s quality of life.The large scale provides interesting opportunities for both urban development and strategic energy planning; the diverse mix of buildings and functions also allow for interesting discussions regarding PEDs. Another interesting facet is that the district heating grid is almost fully supplied by waste heat.
      B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
      B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project developmentPOCITYF brings together eight cities (Lightouse and Fellow cities), all having cultural heritage areas in their territory. All are intrinsically motivated to participate in the necessary energy transition not only for their conventional city districts of mixed-used, but also for districts with individually specificities as those belonging in their cultural heritage, which at the moment may be acting as barriers for their further environmental sustainability, but after POCITYF will be acting as a promising building retrofits roadmap for similar and other EU cities.The area has an interesting history of development and has recently undergone several urban improvements. This is coupled with a strong local network of business owners and other stakeholders, all with an interest in developing the area in the best way possible. This made for an interesting case from a planning perspective to investigate how this network would pick up on the concept of PED and whether they could see any potential utility in relation to their everyday experiences.
      B1P003: Environment of the case study area
      B2P003: Environment of the case study areaUrban areaRuralSuburban area
      B1P004: Type of district
      B2P004: Type of district
      • Renovation
      • New construction,
      • Renovation
      • Renovation
      B1P005: Case Study Context
      B1P005: Case Study Context
      • Preservation Area
      • New Development
      • Retrofitting Area
      B1P006: Year of construction
      B1P006: Year of construction
      B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
      B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential16.931
      B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
      B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
      B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
      B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
      B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
      B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
      B1P011: Population density before intervention
      B1P011: Population density before intervention0000000
      B1P012: Population density after intervention
      B1P012: Population density after intervention0000000
      B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
      B1P013: Residentialnonononononono
      B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Officenonononononono
      B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Industry and Utilitynonononononono
      B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Commercialnonononononono
      B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Institutionalnonononononono
      B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Natural areasnonononononono
      B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Recreationalnonononononono
      B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Dismissed areasnonononononono
      B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Othernonononononono
      B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
      B1P014: Residentialnonononononono
      B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Officenonononononono
      B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Industry and Utilitynonononononono
      B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Commercialnonononononono
      B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Institutionalnonononononono
      B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Natural areasnonononononono
      B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Recreationalnonononononono
      B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Dismissed areasnonononononono
      B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Othernonononononono
      B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
      B2P001: PED Lab concept definitionaddressing the concept and implementation of Microgrids and aims to become a leading experimental facility for improving the optimal development of Flexible Energy Buildings and Flexibility AggregationGroningen was selected as Lighthouse City for the MAKING-CITY project. MAKING-CITY is a 60-month Horizon 2020 project launched in December 2018. It aims to address and demonstrate the urban energy system transformation towards smart and low-carbon cities, based on the Positive Energy District (PED) concept. The PED operational models developed in MAKING-CITY will help European and other cities around the world to adopt a long-term City Vision 2050 for energy transition and sustainable urbanisation whilst turning citizens into actors of this transformation. Groningen works with two PED districts in two completely different neighbourhoods in terms of structure and buildings. This is why we see this as a lab: to see wat works and what doesn’t. In order to be able to implement this in the rest of the city.An ongoing process and dialogue with local stakeholders to determine the future development of the area.
      B2P002: Installation life time
      B2P002: Installation life timePermanent installationThe MAKING-CITY project lasts from November 2018 – November 2023. By that time PED North and PED South East are a fact.No new installation will be made throughout the project. Rather the project will attempt to establish a local PED network with the aim of empowering the stakeholders to better engage with sustainable technologies.
      B2P003: Scale of action
      B2P003: ScaleVirtualDistrictVirtualDistrictDistrict
      B2P004: Operator of the installation
      B2P004: Operator of the installationCM Maia, IPMAIA, NEW, AdEP.IRECThe Municipality of Groningen is Manager of the lab but works closely with other parties such as the university, university of applied sciences, research institute TNO and several other parties.Kristian Olesen
      B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
      B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materialsGroningen does not have a strategy to reuse and recyle materialsReplication is primarily focused on the establishment of a local network with an interest in and understanding of PED.
      B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
      B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?NoNoNoNo
      B2P006: Other
      B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
      B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
      • Strategic
      • Strategic,
      • Private
      • Civic
      • Civic
      B2P007: Other
      B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
      B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED LabMunicipalityResearch center/UniversityMunicipalityResearch center/University
      B2P008: Other
      B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
      B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
      • Academia,
      • Private,
      • Industrial,
      • Citizens, public, NGO,
      • Other
      • Academia,
      • Private,
      • Industrial,
      • Other
      • Academia,
      • Private
      B2P009: OtherEnergy Agencyresearch companies, monitoring company, ict company
      B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
      B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
      B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
      B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
      • Buildings,
      • Demand-side management,
      • Prosumers,
      • Renewable generation,
      • Energy storage,
      • Efficiency measures,
      • Lighting,
      • E-mobility,
      • Information and Communication Technologies (ICT),
      • Ambient measures,
      • Social interactions
      • Buildings,
      • Demand-side management,
      • Prosumers,
      • Renewable generation,
      • Energy storage,
      • Energy networks,
      • Waste management,
      • E-mobility,
      • Social interactions,
      • Circular economy models
      • Demand-side management,
      • Energy storage,
      • Energy networks,
      • Efficiency measures,
      • Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)
      • Buildings,
      • Demand-side management,
      • Energy storage,
      • Energy networks,
      • Waste management,
      • Lighting,
      • E-mobility,
      • Information and Communication Technologies (ICT),
      • Social interactions,
      • Business models
      B2P011: Other
      B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
      B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
      • Monitoring and evaluation infrastructure,
      • Tools, spaces, events for testing and validation
      • Monitoring and evaluation infrastructure,
      • Tools for prototyping and modelling,
      • Tools, spaces, events for testing and validation
      • Monitoring and evaluation infrastructure,
      • Tools for prototyping and modelling,
      • Tools, spaces, events for testing and validation
      • Tools for prototyping and modelling
      B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
      B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external peopleDepends on the building: _Tecmaia is open to the public but the buildings are for the exclusive use of companies allocated at the industrial site; _The municipal buildings have public access; _The residential buildings have an exclusive use for the residents.
      B2P014: Monitoring measures
      B2P014: Monitoring measures
      • Execution plan,
      • Available data,
      • Type of measured data
      • Equipment
      • Execution plan,
      • Available data,
      • Type of measured data,
      • Equipment,
      • Level of access
      B2P015: Key Performance indicators
      B2P015: Key Performance indicators
      • Energy,
      • Environmental,
      • Social,
      • Economical / Financial
      • Energy
      • Energy,
      • Environmental
      • Energy,
      • Social,
      • Economical / Financial
      B2P016: Execution of operations
      B2P016: Execution of operationsCurrent PED status (WP5 SPARCS): Conceptualization and methodology definition of the (virtual) PED for Maia Municipality with real monitoring and assessment in order to replicate and scale up to a city-level PED. The financial investments were already targeted.
      B2P017: Capacities
      B2P017: Capacities_Energy production and storage, _Monitoring; _Digitization.- Building simulation model: thermal inertia and thermal loads of a building or community can be co-simulated with a building model. – System Operator and Aggregator simulation models: the interaction with remote control actions carried out by electricity System Operators or flexibility Aggregators can be simulated as well. – Grid simulation model: the physical interaction of the building with the grid power supply can be simulated enabling the experimental validation of flexibility services to the network.
      B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
      B2P018: Relations with stakeholdersThe relationship with stakeholders (municipal companies, industry, citizens, etc) has been fundamental for the definition of the PED. In this sense, some sessions were organized to gather different points of view in order to trace the best path for the PED. Also, the participation of Maia Municipality in EU projects, as EHHUR and OMEGA-X, makes possible the share of knowledge between different partners.
      B2P019: Available tools
      B2P019: Available tools
      • Energy modelling,
      • Social models,
      • Business and financial models,
      • Fundraising and accessing resources,
      • Matching actors
      • Energy modelling
      • Energy modelling,
      • Social models,
      • Business and financial models
      B2P019: Available tools
      B2P020: External accessibility
      B2P020: External accessibility
      C1P001: Unlocking Factors
      C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
      C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits4 - Important2 - Slightly important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
      C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
      C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
      C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)
      C1P002: Driving Factors
      C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
      C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
      C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P002: Economic growth need2 - Slightly important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
      C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness2 - Slightly important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)Earthquakes due to gas extraction
      C1P003: Administrative barriers
      C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P003: Lack of public participation3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
      C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)
      C1P004: Policy barriers
      C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
      C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)
      C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
      C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Regulatory instability3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Non-effective regulations4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
      C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
      C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
      C1P006: Environmental barriers
      C1P006: Environmental barriers
      C1P007: Technical barriers
      C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
      C1P007: Deficient planning3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P007: Lack of well-defined process4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
      C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
      C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)
      C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
      C1P008: Inertia4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
      C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
      C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies5 - Very important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
      C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Rebound effect4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
      C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
      C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
      C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
      C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
      C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities4 - Important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
      C1P010: Financial barriers
      C1P010: Hidden costs4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P010: Economic crisis4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P010: Risk and uncertainty4 - Important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
      C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
      C1P011: Market barriers
      C1P011: Split incentives5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
      C1P011: Energy price distortion4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
      C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)4 - Important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
      C1P012: Stakeholders involved
      C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation
      C1P012: Research & Innovation
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Financial/Funding
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation
      C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Business process management
      • Planning/leading
      C1P012: Urban Services providers
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Real Estate developers
      • Construction/implementation
      C1P012: Design/Construction companies
      • Construction/implementation
      C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
      • None
      C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation
      C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Other
      C1P012: Other (if any)
      Summary

      Authors (framework concept)

      Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

      Contributors (to the content)

      Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

      Implemented by

      Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
      Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)

      Join the Action

      PED-EU-NET is an open, interdisciplinary and growing network welcoming academics, practitioners and relevant stakeholders to contribute to the activities of the work plan.
      Join Now

      COST

      COST is an EU funding programme that enables researchers to set up their interdisciplinary research networks in Europe and beyond. We provide funds for organising conferences, meetings, training schools, short scientific exchanges or other networking activities in a wide range of scientific topics. By creating open spaces where people and ideas can grow, we unlock the full potential of science.

      PED-EU-NET

      The COST Action Positive Energy Districts European Network (PED-EU-NET) aims to mobilise researchers and other relevant stakeholders across different domains and sectors to drive the deployment of Positive Energy Districts (PEDs) in Europe through open sharing of knowledge, exchange of ideas, pooling of resources, experimentation of new methods and co-creation of novel solutions.

      Action Details

      Grant Holder
      Department of Planning, Design, Technology of Architecture, Sapienza University of Rome

      Start of Action: 10 September 2020
      End of Action: 09 September 2024
      CSO approval date: 24/03/2020

      © 2021-2023 PED-EU-NET COST Action CA19126. All rights reserved.