Search
Close this search box.
Search
Map View
Table View
Projects
Filters:
Clear Filters Export All Entries (CSV)
NameProjectTypeCompare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau PED Relevant Case Study Compare
SmartEnCity, Lecce SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study Compare
STARDUST, Trento STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö PED Relevant Case Study Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki PED Relevant Case Study Compare
REPLICATE (pilot action in the Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings), Firenze PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Sinfonia, Bolzano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna PED Case Study Compare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento PED Case Study Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna PED Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Võru +CityxChange PED Case Study Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Furuset project, Oslo ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights PED Case Study Compare
Ydalir project ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fornebu, Bærum ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou PED Case Study Compare
Smart Energy Åland PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Munich, Harthof district PED Case Study Compare
Lublin MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Findhorn, the Park InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities PED Case Study Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Aalborg East PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Ankara, Çamlık District PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Trenčín MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Zaragoza, Actur NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins PED Case Study Compare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Espoo, Kera SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Freiburg, Waldsee PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district PED Case Study Compare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe PED Case Study Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district PED Case Study Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark PED Case Study Uncompare
Évora, Portugal POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Uncompare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Groningen, PED South MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Groningen, PED North MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Lab Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT PED Lab Compare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Uncompare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Uncompare
Salzburg, Gneis district Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Tartu, City centre area SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab PED Lab Compare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Kifissia, Energy community SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study
TitleKifissia, Energy community
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district
«×»
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark
«×»
City of Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block
«×»
Évora, Portugal
«×»
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga
«×»
REPLICATE (pilot action in the Novoli-Cascine district on "le PIagge" buildings), Firenze
«×»
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED LabKifissia, Energy communityBologna, Pilastro-Roveri districtVienna, Am KempelenparkCity of Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva blockÉvora, PortugalIstanbul, Kadikoy district, CaferagaREPLICATE (pilot action in the Novoli-Cascine district on "le PIagge" buildings), Firenze
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case studynonoyesyesnoyesno
PED relevant case studyyesyesnonoyesnoyes
PED Lab.nonononoyesnono
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutralitynoyesyesnonoyesyes
Annual energy surplusnonoyesnoyesnono
Energy communityyesyesnonoyesyesno
Circularitynonononononono
Air quality and urban comfortyesnononononono
Electrificationyesnononononono
Net-zero energy costnonononononono
Net-zero emissionnonononononono
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)nonononononono
Maximise self-sufficiencynononoyesnonono
Othernonononononoyes
Other (A1P004)Social aspects/affordability; The technological choice about RES exploitation, has been made also taking into account the local air quality issue in the urban centre (no biomass, no CHP)
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED LabPlanning PhasePlanning PhasePlanning PhaseIn operationImplementation PhasePlanning PhaseCompleted
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date09/1907/1606/1810/1901/2001/17
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date10/2302/2503/2209/2412/2212/21
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • Meteorological open data,
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets
  • General statistical datasets
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Meteorological open data,
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets
A1P009: Other
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
    • Boeri, A., Boulanger, S., Turci, G., Pagliula, S. (2021) Strategie e tecnologie abilitanti per PED misti: efficienza tra smart cities e industria 4.0. TECHNE, 22, 180-190,
    • Barroco Fontes Cunha F., Carani C., Nucci C.A., Castro C., Santana Silva M., Andrade Torres E. (2021) Transitioning to a low carbon society through energy communities: Lessons learned from Brazil and Italy, ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2021, 75, 1-19.,
    • GRETA Project, Pilastro-Roveri case study. Available at: https://projectgreta.eu/case-study/renewable-energy-district/
    • M. Hukkalainen, F. Zarrin, K. Klobut, O. Lindholm, M. Ranta, P. Hajduk, T. Vainio-Kaila, E. Wanne, J. Tartia, H. Horn, K. Kontu, J. Juhmen, S. Santala, R. Turtiainen, J. Töyräs, T. Koljonen. (2020). Deliverable D3.1 Detailed plan of the Espoo smart city lighthouse demonstrations. Available online: https://www.sparcs.info/sites/default/files/2020-09/SPARCS_D3.1_Detailed_plan_Espoo.pdf,
    • Hukkalainen, Zarrin Fatima, Krzysztof Klobut, Kalevi Piira, Mikaela Ranta, Petr Hajduk, Tiina Vainio-Kaila , Elina Wanne, Jani Tartia, Angela Bartel, Joni Mäkinen, Mia Kaurila, Kaisa Kontu, Jaano Juhmen, Merja Ryöppy, Reetta Turtiainen, Joona Töyräs, Timo Koljonen (2021) Deliverable 3.2 Midterm report on the implemented demonstrations of solutions for energy positive blocks in Espoo. Available online: https://www.sparcs.info/sites/default/files/2022-02/SPARCS_D3.2.pdf,
    • www.lippulaiva.fi
    • Alpagut, B., Lopez Romo, A., Hernández, P., Tabanoğlu, O., & Hermoso Martinez, N. (2021). A GIS-Based Multicriteria Assessment for Identification of Positive Energy Districts Boundary in Cities. Energies, 14(22), 7517.
    A1P011: Geographic coordinates
    X Coordinate (longitude):23.81458811.39732316.39529224.6543-7.90937729.0263195268751711.230539
    Y Coordinate (latitude):38.07734944.50710648.17359860.149138.57080440.9884139524746143.792711
    A1P012: Country
    A1P012: CountryGreeceItalyAustriaFinlandPortugalTurkeyItaly
    A1P013: City
    A1P013: CityMunicipality of KifissiaBolognaViennaEspooÉvoraIstanbulFirenze
    A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
    A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).CsaCfaCwbDfbCsaCsbCfa
    A1P015: District boundary
    A1P015: District boundaryVirtualGeographicGeographicGeographicGeographicGeographic
    OtherThe energy will be produced by a PV plant installed on the terrace of a municipal building. Members of the energy community (that is under formation) will benefit from the energy produced via virtual net metering. PV instalment and the buildings (owned by the members of the community) will be within the boundaries of the Municipality but not necessary in the same area/district/neighbourhood
    A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
    A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:MixedPrivatePrivateMixedMixedMixed
    A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
    A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:Multiple OwnersSingle OwnerSingle OwnerMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple Owners
    A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
    A1P018: Number of buildings in PED19626913
    A1P019: Conditioned space
    A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]112000116052
    A1P020: Total ground area
    A1P020: Total ground area [m²]78000001650001151727
    A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
    A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area0001000
    A1P022: Financial schemes
    A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estatenononoyesnonono
    A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO schemenonononononono
    A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Othernonononononono
    A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural fundingnonononononoyes
    A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National fundingnoyesnonononoyes
    A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional fundingnoyesnonononono
    A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal fundingnoyesnonononoyes
    A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Othernonononononono
    A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EUnoyesnoyesyesyesno
    A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]30887519998275
    A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Nationalnonononononono
    A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regionalnoyesnonononono
    A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Othernonononononono
    A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022: Other
    A1P023: Economic Targets
    A1P023: Economic Targets
    • Job creation,
    • Positive externalities,
    • Boosting local businesses
    • Job creation,
    • Positive externalities,
    • Boosting local businesses
    • Job creation,
    • Positive externalities,
    • Other
    A1P023: OtherBoosting new investors to the area, - Increasing the touristic value of area and urban mobility at the area, - Increasing the regional value (housing price, etc.), - Providing economic advantages by switching to positive energy production
    A1P024: More comments:
    A1P024: More comments:The Pilastro-Roveri area is a large peri-urban district in the northeast of the city of Bologna (about 650 hectares). In particular, the northern area is mainly characterised by the residential sector of Rione Pilastro, a significant complex of social housing built in the 1960s in response to the housing emergency due to migrations from southern Italy and nowadays satisfying more global migrations. The southern area is instead characterised by the presence of the production district called Roveri. The area appears relevant for the research as it has several evolution potentials towards a climate-neutral district. In particular some key factors are interesting: - the presence of one of the largest photovoltaic parks in Europe on the roofs of CAAB, characterised by a production of 11,350,000 Kw/h of primary energy; - the presence of companies attentive to the issues of climate change and energy, able to act as facilitators for the area. This is the case of FIVE, a leader in the production of electric bicycles, whose plant is the first nZEB (nearly Zero Energy Building) productive building in the city; - the high presence of industrial buildings of different sizes needing a reduction in energy consumption; - the presence of obsolete, sometimes in decay, and of general highly energy-intensive buildings in the Pilastro area, accompanied by spread phenomena of energy poverty; - the presence of spaces that could be converted (e.g. unused warehouses, unexploited green areas, etc.); - the presence of an active community, characterised by numerous associations, but also by social challenges linked to multiple vulnerabilities; - the presence of local actors interested in the development of the area (including the Municipality, the University, Confindustria, ENEA, Confartigianato, etc.). Two main research projects are actually ongoing in the area, applying solutions towards energy improvement and transition strategies to guide the area towards climate neutrality: - GECO - Green Energy Community, funded by EIT Climate-KIC and active since 2019, aims to trigger a virtuous path of energy sharing between companies and citizens through the creation of an energy community. - GRETA - Green Energy Transition Actions, funded by the H2020 programme, aims to understand drivers and barriers on the involvement of citizens in the energy transition processes, by formulating Community Transition Pathways and Energy Citizenship Contracts. [from: Boeri, A., Boulanger, S., Turci, G., Pagliula, S. (2021) Strategie e tecnologie abilitanti per PED misti: efficienza tra smart cities e industria 4.0. TECHNE, 22, 180-190]The Espoonlahti district is located on the south-western coast of Espoo. With 56,000 inhabitants, it is the second largest of the Espoo city centres. The number of inhabitants is estimated to grow to 70,000 within the next 10 years. Espoonlahti will be a future transit hub of the south-western Espoo, along the metro line, and the increasing stream of passengers provides a huge potential for retail, business and residential developments. E-mobility solutions and last-mile services have strong potential in the area when subway extension is finished and running. The extensive (re)development of the Lippulaiva blocks make a benchmark catering to the everyday needs of residents. The completely new shopping centre is a state-of-the-art cross point with 20,000 daily customers and 10,000 daily commuters (3.5 million/year). The new underground metro line and station, and feeder line bus terminal, are fully integrated. Residential housing of approximately 550 new apartments will be built on top. Lippulaiva is a large traffic hub, directly connected to public transport and right next to the Länsiväylä highway and extensive cycle paths. Lippulaiva offers diverse, mixed-use services, such as a shopping mall, public services, a day care centre, residential apartment buildings, and underground parking facilities. Lippulaiva received the LEED Gold environmental certificate and Smart Building Gold certificate. • Flagship of sustainability • Cooling and heating demand from geothermal energy system (on-site) with energy storage system, 4 MW • PV panels: roof and façade, 630 kWp • Smart control strategies for electricity and thermal energy, smart microgrid-system and battery storage • Charging capacity for 134 EVs
    A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
    A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]
    Contact person for general enquiries
    A1P026: NameArtemis Giavasoglou, Kleopatra KalampokaProf. Danila LongoGerhard HoferElina EkelundJoão Bravo DiasMr. Dogan UNERIChristoph Gollner
    A1P027: OrganizationMunicipality of Kifissia – SPARCS local teamUniversity of Bologna - Architecture Departmente7 energy innovation & engineeringCitycon OyjEDP LabelecMunicipality of KadikoyFFG
    A1P028: AffiliationMunicipality / Public BodiesResearch Center / UniversitySME / IndustrySME / IndustrySME / IndustryMunicipality / Public BodiesOther
    A1P028: Other
    A1P029: Emailgiavasoglou@kifissia.grgerhard.hofer@e-sieben.atElina.ekelund@citycon.comjoao.bravodias@edp.ptdogan.uneri@kadikoy.bel.trchristoph.gollner@ffg.at
    Contact person for other special topics
    A1P030: NameStavros Zapantis - vice mayorElina EkelundMrs. Damla MUHCU YILMAZ
    A1P031: Emailstavros.zapantis@gmail.comElina.ekelund@citycon.comdamla.muhcu@kadikoy.bel.tr
    Pursuant to the General Data Protection RegulationYesYesYesYesYesYes
    A2P001: Fields of application
    A2P001: Fields of application
    • Energy production
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Digital technologies,
    • Waste management
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy production,
    • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
    • Digital technologies,
    • Waste management
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Digital technologies
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Digital technologies,
    • Waste management,
    • Construction materials
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
    • Digital technologies
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Digital technologies
    A2P001: Other
    A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
    A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fieldsEnergy efficiency: - buildings energy retrofit supported by tax incentives (110%, façade bonus, eco-bonus, sismabonus, renovation bonus, etc.); - several activities - such as Workshops, Webinars, Roundtables, Urban Trekking, etc…- are encouraged in the area to deepen knowledge and raise awareness on energy issues among urban stakeholders (householders, occupants, workers, etc..); - reduction in energy consumption also through every day energy saving actions. The spread of energy poverty phenomena in the area is considered urgent both for the medium-low-income population living in Pilastro and for small and medium-sized enterprises placed in Roveri; - Project for a One-stop-shop to guide residents and enterprises towards more conscious energy behaviours (planned in Bologna SECAP). Energy production: - installation of new photovoltaic (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; - presence of a waste to energy plant connected to the district heating system; - presence of a large PV plant in the CAAB area - 11,350,000 Kw/h Energy flexibility: - testing energy community and collective self-consumption feasibility in Pilastro area through an active citizens involvement process; - testing energy community feasibility among SMEs in Roveri industrial area; - testing the potential of complementary energy consumption profiles between residential area (Pilastro) and industrial area (Roveri). Digital technologies: - smart-meters installation in some dwellings in order to monitor consumption and suggest more sustainable energy behaviors; - Blog Pilastro as a tool to inform about the main activities and events ongoing in the area; E-mobility - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; - e-bike/bikesharing services recovery (in fact during Covid-19 in the area Mobike service was suspended) and implementation. Urban comfort and air quality - Control units for air pollutants concentration (PM2.5, PM10, NO2); - Microclimatic simulationEnergy efficiency: - eliminating waste energy utilizing smart energy system - utilizing excess heat from grocery stores Energy flexibility: - A battery energy storage system (1,5 MW/1,5MWh); Active participation in Nordpool electricity market (FCR-N) Energy production: - heating and cooling from geothermal heat pump system; 171 energy wells (over 51 km); heat capacity 4 MW - installation of new photovoltaic (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; Estimation of annual production is about 540 MWh (630 kWp) E-mobility - Installation of charging stations for electric vehicles (for 134 EVs) - e-bike services (warm storage room, charging cabinets for e-bikes) Digital technologies: - Building Analytics system by Schneider Electric
    A2P003: Application of ISO52000
    A2P003: Application of ISO52000YesYesNoYes
    A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
    A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoYesYesNo
    A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
    A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoNoNoYes
    A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
    A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculationMobility is not included in the energy model.
    A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
    A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]5.50.94
    A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
    A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]5.80.10
    A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
    A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]
    A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
    A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
    A2P011: PVyesyesnoyesnoyesno
    A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.540.51
    A2P011: Windnonononononono
    A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Hydrononononononono
    A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Biomass_elnonononononono
    A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
    A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: PVT_elnonononononono
    A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Othernonononononono
    A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
    A2P012: Geothermalnononoyesnonono
    A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]5
    A2P012: Solar Thermalnoyesnononoyesno
    A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.08
    A2P012: Biomass_heatnoyesnonononono
    A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Waste heat+HPnonononononono
    A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
    A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: PVT_thnonononononono
    A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
    A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Othernonononononono
    A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
    A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notesTwo scenarios are conducted regarding Kadikoy PED energy generation. For the second scenario, just 0.53GWh/annum PV production is proposed.
    A2P014: Annual energy use
    A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]11.30.74
    A2P015: Annual energy delivered
    A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]5.760.49
    A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
    A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]00
    A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
    A2P017: Gasnonononononono
    A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
    A2P017: Coalnonononononono
    A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
    A2P017: Oilnonononononono
    A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
    A2P017: Othernonononononono
    A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
    A2P018: PVnononononoyesno
    A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]-0.26
    A2P018: Windnonononononono
    A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Hydrononononononono
    A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Biomass_elnonononononono
    A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
    A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: PVT_elnonononononono
    A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Othernononoyesnonono
    A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]5.26
    A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
    A2P019: Geothermalnonononononono
    A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Solar Thermalnonononononono
    A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Biomass_heatnonononononono
    A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Waste heat+HPnonononononono
    A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
    A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: PVT_thnonononononono
    A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
    A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Othernonononononono
    A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
    A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary0001.05323193916350-2.26923076923080
    A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
    A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]0
    A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
    A2P022: Safety & Security
    A2P022: Health
    A2P022: Education
    A2P022: Mobility
    A2P022: EnergyOn-site energy ratio
    A2P022: Water
    A2P022: Economic development
    A2P022: Housing and Community
    A2P022: Waste
    A2P022: Other
    A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
    A2P023: Photovoltaicsnoyesnoyesyesyesyes
    A2P023: Solar thermal collectorsnoyesnonoyesyesyes
    A2P023: Wind Turbinesnonononononono
    A2P023: Geothermal energy systemnoyesnoyesnonono
    A2P023: Waste heat recoverynononoyesnonono
    A2P023: Waste to energynoyesnonononono
    A2P023: Polygenerationnonononononono
    A2P023: Co-generationnoyesnonononono
    A2P023: Heat Pumpnoyesnononoyesyes
    A2P023: Hydrogennonononononono
    A2P023: Hydropower plantnonononononono
    A2P023: Biomassnonononononono
    A2P023: Biogasnonononononono
    A2P023: Other
    A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
    A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)noyesnoyesyesnoyes
    A2P024: Energy management systemnononoyesyesnono
    A2P024: Demand-side managementnonononononono
    A2P024: Smart electricity gridnononoyesyesnoyes
    A2P024: Thermal Storagenononoyesyesnono
    A2P024: Electric Storagenoyesnoyesyesnono
    A2P024: District Heating and Coolingnoyesnonononono
    A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systemsnonononoyesnoyes
    A2P024: P2P – buildingsnonononoyesnono
    A2P024: Other
    A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
    A2P025: Deep Retrofittingnoyesnonononoyes
    A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildingsnonononoyesnono
    A2P025: High-performance new buildingsnoyesnoyesnonono
    A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)noyesnoyesnonoyes
    A2P025: Urban data platformsnonononoyesnono
    A2P025: Mobile applications for citizensnoyesnonoyesnoyes
    A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)noyesnoyesyesnono
    A2P025: Smart irrigationnonononononono
    A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposalnoyesnonoyesnono
    A2P025: Smart surveillancenoyesnonoyesnono
    A2P025: Other
    A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
    A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)noyesnonononono
    A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)noyesnoyesnonono
    A2P026: e-Mobilitynoyesnoyesyesnoyes
    A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutionsnoyesnonoyesnono
    A2P026: Car-free areanonononononono
    A2P026: OtherLocal transportation hub with direct connection to metro & bus terminal; parking spaces for 1,400 bicycles and for 1,300 cars Promoting e-Mobility: 134 charging stations, A technical reservation for expanding EV charging system 1400 bicycle racks and charging cabinets for 10 e-bicycle batteries
    A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
    A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
    A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
    A2P028: Energy efficiency certificatesYesYesNoNo
    A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesEnergy Performance Certificate - in Greece it is mandatory in order to buy or rent a house or a dwellingEnergy Performance Certificate for each dwellingEnergy Performance Certificate => Energy efficiency class B (2018 version)
    A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
    A2P029: Any other building / district certificatesNoYesNoNo
    A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesLEED (Core & Shell, v4) GOLD certification, Smart Building certification (GOLD)
    A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
    A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
    • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
    • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC)
    • Urban Renewal Strategies,
    • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
    • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
    • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
    • New development strategies,
    • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
    • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
    • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    • Urban Renewal Strategies,
    • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
    • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    • Smart cities strategies
    A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
    A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategyCity level targets Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan (PUMS) - 2019 | Targets: - by 2030 440,000 daily trips will no longer be made by car but on foot, by bike or by public transport; - by 2030 12% of vehicles will be electric; Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan (SECAP) - 2021 | Targets: - by 2025 deep renovation of 3% per year of residential homes (insulation of building envelopes and adoption of heat pump heating system); - by 2030 reduction of electricity consumption at least of 20% compared to 2018; - by 2030 100% coverage of electricity consumption for municipal buildings; - by 2030 increase public green areas by at least 10% Urban General Plan (PUG) - 2021 | Targets: - by 2030 net zero land consumption; National level targets Integrated National Energy and Climate Plan - 2020 | Targets: - by 2030 reduction of 43% for primary energy consumption, with respect to the reference 2007 scenario. - by 2030 increase of 30% of energy production from renewable sources; - by 2025 energy generation for electricity independent from the use of coal;Relevant city strategies behind PED development in Espoo include the following: - The Espoo Story: Sustainability is heavily included within the values and goals of the current Espoo city strategy, also known as the Espoo Story, running from 2021 to 2025. For example, the strategy names being a responsible pioneer as one of the main values of the city and has chosen achieving carbon neutrality by 2030 as one of the main goals of the current council term. In addition to the Espoo story, four cross-administrative development programmes act as cooperation platforms that allow the city, together with its partners, to develop innovative solutions through experiments and pilot projects in line with the Espoo Story. The Sustainable Espoo development programme is one of the four programmes, thus putting sustainability on the forefront in city development work. - EU Mission: 100 climate-neutral and smart cities by 2030: Cities selected for the Mission commit to achieving carbon-neutrality in 2030. A key tool in the Mission is the Climate City Contract. Each selected city will prepare and implement its contracts in collaboration with local businesses as well as other stakeholders and residents. - Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy: Espoo is committed to the Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy, under which the signatories commit to supporting the European Union’s 40% greenhouse gas emission reduction goal by 2030. The Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan (SECAP) is a key instrument for implementing the agreement. The Action Plan outlines the key measures the city will take to achieve its carbon neutrality goal. The plan also includes a mapping of climate change risks and vulnerabilities, adaptation measures, emission calculations, emission reduction scenarios and impact estimations of measures. The SECAP of the City of Espoo is available here (only available in Finnish). - UN Sustainable development Goals: The city of Espoo has committed to becoming a forerunner and achieving the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) by 2025. The goal is to make Espoo financially, ecologically, socially, and culturally sustainable. - The Circular Cities Declaration: At the end of 2020, Espoo signed the Europe-wide circular economy commitment Circular Cities Declaration. The ten goals of the declaration promote the implementation of the city’s circular economy. - Espoo Clean Heat: Fortum and the City of Espoo are committed to producing carbon-neutral district heating in the network operating in the areas of Espoo, Kauniainen and Kirkkonummi during the 2020s. The district heating network provides heating to some 250,000 end-users in homes and offices. Coal will be completely abandoned in the production of district heating by 2025. The main targets related to PED development included in the noted city strategies are the following: - Espoo will achieve carbon neutrality by 2030. To be precise, this carbon neutrality goal is defined as an 80% emission reduction from the 1990 level by the year 2030. The remaining 20% share can be absorbed in carbon sinks or compensated by other means. - District heating in Espoo will be carbon-neutral by 2029, and coal-based production will be phased out from district heating by 2025. - Espoo aims to end the use of fossil fuels in the heating of city-owned buildings by 2025. - Quantitative goals within the Espoo SECAP report: - Espoo aims to reduce total energy consumption within the municipal sector by 7.5% by the end of 2025 in comparison to the 2015 level. The social housing company Espoon Asunnot OY aims to meet the same target. - Espoo aims to cover 10% of the energy consumption of new buildings via on-site production. - Espoo aims to raise the modal split of cycling to 15% by 2024. - Espoo aims to raise the modal split of public transport by 1.1% yearly. - Espoo aims to reduce the emissions of bus transport by 90% by the end of 2025, when compared to 2010 levels.
    A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
    A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
    • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
    • Electrification of Cooking Methods
    • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
    • Electrification of Cooking Methods
    A3P003: Other
    A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
    A3P004: Identification of needs and prioritiesBologna needs to reach the climate neutrality proceeding by ‘part’ of the city. Pilastro-Roveri is a promising district due to the following reasons: - some buildings need to be renovated both to increase the energy performance, the seismic behaviour, spaces liveability and comfort; - Pilastro is a residential area with the presence of a high percentage of vulnerable inhabitants affected by energy poverty phenomenon. This situation needs to be prioritized; - Pilastro is characterized by the presence of large underused green spaces that can represent a valuable resource for social cohesion and for heat island phenomenon mitigation; - Roveri is an industrial area where some small-medium enterprises are investing in order to improve their facilities and to efficiency their production cycle; - Roveri and Pilastro areas present complementary energy consumption curves throughout the day/week with a high potential for energy sharing and flexibility.- Citycon (developer and owner of Lippulaiva) aims to be carbon neutral in its energy use by 2030 - Lippulaiva is a unique urban centre with state-of-the-art energy concept. The centre has a smart managing system, which allows for example the temporary reduction of power used in air conditioning and charging stations when energy consumption is at its peak. In addition, a backup generator and a large electric battery will balance the operation of the electricity network. - Lippulaiva is also an important mobility hub for the people of Espoo. Espoonlahti metro station is located under the centre, and the West Metro started to operate to Espoonlahti in December 2022. Lippulaiva also has a bus terminal, which serves the metro’s feeder traffic in the Espoonlahti major district.
    A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
    A3P005: Sustainable behaviourBologna SECAP, as well as the participation to the 100 Climate-Neutral Cities, promotes the PED model as an enabling tool to foster city energy transition process. In Pilastro-Roveri district two main sustainable behaviours approaches can be identified: - bottom-up approach - some citizens are joining forces to create groups of energy self-consumption, in view of energy communities’ implementation and, at the same time, some companies have already undertaken some efficiency intervention on the production system by leveraging highly energy-efficient technologies; - top-down approach - GECO and GRETA are international ongoing projects on the area that promote innovation and energy transition with important fundings from the European Union, but with a particular focus on citizen engagement and participatory approach. Simultaneously, new and updated planning tools such as PUG, SECAP and SUMP identify in this part of Bologna city a key area to enable an ecological transition process holding together all relevant stakeholders - citizens, small-medium enterprises and Institutions. These two thrusts (bottom-up and top-down) need to be optimized in view of a participatory pathway towards the grounding of a Positive Energy District in Pilastro-Roveri.For Citycon, it was important to engage local people within the Lippulaiva project. During the construction period as well as after opening of the shopping center, citizens have been engaged in multiple ways, such as informing local citizens of the progress of construction, engaging young people in the design processes of the shopping centre and long-term commitment of youngsters with Lippulaiva Buddy class initiative. Users’ engagement activities are conducted in close co-operation with SPARCS partners.
    A3P006: Economic strategies
    A3P006: Economic strategies
    • Innovative business models,
    • PPP models,
    • Circular economy models,
    • Demand management Living Lab,
    • Existing incentives
    • Innovative business models
    • Innovative business models,
    • PPP models,
    • Circular economy models,
    • Demand management Living Lab,
    • Local trading
    A3P006: Other
    A3P007: Social models
    A3P007: Social models
    • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
    • Citizen Social Research,
    • Policy Forums,
    • Affordability,
    • Prevention of energy poverty,
    • Digital Inclusion,
    • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance,
    • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies
    • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
    • Citizen Social Research,
    • Prevention of energy poverty,
    • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies
    A3P007: Other
    A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
    A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
    • Strategic urban planning,
    • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
    • City Vision 2050,
    • SECAP Updates,
    • Building / district Certification
    • Building / district Certification
    • Strategic urban planning,
    • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
    • District Energy plans,
    • City Vision 2050,
    • SECAP Updates
    A3P008: Other“zero volumes” structural plan (2015), Covenant of Mayors Sustainable Energy Action Plan (2011)
    A3P009: Environmental strategies
    A3P009: Environmental strategies
    • Energy Neutral,
    • Low Emission Zone,
    • Net zero carbon footprint,
    • Life Cycle approach,
    • Pollutants Reduction,
    • Greening strategies
    • Other
    • Energy Neutral,
    • Low Emission Zone,
    • Net zero carbon footprint
    A3P009: OtherCarbon free in terms of energy
    A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
    A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspectsPEDs in Italy are meant as strategies towards climate-neutrality: at national/regional/local level a specific legislation on PEDs development is not yet available. However, the European Commission has legislated on Energy Community (‘Renewable energy’ directive - 2018/2001/EU and ‘Common rules for the internal electricity market’ directive- 2019/944/EU). Italy, starting from 2020, has transposed the Directives at national level (‘Milleproroghe’ decree then made effective by ‘Promotion of Renewable sources’ decree 199/2021). At regional level Emilia Romagna in May 2022 developed a law encouraging EC model diffusion (LR 5/2022 ‘Promotion and support of renewable energy communities and renewable energy self-consumers acting collectively’). Energy Community, according to Lindholm et al. 2021, can be considered as ‘a first implementation step towards PEDs.’- Energy efficiency regulations (Directive 2006/32/EC and 2009/72/EC) - EU directive 2010/31/EU on the energy performance of buildings => all new buildings should be “nearly zero-energy buildings” (nZEB) from 2021
    B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
    B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definitionPilastro-Roveri district can be considered as a PED-relevant area. Even though at the moment the area doesn’t meet annual energy positive balance, it addresses some relevant key aspects listed in the JPI UE PED Framework Definition such as: - high level of aspiration in terms of energy efficiency, energy flexibility and energy production; - integration of different systems and infrastructures; - inclusion of aspects not only related to energy sector, but also connected with social, economic and environmental sustainability.Lippulaiva is a project with high level goal in terms of energy efficiency, energy flexibility and energy production.The PED main objective is to achieve the energy transition while preserving cultural heritage and improving citizen’s quality of life.
    B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
    B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project developmentPilastro-Roveri district is not actually meant to become a PEDs. However, it can be considered as a PED-relevant case-study since a participatory transition pathway towards a more sustainable, efficient and resilient district is gaining ground, involving the main urban stakeholders. At the same time, the most recent city plan and policies (such as the city SECAPs - updated in 2021) are promoting PED model as a key strategy to guide Bologna towards climate neutrality by 2030.- Citycon’s (developer and owner of Lippulaiva) target is to be carbon neutral by 2030 - Increasing sustainability requirements from the financing, tenants, cities, other stakeholdersPOCITYF brings together eight cities (Lightouse and Fellow cities), all having cultural heritage areas in their territory. All are intrinsically motivated to participate in the necessary energy transition not only for their conventional city districts of mixed-used, but also for districts with individually specificities as those belonging in their cultural heritage, which at the moment may be acting as barriers for their further environmental sustainability, but after POCITYF will be acting as a promising building retrofits roadmap for similar and other EU cities.
    B1P003: Environment of the case study area
    B2P003: Environment of the case study areaUrban areaUrban areaUrban areaUrban areaUrban areaUrban area
    B1P004: Type of district
    B2P004: Type of district
    • Renovation
    • Renovation
    • New construction
    • Renovation
    • Renovation
    • Renovation
    B1P005: Case Study Context
    B1P005: Case Study Context
    • Retrofitting Area
    • Re-use / Transformation Area,
    • New Development
    • Re-use / Transformation Area,
    • New Development
    • Preservation Area
    • Re-use / Transformation Area,
    • Retrofitting Area
    • Retrofitting Area
    B1P006: Year of construction
    B1P006: Year of construction2022
    B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
    B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential23.379
    B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
    B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
    B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
    B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
    B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
    B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
    B1P011: Population density before intervention
    B1P011: Population density before intervention0000000
    B1P012: Population density after intervention
    B1P012: Population density after intervention0000000
    B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
    B1P013: Residentialnoyesnononoyesyes
    B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]20200
    B1P013: Officenoyesyesnonoyesno
    B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Industry and Utilitynoyesnonononono
    B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Commercialnoyesyesyesnoyesno
    B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Institutionalnoyesnonononono
    B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Natural areasnoyesnoyesnonono
    B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Recreationalnoyesnonononono
    B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Dismissed areasnoyesnonononono
    B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Othernononononoyesno
    B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]Cultural Center, Sports Center / Total building and land use data of neigborhood 13,878 residential, 4,441 commercial using before intervention. For project area & 49 building area m2
    B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
    B1P014: Residentialnoyesyesyesnoyesyes
    B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]20200
    B1P014: Officenoyesyesnonoyesno
    B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Industry and Utilitynoyesnonononono
    B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Commercialnoyesyesyesnoyesno
    B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Institutionalnoyesnonononono
    B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Natural areasnoyesnonononono
    B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Recreationalnoyesnonononono
    B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Dismissed areasnoyesnonononono
    B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Othernononononoyesno
    B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
    B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
    B2P002: Installation life time
    B2P002: Installation life time
    B2P003: Scale of action
    B2P003: ScaleDistrictDistrict
    B2P004: Operator of the installation
    B2P004: Operator of the installation
    B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
    B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
    B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
    B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?
    B2P006: Other
    B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
    B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
    B2P007: Other
    B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
    B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
    B2P008: Other
    B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
    B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
    B2P009: Other
    B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
    B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
    B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
    B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
    • Buildings,
    • Demand-side management,
    • Prosumers,
    • Renewable generation,
    • Energy storage,
    • Energy networks,
    • Waste management,
    • E-mobility,
    • Social interactions,
    • Circular economy models
    B2P011: Other
    B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
    B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
    • Monitoring and evaluation infrastructure,
    • Tools for prototyping and modelling,
    • Tools, spaces, events for testing and validation
    B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
    B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
    B2P014: Monitoring measures
    B2P014: Monitoring measures
    B2P015: Key Performance indicators
    B2P015: Key Performance indicators
    • Energy
    B2P016: Execution of operations
    B2P016: Execution of operations
    B2P017: Capacities
    B2P017: Capacities
    B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
    B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
    B2P019: Available tools
    B2P019: Available tools
    B2P019: Available tools
    B2P020: External accessibility
    B2P020: External accessibility
    C1P001: Unlocking Factors
    C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)
    C1P002: Driving Factors
    C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Economic growth need2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)
    C1P003: Administrative barriers
    C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Lack of public participation3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)
    C1P004: Policy barriers
    C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)
    C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
    C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Regulatory instability3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Non-effective regulations4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
    C1P006: Environmental barriers
    C1P006: Environmental barriers
    C1P007: Technical barriers
    C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Deficient planning3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Lack of well-defined process4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)
    C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
    C1P008: Inertia4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Rebound effect4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
    C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
    C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
    C1P010: Financial barriers
    C1P010: Hidden costs4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Economic crisis4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Risk and uncertainty5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
    C1P011: Market barriers
    C1P011: Split incentives5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P011: Energy price distortion5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
    C1P012: Stakeholders involved
    C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    C1P012: Research & Innovation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation
    C1P012: Financial/Funding
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Business process management
    • None
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    • None
    C1P012: Urban Services providers
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • None
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation
    C1P012: Real Estate developers
    • None
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • None
    C1P012: Design/Construction companies
    • Construction/implementation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    • Construction/implementation
    C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation
    C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Other
    C1P012: Other (if any)
    Summary

    Authors (framework concept)

    Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

    Contributors (to the content)

    Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

    Implemented by

    Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
    Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)

    Join the Action

    PED-EU-NET is an open, interdisciplinary and growing network welcoming academics, practitioners and relevant stakeholders to contribute to the activities of the work plan.
    Join Now

    COST

    COST is an EU funding programme that enables researchers to set up their interdisciplinary research networks in Europe and beyond. We provide funds for organising conferences, meetings, training schools, short scientific exchanges or other networking activities in a wide range of scientific topics. By creating open spaces where people and ideas can grow, we unlock the full potential of science.

    PED-EU-NET

    The COST Action Positive Energy Districts European Network (PED-EU-NET) aims to mobilise researchers and other relevant stakeholders across different domains and sectors to drive the deployment of Positive Energy Districts (PEDs) in Europe through open sharing of knowledge, exchange of ideas, pooling of resources, experimentation of new methods and co-creation of novel solutions.

    Action Details

    Grant Holder
    Department of Planning, Design, Technology of Architecture, Sapienza University of Rome

    Start of Action: 10 September 2020
    End of Action: 09 September 2024
    CSO approval date: 24/03/2020

    © 2021-2023 PED-EU-NET COST Action CA19126. All rights reserved.