Filters:
NameProjectTypeCompare
Örebro-Vivalla JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Tiurberget, Kongsvinger JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Texel JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hällefors, Sweden JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cerdanyola del Valles, School of Engineering, Campus Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Bucharest, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies (ASE) PED Lab OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Pamplona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Trondheim, Svartlamon OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Savona, The University of Genova, Savona Campus OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Torres Vedras, Encosta de São Vicente COPPER PED Lab Compare
Malmö, Stadium area (Stadionområdet) PED StepWise PED Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Utrecht Science Park PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Kriegerheimstätten PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, 16. District, Leben am Wilhelminenberg HeatCOOP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Laxenburgerstraße AH HeatCOOP PED Lab Compare
Tartu, Annelinn V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Kanaleneiland V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aveiro, Aradas district V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau PED Relevant Case Study Compare
SmartEnCity, Lecce SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study Compare
STARDUST, Trento STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö PED Relevant Case Study Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki PED Relevant Case Study Compare
REPLICATE (pilot action in the Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings), Firenze PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna PED Case Study Uncompare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento PED Case Study Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna PED Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Võru +CityxChange PED Case Study Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Furuset project, Oslo ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights PED Case Study Compare
Ydalir project ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fornebu, Bærum ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou PED Case Study Compare
Smart Energy Åland PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Munich, Harthof district PED Case Study Compare
Lublin MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Findhorn, the Park InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities PED Case Study Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Aalborg East PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Ankara, Çamlık District PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Trenčín MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Relevant Case Study
Zaragoza, Actur NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins PED Case Study Compare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Uncompare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Espoo, Kera SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Freiburg, Waldsee PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district PED Case Study Compare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe PED Case Study Uncompare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district PED Case Study Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark PED Case Study Compare
Évora, Portugal POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Groningen, PED South MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Groningen, PED North MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Lab Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT PED Lab Compare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Uncompare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Salzburg, Gneis district Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Tartu, City centre area SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab PED Lab Compare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Kifissia, Energy community SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
TitleUden, Loopkantstraat
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga
Graz, Reininghausgründe
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED LabUden, LoopkantstraatIzmir, District of KarşıyakaIstanbul, Kadikoy district, CaferagaGraz, ReininghausgründeZukunftsquartier, Vienna
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case studynoyesyesyesyes
PED relevant case studyyesnononono
PED Lab.nonononono
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutralityyesyesyesyesyes
Annual energy surplusyesyesnonoyes
Energy communitynonoyesnono
Circularitynonononono
Air quality and urban comfortnoyesnonono
Electrificationyesnononono
Net-zero energy costnoyesnonono
Net-zero emissionnonononono
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)nonononono
Maximise self-sufficiencynoyesnonono
Othernonononoyes
Other (A1P004)Energy efficient; Economic feasibility ; High quality of living and comfort; Early and constant user integration for reaching the positive energy goal.
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED LabIn operationPlanning PhasePlanning PhaseImplementation PhasePlanning Phase
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date06/1710/2201/20201907/18
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date05/2310/2512/222025
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability
  • Monitoring data available within the districts
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Meteorological open data,
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets
  • GIS open datasets
A1P009: OtherOther
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
  • Inger Andresen, Tonje Healey Trulsrud, Luca Finocchiaro, Alessandro Nocente, Meril Tamm, Joana Ortiz, Jaume Salom, Abel Magyari, Linda Hoes-van Oeffelen, Wouter Borsboom, Wim Kornaat, Niki Gaitani, Design and performance predictions of plus energy neighbourhoods – Case studies of demonstration projects in four different European climates, Energy and Buildings, Volume 274, 2022, 112447, ISSN 0378-7788, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112447. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778822006181),
  • Deliverable, Report: Integrated Energy Design for Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods (syn.ikia),
  • Deliverable, Report: DEMONSTRATION CASE OF SUSTAINABLE PLUS ENERGY NEIGHBOURHOODS IN MARINE CLIMATE (syn.ikia),
  • https://www.synikia.eu/no/bibliotek/
  • Alpagut, B., Lopez Romo, A., Hernández, P., Tabanoğlu, O., & Hermoso Martinez, N. (2021). A GIS-Based Multicriteria Assessment for Identification of Positive Energy Districts Boundary in Cities. Energies, 14(22), 7517.
  • E. Rainer, H. Schnitzer, T. Mach, T. Wieland, M. Reiter, L. Fickert, E. Schmautzer, A. Passer, H. Oblak, H. Kreiner, R. Lazar, M. Duschek, et al. (2015): Rahmenplan Energy City Graz-Reininghaus – Subprojekt 2 des Leitprojektes „ECR Energy City Graz – Reininghaus Online: Rahmenplan Energy City Graz-Reininghaus - Haus der Zukunft (nachhaltigwirtschaften.at),
  • H.Schnitzer et al. (2016): Arbeiten und Wohnen in der Smart City Reininghaus, Online: Arbeiten und Wohnen in Graz Reininghaus - Smartcities
A1P011: Geographic coordinates
X Coordinate (longitude):5.619127.11004929.0263195268751715.40744016.330665
Y Coordinate (latitude):51.660638.49605440.9884139524746147.060748.216521
A1P012: Country
A1P012: CountryNetherlandsTurkeyTurkeyAustriaAustria
A1P013: City
A1P013: CityUdenİzmirIstanbulGrazVienna
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).CfbCsaCsbDfbCfb
A1P015: District boundary
A1P015: District boundaryGeographicGeographicGeographicGeographic
Other
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:PrivatePrivateMixedMixedMixed
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:Single OwnerMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple Owners
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED12113100
A1P019: Conditioned space
A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]2360102795116052
A1P020: Total ground area
A1P020: Total ground area [m²]38603260011517271000000
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area13000
A1P022: Financial schemes
A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estateyesnonoyesno
A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]7804440
A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO schemenonononono
A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Othernonononoyes
A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural fundingnonononono
A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National fundingnononoyesyes
A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional fundingnonononono
A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal fundingnononoyesno
A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Othernonononono
A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EUnoyesyesnono
A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]1193355
A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Nationalnoyesnonono
A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regionalnonononono
A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Othernonononono
A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022: Other
A1P023: Economic Targets
A1P023: Economic Targets
  • Positive externalities,
  • Boosting local and sustainable production
  • Job creation,
  • Positive externalities,
  • Other
  • Job creation,
  • Boosting local businesses,
  • Boosting consumption of local and sustainable products
A1P023: OtherBoosting new investors to the area, - Increasing the touristic value of area and urban mobility at the area, - Increasing the regional value (housing price, etc.), - Providing economic advantages by switching to positive energy production
A1P024: More comments:
A1P024: More comments:The project is a follow-up from the “Social Beautiful” concept which was developed in collaboration between Labyrint (Support in sheltered housing), Area (housing company), the municipality of Uden, and Hendriks Coppelmans (developer). The concept aims to provide an answer to changes in various policy areas and the changing demands of society. The Social Beautiful concept consists of the following elements: 1. Living, working, and community services are brought together in one location. A multifunctional residential and service centre is being realized at the location. 2. Housing is shaped by the realization of financially accessible homes suitable for the target group. The housing design is tailored to the target group. it may also include sheltered / protected living. 3. Work takes place at the location or from the same location. The work has a social function within the neighbourhood. Wage-related work must contribute to providing structure in the daily activities of the residents. 4. Neighbourhood management is organized from the location in the surrounding neighbourhood. A service package is provided from the residential and service centre that contributes to the ability of neighbourhood residents to live independently for longer, to strengthen the social network, and to improve the quality of life and safety in the neighbourhood. 5. The houses are suitable for use at all times for regular rental. Communal facilities must be realized within the contours of a regular apartment. The objective is to offer a suitable living and working situation to a group of vulnerable citizens. In this way they become a fully-fledged part of society. They not only make use of the facilities themselves, but also give substance to the level of facilities in the municipality. Due to the integrated approach, they experience a greater sense of well-being and security.The “Reininghausgründe” are a new quarter near the centre of the City of Graz. In the area of a former brewery, close to more, still working industries, a new town centre is being established. It will include living areas, workplaces, shops, schools and a park, so that the need for individual mobility is minimized. It is connected to the city centre by bike paths, busses and a tram. Car sharing is provided as well. Some key-energy aspects: • characteristic 1: For the heat supply in the innovative Reininghaus energy model, low-temperature waste heat from a nearby steel plant is harnessed through the use of heat pumps. • characteristic 2: The district heating system operates at low temperatures. • characteristic 3: Generated heat that is not used immediately is stored in the power tower and supplied on demand. Other important aspects of the project are the following: • characteristic 1: Most houses are low-energy houses, some of the certified with the “Klima Aktiv” label • characteristic 2: There are extremely few parking possibilities for residents and visitors; this will foster the use of public transport and bikes • characteristic 3: All the necessary infrastructure for the “daily need” can be reached within walking distance The area of the project is going to be very “green” when finished. Featuring a big district parc, lots of other green spaces are in planning.
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]7804440
Contact person for general enquiries
A1P026: NameTonje Healey TrulsrudOzlem SenyolMr. Dogan UNERIKatharina SchwarzChristoph Gollner
A1P027: OrganizationNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)Karsiyaka MunicipalityMunicipality of KadikoyStadtLABOR, Innovationen für urbane Lebensqualität GmbHFFG
A1P028: AffiliationResearch Center / UniversityMunicipality / Public BodiesMunicipality / Public BodiesSME / IndustryOther
A1P028: Other
A1P029: Emailtonje.h.trulsrud@ntnu.noozlemkocaer2@gmail.comdogan.uneri@kadikoy.bel.trkatharina.schwarz@stadtlaborgraz.atchristoph.gollner@ffg.at
Contact person for other special topics
A1P030: NameHasan Burak CavkaMrs. Damla MUHCU YILMAZHans Schnitzer
A1P031: Emailhasancavka@iyte.edu.trdamla.muhcu@kadikoy.bel.trhans.schnitzer@stadtlaborgraz.at
Pursuant to the General Data Protection RegulationYesYesYesYesYes
A2P001: Fields of application
A2P001: Fields of application
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • Waste management,
  • Indoor air quality,
  • Construction materials
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.)
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • E-mobility,
  • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
  • Digital technologies
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
  • Water use,
  • Indoor air quality,
  • Other
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production
A2P001: OtherUrban Management; Air Quality
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fieldsEnergy efficiency: Energy efficient envelope, with good insulation, triple glazing windows and airtight envelope. (EPC = 0) Energy Flexibility: MCP controls for the heat pump in the apartments. Energy production: PV panels on the roof, Ground source heat pumps Waste management: construction waste was kept to a minimum and sorted and collected separately as much as possible. Indoor air quality: Exhaust ventilation and opening of windows Construction materials: low carbon emission building materialsMethods involve studying the feasibility of digital PED references for the case cities about their energy, environmental, and economic performance by EnergyPlus tool. In case of insufficient energy data and the need of high resolution data, ‘Gaussian mixture model and expectation-maximization algorithm’ and ‘time-series decomposition-recombination’ method will be used to supplement data to EnergyPlus. The feasibility results will be returned to stakeholders for iterative discussion, and the iterative results will be used to update digital references. Replication plans are developed based on such a cooperation process for strategies to implement PEDs. If a PED is demonstrated during the project period, the measured data will be used to verify the feasibility model to optimize previous results (WP7– R3 & R4). In the MAKING-CITY project, the overall PED design method is developed, which will be further optimised in this project. In addition, PED-ACT will use the methods and knowledge, including how to choose a suitable PED in a city, energy balance calculation, and technologies available for PED. The RUGGEDISED project outputs the governance model into the replication plan in PED-ACT. Its ‘smart city open-data decision platform’ will illustrate an excellent example for the database in PED-ACT. The IEA EBC Annex 83 and Cost Action 19126 create the basis for data collection, developing existing PED databases, characterization of PED, and review of regulations of PED, as well as development of simulation tools. The UBEM project further enables a detailed high-resolution energy balance calculation of PED.Energy efficiency: o Several activities: Workshops, Webinars to deepen the knowledge and raise awareness renewable energies o for example rooftop Photovoltaics green & blue infrastructures o Parks, Rooftop Gardens, Quarter Parks, Water elements included in the parks rooftop farming o To produce vegetables in the quarter stormwater management mobility o less parking and less cars in the district. Solutions for boosting public transport with sponsored public transport tickets; building of better bike and pedestrian infrastructure social aspects o district management was established in the district local supply of goods of daily need o Schools within 15 minutes walking distance Supermarkets and other shops within the district
A2P003: Application of ISO52000
A2P003: Application of ISO52000YesYesYesNo
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoYesNoYes
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoNoYes
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculationnot includedMobility is not included in the calculations.- Number of cars per household - Fraction of electric cars - Number of public transport tickets (week/ annual tickets)
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]0.1483.8620.94
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]0.1091.2260.10
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
A2P011: PVyesyesyesyesno
A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.0581.0280.51
A2P011: Windnonononono
A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Hydrononononono
A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Biomass_elnonononono
A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Biomass_peat_elnonononono
A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: PVT_elnonononono
A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Othernonononono
A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
A2P012: Geothermalyesnonoyesno
A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Solar Thermalnonoyesyesno
A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.08
A2P012: Biomass_heatnonononono
A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Waste heat+HPnononoyesno
A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Biomass_peat_heatnonononono
A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: PVT_thnonononono
A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Biomass_firewood_thnonononono
A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Othernonononono
A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes*Annual energy use below is presentedin primary energy consumptionTwo scenarios are conducted regarding Kadikoy PED energy generation. For the second scenario, just 0.53GWh/annum PV production is proposed.Groundwater (used for heat pumps)
A2P014: Annual energy use
A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]0.1945.0880.74
A2P015: Annual energy delivered
A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]0.03680.49
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
A2P017: Gasnoyesnonono
A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Coalnonononono
A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Oilnonononono
A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Othernonononono
A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
A2P018: PVnoyesyesyesno
A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]0.707-0.26
A2P018: Windnononoyesno
A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Hydronononoyesno
A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Biomass_elnonononono
A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Biomass_peat_elnonononono
A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: PVT_elnonononono
A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Othernonononono
A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
A2P019: Geothermalnonononono
A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Solar Thermalnononoyesno
A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_heatnononoyesno
A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Waste heat+HPnononoyesno
A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_peat_heatnonononono
A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: PVT_thnonononono
A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_firewood_thnonononono
A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Othernonononono
A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary01.4540311173975-2.269230769230800
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]-0.000430.036
A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
A2P022: Safety & SecurityPersonal Safety
A2P022: HealthHealthy community
A2P022: Education
A2P022: MobilitySustainable mobilityx
A2P022: EnergyNOn-renewable primary energy balance, renewable energy ratio, grid purchase factor, load cover factor/self-generation, supply cover factor/self-consumption, net energy/net power, peak delivered/peak expoted, total greenhouse gas emissionx
A2P022: Waterx
A2P022: Economic developmentcapital costs, operational cots, overall economic performance (5 KPIs)x
A2P022: Housing and Communitydemographic composition, diverse community, social cohesionx
A2P022: Waste
A2P022: OtherSmartness and flecibility, Indoor Environmental Quality, Social performance - Equity (affordable housing, access to servicees and amenitioes, afforability of energy, living conditions, sustinable mobility, universal design)
A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
A2P023: Photovoltaicsyesyesyesyesyes
A2P023: Solar thermal collectorsnonoyesnono
A2P023: Wind Turbinesnonononono
A2P023: Geothermal energy systemyesnononoyes
A2P023: Waste heat recoverynononoyesno
A2P023: Waste to energynonononono
A2P023: Polygenerationnonononono
A2P023: Co-generationnonononono
A2P023: Heat Pumpyesyesyesyesyes
A2P023: Hydrogennonononono
A2P023: Hydropower plantnonononono
A2P023: Biomassnonononono
A2P023: Biogasnonononono
A2P023: Other
A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)nononoyesno
A2P024: Energy management systemyesnononono
A2P024: Demand-side managementyesnononono
A2P024: Smart electricity gridnonononono
A2P024: Thermal Storagenononoyesno
A2P024: Electric Storagenonononono
A2P024: District Heating and Coolingnononoyesyes
A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systemsyesnononono
A2P024: P2P – buildingsnonononono
A2P024: Other
A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
A2P025: Deep Retrofittingnoyesnonono
A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildingsnonononono
A2P025: High-performance new buildingsyesnonoyesno
A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)nononoyesno
A2P025: Urban data platformsnonononono
A2P025: Mobile applications for citizensnononoyesno
A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)yesyesnonono
A2P025: Smart irrigationnononoyesno
A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposalnonononono
A2P025: Smart surveillancenonononono
A2P025: Other
A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)nononoyesno
A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)nononoyesno
A2P026: e-Mobilitynononoyesno
A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutionsnononoyesno
A2P026: Car-free areanononoyesno
A2P026: Other
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes- Multimodal mobility nodes - Support of public transport tickets - Mobility consulting - District management
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificatesYesNoNoYes
A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesEPC = 0, energy neutral buildingEnergieausweis mandatory if buildings/ flats/ apartments are sold
A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
A2P029: Any other building / district certificatesNoNoNoYes
A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesKlimaaktiv standard  Voluntary! Certification can be for buildings and/or quarters. The different quarters are built in different standards. Ranging from bronze/silver/gold
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
  • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
  • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
  • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
  • Urban Renewal Strategies,
  • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
  • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
  • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
  • Smart cities strategies,
  • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
  • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
  • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
  • Smart cities strategies
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategyKarşıyaka Municipality is the first local government in Turkey to sign the Covenant of Mayors in 2011. During this period, the greenhouse gas inventory of the district was carried out three times and reduction targets were set for 2020 and 2030. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan prepared as of the end of 2021, Karşıyaka Municipality has targeted a 40% reduction in its emissions for 2030 compared to the base year 2018. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan, Karşıyaka Municipality aims to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions from 3.96 tCO2e / person in 2018 to 2.37 tCO2e / person in 2030. System solutions such as the use of renewable energy sources, air, ground or water source heat pump, cogeneration and microcogeneration are analysed by designers in order to fully or partially meet the energy requirements for heating, cooling, ventilation, hot water, electricity and lighting for all buildings with a floor area of less than 20,000 square metres. If at least 50% of the building's total energy consumption costs are covered by one or more of these applications, the points are taken in the assessment table in the Building and housing estate business certification guide of 2023.City level targets Klimaschutzplan Graz - 2022 | Targets: - Climate neutrality until 2040 - Social justice and high quality of life - High innovation levels Mobilitätsplan Graz 2040 – under development | Targets: - Modal Split 80:20 until 2040 80% Public transport, bike, walking | 20% cars Kommunales Energiekonzept (2017) | Targets: - Increase of district heating Energiemasterplan Graz (2018) | Targets: - Energy efficiency of urban dwellings and infrastructures - District heating and solar energy - Energy efficiency of private dwellings - Climate conscious mobility National level targets Klimaschutzplan Österreich -draft, expected by 2024 | Targets: - Decarbonisation (reduction of GHG, renewable energies, - Climate neutrality until 2040 - Energy efficiency - Security of energy supply
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
  • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
  • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
  • Electrification of Cooking Methods
  • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
  • Electrification of Cooking Methods,
  • Biogas
A3P003: Other
A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
A3P004: Identification of needs and prioritiesAccording to the model developed for the district, the electrification of heating and cooling is necessary.Therefore, there needs to be the implementation of a heat pump. The building-integrated photovoltaic panelsshould follow. Through net-metering practices, the district is expected to reach energy positivity throughthis scenario.Reininghaus needs green spaces and places Sector coupling of water, waste water, electricity ICT and demand side management Mobility - Reininghaus needs better infrastructure for bikes and pedestrians - Public transportation should be more affordable and Sharing should be implemented in the district Infrastructure should cover daily needs within walking distance Infrastructure for local jobs and shared offices
A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
A3P005: Sustainable behaviour- citizen participation and promotion of functioning neighbourhoods (e.g., through city district management) As of today, solutions for the energy transition in the residential sector have focused on the construction of energy-efficient buildings and on the energy-efficient refurbishment of existing buildings. Measures to influence user behaviour and to directly address residents and neighbourhoods as actors of the energy transition play a minor role and are also not formalized. At the same time, moving into a new apartment offers a ‘window of opportunity’ to establish new everyday practices and behaviour. In already inhabited housing developments, well-functioning neighbourhoods or existing, ‘sustainability pioneers’ are key to motivating people to adopt more resource-efficient lifestyles. In order to prepare such agents of change towards more climate protection and sustainability in the context of housing, Austria launched the BAREWO project. The aim is to develop a kit of formats, methods, and interventions for resource-efficient housing. This toolkit will be tested in six testbeds, among which quarter 12 (Q12) of Graz- Reininghaus, as soon as first residents move in (approx. 2024). Austrian TRANS-PED partner StadtLABOR, which is also a partner in the BAREWO project, will support Q12 in this process. In parallel, a monitoring system will be developed to make the (climate) effects of the kit measurable. In addition, a guideline for property managers will be developed, which will serve as an orientation for them on how their residents can be coached in matters of climate protection and sustainability in everyday (residential) life. From the very beginning, (communication) measures are implemented and relevant stakeholders are involved in the project (project advisory board) to ensure the multiplicability, financing and broad application of the toolkit. If successful, the toolkit could also be scaled up to other quarters in Reininghaus.
A3P006: Economic strategies
A3P006: Economic strategies
  • Innovative business models,
  • PPP models,
  • Circular economy models,
  • Demand management Living Lab,
  • Local trading
  • PPP models,
  • Local trading
A3P006: Other
A3P007: Social models
A3P007: Social models
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
  • Social incentives,
  • Quality of Life
  • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
  • Affordability
  • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
  • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
  • Citizen Social Research,
  • Prevention of energy poverty,
  • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
  • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
  • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
  • Social incentives,
  • Quality of Life,
  • Affordability,
  • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
A3P007: Other
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
  • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
  • District Energy plans,
  • SECAP Updates
  • Strategic urban planning,
  • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
  • District Energy plans,
  • City Vision 2050,
  • SECAP Updates
  • Strategic urban planning,
  • City Vision 2050,
  • Building / district Certification
A3P008: Other
A3P009: Environmental strategies
A3P009: Environmental strategies
  • Energy Neutral,
  • Low Emission Zone,
  • Pollutants Reduction
  • Energy Neutral,
  • Low Emission Zone,
  • Net zero carbon footprint
  • Pollutants Reduction,
  • Greening strategies,
  • Sustainable Urban drainage systems (SUDS),
  • Nature Based Solutions (NBS)
A3P009: Other
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspectsMobility contracts: A mobility contract is concluded between the City of Graz and the property developers in the course of development plans and serves to reduce the motor vehicle traffic to be expected as a result of the construction project. Push & pull measures are agreed: With a lower car parking space key, which is significantly lower than today's usual requirements, offers and information for easier use of public transport, walking and cycling, as well as car sharing and e-mobility are simultaneously created by the property developers, leading to a win-win-win situation for all parties involved. Basic principles - Possibility of combining effective "push & pull" measures => control option (e.g. reduction of car parking spaces, but optimisation of accessibility to public transport and walking and cycling networks, public transport tickets, mobility information, ... etc.) - Changing mobility behaviour in favour of sustainable forms of transport from the moment the flat is handed over ("upheaval" in personal mobility behaviour when changing the residential location) - Reduction in construction and maintenance costs (underground car parks, public road infrastructure) - Easier realisation of larger construction projects in the inner city area with lower generation of vehicle demand Städtebauliche Verträge in Graz / Urban development contracts in Graz Qualitative urban (neighbourhood) development with added value for all stakeholders: urban development contracts are modern instruments in the development of cities and neighbourhoods. As one of the pioneers in this field, the City of Graz also increasingly favours this form of quality assurance. Urban development contracts are a contractual form of regulation between the City of Graz and landowners, which enables flexible control of urban (sub)development in the interests of the common interests while at the same time relieving the public authorities. The contracts make property-related stipulations in accordance with urban planning requirements (e.g. urban development concept, development concept, framework plan, zoning plan) and the specialist planning requirements in particular infrastructure, development, design and mobility. This is intended to infrastructure, services of general interest, building land quality and settlement development required for the (parts of the) city.
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definitionThe demonstration projects is a new residential development, which consists of an apartment complex which includes 39 apartments spread over 3 floors. It is a sustainble plus energy neighbouhood, and has reached a plus energy balance on its first year in operation. It has MPC controls on the individual heat pumps to improve the energy flexibility of the apartments. It includes the "social beatiful" concepts with a strong emphasis on the social sustainability of the project.The pilot area was selected on the basis of several criteria: its location within areas prioritised by Karşıyaka Municipality for combating climate change, compliance with the building regulations set out in the Green Building-Site-Operation (2023) guide, which are in line with Municipality's energy policy, the presence of open spaces that allow various applications for renewable energy, proximity to public facilities such as schools and municipal services, the availability of data on energy consumption (e.g. electricity and natural gas bills) and architectural features, the potential for community building, the suitability for solar energy systems, considering orientation and roof structure, and the potential for future building renovations. The aim of the initiative is to explore the feasibility of transforming the district into a Positive Energy District (PED).Reininghaus addresses some relevant key aspects listed in the JPI UE PED Framework Definition such as: - high level of aspiration in terms of energy efficiency, energy flexibility and energy production; - integration of different systems and infrastructures; - inclusion of aspects not only related to energy sector, but also connected with social, economic and environmental sustainability.
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project developmentThe need for social housing and the ambition to create a great living environment with a high-performance apartment complex, supplied with renewable energy. It results in lower energy bills for the tenants and high-quality homes.The Reininghausgründe is a new quarter near the centre of the City of Graz. On the area of a former brewery, close to more, still working industries, a new town centre is being established. The quarter will include living areas, workplaces, shops, schools and a park, so that the need for individual mobility is minimized. It is connected to the historical city centre by bike paths, busses and a tram. Car sharing is provided as well.
B1P003: Environment of the case study area
B2P003: Environment of the case study areaSuburban areaUrban areaUrban areaUrban areaUrban area
B1P004: Type of district
B2P004: Type of district
  • New construction
  • Renovation
  • Renovation
  • New construction
  • New construction,
  • Renovation
B1P005: Case Study Context
B1P005: Case Study Context
  • New Development
  • Retrofitting Area
  • Re-use / Transformation Area,
  • Retrofitting Area
  • New Development
  • New Development,
  • Retrofitting Area
B1P006: Year of construction
B1P006: Year of construction20052025
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential23.3790
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential10000
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential0
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
B1P011: Population density before intervention
B1P011: Population density before intervention00000
B1P012: Population density after intervention
B1P012: Population density after intervention0000.010
B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
B1P013: Residentialnoyesyesnoyes
B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]102795
B1P013: Officenonoyesnoyes
B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Industry and Utilitynononoyesyes
B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Commercialnonoyesnono
B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Institutionalnonononono
B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Natural areasnononoyesno
B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Recreationalnonononono
B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Dismissed areasnonononono
B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Othernonoyesnono
B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]Cultural Center, Sports Center / Total building and land use data of neigborhood 13,878 residential, 4,441 commercial using before intervention. For project area & 49 building area m2
B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
B1P014: Residentialyesyesyesyesyes
B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]2394102795
B1P014: Officenonoyesyesyes
B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Industry and Utilitynonononoyes
B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Commercialnonoyesyesno
B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Institutionalnononoyesno
B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Natural areasnononoyesno
B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Recreationalnononoyesno
B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Dismissed areasnonononono
B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Othernonoyesnono
B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
B2P002: Installation life time
B2P002: Installation life time
B2P003: Scale of action
B2P003: ScaleDistrict
B2P004: Operator of the installation
B2P004: Operator of the installation
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?
B2P006: Other
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
B2P007: Other
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
B2P008: Other
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
B2P009: Other
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
B2P011: Other
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
B2P014: Monitoring measures
B2P014: Monitoring measures
B2P015: Key Performance indicators
B2P015: Key Performance indicators
B2P016: Execution of operations
B2P016: Execution of operations
B2P017: Capacities
B2P017: Capacities
B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
B2P019: Available tools
B2P019: Available tools
B2P019: Available tools
B2P020: External accessibility
B2P020: External accessibility
C1P001: Unlocking Factors
C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)
C1P002: Driving Factors
C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Economic growth need1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness2 - Slightly important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)
C1P003: Administrative barriers
C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Lack of public participation1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)Delay in the Environmental Dialogue processing in the municipality
C1P004: Policy barriers
C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)
C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Regulatory instability1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Non-effective regulations1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
C1P006: Environmental barriers
C1P006: Environmental barriers- Climate Variability: 5 - Topographical Constraints: 4 - Sunlight Availability: 5 - Environmental Regulations: 3 - Zoning Restrictions: 2 - Air and Water Pollution: 2 - Natural Disasters: 1 - Water Scarcity: 1
C1P007: Technical barriers
C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Deficient planning1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Lack of well-defined process1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)
C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
C1P008: Inertia1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Rebound effect1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
C1P010: Financial barriers
C1P010: Hidden costs1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Economic crisis1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Risk and uncertainty5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
C1P011: Market barriers
C1P011: Split incentives1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P011: Energy price distortion1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
C1P012: Stakeholders involved
C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Research & Innovation
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Financial/Funding
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Planning/leading,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Business process management
  • None
  • None
C1P012: Urban Services providers
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • Planning/leading,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Real Estate developers
  • Planning/leading,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • None
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Design/Construction companies
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • Construction/implementation
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation
C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Design/demand aggregation
C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Other
  • None
C1P012: Other (if any)
Summary

Authors (framework concept)

Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

Contributors (to the content)

Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

Implemented by

Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)