Search
Close this search box.
Search
Map View
Table View
Projects
Filters:
Clear Filters Export All Entries (CSV)
NameProjectTypeCompare
Cerdanyola del Valles, School of Engineering, Campus Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Bucharest, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies (ASE) PED Lab OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Pamplona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Trondheim, Svartlamon OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Savona, The University of Genova, Savona Campus OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Torres Vedras, Encosta de São Vicente COPPER PED Lab Compare
Malmö, Stadium area (Stadionområdet) PED StepWise PED Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Utrecht Science Park PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Kriegerheimstätten PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, 16. District, Leben am Wilhelminenberg HeatCOOP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Laxenburgerstraße AH HeatCOOP PED Lab Compare
Tartu, Annelinn V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Kanaleneiland V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aveiro, Aradas district V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau PED Relevant Case Study Compare
SmartEnCity, Lecce SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study Compare
STARDUST, Trento STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö PED Relevant Case Study Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki PED Relevant Case Study Compare
REPLICATE (pilot action in the Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings), Firenze PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna PED Case Study Compare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento PED Case Study Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna PED Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Võru +CityxChange PED Case Study Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Furuset project, Oslo ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights PED Case Study Compare
Ydalir project ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fornebu, Bærum ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou PED Case Study Compare
Smart Energy Åland PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Munich, Harthof district PED Case Study Compare
Lublin MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Uncompare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Findhorn, the Park InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities PED Case Study Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Aalborg East PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Ankara, Çamlık District PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Trenčín MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Zaragoza, Actur NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins PED Case Study Compare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Uncompare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Espoo, Kera SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Freiburg, Waldsee PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district PED Case Study Compare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe PED Case Study Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district PED Case Study Uncompare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark PED Case Study Compare
Évora, Portugal POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Groningen, PED South MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Groningen, PED North MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Lab Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT PED Lab Compare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Salzburg, Gneis district Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Tartu, City centre area SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab PED Lab Compare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Kifissia, Energy community SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
TitleEspoo, Kera
Ankara, Çamlık District
«×»
Lublin
«×»
Lund, Brunnshög district
«×»
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka
«×»
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED LabEspoo, KeraAnkara, Çamlık DistrictLublinLund, Brunnshög districtIzmir, District of Karşıyaka
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case studyyesyesyesyesyes
PED relevant case studyyesyesnonono
PED Lab.nonononono
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutralityyesyesyesyesyes
Annual energy surplusnoyesyesyesyes
Energy communitynoyesyesyesno
Circularityyesnoyesyesno
Air quality and urban comfortnonoyesyesyes
Electrificationnoyesnoyesno
Net-zero energy costnoyesyesnoyes
Net-zero emissionnoyesyesyesno
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)nonoyesnono
Maximise self-sufficiencynoyesyesnoyes
Othernononoyesno
Other (A1P004)Holistic approach on city planning; Minimise car traffic - walkability; Local service; Climate neutral buildings 2030;
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED LabPlanning PhasePlanning PhasePlanning PhaseIn operationPlanning Phase
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date01/1510/22201510/22
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date12/3509/25204010/25
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • Meteorological open data,
  • General statistical datasets
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets,
  • Vehicle registration datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts
A1P009: OtherGIS open dataset is under constructionOther
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
A1P011: Geographic coordinates
X Coordinate (longitude):24.7537777832.79536922.568413.23246940076959927.110049
Y Coordinate (latitude):60.2162222239.88181251.246555.7198979220719338.496054
A1P012: Country
A1P012: CountryFinlandTurkeyPolandSwedenTurkey
A1P013: City
A1P013: CityEspooAnkaraLublinLundİzmir
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).DfbDsbCfbDfbCsa
A1P015: District boundary
A1P015: District boundaryGeographicGeographicGeographicGeographicGeographic
Other
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:MixedPrivatePrivatePublicPrivate
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:Multiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple Owners
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED257520021
A1P019: Conditioned space
A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]2260021664.731500000102795
A1P020: Total ground area
A1P020: Total ground area [m²]5800005080072833.47150000032600
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area00013
A1P022: Financial schemes
A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estatenononoyesno
A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]99999999
A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO schemenonononono
A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Othernonononono
A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural fundingnononoyesno
A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]1000000
A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National fundingnononoyesno
A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]30000000
A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional fundingnononoyesno
A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]30000000
A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal fundingnononoyesno
A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]180000000
A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Othernonononono
A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EUnoyesnoyesyes
A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]20000001193355
A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Nationalnoyesnonoyes
A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regionalnonononono
A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Othernonononono
A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022: OtherMultiple different funding schemes depending on the case.
A1P023: Economic Targets
A1P023: Economic Targets
  • Job creation,
  • Positive externalities,
  • Boosting local businesses,
  • Boosting local and sustainable production,
  • Boosting consumption of local and sustainable products
  • Boosting local and sustainable production
  • Job creation,
  • Positive externalities,
  • Boosting local businesses,
  • Boosting local and sustainable production,
  • Boosting consumption of local and sustainable products
  • Other
  • Positive externalities,
  • Boosting local and sustainable production
A1P023: OtherCircular economyWorld class sustainable living and research environments
A1P024: More comments:
A1P024: More comments:The urban morphology of Çamlık District differs in several ways, compared with the typical urban fabric in Türkiye, along with the capital city of Ankara. The houses on the site are composed of three-story attached single-housing units with multiple rows, creating a total of 257 housing units in total. Low-rise buildings coupled with suitably oriented rooftop surfaces brings about significant advantages in the site. Dense greenery in the site also results in reduced cooling energy demand in the buildings.Lublin PED Area is geographically bounded and the ambition is to reach Self-Sufficiency. There is a shopping centre with a large rooftop area for solar generation and there are also an empty lot (just on the east side of the building) and a carpark area (on the north side) next to the commercial centre. These areas can also be evaluated for on-site (on the ground – or canopies for cars) energy generation. There are also new built (mainly in 2012) residential blocks with high efficiency and this district is so-called an “eco-district”. Thanks to the District Heating Grid (DHN), all buildings are connected to each other the network has potential for sharing mechanisms in the PED Area. Another opportunity for renewable energy is that these buildings are connected to more or less the end point of DHN and for this reason, a waste heat potential from the return pipe may also be considered. There are also small size residentials, that are not connected to the DHN, around the PED area and this enlightened the technical team for exporting energy from PED to these areas with a new infrastructure.
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]
Contact person for general enquiries
A1P026: NameJoni MäkinenProf. Dr. İpek Gürsel DİNODorota Wolińska-PietrzakMarkus PaulssonOzlem Senyol
A1P027: OrganizationCity of EspooMiddle East Technical UniversityLublin MunicipalityCity of LundKarsiyaka Municipality
A1P028: AffiliationMunicipality / Public BodiesResearch Center / UniversityMunicipality / Public BodiesMunicipality / Public BodiesMunicipality / Public Bodies
A1P028: Other
A1P029: Emailjoni.makinen@espoo.fiipekg@metu.edu.trdwolinska@lublin.eumarkus.paulsson@lund.seozlemkocaer2@gmail.com
Contact person for other special topics
A1P030: NameAssoc. Prof. Onur TaylanEva DalmanHasan Burak Cavka
A1P031: Emailotaylan@metu.edu.treva.dalman@lund.sehasancavka@iyte.edu.tr
Pursuant to the General Data Protection RegulationYesYesYesYesYes
A2P001: Fields of application
A2P001: Fields of application
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • E-mobility,
  • Digital technologies,
  • Waste management,
  • Construction materials
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy production,
  • Construction materials
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • E-mobility,
  • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
  • Digital technologies,
  • Indoor air quality
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • E-mobility,
  • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
  • Digital technologies,
  • Water use,
  • Waste management,
  • Construction materials,
  • Other
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.)
A2P001: OtherWalkability and biking
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields- Kera development commitment (https://www.espoo.fi/en/kera-development-commitment). - SPARCS Co-creation model for sustainable and smart urban areas (www.co-creatingsparcs.fi/en). - Kera area carbon neutrality roadmap (https://static.espoo.fi/cdn/ff/MHDdcMNJ9aYn7CjpoD4zNpo5M-M9HIDLXlJdUrUmf-8/1642756766/public/2022-01/Kera%20carbon%20neutrality%20map_EN.pdf)The energy consumption and efficiency of the energy model of Çamlık Site, created using EnergyPlus software, have been evaluated under the scenarios specified below. At each stage, a new system was incorporated to explore the potential of the area becoming a PED. In this context, four scenarios were created to compare different energy scenarios for the Ankara pilot area and to observe the impact of the included systems on energy efficiency: V_base; V_ER; V_ER,HP; V_ER,HP,PV. The basic scenario (V_base) was created using the current state without any improvement to the building envelope. This scenario was developed to determine the annual energy needs of the entire site without any intervention and serves as a reference point for the other developed models. The second scenario (V_ER) was created to improve the building envelopes of all residential units in the area, altering the U-values according to Türkiye's current building standards (TS-825). The third scenario (V_ER,HP) primarily includes a heat pump model that can use electrical energy to produce higher thermal energy and is added on top of the improvements in the second scenario. Finally, the V_ER,HP,PV scenario combines building envelope improvements, the heat pump, and the solar PV system.SEE: D4.1 - Methodology and Guidelines for PED design https://makingcity.eu/results/#1551708358627-aefa76ef-66b2LundaMaTs methodology for traffic and city planning. LundaEko - Lund's programme for ecological sustainability. Municipally owned land is sold to property developers on environmental conditions.Methods involve studying the feasibility of digital PED references for the case cities about their energy, environmental, and economic performance by EnergyPlus tool. In case of insufficient energy data and the need of high resolution data, ‘Gaussian mixture model and expectation-maximization algorithm’ and ‘time-series decomposition-recombination’ method will be used to supplement data to EnergyPlus. The feasibility results will be returned to stakeholders for iterative discussion, and the iterative results will be used to update digital references. Replication plans are developed based on such a cooperation process for strategies to implement PEDs. If a PED is demonstrated during the project period, the measured data will be used to verify the feasibility model to optimize previous results (WP7– R3 & R4). In the MAKING-CITY project, the overall PED design method is developed, which will be further optimised in this project. In addition, PED-ACT will use the methods and knowledge, including how to choose a suitable PED in a city, energy balance calculation, and technologies available for PED. The RUGGEDISED project outputs the governance model into the replication plan in PED-ACT. Its ‘smart city open-data decision platform’ will illustrate an excellent example for the database in PED-ACT. The IEA EBC Annex 83 and Cost Action 19126 create the basis for data collection, developing existing PED databases, characterization of PED, and review of regulations of PED, as well as development of simulation tools. The UBEM project further enables a detailed high-resolution energy balance calculation of PED.
A2P003: Application of ISO52000
A2P003: Application of ISO52000NoYesNoNoYes
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoYesYesYesYes
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoNoNoYesNo
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculationMobility is not included in the calculations.Today electrically charged vehicles are included in the energy balance. In the future also other fuels should be included.Mobility is not included in the calculations.
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]54.53.446253.862
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]19.40.528301.226
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
A2P011: PVyesyesnoyesyes
A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]43.42401.028
A2P011: Windnononoyesno
A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Hydrononononono
A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Biomass_elnonononono
A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Biomass_peat_elnonononono
A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: PVT_elnonononono
A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Othernonononono
A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
A2P012: Geothermalnonononono
A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Solar Thermalnonononono
A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Biomass_heatnonononono
A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Waste heat+HPyesnonoyesno
A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]200
A2P012: Biomass_peat_heatnonononono
A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: PVT_thnonononono
A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Biomass_firewood_thnonononono
A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Othernonononono
A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notesLocal energy utility will implement district level thermal solution. First, energy will be produced from waste heat from a local data center. Further thermal solutions are under discussion and development.
A2P014: Annual energy use
A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]78.83.9765.088
A2P015: Annual energy delivered
A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]15.4
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]00
A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
A2P017: Gasnoyesnonoyes
A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Coalnonononono
A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Oilnonononono
A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Othernonononono
A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
A2P018: PVnononoyesyes
A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]0.707
A2P018: Windnononoyesno
A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Hydronononoyesno
A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Biomass_elnononoyesno
A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Biomass_peat_elnonononono
A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: PVT_elnonononono
A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Othernonononono
A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
A2P019: Geothermalnonononono
A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Solar Thermalnonononono
A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_heatnonononono
A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Waste heat+HPnonononono
A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_peat_heatnonononono
A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: PVT_thnonononono
A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_firewood_thnonononono
A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Othernonononono
A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary00001.4540311173975
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]450000
A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
A2P022: Safety & Security
A2P022: Health
A2P022: Education
A2P022: MobilityMaximum 1/3 transport with car
A2P022: EnergyLocal energy production 150% of energy need
A2P022: Water
A2P022: Economic development
A2P022: Housing and Community50% rental apartments and 50% owner apartments
A2P022: Waste
A2P022: Other
A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
A2P023: Photovoltaicsyesyesyesyesyes
A2P023: Solar thermal collectorsnononoyesno
A2P023: Wind Turbinesnononoyesno
A2P023: Geothermal energy systemnononoyesno
A2P023: Waste heat recoveryyesnonoyesno
A2P023: Waste to energynonononono
A2P023: Polygenerationnononoyesno
A2P023: Co-generationnonononono
A2P023: Heat Pumpyesyesyesyesyes
A2P023: Hydrogennonoyesyesno
A2P023: Hydropower plantnonononono
A2P023: Biomassnonononono
A2P023: Biogasnonononono
A2P023: Other
A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)yesnoyesyesno
A2P024: Energy management systemyesnoyesyesno
A2P024: Demand-side managementyesnoyesyesno
A2P024: Smart electricity gridyesnoyesyesno
A2P024: Thermal Storagenonoyesyesno
A2P024: Electric Storagenonoyesyesno
A2P024: District Heating and Coolingyesnoyesyesno
A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systemsnonoyesyesno
A2P024: P2P – buildingsnonononono
A2P024: Other
A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
A2P025: Deep Retrofittingnoyesyesnoyes
A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildingsnonoyesnono
A2P025: High-performance new buildingsyesnoyesyesno
A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)yesnoyesyesno
A2P025: Urban data platformsyesnoyesyesno
A2P025: Mobile applications for citizensnonoyesnono
A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)yesyesyesyesyes
A2P025: Smart irrigationnonononono
A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposalnononoyesno
A2P025: Smart surveillancenonononono
A2P025: Other
A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)yesnoyesnono
A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)yesnoyesyesno
A2P026: e-Mobilityyesnoyesyesno
A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutionsyesnonoyesno
A2P026: Car-free areanononoyesno
A2P026: Other
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notesWalkability
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificatesNoNoNoYesNo
A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesMiljöbyggnad silver/guld
A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
A2P029: Any other building / district certificatesNoNoNoNoNo
A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
  • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
  • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract)
  • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
  • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
  • Smart cities strategies,
  • Urban Renewal Strategies,
  • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
  • New development strategies,
  • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
  • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
  • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
  • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract)
  • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
  • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
  • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategyCity strategy: Net climate neutrality 2030Karşıyaka Municipality is the first local government in Turkey to sign the Covenant of Mayors in 2011. During this period, the greenhouse gas inventory of the district was carried out three times and reduction targets were set for 2020 and 2030. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan prepared as of the end of 2021, Karşıyaka Municipality has targeted a 40% reduction in its emissions for 2030 compared to the base year 2018. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan, Karşıyaka Municipality aims to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions from 3.96 tCO2e / person in 2018 to 2.37 tCO2e / person in 2030. System solutions such as the use of renewable energy sources, air, ground or water source heat pump, cogeneration and microcogeneration are analysed by designers in order to fully or partially meet the energy requirements for heating, cooling, ventilation, hot water, electricity and lighting for all buildings with a floor area of less than 20,000 square metres. If at least 50% of the building's total energy consumption costs are covered by one or more of these applications, the points are taken in the assessment table in the Building and housing estate business certification guide of 2023.
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
  • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
  • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
  • Other
  • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
A3P003: OtherHeating GridNo gas grid in Brunnshög
A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
A3P004: Identification of needs and prioritiesAccording to the model developed for the district, the electrification of heating and cooling is necessary with heat pumps. Rooftop photovoltaic panels also have the potential for renewable energy generation. Through net-metering practices, the district is expected to reach energy positivity through this scenario.Local waste heat is utlized to a very large extent. More local electricity production is needed. Need to minimise the use of private cars.According to the model developed for the district, the electrification of heating and cooling is necessary.Therefore, there needs to be the implementation of a heat pump. The building-integrated photovoltaic panelsshould follow. Through net-metering practices, the district is expected to reach energy positivity throughthis scenario.
A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
A3P005: Sustainable behaviourNeed to minimise the use of private cars. Need to provide efficient methods for sorce separated waste collection.
A3P006: Economic strategies
A3P006: Economic strategies
  • PPP models,
  • Circular economy models
  • PPP models,
  • Other
A3P006: OtherAttractivenes
A3P007: Social models
A3P007: Social models
  • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
  • Quality of Life
  • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
  • Affordability
  • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
  • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
  • Quality of Life,
  • Strategies towards social mix
  • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
  • Affordability
A3P007: Other
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
  • Strategic urban planning,
  • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
  • District Energy plans
  • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
  • District Energy plans
  • City Vision 2050,
  • SECAP Updates
  • Strategic urban planning,
  • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
  • City Vision 2050,
  • SECAP Updates
  • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
  • District Energy plans,
  • SECAP Updates
A3P008: Other
A3P009: Environmental strategies
A3P009: Environmental strategies
  • Net zero carbon footprint,
  • Life Cycle approach,
  • Greening strategies,
  • Nature Based Solutions (NBS)
  • Energy Neutral,
  • Low Emission Zone
  • Energy Neutral,
  • Low Emission Zone,
  • Net zero carbon footprint,
  • Carbon-free,
  • Life Cycle approach,
  • Greening strategies,
  • Nature Based Solutions (NBS)
  • Net zero carbon footprint,
  • Greening strategies,
  • Sustainable Urban drainage systems (SUDS),
  • Nature Based Solutions (NBS)
  • Energy Neutral,
  • Low Emission Zone,
  • Pollutants Reduction
A3P009: OtherEnergy Positive, Low Emission Zone
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspectsThe municipality cannot demand a specific energy solution to private property owners. It has to be voluntary and market based solutions.
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definitionImplementation of district level heating system to make heating energy positive and expanding local renewable electricity production.Çamlık District, unlike many other districts in Ankara, has a specific urban morphology that draws near the other pilot zones considered by the partners of PED-ACT. The site has three-storey single housing units, along with a fair amount of greenery around. Furthermore, the roof areas enable large amounts of PV installment, which results in higher amounts of local renewable energy potential. Therefore, the district is a good fit for PED development.Vision: The city as a power plant. The ultimate goal is that more energy is produced within the distric boundaries than is being used (heating, electricity & mobility). Energy efficient buildings, efficient mobility, reuse of residual heat and solar electricity are the main methods.The pilot area was selected on the basis of several criteria: its location within areas prioritised by Karşıyaka Municipality for combating climate change, compliance with the building regulations set out in the Green Building-Site-Operation (2023) guide, which are in line with Municipality's energy policy, the presence of open spaces that allow various applications for renewable energy, proximity to public facilities such as schools and municipal services, the availability of data on energy consumption (e.g. electricity and natural gas bills) and architectural features, the potential for community building, the suitability for solar energy systems, considering orientation and roof structure, and the potential for future building renovations. The aim of the initiative is to explore the feasibility of transforming the district into a Positive Energy District (PED).
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project developmentPED-ACT project.The aim is to build a sustainable city with minimal climate impact and maximum quality of life. PED is an important step to acheive the aims of a very ambitious city development.
B1P003: Environment of the case study area
B2P003: Environment of the case study areaUrban areaSuburban areaUrban areaUrban area
B1P004: Type of district
B2P004: Type of district
  • New construction
  • Renovation
  • New construction
  • Renovation
B1P005: Case Study Context
B1P005: Case Study Context
  • Re-use / Transformation Area
  • Retrofitting Area
  • New Development
  • Retrofitting Area
B1P006: Year of construction
B1P006: Year of construction19862005
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential0
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential1400018000
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential2000
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential1000022000
B1P011: Population density before intervention
B1P011: Population density before intervention00000
B1P012: Population density after intervention
B1P012: Population density after intervention0.041379310344828000.0266666666666670
B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
B1P013: Residentialyesyesnonoyes
B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]50800102795
B1P013: Officeyesnonoyesno
B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]60000
B1P013: Industry and Utilityyesnononono
B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Commercialnonononono
B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Institutionalnonononono
B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Natural areasnononoyesno
B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]2000000
B1P013: Recreationalnonononono
B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Dismissed areasyesnononono
B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Othernononoyesno
B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]Outdoor parking: 100000
B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
B1P014: Residentialyesyesnoyesyes
B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]50800600000102795
B1P014: Officeyesnonoyesno
B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]650000
B1P014: Industry and Utilitynonononono
B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Commercialyesnononono
B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Institutionalnononoyesno
B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]50000
B1P014: Natural areasnonononono
B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Recreationalyesnonoyesno
B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]400000
B1P014: Dismissed areasnonononono
B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Othernonononono
B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
B2P002: Installation life time
B2P002: Installation life time
B2P003: Scale of action
B2P003: ScaleDistrict
B2P004: Operator of the installation
B2P004: Operator of the installation
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?Yes
B2P006: Other
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
  • Strategic
B2P007: Other
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED LabMunicipality
B2P008: Other
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
  • Academia,
  • Private,
  • Industrial,
  • Citizens, public, NGO
B2P009: Other
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
  • Buildings,
  • Demand-side management,
  • Prosumers,
  • Renewable generation,
  • Efficiency measures,
  • Waste management,
  • Water treatment,
  • Lighting,
  • E-mobility,
  • Green areas,
  • Circular economy models
B2P011: Other
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
  • Monitoring and evaluation infrastructure
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
B2P014: Monitoring measures
B2P014: Monitoring measures
  • Available data
B2P015: Key Performance indicators
B2P015: Key Performance indicators
  • Energy
B2P016: Execution of operations
B2P016: Execution of operations
B2P017: Capacities
B2P017: Capacities
B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
B2P019: Available tools
B2P019: Available tools
B2P019: Available tools
B2P020: External accessibility
B2P020: External accessibility
C1P001: Unlocking Factors
C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock4 - Important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important
C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important
C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important
C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important4 - Important
C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important
C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important4 - Important2 - Slightly important
C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important
C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)
C1P002: Driving Factors
C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
C1P002: Economic growth need4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important
C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)
C1P003: Administrative barriers
C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important
C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
C1P003: Lack of public participation4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important
C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important
C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important
C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important
C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)
C1P004: Policy barriers
C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important
C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)
C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
C1P005: Regulatory instability3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
C1P005: Non-effective regulations3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important
C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important
C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
C1P006: Environmental barriers
C1P006: Environmental barriers- Climate Variability: 5 - Topographical Constraints: 4 - Sunlight Availability: 5 - Air and Water Pollution: 2 - Water Scarcity: 1 - Environmental Regulations: 3 - Zoning Restrictions: 2 - Natural Disasters: 1?- Climate Variability: 5 - Topographical Constraints: 4 - Sunlight Availability: 5 - Environmental Regulations: 3 - Zoning Restrictions: 2 - Air and Water Pollution: 2 - Natural Disasters: 1 - Water Scarcity: 1
C1P007: Technical barriers
C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
C1P007: Deficient planning3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important
C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P007: Lack of well-defined process3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important
C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important
C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important
C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries2 - Slightly important4 - Important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important4 - Important
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)
C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
C1P008: Inertia3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important
C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important
C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important
C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
C1P008: Rebound effect3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important
C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important
C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important
C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important
C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important
C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important4 - Important
C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
C1P010: Financial barriers
C1P010: Hidden costs3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important
C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important
C1P010: Economic crisis4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
C1P010: Risk and uncertainty3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important
C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important
C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
C1P011: Market barriers
C1P011: Split incentives3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
C1P011: Energy price distortion3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
C1P012: Stakeholders involved
C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • Planning/leading
  • Planning/leading,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Research & Innovation
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • Design/demand aggregation
C1P012: Financial/Funding
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation
  • None
  • Construction/implementation
C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data
  • Planning/leading,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • None
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Business process management
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation
  • None
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation
C1P012: Urban Services providers
  • Planning/leading,
  • Construction/implementation
  • None
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Real Estate developers
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • None
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Design/Construction companies
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation
  • None
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation
C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • None
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs
  • Planning/leading
  • None
  • None
C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation
  • None
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Other
  • None
C1P012: Other (if any)
Summary

Authors (framework concept)

Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

Contributors (to the content)

Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

Implemented by

Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)

Join the Action

PED-EU-NET is an open, interdisciplinary and growing network welcoming academics, practitioners and relevant stakeholders to contribute to the activities of the work plan.
Join Now

COST

COST is an EU funding programme that enables researchers to set up their interdisciplinary research networks in Europe and beyond. We provide funds for organising conferences, meetings, training schools, short scientific exchanges or other networking activities in a wide range of scientific topics. By creating open spaces where people and ideas can grow, we unlock the full potential of science.

PED-EU-NET

The COST Action Positive Energy Districts European Network (PED-EU-NET) aims to mobilise researchers and other relevant stakeholders across different domains and sectors to drive the deployment of Positive Energy Districts (PEDs) in Europe through open sharing of knowledge, exchange of ideas, pooling of resources, experimentation of new methods and co-creation of novel solutions.

Action Details

Grant Holder
Department of Planning, Design, Technology of Architecture, Sapienza University of Rome

Start of Action: 10 September 2020
End of Action: 09 September 2024
CSO approval date: 24/03/2020

© 2021-2023 PED-EU-NET COST Action CA19126. All rights reserved.