| Name | Project | Type | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|
| Örebro-Vivalla | JUST PEPP | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Tiurberget, Kongsvinger | JUST PEPP | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Texel | JUST PEPP | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Hällefors, Sweden | JUST PEPP | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Cerdanyola del Valles, School of Engineering, Campus Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona | OPEN4CEC | PED Lab | Compare |
| Bucharest, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies (ASE) PED Lab | OPEN4CEC | PED Lab | Compare |
| Pamplona | OPEN4CEC | PED Lab | Compare |
| Trondheim, Svartlamon | OPEN4CEC | PED Lab | Compare |
| Savona, The University of Genova, Savona Campus | OPEN4CEC | PED Lab | Compare |
| Torres Vedras, Encosta de São Vicente | COPPER | PED Lab | Compare |
| Malmö, Stadium area (Stadionområdet) | PED StepWise | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Utrecht, Utrecht Science Park | PED StepWise | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Vienna, Kriegerheimstätten | PED StepWise | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Vienna, 16. District, Leben am Wilhelminenberg | HeatCOOP | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Vienna, Laxenburgerstraße AH | HeatCOOP | PED Lab | Compare |
| Tartu, Annelinn | V2G-QUESTS | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Utrecht, Kanaleneiland | V2G-QUESTS | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Aveiro, Aradas district | V2G-QUESTS | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Győr Geothermal District Heating Project | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| SmartEnCity, Lecce | SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| STARDUST, Trento | STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare |
| Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare | |
| mySMARTlife, Helsinki | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| REPLICATE (pilot action in the Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings), Firenze | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Sinfonia, Bolzano | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Hunziker Areal, Zürich | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Sharing Cities, Milano | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Smart Otaniemi, Espoo | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare | |
| Zukunftsquartier, Vienna | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Barrio La Pinada, Paterna | PED Case Study / PED Lab | Compare | |
| Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Võru +CityxChange | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Furuset project, Oslo | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Laser Valley – Land of Lights | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Ydalir project | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
| NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Fornebu, Bærum | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Fleuraye west, Carquefou | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Smart Energy Åland | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Romania, Alba Iulia PED | ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Romania, Alba Iulia PED | InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Munich, Harthof district | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Lublin | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran | CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Bærum, Eiksveien 116 | CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Findhorn, the Park | InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED | ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Umeå, Ålidhem district | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Aalborg East | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare | |
| Ankara, Çamlık District | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study | Uncompare |
| Trenčín | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Uncompare |
| Luxembourg, Betzdorf | LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Vantaa, Aviapolis | NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts | PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Uncompare |
| Vidin, Himik and Bononia | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Oslo, Verksbyen | Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Uden, Loopkantstraat | Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods | PED Relevant Case Study | |
| Zaragoza, Actur | NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Aarhus, Brabrand | BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts | PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare |
| Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city | ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Izmir, District of Karşıyaka | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus | LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Espoo, Kera | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Freiburg, Waldsee | PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Graz, Reininghausgründe | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Oulu, Kaukovainio | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Halmstad, Fyllinge | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Lund, Brunnshög district | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Vienna, Am Kempelenpark | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Évora, Portugal | POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare |
| Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Relevant Case Study | Uncompare |
| Groningen, PED South | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Lab | Compare |
| Groningen, PED North | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Lab | Compare |
| Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Lab | Compare |
| Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT | PED Lab | Compare | |
| Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district | STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Leon, Former Sugar Factory district | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Uncompare |
| Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Salzburg, Gneis district | Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet | Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Tartu, City centre area | SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare |
| Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district | GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab | PED Lab | Compare | |
| Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Kifissia, Energy community | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Title | Uden, Loopkantstraat | Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium | Trenčín | Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga | Vantaa, Aviapolis | Ankara, Çamlık District |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab | ||||||
| A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab | Uden, Loopkantstraat | Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium | Trenčín | Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga | Vantaa, Aviapolis | Ankara, Çamlık District |
| A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet | ||||||
| A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet |
|
|
| |||
| A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site | ||||||
| PED case study | no | no | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| PED relevant case study | yes | yes | no | no | yes | yes |
| PED Lab. | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
| A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab | ||||||
| Climate neutrality | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| Annual energy surplus | yes | yes | yes | no | no | yes |
| Energy community | no | yes | yes | yes | no | yes |
| Circularity | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
| Air quality and urban comfort | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| Electrification | yes | yes | no | no | no | yes |
| Net-zero energy cost | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| Net-zero emission | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous) | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
| Maximise self-sufficiency | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| Other | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| Other (A1P004) | ||||||
| A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab | ||||||
| A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED Lab | In operation | Planning Phase | Planning Phase | Planning Phase | Planning Phase | Planning Phase |
| A1P006: Start Date | ||||||
| A1P006: Start date | 06/17 | 2022 | 06/19 | 01/20 | 01/23 | 10/22 |
| A1P007: End Date | ||||||
| A1P007: End date | 05/23 | 11/23 | 12/22 | 12/27 | 09/25 | |
| A1P008: Reference Project | ||||||
| A1P008: Reference Project | ||||||
| A1P009: Data availability | ||||||
| A1P009: Data availability |
|
|
|
|
| |
| A1P009: Other | ||||||
| A1P010: Sources | ||||||
| Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab |
|
| ||||
| A1P011: Geographic coordinates | ||||||
| X Coordinate (longitude): | 5.6191 | 14.09296 | 18.046870515442922 | 29.02631952687517 | 24.958821 | 32.795369 |
| Y Coordinate (latitude): | 51.6606 | 50.13715 | 48.899251380340274 | 40.98841395247461 | 60.305488 | 39.881812 |
| A1P012: Country | ||||||
| A1P012: Country | Netherlands | Czech Republic | Slovakia | Turkey | Finland | Turkey |
| A1P013: City | ||||||
| A1P013: City | Uden | Kladno | Trencin | Istanbul | Vantaa | Ankara |
| A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification) | ||||||
| A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification). | Cfb | Cfb | Cfb | Csb | Dfb | Dsb |
| A1P015: District boundary | ||||||
| A1P015: District boundary | Geographic | Geographic | Functional | Geographic | Geographic | Geographic |
| Other | V1* (ca 8 buildings) | |||||
| A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab | ||||||
| A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab: | Private | Mixed | Mixed | Mixed | Mixed | Private |
| A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure | ||||||
| A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure: | Single Owner | Multiple Owners | Multiple Owners | Multiple Owners | Multiple Owners | Multiple Owners |
| A1P018: Number of buildings in PED | ||||||
| A1P018: Number of buildings in PED | 1 | 8 | 10 | 13 | 257 | |
| A1P019: Conditioned space | ||||||
| A1P019: Conditioned space [m²] | 2360 | 2000 | 116052 | 22600 | ||
| A1P020: Total ground area | ||||||
| A1P020: Total ground area [m²] | 3860 | 75000 | 1151727 | 3881000 | 50800 | |
| A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area | ||||||
| A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| A1P022: Financial schemes | ||||||
| A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estate | yes | yes | yes | no | yes | no |
| A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | 7804440 | |||||
| A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO scheme | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
| A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Other | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
| A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural funding | no | yes | yes | no | no | no |
| A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National funding | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional funding | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal funding | no | yes | yes | no | yes | no |
| A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Other | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
| A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EU | no | yes | no | yes | yes | yes |
| A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - National | no | yes | no | no | no | yes |
| A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regional | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Other | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022: Other | Multiple different funding schemes depending on the development site within the District and Lab. | |||||
| A1P023: Economic Targets | ||||||
| A1P023: Economic Targets |
|
|
|
|
| |
| A1P023: Other | Boosting new investors to the area, - Increasing the touristic value of area and urban mobility at the area, - Increasing the regional value (housing price, etc.), - Providing economic advantages by switching to positive energy production | |||||
| A1P024: More comments: | ||||||
| A1P024: More comments: | The project is a follow-up from the “Social Beautiful” concept which was developed in collaboration between Labyrint (Support in sheltered housing), Area (housing company), the municipality of Uden, and Hendriks Coppelmans (developer). The concept aims to provide an answer to changes in various policy areas and the changing demands of society. The Social Beautiful concept consists of the following elements: 1. Living, working, and community services are brought together in one location. A multifunctional residential and service centre is being realized at the location. 2. Housing is shaped by the realization of financially accessible homes suitable for the target group. The housing design is tailored to the target group. it may also include sheltered / protected living. 3. Work takes place at the location or from the same location. The work has a social function within the neighbourhood. Wage-related work must contribute to providing structure in the daily activities of the residents. 4. Neighbourhood management is organized from the location in the surrounding neighbourhood. A service package is provided from the residential and service centre that contributes to the ability of neighbourhood residents to live independently for longer, to strengthen the social network, and to improve the quality of life and safety in the neighbourhood. 5. The houses are suitable for use at all times for regular rental. Communal facilities must be realized within the contours of a regular apartment. The objective is to offer a suitable living and working situation to a group of vulnerable citizens. In this way they become a fully-fledged part of society. They not only make use of the facilities themselves, but also give substance to the level of facilities in the municipality. Due to the integrated approach, they experience a greater sense of well-being and security. | The urban morphology of Çamlık District differs in several ways, compared with the typical urban fabric in Türkiye, along with the capital city of Ankara. The houses on the site are composed of three-story attached single-housing units with multiple rows, creating a total of 257 housing units in total. Low-rise buildings coupled with suitably oriented rooftop surfaces brings about significant advantages in the site. Dense greenery in the site also results in reduced cooling energy demand in the buildings. | ||||
| A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs | ||||||
| A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR] | 7804440 | 0 | ||||
| Contact person for general enquiries | ||||||
| A1P026: Name | Tonje Healey Trulsrud | David Škorňa | Vladimír Škola | Mr. Dogan UNERI | Eira Linko | Prof. Dr. İpek Gürsel DİNO |
| A1P027: Organization | Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) | Město Kladno | City of Trencin | Municipality of Kadikoy | City of Vantaa | Middle East Technical University |
| A1P028: Affiliation | Research Center / University | Municipality / Public Bodies | Other | Municipality / Public Bodies | Municipality / Public Bodies | Research Center / University |
| A1P028: Other | Project Manager | |||||
| A1P029: Email | tonje.h.trulsrud@ntnu.no | david.skorna@mestokladno.cz | vladimir.skola@trencin.sk | dogan.uneri@kadikoy.bel.tr | eira.linko@vantaa.fi | ipekg@metu.edu.tr |
| Contact person for other special topics | ||||||
| A1P030: Name | Michal Kuzmič | Vladimír Škola | Mrs. Damla MUHCU YILMAZ | Assoc. Prof. Onur Taylan | ||
| A1P031: Email | michal.kuzmic@cvut.cz | vladimir.skola@trencin.sk | damla.muhcu@kadikoy.bel.tr | otaylan@metu.edu.tr | ||
| Pursuant to the General Data Protection Regulation | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| A2P001: Fields of application | ||||||
| A2P001: Fields of application |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A2P001: Other | ||||||
| A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields | ||||||
| A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields | Energy efficiency: Energy efficient envelope, with good insulation, triple glazing windows and airtight envelope. (EPC = 0) Energy Flexibility: MCP controls for the heat pump in the apartments. Energy production: PV panels on the roof, Ground source heat pumps Waste management: construction waste was kept to a minimum and sorted and collected separately as much as possible. Indoor air quality: Exhaust ventilation and opening of windows Construction materials: low carbon emission building materials | Trnsys, PV modelling tools, CAD | Pilot collaboration with landowners. Carbon footprint assessment and planning guidelines in zoning planning. Green infrastructure requirements. Examples of considered energy solutions: waste heat recovery and utilization, geothermal, air-water heat pumps, district heating return water, photovoltaics, A-class energy efficiency, smart control and monitoring, energy storages, E-mobility above national requirements, cooling | The energy consumption and efficiency of the energy model of Çamlık Site, created using EnergyPlus software, have been evaluated under the scenarios specified below. At each stage, a new system was incorporated to explore the potential of the area becoming a PED. In this context, four scenarios were created to compare different energy scenarios for the Ankara pilot area and to observe the impact of the included systems on energy efficiency: V_base; V_ER; V_ER,HP; V_ER,HP,PV. The basic scenario (V_base) was created using the current state without any improvement to the building envelope. This scenario was developed to determine the annual energy needs of the entire site without any intervention and serves as a reference point for the other developed models. The second scenario (V_ER) was created to improve the building envelopes of all residential units in the area, altering the U-values according to Türkiye's current building standards (TS-825). The third scenario (V_ER,HP) primarily includes a heat pump model that can use electrical energy to produce higher thermal energy and is added on top of the improvements in the second scenario. Finally, the V_ER,HP,PV scenario combines building envelope improvements, the heat pump, and the solar PV system. | ||
| A2P003: Application of ISO52000 | ||||||
| A2P003: Application of ISO52000 | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | |
| A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance | ||||||
| A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance | No | Yes | No | Yes | ||
| A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance | ||||||
| A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance | No | No | No | |||
| A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation | ||||||
| A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation | not included | Not yet included. | The calculation of the energy balance will be further developed and specified under the Neutralpath-project. Mobility related emissions are taken into account in the carbon footprint calculation of each zoning plan in the development area. | Mobility is not included in the calculations. | ||
| A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand | ||||||
| A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum] | 0.148 | 1.4 | 0.94 | 3.446 | ||
| A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand | ||||||
| A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum] | 0.109 | 0.3 | 0.10 | 0.528 | ||
| A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility | ||||||
| A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure | ||||||
| A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year | ||||||
| A2P011: PV | yes | yes | no | yes | yes | yes |
| A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 0.058 | 1.1 | 0.51 | 3.4240 | ||
| A2P011: Wind | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P011: Hydro | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P011: Biomass_el | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P011: Biomass_peat_el | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P011: PVT_el | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P011: Other | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year | ||||||
| A2P012: Geothermal | yes | no | no | no | yes | no |
| A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P012: Solar Thermal | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
| A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 0.08 | |||||
| A2P012: Biomass_heat | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P012: Waste heat+HP | no | yes | no | no | yes | no |
| A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 1.7 | |||||
| A2P012: Biomass_peat_heat | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P012: PVT_th | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P012: Biomass_firewood_th | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P012: Other | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes | ||||||
| A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes | *Annual energy use below is presentedin primary energy consumption | Waste heat from cooling the ice rink. | Two scenarios are conducted regarding Kadikoy PED energy generation. For the second scenario, just 0.53GWh/annum PV production is proposed. | |||
| A2P014: Annual energy use | ||||||
| A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum] | 0.194 | 2.1 | 0.74 | 3.976 | ||
| A2P015: Annual energy delivered | ||||||
| A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum] | 0.0368 | 0.49 | ||||
| A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year | ||||||
| A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | 0 | |||||
| A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year | ||||||
| A2P017: Gas | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P017: Coal | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P017: Oil | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P017: Other | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year | ||||||
| A2P018: PV | no | no | no | yes | yes | no |
| A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | -0.26 | |||||
| A2P018: Wind | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
| A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P018: Hydro | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
| A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P018: Biomass_el | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
| A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P018: Biomass_peat_el | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P018: PVT_el | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P018: Other | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year | ||||||
| A2P019: Geothermal | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P019: Solar Thermal | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P019: Biomass_heat | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
| A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P019: Waste heat+HP | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
| A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P019: Biomass_peat_heat | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P019: PVT_th | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P019: Biomass_firewood_th | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P019: Other | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary | ||||||
| A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary | 0 | 0 | 0 | -2.2692307692308 | 0 | 0 |
| A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED | ||||||
| A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum] | -0.00043 | -104 | ||||
| A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab | ||||||
| A2P022: Safety & Security | Personal Safety | |||||
| A2P022: Health | Healthy community | |||||
| A2P022: Education | ||||||
| A2P022: Mobility | Sustainable mobility | |||||
| A2P022: Energy | NOn-renewable primary energy balance, renewable energy ratio, grid purchase factor, load cover factor/self-generation, supply cover factor/self-consumption, net energy/net power, peak delivered/peak expoted, total greenhouse gas emission | Energy demand (heating and hot water), Energy demand (cooling), Cooling demand, Distributin losses, PV production, RES production, OER, Primafry Non-renewable energy balance, AMR, HMR, CO2 balance | ||||
| A2P022: Water | ||||||
| A2P022: Economic development | capital costs, operational cots, overall economic performance (5 KPIs) | Investment cost, Caputal cost, Operation cost, payback period, NPV, cummulated cash flow, savings, Life cycle, ROI, SROI | ||||
| A2P022: Housing and Community | demographic composition, diverse community, social cohesion | |||||
| A2P022: Waste | ||||||
| A2P022: Other | Smartness and flecibility, Indoor Environmental Quality, Social performance - Equity (affordable housing, access to servicees and amenitioes, afforability of energy, living conditions, sustinable mobility, universal design) | |||||
| A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation | ||||||
| A2P023: Photovoltaics | yes | yes | no | yes | yes | yes |
| A2P023: Solar thermal collectors | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
| A2P023: Wind Turbines | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P023: Geothermal energy system | yes | no | no | no | yes | no |
| A2P023: Waste heat recovery | no | yes | no | no | yes | no |
| A2P023: Waste to energy | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
| A2P023: Polygeneration | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
| A2P023: Co-generation | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P023: Heat Pump | yes | yes | no | yes | yes | yes |
| A2P023: Hydrogen | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P023: Hydropower plant | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P023: Biomass | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
| A2P023: Biogas | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P023: Other | The technological solutions can vary within the PED Lab area and will be specified case by case. | |||||
| A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility | ||||||
| A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) | no | yes | no | no | yes | no |
| A2P024: Energy management system | yes | yes | yes | no | yes | no |
| A2P024: Demand-side management | yes | yes | no | no | yes | no |
| A2P024: Smart electricity grid | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
| A2P024: Thermal Storage | no | no | yes | no | yes | no |
| A2P024: Electric Storage | no | no | yes | no | yes | no |
| A2P024: District Heating and Cooling | no | yes | yes | no | yes | no |
| A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systems | yes | yes | no | no | yes | no |
| A2P024: P2P – buildings | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P024: Other | The technological solutions can vary within the PED Lab area and will be specified case by case. | |||||
| A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency | ||||||
| A2P025: Deep Retrofitting | no | yes | yes | no | no | yes |
| A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildings | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
| A2P025: High-performance new buildings | yes | no | no | no | yes | no |
| A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting) | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P025: Urban data platforms | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
| A2P025: Mobile applications for citizens | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting) | yes | yes | yes | no | yes | yes |
| A2P025: Smart irrigation | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposal | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P025: Smart surveillance | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P025: Other | The technological solutions can vary within the PED Lab area and will be specified case by case. | |||||
| A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility | ||||||
| A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private) | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
| A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances) | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
| A2P026: e-Mobility | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
| A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutions | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
| A2P026: Car-free area | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P026: Other | ||||||
| A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes | ||||||
| A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes | SUMP AVAILABLE | |||||
| A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates | ||||||
| A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | |
| A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes | EPC = 0, energy neutral building | National standards apply. | ||||
| A2P029: Any other building / district certificates | ||||||
| A2P029: Any other building / district certificates | No | No | No | No | ||
| A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes | ||||||
| A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy | ||||||
| A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy |
|
|
|
| ||
| A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy | ||||||
| A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy | Carbon neutrality 2050 | Carbon-Neutral Vantaa by 2030 (min. 80 % reduction of yearly emissions, capture or compensation os the residual 20 %), | ||||
| A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid | ||||||
| A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid |
|
|
| |||
| A3P003: Other | SECAP developed in 2023 | |||||
| A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities | ||||||
| A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities | SELF SUSTAINABILITY, SELF EFFICIENCY | According to the model developed for the district, the electrification of heating and cooling is necessary with heat pumps. Rooftop photovoltaic panels also have the potential for renewable energy generation. Through net-metering practices, the district is expected to reach energy positivity through this scenario. | ||||
| A3P005: Sustainable behaviour | ||||||
| A3P005: Sustainable behaviour | BASED ON SECAP DEVELOPED IN 2023 | |||||
| A3P006: Economic strategies | ||||||
| A3P006: Economic strategies |
|
|
| |||
| A3P006: Other | ||||||
| A3P007: Social models | ||||||
| A3P007: Social models |
|
|
|
|
| |
| A3P007: Other | ||||||
| A3P008: Integrated urban strategies | ||||||
| A3P008: Integrated urban strategies |
|
|
|
| ||
| A3P008: Other | ||||||
| A3P009: Environmental strategies | ||||||
| A3P009: Environmental strategies |
|
|
|
| ||
| A3P009: Other | Energy Positive, Low Emission Zone | |||||
| A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects | ||||||
| A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects | ||||||
| B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition | ||||||
| B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition | The demonstration projects is a new residential development, which consists of an apartment complex which includes 39 apartments spread over 3 floors. It is a sustainble plus energy neighbouhood, and has reached a plus energy balance on its first year in operation. It has MPC controls on the individual heat pumps to improve the energy flexibility of the apartments. It includes the "social beatiful" concepts with a strong emphasis on the social sustainability of the project. | Onsite Energy Ratio > 1 | GOOD MIX OF PUBLIC PRIVATE BUILDINGS | Neutralpath-project is working with the cocept of PCEDs = Positive and Clean Energy Districts (energy-efficient and energy-flexible districts with net zero greenhouse gas emissions and a surplus of renewable energy). Aviapolis Climate-Neutral Lab will work with both PCED and PCED relevant cases within the district. | Çamlık District, unlike many other districts in Ankara, has a specific urban morphology that draws near the other pilot zones considered by the partners of PED-ACT. The site has three-storey single housing units, along with a fair amount of greenery around. Furthermore, the roof areas enable large amounts of PV installment, which results in higher amounts of local renewable energy potential. Therefore, the district is a good fit for PED development. | |
| B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development | ||||||
| B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development | The need for social housing and the ambition to create a great living environment with a high-performance apartment complex, supplied with renewable energy. It results in lower energy bills for the tenants and high-quality homes. | Strategic, economic | Replication of unique PED know how | According to Vantaa city strategy 2021-2025 Aviapolis area aims to become the greenest airport city in Europe. The district is transforming from a logistics and business focused area to a lively urban district which gives an opportunity to rethink the areas energy solutions. With Neutralpath-project Vantaa aims to support the development of the district's energy system and explore innovative, energy efficient and fossil free district energy solutions. | PED-ACT project. | |
| B1P003: Environment of the case study area | ||||||
| B2P003: Environment of the case study area | Suburban area | Urban area | Urban area | Urban area | Urban area | Suburban area |
| B1P004: Type of district | ||||||
| B2P004: Type of district |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| B1P005: Case Study Context | ||||||
| B1P005: Case Study Context |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| B1P006: Year of construction | ||||||
| B1P006: Year of construction | 1986 | |||||
| B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential | ||||||
| B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential | 23.379 | |||||
| B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential | ||||||
| B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential | ||||||
| B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential | ||||||
| B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential | ||||||
| B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential | ||||||
| B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential | ||||||
| B1P011: Population density before intervention | ||||||
| B1P011: Population density before intervention | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| B1P012: Population density after intervention | ||||||
| B1P012: Population density after intervention | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention | ||||||
| B1P013: Residential | no | yes | no | yes | yes | yes |
| B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²] | 50800 | |||||
| B1P013: Office | no | yes | no | yes | yes | no |
| B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P013: Industry and Utility | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
| B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P013: Commercial | no | no | no | yes | yes | no |
| B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P013: Institutional | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
| B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P013: Natural areas | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P013: Recreational | no | yes | no | no | yes | no |
| B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P013: Dismissed areas | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
| B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P013: Other | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
| B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²] | Cultural Center, Sports Center / Total building and land use data of neigborhood 13,878 residential, 4,441 commercial using before intervention. For project area & 49 building area m2 | |||||
| B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention | ||||||
| B1P014: Residential | yes | yes | no | yes | yes | yes |
| B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²] | 2394 | 50800 | ||||
| B1P014: Office | no | yes | no | yes | yes | no |
| B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P014: Industry and Utility | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
| B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P014: Commercial | no | no | no | yes | yes | no |
| B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P014: Institutional | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
| B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P014: Natural areas | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P014: Recreational | no | yes | no | no | yes | no |
| B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P014: Dismissed areas | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P014: Other | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
| B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B2P001: PED Lab concept definition | ||||||
| B2P001: PED Lab concept definition | Neutralpath-project is working with the cocept of PCEDs = Positive and Clean Energy Districts (energy-efficient and energy-flexible districts with net zero greenhouse gas emissions and a surplus of renewable energy). Aviapolis Climate-Neutral Lab will work with both PCED and PCED relevant cases within the district. | |||||
| B2P002: Installation life time | ||||||
| B2P002: Installation life time | ||||||
| B2P003: Scale of action | ||||||
| B2P003: Scale | District | |||||
| B2P004: Operator of the installation | ||||||
| B2P004: Operator of the installation | The City of Vantaa manages the lab, working closely with landowners and other stakeholders such as energy companies, solution providers, universities and citizens. | |||||
| B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials | ||||||
| B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials | ||||||
| B2P006: Circular Economy Approach | ||||||
| B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials? | ||||||
| B2P006: Other | ||||||
| B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab | ||||||
| B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab |
| |||||
| B2P007: Other | ||||||
| B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab | ||||||
| B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab | Municipality | |||||
| B2P008: Other | ||||||
| B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab | ||||||
| B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab |
| |||||
| B2P009: Other | ||||||
| B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities | ||||||
| B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities | ||||||
| B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab | ||||||
| B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab | ||||||
| B2P011: Other | ||||||
| B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab | ||||||
| B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab | ||||||
| B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people | ||||||
| B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people | ||||||
| B2P014: Monitoring measures | ||||||
| B2P014: Monitoring measures | ||||||
| B2P015: Key Performance indicators | ||||||
| B2P015: Key Performance indicators |
| |||||
| B2P016: Execution of operations | ||||||
| B2P016: Execution of operations | ||||||
| B2P017: Capacities | ||||||
| B2P017: Capacities | ||||||
| B2P018: Relations with stakeholders | ||||||
| B2P018: Relations with stakeholders | ||||||
| B2P019: Available tools | ||||||
| B2P019: Available tools |
| |||||
| B2P019: Available tools | ||||||
| B2P020: External accessibility | ||||||
| B2P020: External accessibility | To follow the lab and Vantaa's activities in Neutralpath, fill in the following form: https://neutralpath.eu/fi/tayta-lomake-liittyaksesi-cn-labiin/ | |||||
| C1P001: Unlocking Factors | ||||||
| C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important |
| C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important |
| C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important |
| C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important |
| C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important |
| C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important |
| C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up) | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important |
| C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down) | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important |
| C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.) | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important |
| C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important |
| C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important |
| C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important |
| C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES) | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important |
| C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important |
| C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any) | Collaboration with the local partners | Real-estate market situation | ||||
| C1P002: Driving Factors | ||||||
| C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important |
| C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency) | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important |
| C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important |
| C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important |
| C1P002: Economic growth need | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.) | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important |
| C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important |
| C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any) | ||||||
| C1P003: Administrative barriers | ||||||
| C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important |
| C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P003: Lack of public participation | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important |
| C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important |
| C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important |
| C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important |
| C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos) | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important |
| C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important |
| C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any) | Delay in the Environmental Dialogue processing in the municipality | Fragmented financial support; lack of experimental budget for complex projects, etc. | ||||
| C1P004: Policy barriers | ||||||
| C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important |
| C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important |
| C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any) | Different priorities; overall problematic system od decentralization powers; non-fuctioning model of local development funding, etc. | |||||
| C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers | ||||||
| C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important |
| C1P005: Regulatory instability | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important |
| C1P005: Non-effective regulations | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important |
| C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important |
| C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important |
| C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important |
| C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any) | ||||||
| C1P006: Environmental barriers | ||||||
| C1P006: Environmental barriers | - Climate Variability: 5 - Topographical Constraints: 4 - Sunlight Availability: 5 - Air and Water Pollution: 2 - Water Scarcity: 1 - Environmental Regulations: 3 - Zoning Restrictions: 2 - Natural Disasters: 1 | |||||
| C1P007: Technical barriers | ||||||
| C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P007: Deficient planning | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important |
| C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P007: Lack of well-defined process | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important |
| C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important |
| C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any) | Inadequate regulation towards energy transition | |||||
| C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers | ||||||
| C1P008: Inertia | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important |
| C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important |
| C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important |
| C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P008: Rebound effect | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important |
| C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important |
| C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any) | ||||||
| C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers | ||||||
| C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important |
| C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important |
| C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important |
| C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any) | ||||||
| C1P010: Financial barriers | ||||||
| C1P010: Hidden costs | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important |
| C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P010: Economic crisis | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important |
| C1P010: Risk and uncertainty | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important |
| C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important |
| C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any) | ||||||
| C1P011: Market barriers | ||||||
| C1P011: Split incentives | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important |
| C1P011: Energy price distortion | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important |
| C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs) | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any) | ||||||
| C1P012: Stakeholders involved | ||||||
| C1P012: Government/Public Authorities |
|
|
|
| ||
| C1P012: Research & Innovation |
|
|
|
| ||
| C1P012: Financial/Funding |
| |||||
| C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data |
|
| ||||
| C1P012: Business process management |
| |||||
| C1P012: Urban Services providers |
|
| ||||
| C1P012: Real Estate developers |
|
|
|
| ||
| C1P012: Design/Construction companies |
|
|
| |||
| C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens |
|
|
|
| ||
| C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs |
| |||||
| C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce |
|
| ||||
| C1P012: Other | ||||||
| C1P012: Other (if any) | ||||||
| Summary |
Authors (framework concept)
Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)
Contributors (to the content)
Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)
Implemented by
Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)
