Search
Close this search box.
Search
Map View
Table View
Projects
Filters:
Clear Filters Export All Entries (CSV)
NameProjectTypeCompare
Tartu, Estonia V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Utrecht, the Netherlands (District of Kanaleneiland) V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aveiro, Portugal V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau PED Relevant Case Study Compare
SmartEnCity, Lecce SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study Compare
STARDUST, Trento STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö PED Relevant Case Study Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki PED Relevant Case Study Compare
REPLICATE (pilot action in the Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings), Firenze PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna PED Case Study Uncompare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento PED Case Study Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna PED Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Võru +CityxChange PED Case Study Uncompare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Furuset project, Oslo ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights PED Case Study Compare
Ydalir project ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fornebu, Bærum ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou PED Case Study Compare
Smart Energy Åland PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Munich, Harthof district PED Case Study Compare
Lublin MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Uncompare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Findhorn, the Park InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities PED Case Study Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Aalborg East PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Ankara, Çamlık District PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Trenčín MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Relevant Case Study
Zaragoza, Actur NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins PED Case Study Compare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Espoo, Kera SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Freiburg, Waldsee PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district PED Case Study Uncompare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe PED Case Study Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district PED Case Study Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark PED Case Study Compare
Évora, Portugal POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Groningen, PED South MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Uncompare
Groningen, PED North MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Lab Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT PED Lab Compare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Salzburg, Gneis district Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Tartu, City centre area SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab PED Lab Uncompare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Kifissia, Energy community SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
TitleUden, Loopkantstraat
Lublin
«×»
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab
«×»
Võru +CityxChange
«×»
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna
«×»
Freiburg, Waldsee
«×»
Groningen, PED South
«×»
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED LabUden, LoopkantstraatLublinBarcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLabVõru +CityxChangeZukunftsquartier, ViennaFreiburg, WaldseeGroningen, PED South
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case studynoyesnoyesyesyesno
PED relevant case studyyesnononononono
PED Lab.nonoyesnononoyes
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutralityyesyesnoyesyesyesyes
Annual energy surplusyesyesnonoyesnoyes
Energy communitynoyesyesnonoyesyes
Circularitynoyesnonononoyes
Air quality and urban comfortnoyesnonononono
Electrificationyesnoyesnonoyesno
Net-zero energy costnoyesnonononono
Net-zero emissionnoyesyesyesnoyesyes
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)noyesyesnononono
Maximise self-sufficiencynoyesnonononono
Othernonoyesyesyesnono
Other (A1P004)Green ITSustainable Development; Energy neutral; Energy efficient; Carbon-free; Sustainable neighbourhood; Social aspects/affordabilityEnergy efficient; Economic feasibility ; High quality of living and comfort; Early and constant user integration for reaching the positive energy goal.
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED LabIn operationPlanning PhaseIn operationCompletedPlanning PhasePlanning PhaseImplementation Phase
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date06/1701/201111/1807/1811/2112/18
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date05/2302/201311/2311/2412/23
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets,
  • Vehicle registration datasets
  • General statistical datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • GIS open datasets
A1P009: Other
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
  • Inger Andresen, Tonje Healey Trulsrud, Luca Finocchiaro, Alessandro Nocente, Meril Tamm, Joana Ortiz, Jaume Salom, Abel Magyari, Linda Hoes-van Oeffelen, Wouter Borsboom, Wim Kornaat, Niki Gaitani, Design and performance predictions of plus energy neighbourhoods – Case studies of demonstration projects in four different European climates, Energy and Buildings, Volume 274, 2022, 112447, ISSN 0378-7788, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112447. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778822006181),
  • Deliverable, Report: Integrated Energy Design for Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods (syn.ikia),
  • Deliverable, Report: DEMONSTRATION CASE OF SUSTAINABLE PLUS ENERGY NEIGHBOURHOODS IN MARINE CLIMATE (syn.ikia),
  • https://www.synikia.eu/no/bibliotek/
  • Data from the local energy provider available (restricted usage for some data points because of data security reasons,
  • renewable energy potential,
  • own calculations based on publicly available data,
  • Some data can be found in https://geoportal.freiburg.de/freigis/
  • TNO, Hanze, RUG,
  • Ped noord book
A1P011: Geographic coordinates
X Coordinate (longitude):5.619122.56842.126.99594816.3306657.8858571358429176.590655
Y Coordinate (latitude):51.660651.246541.357.84581348.21652147.98653520708004553.204087
A1P012: Country
A1P012: CountryNetherlandsPolandSpainEstoniaAustriaGermanyNetherlands
A1P013: City
A1P013: CityUdenLublinBarcelona and TarragonaVõruViennaFreiburg im BreisgauGroningen
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).CfbCfbCsaDfbCfbCfbCfa
A1P015: District boundary
A1P015: District boundaryGeographicGeographicVirtualVirtualFunctional
Other
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:PrivatePrivatePublicMixedMixedMixedMixed
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:Single OwnerMultiple OwnersSingle OwnerMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple Owners
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED15029414
A1P019: Conditioned space
A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]236021664.732840707.86
A1P020: Total ground area
A1P020: Total ground area [m²]386072833.47220000492000045.093
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area1000000
A1P022: Financial schemes
A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estateyesnononononoyes
A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]7804440
A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO schemenonononononono
A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Othernonononoyesnoyes
A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural fundingnonononononono
A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National fundingnonononoyesnoyes
A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional fundingnonononononono
A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal fundingnononononoyesyes
A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Othernonononononono
A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EUnononononoyesyes
A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Nationalnononononoyesno
A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regionalnonononononono
A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Othernonononononono
A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022: Other
A1P023: Economic Targets
A1P023: Economic Targets
  • Job creation,
  • Positive externalities,
  • Boosting local businesses,
  • Boosting local and sustainable production,
  • Boosting consumption of local and sustainable products
  • Job creation,
  • Boosting local and sustainable production
  • Boosting local businesses,
  • Boosting local and sustainable production
A1P023: Other
A1P024: More comments:
A1P024: More comments:The project is a follow-up from the “Social Beautiful” concept which was developed in collaboration between Labyrint (Support in sheltered housing), Area (housing company), the municipality of Uden, and Hendriks Coppelmans (developer). The concept aims to provide an answer to changes in various policy areas and the changing demands of society. The Social Beautiful concept consists of the following elements: 1. Living, working, and community services are brought together in one location. A multifunctional residential and service centre is being realized at the location. 2. Housing is shaped by the realization of financially accessible homes suitable for the target group. The housing design is tailored to the target group. it may also include sheltered / protected living. 3. Work takes place at the location or from the same location. The work has a social function within the neighbourhood. Wage-related work must contribute to providing structure in the daily activities of the residents. 4. Neighbourhood management is organized from the location in the surrounding neighbourhood. A service package is provided from the residential and service centre that contributes to the ability of neighbourhood residents to live independently for longer, to strengthen the social network, and to improve the quality of life and safety in the neighbourhood. 5. The houses are suitable for use at all times for regular rental. Communal facilities must be realized within the contours of a regular apartment. The objective is to offer a suitable living and working situation to a group of vulnerable citizens. In this way they become a fully-fledged part of society. They not only make use of the facilities themselves, but also give substance to the level of facilities in the municipality. Due to the integrated approach, they experience a greater sense of well-being and security.Lublin PED Area is geographically bounded and the ambition is to reach Self-Sufficiency. There is a shopping centre with a large rooftop area for solar generation and there are also an empty lot (just on the east side of the building) and a carpark area (on the north side) next to the commercial centre. These areas can also be evaluated for on-site (on the ground – or canopies for cars) energy generation. There are also new built (mainly in 2012) residential blocks with high efficiency and this district is so-called an “eco-district”. Thanks to the District Heating Grid (DHN), all buildings are connected to each other the network has potential for sharing mechanisms in the PED Area. Another opportunity for renewable energy is that these buildings are connected to more or less the end point of DHN and for this reason, a waste heat potential from the return pipe may also be considered. There are also small size residentials, that are not connected to the DHN, around the PED area and this enlightened the technical team for exporting energy from PED to these areas with a new infrastructure.Semi-Virtual Energy Integration Laboratory (SEILAB) The Energy Smart Lab is an infrastructure conceived as a flexible and versatile platform for innovative technological developments for both industry and competitive R+D projects. The areas of expertise of this laboratory pivot around the following technologies: – Power Electronics for the integration and control of the elements within a building or community: Renewable Energy Sources (RES), Energy Storage Systems and Electric Vehicles (EV) – ICT Platform for smart communications and energy management of systems, building, networks and communities. – Energy System Integration technologies for smart and flexible buildings and grids including RES and EV. The laboratory operation is based on the hardware emulation approach, which allows for real physical equipment to be operated under a broad range of scenarios without depending on the real occurrence of the boundary conditions suitable for the experimental validation. The laboratory is pioneer in addressing the concept and implementation of Microgrids and aims to become a leading experimental facility for improving the optimal development of Flexible Energy Buildings and Flexibility Aggregation.
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]7804440
Contact person for general enquiries
A1P026: NameTonje Healey TrulsrudDorota Wolińska-PietrzakDr. Jaume Salom, Dra. Cristina CorcheroChristoph GollnerChristoph GollnerDr. Annette SteingrubeJasper Tonen, Elisabeth Koops
A1P027: OrganizationNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)Lublin MunicipalityIRECFFGFFGFraunhofer Institute for solar energy systemsMunicipality of Groningen
A1P028: AffiliationResearch Center / UniversityMunicipality / Public BodiesResearch Center / UniversityOtherOtherResearch Center / UniversityMunicipality / Public Bodies
A1P028: Other
A1P029: Emailtonje.h.trulsrud@ntnu.nodwolinska@lublin.euJsalom@irec.catchristoph.gollner@ffg.atchristoph.gollner@ffg.atAnnette.Steingrube@ise.fraunhofer.deJasper.tonen@groningen.nl
Contact person for other special topics
A1P030: Name
A1P031: Email
Pursuant to the General Data Protection RegulationYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
A2P001: Fields of application
A2P001: Fields of application
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • Waste management,
  • Indoor air quality,
  • Construction materials
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • E-mobility,
  • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
  • Digital technologies,
  • Indoor air quality
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • E-mobility,
  • Digital technologies
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy production
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • E-mobility,
  • Waste management
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • E-mobility,
  • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
  • Waste management
A2P001: Other
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fieldsEnergy efficiency: Energy efficient envelope, with good insulation, triple glazing windows and airtight envelope. (EPC = 0) Energy Flexibility: MCP controls for the heat pump in the apartments. Energy production: PV panels on the roof, Ground source heat pumps Waste management: construction waste was kept to a minimum and sorted and collected separately as much as possible. Indoor air quality: Exhaust ventilation and opening of windows Construction materials: low carbon emission building materialsSEE: D4.1 - Methodology and Guidelines for PED design https://makingcity.eu/results/#1551708358627-aefa76ef-66b2Energy SmartLab capacities - Building simulation model: thermal inertia and thermal loads of a building or community can be co-simulated with a building model. – System Operator and Aggregator simulation models: the interaction with remote control actions carried out by electricity System Operators or flexibility Aggregators can be simulated as well. – Grid simulation model: the physical interaction of the building with the grid power supply can be simulated enabling the experimental validation of flexibility services to the network. Energy SmartLab systems - SAFT Li-ion battery: maximum stored energy 20000 Wh, rated power 150 kW, rated discharge current 200 A, rated charge current 34 A, operating voltage 189 V – 227 V – 254 V, capacity 82 Ah. – Ultracapacitors: maximum stored energy 57 Wh, rated power 10 kW, rated current 20 A, peak current (<1s) 200 Apk, operating voltage 250 V – 500 V, capacity 1,65 F. – Electric vehicle second life battery: maximum stored energy 23300 Wh, rated power 40 kW, rated current 150 A, operating voltage 240 V – 400 V, capacity 32 Ah - 5 microgrid emulators (emulated power 5.5 kVA, max generation connected 10kVA, max consumption connected 10 kVA) - 1 grid emulator (Rated power: 200 kVA, Rated current per phase: 350 A, Rated current per neutral conductor: 35)Energy system modelingEnergy efficiency: - buildings energy retrofit supported by tax bonuses - replacing heat supply technologies Energy production: - installation of new (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; - presence of a large PV plant in the South East (2 solar parks: 12MW and 107MW) and North area (0,4 MW) Energy flexibility: - energy storage solutions, battery storage and possible hydrogen production - GRID balancing services E-mobility - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; Urban Management - make use of the organizational structure Waste Management - circular use of municipal waste streams
A2P003: Application of ISO52000
A2P003: Application of ISO52000YesNoYesNo
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoYesYesYesNo
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoNoYesYesNo
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculationnot included– Electric vehicle second life battery: maximum stored energy 23300 Wh, rated power 40 kW, rated current 150 A, operating voltage 240 V – 400 V, capacity 32 AhAll energy demands are included in energy balance, either fuel demands or electrical demand of transport sector; Projection is made of future share of electric mobilty, rest is covered with synthetic fuels to achieve climate neutralityMobility, till now, is not included in the energy model.
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]0.148135.7151.86
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]0.10931.761.45
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
A2P011: PVyesnoyesnononono
A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.058
A2P011: Windnonononononono
A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Hydrononononononono
A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Biomass_elnonononononono
A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: PVT_elnonononononono
A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Othernonononononono
A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
A2P012: Geothermalyesnononononoyes
A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Solar Thermalnonononononoyes
A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Biomass_heatnonononononoyes
A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Waste heat+HPnonononononoyes
A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: PVT_thnonononononoyes
A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Othernonononononono
A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes*Annual energy use below is presentedin primary energy consumption53 MW PV potential in all three quarters; no other internal renewable energy potentials knownGeothermal heatpump systems, Waste heat from data centers
A2P014: Annual energy use
A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]0.194132.5
A2P015: Annual energy delivered
A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]0.0368
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
A2P017: Gasnonoyesnononono
A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Coalnonononononono
A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Oilnonononononono
A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Othernonononononono
A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
A2P018: PVnonononononono
A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Windnonononononono
A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Hydrononononononono
A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Biomass_elnonononononono
A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: PVT_elnonononononono
A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Othernonononononono
A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
A2P019: Geothermalnonononononono
A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Solar Thermalnonononononono
A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_heatnonononononono
A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Waste heat+HPnonononononono
A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: PVT_thnonononononono
A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Othernonononononono
A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary0000000
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]-0.00043
A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
A2P022: Safety & SecurityPersonal Safety
A2P022: HealthHealthy community
A2P022: Education
A2P022: MobilitySustainable mobilityyes
A2P022: EnergyNOn-renewable primary energy balance, renewable energy ratio, grid purchase factor, load cover factor/self-generation, supply cover factor/self-consumption, net energy/net power, peak delivered/peak expoted, total greenhouse gas emissionyes
A2P022: Water
A2P022: Economic developmentcapital costs, operational cots, overall economic performance (5 KPIs)
A2P022: Housing and Communitydemographic composition, diverse community, social cohesionyes
A2P022: Waste
A2P022: OtherSmartness and flecibility, Indoor Environmental Quality, Social performance - Equity (affordable housing, access to servicees and amenitioes, afforability of energy, living conditions, sustinable mobility, universal design)
A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
A2P023: Photovoltaicsyesyesyesnoyesyesyes
A2P023: Solar thermal collectorsnononoyesnoyesyes
A2P023: Wind Turbinesnonononononono
A2P023: Geothermal energy systemyesnononoyesyesyes
A2P023: Waste heat recoverynononononoyesyes
A2P023: Waste to energynononononoyesyes
A2P023: Polygenerationnonononononono
A2P023: Co-generationnononononoyesno
A2P023: Heat Pumpyesyesnonoyesyesyes
A2P023: Hydrogennoyesnononoyesno
A2P023: Hydropower plantnononononoyesno
A2P023: Biomassnononononoyesno
A2P023: Biogasnononononoyesno
A2P023: Other
A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)noyesyesnonoyesyes
A2P024: Energy management systemyesyesyesnonoyesyes
A2P024: Demand-side managementyesyesnononoyesno
A2P024: Smart electricity gridnoyesyesnonoyesno
A2P024: Thermal Storagenoyesnononoyesyes
A2P024: Electric Storagenoyesyesnonoyesyes
A2P024: District Heating and Coolingnoyesnoyesyesyesyes
A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systemsyesyesnononoyesyes
A2P024: P2P – buildingsnononononoyesno
A2P024: Other
A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
A2P025: Deep Retrofittingnoyesnononoyesno
A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildingsnoyesnononoyesyes
A2P025: High-performance new buildingsyesyesnonononoyes
A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)noyesnonononoyes
A2P025: Urban data platformsnoyesnononoyesyes
A2P025: Mobile applications for citizensnoyesnonononono
A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)yesyesyesnononono
A2P025: Smart irrigationnonononononono
A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposalnonononononono
A2P025: Smart surveillancenonononononono
A2P025: Other
A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)noyesyesnonoyesno
A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)noyesnononoyesno
A2P026: e-Mobilitynoyesnononoyesyes
A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutionsnononononoyesno
A2P026: Car-free areanonononononono
A2P026: Other
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificatesYesNoNoYes
A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesEPC = 0, energy neutral buildingEnergy Performance Certificate
A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
A2P029: Any other building / district certificatesNoNoNo
A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
  • Smart cities strategies,
  • Urban Renewal Strategies,
  • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
  • New development strategies,
  • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
  • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
  • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
  • Smart cities strategies,
  • New development strategies
  • Smart cities strategies,
  • Urban Renewal Strategies
  • Smart cities strategies
  • Smart cities strategies
  • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
  • New development strategies,
  • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategyClimate neutrality by 2035
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
  • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
  • Other
  • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
  • Biogas,
  • Hydrogen
  • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
  • Electrification of Cooking Methods,
  • Biogas
A3P003: OtherHeating Grid
A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities-Allows for real physical equipment to be operated under a broad range of scenarios without depending on the real occurrence of the boundary conditions suitable for the experimental validation -Pioneer in addressing the concept and implementation of Microgrids and aims to become a leading experimental facility for improving the optimal development of Flexible Energy Buildings and Flexibility Aggregation.Freiburg has ambitious goals and wants to achieve climate neutrality until 2035, the PED concept could help to develop suitable strategies on district level
A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
A3P005: Sustainable behaviour-Improving the development of Net Zero Energy Buildings and Flexible Energy buildings.Energy efficiency by renovation measures for buildings and measures for saving electricity; electrification by installation of heat pumps and photovoltaics and switching to electric cars, additional measures not directly related to PED like sustainable diet and sharing economyIn Groningen we are working with different sustainable behaviours approaches and also developed the Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA). Currently, there are two different approaches in use in the municipality of Groningen: the District energy approach (Wijkgerichte aanpak, developed by the Municipality of Groningen) and the Cooperative approach (Coöperative Aanpak, developed by Grunneger Power). Based upon those approaches and knowledge that is gained through social research executed by TNO and HUAS the new Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA) has been developed.
A3P006: Economic strategies
A3P006: Economic strategies
  • Demand management Living Lab
  • Demand management Living Lab,
  • Local trading,
  • Existing incentives
  • Innovative business models,
  • Blockchain
A3P006: Other
A3P007: Social models
A3P007: Social models
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
  • Social incentives,
  • Quality of Life
  • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies
  • Digital Inclusion,
  • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
  • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
  • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
  • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance,
  • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
  • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
  • Citizen Social Research,
  • Prevention of energy poverty,
  • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
A3P007: Other
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
  • City Vision 2050,
  • SECAP Updates
  • Strategic urban planning,
  • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
  • District Energy plans
  • Strategic urban planning,
  • District Energy plans,
  • City Vision 2050,
  • SECAP Updates
A3P008: Other
A3P009: Environmental strategies
A3P009: Environmental strategies
  • Energy Neutral,
  • Low Emission Zone,
  • Net zero carbon footprint,
  • Carbon-free,
  • Life Cycle approach,
  • Greening strategies,
  • Nature Based Solutions (NBS)
  • Energy Neutral,
  • Low Emission Zone,
  • Pollutants Reduction,
  • Greening strategies
  • Energy Neutral,
  • Carbon-free
  • Energy Neutral
A3P009: Other
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects- European Commission has legislated on Energy Community (‘Renewable energy’ directive - 2018/2001/EU and ‘Common rules for the internal electricity market’ directive- 2019/944/EU). - Spanish building certification is regulated through Royal Decree 235/2013.At national/regional/local level a legislation on PEDs development is not yet available in the Netherlands. There will be a new Environmental Act and Heat Act in the nearby future. We are working on a paper about the current legal barriers, which are in short for Groningen:  Lack of legal certainty and clarity with regard to the energy legislation.  Lack of coherence between policy and legislation from different ministries.  The planned revision of the Dutch Heat Law prevents Groningen from effectively realizing sustainable heat transition plans and goals.  Lack of capacity on the distribution grid for electricity
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definitionThe demonstration projects is a new residential development, which consists of an apartment complex which includes 39 apartments spread over 3 floors. It is a sustainble plus energy neighbouhood, and has reached a plus energy balance on its first year in operation. It has MPC controls on the individual heat pumps to improve the energy flexibility of the apartments. It includes the "social beatiful" concepts with a strong emphasis on the social sustainability of the project.Assessment methods for this ped (and for germany) is defined in this project at the moment and will be tested at that case study
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project developmentThe need for social housing and the ambition to create a great living environment with a high-performance apartment complex, supplied with renewable energy. It results in lower energy bills for the tenants and high-quality homes.City is interested in transforming the quarter, as many buildings are old, have private owner structures and have decentralised heating systems. As the city wants to become climate neutral by 2035 action is needed now. In the research project PED urban the idea is to focus on the future energy system of the quarter and use it as a case study to develop a common assessment method for PEDs in alignment with european efforts in that regard
B1P003: Environment of the case study area
B2P003: Environment of the case study areaSuburban areaUrban areaSuburban area
B1P004: Type of district
B2P004: Type of district
  • New construction
  • Renovation
  • New construction,
  • Renovation
  • Renovation
B1P005: Case Study Context
B1P005: Case Study Context
  • New Development
  • Retrofitting Area
  • New Development,
  • Retrofitting Area
  • Retrofitting Area
B1P006: Year of construction
B1P006: Year of construction
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential5898
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential5898
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
B1P011: Population density before intervention
B1P011: Population density before intervention0000000
B1P012: Population density after intervention
B1P012: Population density after intervention000000.00119878048780490
B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
B1P013: Residentialnononoyesyesyesno
B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Officenonononoyesyesno
B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Industry and Utilitynononoyesyesyesno
B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Commercialnononoyesnoyesno
B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Institutionalnononononoyesno
B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Natural areasnononoyesnoyesno
B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Recreationalnononononoyesno
B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Dismissed areasnonononononono
B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Othernononoyesnonono
B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
B1P014: Residentialyesnonoyesyesyesno
B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]2394
B1P014: Officenonononoyesyesno
B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Industry and Utilitynononoyesyesyesno
B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Commercialnononoyesnoyesno
B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Institutionalnononononoyesno
B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Natural areasnononoyesnoyesno
B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Recreationalnononononoyesno
B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Dismissed areasnonononononono
B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Othernononoyesnonono
B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
B2P001: PED Lab concept definitionaddressing the concept and implementation of Microgrids and aims to become a leading experimental facility for improving the optimal development of Flexible Energy Buildings and Flexibility AggregationGroningen was selected as Lighthouse City for the MAKING-CITY project. MAKING-CITY is a 60-month Horizon 2020 project launched in December 2018. It aims to address and demonstrate the urban energy system transformation towards smart and low-carbon cities, based on the Positive Energy District (PED) concept. The PED operational models developed in MAKING-CITY will help European and other cities around the world to adopt a long-term City Vision 2050 for energy transition and sustainable urbanisation whilst turning citizens into actors of this transformation. Groningen works with two PED districts in two completely different neighbourhoods in terms of structure and buildings. This is why we see this as a lab: to see wat works and what doesn’t. In order to be able to implement this in the rest of the city.
B2P002: Installation life time
B2P002: Installation life timeThe MAKING-CITY project lasts from November 2018 – November 2023. By that time PED North and PED South East are a fact.
B2P003: Scale of action
B2P003: ScaleDistrictVirtualDistrictDistrictDistrict
B2P004: Operator of the installation
B2P004: Operator of the installationIRECThe Municipality of Groningen is Manager of the lab but works closely with other parties such as the university, university of applied sciences, research institute TNO and several other parties.
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materialsGroningen does not have a strategy to reuse and recyle materials
B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?YesNoYesNo
B2P006: Other
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
  • Strategic
  • Strategic,
  • Private
  • Civic
B2P007: Other
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED LabMunicipalityResearch center/UniversityMunicipality
B2P008: Other
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
  • Academia,
  • Private,
  • Industrial,
  • Citizens, public, NGO
  • Academia,
  • Private,
  • Industrial,
  • Other
B2P009: Otherresearch companies, monitoring company, ict company
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
  • Buildings,
  • Demand-side management,
  • Prosumers,
  • Renewable generation,
  • Efficiency measures,
  • Waste management,
  • Water treatment,
  • Lighting,
  • E-mobility,
  • Green areas,
  • Circular economy models
  • Demand-side management,
  • Energy storage,
  • Energy networks,
  • Efficiency measures,
  • Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)
  • Buildings,
  • Demand-side management,
  • Energy storage,
  • Energy networks,
  • Waste management,
  • Lighting,
  • E-mobility,
  • Information and Communication Technologies (ICT),
  • Social interactions,
  • Business models
B2P011: Other
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
  • Monitoring and evaluation infrastructure
  • Monitoring and evaluation infrastructure,
  • Tools for prototyping and modelling,
  • Tools, spaces, events for testing and validation
  • Tools for prototyping and modelling
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
B2P014: Monitoring measures
B2P014: Monitoring measures
  • Available data
  • Equipment
  • Execution plan,
  • Available data,
  • Type of measured data,
  • Equipment,
  • Level of access
B2P015: Key Performance indicators
B2P015: Key Performance indicators
  • Energy
  • Energy,
  • Environmental
  • Energy,
  • Social,
  • Economical / Financial
B2P016: Execution of operations
B2P016: Execution of operations
B2P017: Capacities
B2P017: Capacities- Building simulation model: thermal inertia and thermal loads of a building or community can be co-simulated with a building model. – System Operator and Aggregator simulation models: the interaction with remote control actions carried out by electricity System Operators or flexibility Aggregators can be simulated as well. – Grid simulation model: the physical interaction of the building with the grid power supply can be simulated enabling the experimental validation of flexibility services to the network.
B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
B2P019: Available tools
B2P019: Available tools
  • Energy modelling
  • Energy modelling,
  • Social models,
  • Business and financial models
B2P019: Available tools
B2P020: External accessibility
B2P020: External accessibility
C1P001: Unlocking Factors
C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important
C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important
C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important
C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important
C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important
C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important
C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important
C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important
C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important
C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important
C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important
C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)
C1P002: Driving Factors
C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important
C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important
C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important
C1P002: Economic growth need1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)Earthquakes due to gas extraction
C1P003: Administrative barriers
C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important
C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
C1P003: Lack of public participation1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important
C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important
C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important
C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important
C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)Delay in the Environmental Dialogue processing in the municipality
C1P004: Policy barriers
C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)
C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important
C1P005: Regulatory instability1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important
C1P005: Non-effective regulations1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important
C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
C1P006: Environmental barriers
C1P006: Environmental barriers
C1P007: Technical barriers
C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important
C1P007: Deficient planning1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important
C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important
C1P007: Lack of well-defined process1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important
C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important
C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important
C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)
C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
C1P008: Inertia1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important
C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important
C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important
C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important
C1P008: Rebound effect1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important
C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important
C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important
C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
C1P010: Financial barriers
C1P010: Hidden costs1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important
C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
C1P010: Economic crisis1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Risk and uncertainty5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important
C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
C1P011: Market barriers
C1P011: Split incentives1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important
C1P011: Energy price distortion1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important
C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
C1P012: Stakeholders involved
C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • Planning/leading
  • Planning/leading
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation
C1P012: Research & Innovation
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Financial/Funding
  • None
  • None
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation
C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data
  • None
  • None
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Business process management
  • None
  • None
  • Planning/leading
C1P012: Urban Services providers
  • None
  • None
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Real Estate developers
  • Planning/leading,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • None
  • None
  • Construction/implementation
C1P012: Design/Construction companies
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • None
  • Construction/implementation
  • Construction/implementation
C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • None
  • Planning/leading,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • None
C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs
  • None
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation
C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce
  • None
  • None
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Other
  • None
C1P012: Other (if any)
Summary

Authors (framework concept)

Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

Contributors (to the content)

Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

Implemented by

Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)

Join the Action

PED-EU-NET is an open, interdisciplinary and growing network welcoming academics, practitioners and relevant stakeholders to contribute to the activities of the work plan.
Join Now

COST

COST is an EU funding programme that enables researchers to set up their interdisciplinary research networks in Europe and beyond. We provide funds for organising conferences, meetings, training schools, short scientific exchanges or other networking activities in a wide range of scientific topics. By creating open spaces where people and ideas can grow, we unlock the full potential of science.

PED-EU-NET

The COST Action Positive Energy Districts European Network (PED-EU-NET) aims to mobilise researchers and other relevant stakeholders across different domains and sectors to drive the deployment of Positive Energy Districts (PEDs) in Europe through open sharing of knowledge, exchange of ideas, pooling of resources, experimentation of new methods and co-creation of novel solutions.

Action Details

Grant Holder
Department of Planning, Design, Technology of Architecture, Sapienza University of Rome

Start of Action: 10 September 2020
End of Action: 09 September 2024
CSO approval date: 24/03/2020

© 2021-2023 PED-EU-NET COST Action CA19126. All rights reserved.