Search
Close this search box.
Search
Map View
Table View
Projects
Filters:
Clear Filters Export All Entries (CSV)
NameProjectTypeCompare
Tartu, Estonia V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Utrecht, the Netherlands (District of Kanaleneiland) V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aveiro, Portugal V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau PED Relevant Case Study Compare
SmartEnCity, Lecce SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study Compare
STARDUST, Trento STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö PED Relevant Case Study Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki PED Relevant Case Study Compare
REPLICATE (pilot action in the Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings), Firenze PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna PED Case Study Compare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento PED Case Study Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna PED Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Võru +CityxChange PED Case Study Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Furuset project, Oslo ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights PED Case Study Compare
Ydalir project ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fornebu, Bærum ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou PED Case Study Compare
Smart Energy Åland PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Munich, Harthof district PED Case Study Compare
Lublin MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Uncompare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Findhorn, the Park InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Uncompare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities PED Case Study Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Aalborg East PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Ankara, Çamlık District PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Trenčín MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Uncompare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Zaragoza, Actur NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins PED Case Study Compare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Espoo, Kera SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Freiburg, Waldsee PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district PED Case Study Compare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe PED Case Study Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district PED Case Study Uncompare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark PED Case Study Compare
Évora, Portugal POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Groningen, PED South MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Groningen, PED North MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Lab Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT PED Lab Uncompare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Uncompare
Salzburg, Gneis district Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Tartu, City centre area SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab PED Lab Compare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Kifissia, Energy community SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
TitleGroningen, PED North
Findhorn, the Park
«×»
City of Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block
«×»
Ankara, Çamlık District
«×»
Lund, Brunnshög district
«×»
Lublin
«×»
Trenčín
«×»
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT
«×»
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED LabGroningen, PED NorthFindhorn, the ParkCity of Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva blockAnkara, Çamlık DistrictLund, Brunnshög districtLublinTrenčínLubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case studynoyesyesyesyesyesyesno
PED relevant case studynononoyesnononono
PED Lab.yesnonononononoyes
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutralityyesyesnoyesyesyesyesno
Annual energy surplusyesyesnoyesyesyesyesno
Energy communityyesyesnoyesyesyesyesno
Circularityyesyesnonoyesyesnono
Air quality and urban comfortnonononoyesyesnoyes
Electrificationnoyesnoyesyesnonono
Net-zero energy costnononoyesnoyesnono
Net-zero emissionyesyesnoyesyesyesnoyes
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)nononononoyesyesyes
Maximise self-sufficiencynoyesyesyesnoyesnono
Othernonononoyesnonono
Other (A1P004)Holistic approach on city planning; Minimise car traffic - walkability; Local service; Climate neutral buildings 2030;
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED LabImplementation PhaseIn operationIn operationPlanning PhaseIn operationPlanning PhasePlanning PhaseImplementation Phase
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date12/1801/6206/1810/22201506/1911/19
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date12/2303/2209/25204011/2312/23
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Meteorological open data
  • General statistical datasets
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • Meteorological open data,
  • General statistical datasets
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets,
  • Vehicle registration datasets
  • GIS open datasets
  • General statistical datasets
A1P009: OtherGIS open dataset is under construction
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
  • TNO, Hanze, RUG,
  • Ped noord book
    • M. Hukkalainen, F. Zarrin, K. Klobut, O. Lindholm, M. Ranta, P. Hajduk, T. Vainio-Kaila, E. Wanne, J. Tartia, H. Horn, K. Kontu, J. Juhmen, S. Santala, R. Turtiainen, J. Töyräs, T. Koljonen. (2020). Deliverable D3.1 Detailed plan of the Espoo smart city lighthouse demonstrations. Available online: https://www.sparcs.info/sites/default/files/2020-09/SPARCS_D3.1_Detailed_plan_Espoo.pdf,
    • Hukkalainen, Zarrin Fatima, Krzysztof Klobut, Kalevi Piira, Mikaela Ranta, Petr Hajduk, Tiina Vainio-Kaila , Elina Wanne, Jani Tartia, Angela Bartel, Joni Mäkinen, Mia Kaurila, Kaisa Kontu, Jaano Juhmen, Merja Ryöppy, Reetta Turtiainen, Joona Töyräs, Timo Koljonen (2021) Deliverable 3.2 Midterm report on the implemented demonstrations of solutions for energy positive blocks in Espoo. Available online: https://www.sparcs.info/sites/default/files/2022-02/SPARCS_D3.2.pdf,
    • www.lippulaiva.fi
    • http://www.ceder.es/redes-inteligentes,
    • O. Izquierdo-Monge, Paula Peña-Carro et al. Conversion of a network section with loads, storage systems and renewable generation sources into a smart microgrid. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(11), 5012. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11115012,
    • O. Izquierdo-Monge, Paula Peña-Carro et al. A Methodology for the Conversion of a Network Section with Generation Sources, Storage and Loads into an Electrical Microgrid Based on Raspberry Pi and Home Assistant. ICSC-Cities 2020, CCIS 1359 proceedings. Springer. https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69136-3_1
    A1P011: Geographic coordinates
    X Coordinate (longitude):6.535121-3.609924.654332.79536913.23246940076959922.568418.046870515442922-2.508
    Y Coordinate (latitude):53.23484657.653060.149139.88181255.7198979220719351.246548.89925138034027441.603
    A1P012: Country
    A1P012: CountryNetherlandsUnited KingdomFinlandTurkeySwedenPolandSlovakiaSpain
    A1P013: City
    A1P013: CityGroningenFindhornEspooAnkaraLundLublinTrencinLubia - Soria
    A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
    A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).CfaDwcDfbDsbDfbCfbCfbCfb
    A1P015: District boundary
    A1P015: District boundaryFunctionalGeographicGeographicGeographicGeographicGeographicFunctionalGeographic
    Other
    A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
    A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:MixedMixedPrivatePrivatePublicPrivateMixedPublic
    A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
    A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:Multiple OwnersMultiple OwnersSingle OwnerMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersSingle Owner
    A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
    A1P018: Number of buildings in PED716092572005106
    A1P019: Conditioned space
    A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]1.0111200022600150000021664.732000
    A1P020: Total ground area
    A1P020: Total ground area [m²]17.13218000016500050800150000072833.47750006400000
    A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
    A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area00101000
    A1P022: Financial schemes
    A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estateyesyesyesnoyesnoyesno
    A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]99999999
    A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO schemenononononononono
    A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Otheryesnonononononono
    A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural fundingnonononoyesnoyesno
    A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]1000000
    A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National fundingyesyesnonoyesnonono
    A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]30000000
    A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional fundingnonononoyesnonono
    A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]30000000
    A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal fundingyesnononoyesnoyesno
    A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]180000000
    A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Othernonononononoyesno
    A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EUyesyesyesyesyesnonono
    A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]3088752000000
    A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Nationalnononoyesnononoyes
    A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regionalnononononononoyes
    A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Othernononononononono
    A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022: Other
    A1P023: Economic Targets
    A1P023: Economic Targets
    • Boosting local businesses,
    • Boosting local and sustainable production
    • Job creation,
    • Positive externalities,
    • Boosting local businesses
    • Boosting local and sustainable production
    • Other
    • Job creation,
    • Positive externalities,
    • Boosting local businesses,
    • Boosting local and sustainable production,
    • Boosting consumption of local and sustainable products
    • Boosting local businesses,
    • Boosting local and sustainable production
    • Boosting local and sustainable production,
    • Boosting consumption of local and sustainable products
    A1P023: OtherWorld class sustainable living and research environments
    A1P024: More comments:
    A1P024: More comments:The Espoonlahti district is located on the south-western coast of Espoo. With 56,000 inhabitants, it is the second largest of the Espoo city centres. The number of inhabitants is estimated to grow to 70,000 within the next 10 years. Espoonlahti will be a future transit hub of the south-western Espoo, along the metro line, and the increasing stream of passengers provides a huge potential for retail, business and residential developments. E-mobility solutions and last-mile services have strong potential in the area when subway extension is finished and running. The extensive (re)development of the Lippulaiva blocks make a benchmark catering to the everyday needs of residents. The completely new shopping centre is a state-of-the-art cross point with 20,000 daily customers and 10,000 daily commuters (3.5 million/year). The new underground metro line and station, and feeder line bus terminal, are fully integrated. Residential housing of approximately 550 new apartments will be built on top. Lippulaiva is a large traffic hub, directly connected to public transport and right next to the Länsiväylä highway and extensive cycle paths. Lippulaiva offers diverse, mixed-use services, such as a shopping mall, public services, a day care centre, residential apartment buildings, and underground parking facilities. Lippulaiva received the LEED Gold environmental certificate and Smart Building Gold certificate. • Flagship of sustainability • Cooling and heating demand from geothermal energy system (on-site) with energy storage system, 4 MW • PV panels: roof and façade, 630 kWp • Smart control strategies for electricity and thermal energy, smart microgrid-system and battery storage • Charging capacity for 134 EVsThe urban morphology of Çamlık District differs in several ways, compared with the typical urban fabric in Türkiye, along with the capital city of Ankara. The houses on the site are composed of three-story attached single-housing units with multiple rows, creating a total of 257 housing units in total. Low-rise buildings coupled with suitably oriented rooftop surfaces brings about significant advantages in the site. Dense greenery in the site also results in reduced cooling energy demand in the buildings.Lublin PED Area is geographically bounded and the ambition is to reach Self-Sufficiency. There is a shopping centre with a large rooftop area for solar generation and there are also an empty lot (just on the east side of the building) and a carpark area (on the north side) next to the commercial centre. These areas can also be evaluated for on-site (on the ground – or canopies for cars) energy generation. There are also new built (mainly in 2012) residential blocks with high efficiency and this district is so-called an “eco-district”. Thanks to the District Heating Grid (DHN), all buildings are connected to each other the network has potential for sharing mechanisms in the PED Area. Another opportunity for renewable energy is that these buildings are connected to more or less the end point of DHN and for this reason, a waste heat potential from the return pipe may also be considered. There are also small size residentials, that are not connected to the DHN, around the PED area and this enlightened the technical team for exporting energy from PED to these areas with a new infrastructure.The Centre for the Development of Renewable Energy (CEDER)is specialized in applied research, development and promotion of renewable energy. Among the facilities of this Centre, the urban laboratory CEDER-CIEMAT assess the performance of different configurations of energy networks at the district level. This PED-Lab infrastructure is an energy district that connects six office buildings with energy generation installations by means of two energy rings: electrical grid (in operation phase) and thermal network (in the implementation phase). The buildings of this PED Lab can act as energy demanders or suppliers depending on the climatic and operational conditions. The majority of these buildings are constructed with conventional technologies but some of them are implemented with efficient and sustainable measures. The thermal network is composed by two biomass boilers, 300 kW power each, and water tanks with 90 kWh of thermal storage. This network will shortly be expanded with a low temperature (90°C) and high temperature (150°-250°C) rings. The low-temperature ring is made up by two Stirling engine cogeneration boilers (one biomass gasification boiler and one gas boiler). The high-temperature ring has a thermal generator made up of Fresnel solar concentrators and an ORC cogeneration system fed directly from the solar concentrator. The high-temperature ring is interconnected with the low-temperature ring through an oil/water heat exchanger. This network has thermal storage systems in the modalities of: aquifers, boreholes, phase change materials, cold storage with geothermal exchange ground recovery and thermal storage at very low temperature with zeolites. The electrical grid incorporates different renewable generation technologies (50 kW wind turbine and eight different photovoltaic systems, a reversible hydraulic system), and engine generator of 100 kVA, electricity storages (batteries) and flexible loads.
    A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
    A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]0
    Contact person for general enquiries
    A1P026: NameJasper Tonen, Elisabeth KoopsStefano NebioloElina EkelundProf. Dr. İpek Gürsel DİNOMarkus PaulssonDorota Wolińska-PietrzakVladimír ŠkolaDr. Raquel Ramos
    A1P027: OrganizationMunicipality of GroningenFindhorn Innovation Research and Education CICCitycon OyjMiddle East Technical UniversityCity of LundLublin MunicipalityCity of TrencinCentre for the Development of Renewable Energy (CEDER) - Centre for Energy, Environment and Technology Research (CIEMAT)
    A1P028: AffiliationMunicipality / Public BodiesResearch Center / UniversitySME / IndustryResearch Center / UniversityMunicipality / Public BodiesMunicipality / Public BodiesOtherResearch Center / University
    A1P028: OtherProject Manager
    A1P029: EmailJasper.tonen@groningen.nlstefanonebiolo@gmail.comElina.ekelund@citycon.comipekg@metu.edu.trmarkus.paulsson@lund.sedwolinska@lublin.euvladimir.skola@trencin.skraquel.ramos@ciemat.es
    Contact person for other special topics
    A1P030: NameElina EkelundAssoc. Prof. Onur TaylanEva DalmanVladimír ŠkolaDr. Oscar Seco
    A1P031: EmailElina.ekelund@citycon.comotaylan@metu.edu.treva.dalman@lund.sevladimir.skola@trencin.skoscar.seco@ciemat.es
    Pursuant to the General Data Protection RegulationYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
    A2P001: Fields of application
    A2P001: Fields of application
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
    • Waste management
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Waste management
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Digital technologies
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy production,
    • Construction materials
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
    • Digital technologies,
    • Water use,
    • Waste management,
    • Construction materials,
    • Other
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
    • Digital technologies,
    • Indoor air quality
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • Digital technologies,
    • Indoor air quality
    A2P001: OtherWalkability and biking
    A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
    A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fieldsEnergy efficiency: - buildings energy retrofit supported by tax bonuses - replacing heat supply technologies Energy production: - installation of new (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; - presence of a large PV plant in the South East (2 solar parks: 12MW and 107MW) and North area (0,4 MW) Energy flexibility: - energy storage solutions, battery storage and possible hydrogen production - GRID balancing services E-mobility - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; Urban Management - make use of the organizational structure Waste Management - circular use of municipal waste streamsEnergy efficiency: - eliminating waste energy utilizing smart energy system - utilizing excess heat from grocery stores Energy flexibility: - A battery energy storage system (1,5 MW/1,5MWh); Active participation in Nordpool electricity market (FCR-N) Energy production: - heating and cooling from geothermal heat pump system; 171 energy wells (over 51 km); heat capacity 4 MW - installation of new photovoltaic (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; Estimation of annual production is about 540 MWh (630 kWp) E-mobility - Installation of charging stations for electric vehicles (for 134 EVs) - e-bike services (warm storage room, charging cabinets for e-bikes) Digital technologies: - Building Analytics system by Schneider ElectricThe energy consumption and efficiency of the energy model of Çamlık Site, created using EnergyPlus software, have been evaluated under the scenarios specified below. At each stage, a new system was incorporated to explore the potential of the area becoming a PED. In this context, four scenarios were created to compare different energy scenarios for the Ankara pilot area and to observe the impact of the included systems on energy efficiency: V_base; V_ER; V_ER,HP; V_ER,HP,PV. The basic scenario (V_base) was created using the current state without any improvement to the building envelope. This scenario was developed to determine the annual energy needs of the entire site without any intervention and serves as a reference point for the other developed models. The second scenario (V_ER) was created to improve the building envelopes of all residential units in the area, altering the U-values according to Türkiye's current building standards (TS-825). The third scenario (V_ER,HP) primarily includes a heat pump model that can use electrical energy to produce higher thermal energy and is added on top of the improvements in the second scenario. Finally, the V_ER,HP,PV scenario combines building envelope improvements, the heat pump, and the solar PV system.LundaMaTs methodology for traffic and city planning. LundaEko - Lund's programme for ecological sustainability. Municipally owned land is sold to property developers on environmental conditions.SEE: D4.1 - Methodology and Guidelines for PED design https://makingcity.eu/results/#1551708358627-aefa76ef-66b2Energy efficiency: - Buildings energy retrofit. Energy production: - Biomass Boiler capacity: 0.6 MW. Annual production: 1.2 GWh - Solar thermal collectors: 70 kW, planned extended to: 0.47MW - Geotermal & Absorption Pumps: 100 kW - Share of renewables after extension: 100% (30% solar thermal and 70% biomass) - AOC 50kW wind turbine. Awaiting installation of a two-way AC-AC converter for subsequent connection to the grid - Bornay Inclin 3 kW wind turbine, connected to 24 Vdc batteries, to be connected to the grid by means of Xantrex inverter/charger - 9kW photovoltaic park (66PV panels, brand BP Solar,type BP5140,of 140W) connected to the grid by means of two INGECON SUN 5 inverters - 5kW photovoltaic pergola (24PV panels, brand Solon, type P200, of 210W) connected to the grid by means of one INGECON SUN 5 inverter - 8.28kW photovoltaic roof (36PV panels, Brand LDK, type LDK-230P-20), connected to the grid by means of one INGECONSUN 10 inverter - 12kW photovoltaic roof (80PV panels, brand Gamesa, type GS-1501), connected to the grid. - Reversible hydraulic system connected to a 60 kW electric generator and a pumping system. -Stirling engine with a heat lamp based on natural gas, a helium cool lamp, 10kWe maximum power delivered and global performance of approximately 33%. Energy flexibility: - Thermal storage systems: water tanks 90kW, aquifers, boreholes, phase change materials, cold storage with geothermal exchange ground recovery and thermal storage at very low temperature with zeolites. - Electrical storage systems: batteries (lead-acid and lithium-ion). - Flexible loads. Control systems and Digital technologies: - Full monitoring campaign. - Smart-meters installation to monitor consumption and suggest another energy behaviours. - Dynamic simulation tools to optimize the energy performance. Urban comfort and air quality: - Meteorological stations to monitor the climate evolution. - Microclimatic simulation tools to quantify the thermal behaviour.
    A2P003: Application of ISO52000
    A2P003: Application of ISO52000NoYesYesNoNoNo
    A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
    A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoYesYesYesYesYes
    A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
    A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoNoNoYesNoNo
    A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
    A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculationMobility, till now, is not included in the energy model.Mobility is not included in the energy model.Mobility is not included in the calculations.Today electrically charged vehicles are included in the energy balance. In the future also other fuels should be included.
    A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
    A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]2.35.53.44625
    A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
    A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]0.331.25.80.52830
    A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
    A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]
    A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
    A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
    A2P011: PVnoyesyesyesyesnonoyes
    A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.543.4240
    A2P011: Windnoyesnonoyesnonoyes
    A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Hydronononononononoyes
    A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Biomass_elnononononononoyes
    A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Biomass_peat_elnononononononono
    A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: PVT_elnononononononono
    A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Othernononononononono
    A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
    A2P012: Geothermalyesnoyesnonononoyes
    A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]5
    A2P012: Solar Thermalyesyesnononononoyes
    A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Biomass_heatyesyesnononononoyes
    A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.1
    A2P012: Waste heat+HPyesyesnonoyesnonoyes
    A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]200
    A2P012: Biomass_peat_heatnononononononono
    A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: PVT_thyesnonononononono
    A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Biomass_firewood_thnoyesnononononoyes
    A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Othernononononononono
    A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
    A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notesGeothermal heatpump systems, Waste heat from data centers3x225 kW wind turbines + 100 kW PV
    A2P014: Annual energy use
    A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]1.211.33.976
    A2P015: Annual energy delivered
    A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]1.25.76
    A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
    A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]000
    A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
    A2P017: Gasnononoyesnononono
    A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
    A2P017: Coalnononononononono
    A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
    A2P017: Oilnononononononono
    A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
    A2P017: Othernononononononono
    A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
    A2P018: PVnonononoyesnonono
    A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Windnonononoyesnonono
    A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Hydrononononoyesnonono
    A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Biomass_elnonononoyesnonono
    A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Biomass_peat_elnononononononono
    A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: PVT_elnononononononono
    A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Othernonoyesnonononono
    A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]5.26
    A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
    A2P019: Geothermalnononononononono
    A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Solar Thermalnononononononono
    A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Biomass_heatnononononononono
    A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Waste heat+HPnononononononono
    A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Biomass_peat_heatnononononononono
    A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: PVT_thnononononononono
    A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Biomass_firewood_thnononononononono
    A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Othernononononononono
    A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
    A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary001.053231939163500000
    A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
    A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]0
    A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
    A2P022: Safety & Security
    A2P022: Health
    A2P022: Education
    A2P022: MobilityMaximum 1/3 transport with car
    A2P022: EnergyOn-site energy ratioLocal energy production 150% of energy need
    A2P022: Water
    A2P022: Economic development
    A2P022: Housing and Community50% rental apartments and 50% owner apartments
    A2P022: Waste
    A2P022: Other
    A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
    A2P023: Photovoltaicsyesyesyesyesyesyesnoyes
    A2P023: Solar thermal collectorsyesyesnonoyesnonoyes
    A2P023: Wind Turbinesnoyesnonoyesnonoyes
    A2P023: Geothermal energy systemyesnoyesnoyesnonoyes
    A2P023: Waste heat recoveryyesyesyesnoyesnonoyes
    A2P023: Waste to energyyesnonononononono
    A2P023: Polygenerationnonononoyesnonoyes
    A2P023: Co-generationnononononononoyes
    A2P023: Heat Pumpyesyesnoyesyesyesnoyes
    A2P023: Hydrogennonononoyesyesnoyes
    A2P023: Hydropower plantnononononononoyes
    A2P023: Biomassnoyesnononononoyes
    A2P023: Biogasnononononononono
    A2P023: Other
    A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
    A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)yesnoyesnoyesyesnoyes
    A2P024: Energy management systemyesyesyesnoyesyesyesyes
    A2P024: Demand-side managementyesnononoyesyesnoyes
    A2P024: Smart electricity gridnonoyesnoyesyesnoyes
    A2P024: Thermal Storageyesyesyesnoyesyesyesyes
    A2P024: Electric Storageyesyesyesnoyesyesyesyes
    A2P024: District Heating and Coolingyesyesnonoyesyesyesyes
    A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systemsyesnononoyesyesnoyes
    A2P024: P2P – buildingsnononononononono
    A2P024: Other
    A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
    A2P025: Deep Retrofittingnononoyesnoyesyesyes
    A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildingsyesnonononoyesyesno
    A2P025: High-performance new buildingsyesyesyesnoyesyesnono
    A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)yesnoyesnoyesyesnono
    A2P025: Urban data platformsyesnononoyesyesnono
    A2P025: Mobile applications for citizensnononononoyesnono
    A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)nonoyesyesyesyesyesyes
    A2P025: Smart irrigationnononononononono
    A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposalnonononoyesnonono
    A2P025: Smart surveillancenononononononono
    A2P025: Other
    A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
    A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)nononononoyesnono
    A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)nonoyesnoyesyesnono
    A2P026: e-Mobilityyesyesyesnoyesyesnono
    A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutionsnonononoyesnonono
    A2P026: Car-free areanonononoyesnonoyes
    A2P026: OtherLocal transportation hub with direct connection to metro & bus terminal; parking spaces for 1,400 bicycles and for 1,300 cars Promoting e-Mobility: 134 charging stations, A technical reservation for expanding EV charging system 1400 bicycle racks and charging cabinets for 10 e-bicycle batteries
    A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
    A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notesWalkabilitySUMP AVAILABLE
    A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
    A2P028: Energy efficiency certificatesYesYesNoYesNoYes
    A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesEnergy Performance CertificateEnergy Performance Certificate => Energy efficiency class B (2018 version)Miljöbyggnad silver/guldIn Spain it is mandatory the Energy Performance Certificate in order to buy or rent a house or a dwelling
    A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
    A2P029: Any other building / district certificatesYesNoNoNoNo
    A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesLEED (Core & Shell, v4) GOLD certification, Smart Building certification (GOLD)
    A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
    A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
    • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
    • New development strategies,
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
    • New development strategies,
    • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract)
    • Smart cities strategies,
    • Urban Renewal Strategies,
    • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
    • New development strategies,
    • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
    • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    • Smart cities strategies,
    • New development strategies,
    • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
    • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract)
    A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
    A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategyRelevant city strategies behind PED development in Espoo include the following: - The Espoo Story: Sustainability is heavily included within the values and goals of the current Espoo city strategy, also known as the Espoo Story, running from 2021 to 2025. For example, the strategy names being a responsible pioneer as one of the main values of the city and has chosen achieving carbon neutrality by 2030 as one of the main goals of the current council term. In addition to the Espoo story, four cross-administrative development programmes act as cooperation platforms that allow the city, together with its partners, to develop innovative solutions through experiments and pilot projects in line with the Espoo Story. The Sustainable Espoo development programme is one of the four programmes, thus putting sustainability on the forefront in city development work. - EU Mission: 100 climate-neutral and smart cities by 2030: Cities selected for the Mission commit to achieving carbon-neutrality in 2030. A key tool in the Mission is the Climate City Contract. Each selected city will prepare and implement its contracts in collaboration with local businesses as well as other stakeholders and residents. - Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy: Espoo is committed to the Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy, under which the signatories commit to supporting the European Union’s 40% greenhouse gas emission reduction goal by 2030. The Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan (SECAP) is a key instrument for implementing the agreement. The Action Plan outlines the key measures the city will take to achieve its carbon neutrality goal. The plan also includes a mapping of climate change risks and vulnerabilities, adaptation measures, emission calculations, emission reduction scenarios and impact estimations of measures. The SECAP of the City of Espoo is available here (only available in Finnish). - UN Sustainable development Goals: The city of Espoo has committed to becoming a forerunner and achieving the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) by 2025. The goal is to make Espoo financially, ecologically, socially, and culturally sustainable. - The Circular Cities Declaration: At the end of 2020, Espoo signed the Europe-wide circular economy commitment Circular Cities Declaration. The ten goals of the declaration promote the implementation of the city’s circular economy. - Espoo Clean Heat: Fortum and the City of Espoo are committed to producing carbon-neutral district heating in the network operating in the areas of Espoo, Kauniainen and Kirkkonummi during the 2020s. The district heating network provides heating to some 250,000 end-users in homes and offices. Coal will be completely abandoned in the production of district heating by 2025. The main targets related to PED development included in the noted city strategies are the following: - Espoo will achieve carbon neutrality by 2030. To be precise, this carbon neutrality goal is defined as an 80% emission reduction from the 1990 level by the year 2030. The remaining 20% share can be absorbed in carbon sinks or compensated by other means. - District heating in Espoo will be carbon-neutral by 2029, and coal-based production will be phased out from district heating by 2025. - Espoo aims to end the use of fossil fuels in the heating of city-owned buildings by 2025. - Quantitative goals within the Espoo SECAP report: - Espoo aims to reduce total energy consumption within the municipal sector by 7.5% by the end of 2025 in comparison to the 2015 level. The social housing company Espoon Asunnot OY aims to meet the same target. - Espoo aims to cover 10% of the energy consumption of new buildings via on-site production. - Espoo aims to raise the modal split of cycling to 15% by 2024. - Espoo aims to raise the modal split of public transport by 1.1% yearly. - Espoo aims to reduce the emissions of bus transport by 90% by the end of 2025, when compared to 2010 levels.City strategy: Net climate neutrality 2030- Testing the combination of renewable technologies at district level. - Optimization of the generation side based on the weather forecasting and demand side. - Optimization of the control system, connected to the central node, to design and perform virtual analyses based on the combination of all the systems and infrastructures. - Optimization of ICT systems. - Design and management of a virtual analysis - Optimization of efficient measures: building performance, user´s behaviour… - Combination of flexible storage systems to operate the global installation.
    A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
    A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
    • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
    • Electrification of Cooking Methods,
    • Biogas
    • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
    • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
    • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
    • Other
    • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
    • Biogas,
    • Hydrogen
    A3P003: OtherNo gas grid in BrunnshögHeating GridSECAP developed in 2023
    A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
    A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities- Citycon (developer and owner of Lippulaiva) aims to be carbon neutral in its energy use by 2030 - Lippulaiva is a unique urban centre with state-of-the-art energy concept. The centre has a smart managing system, which allows for example the temporary reduction of power used in air conditioning and charging stations when energy consumption is at its peak. In addition, a backup generator and a large electric battery will balance the operation of the electricity network. - Lippulaiva is also an important mobility hub for the people of Espoo. Espoonlahti metro station is located under the centre, and the West Metro started to operate to Espoonlahti in December 2022. Lippulaiva also has a bus terminal, which serves the metro’s feeder traffic in the Espoonlahti major district.According to the model developed for the district, the electrification of heating and cooling is necessary with heat pumps. Rooftop photovoltaic panels also have the potential for renewable energy generation. Through net-metering practices, the district is expected to reach energy positivity through this scenario.Local waste heat is utlized to a very large extent. More local electricity production is needed. Need to minimise the use of private cars.SELF SUSTAINABILITY, SELF EFFICIENCY- Create a thermal energy storage tank to be used for air conditioning the buildings. - Some buildings need to be renovated both to increase the energy performance, the seismic behaviour and spaces liveability and comfort. - Optimizing the coupling between technologies. - Guarantee the flexibility to operate the renewable installations to operate in different phases and with different configurations. - CEDER is a public research center and needs to have connected any energy system to the same grid. - CEDER has an industrial develop area where some experimental thermal storage system could be tested.
    A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
    A3P005: Sustainable behaviourIn Groningen we are working with different sustainable behaviours approaches and also developed the Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA). Currently, there are two different approaches in use in the municipality of Groningen: the District energy approach (Wijkgerichte aanpak, developed by the Municipality of Groningen) and the Cooperative approach (Coöperative Aanpak, developed by Grunneger Power). Based upon those approaches and knowledge that is gained through social research executed by TNO and HUAS the new Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA) has been developed.For Citycon, it was important to engage local people within the Lippulaiva project. During the construction period as well as after opening of the shopping center, citizens have been engaged in multiple ways, such as informing local citizens of the progress of construction, engaging young people in the design processes of the shopping centre and long-term commitment of youngsters with Lippulaiva Buddy class initiative. Users’ engagement activities are conducted in close co-operation with SPARCS partners.Need to minimise the use of private cars. Need to provide efficient methods for sorce separated waste collection.BASED ON SECAP DEVELOPED IN 2023- Minimize the building energy consumption while maintaining indoor comfort levels. - Onsite renewable production with flexible storage elements to fix demand side and generation side. - Flexible control solutions through digitalization systems.
    A3P006: Economic strategies
    A3P006: Economic strategies
    • Innovative business models,
    • Blockchain
    • Innovative business models
    • PPP models,
    • Other
    • Demand management Living Lab
    A3P006: OtherAttractivenes
    A3P007: Social models
    A3P007: Social models
    • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Citizen Social Research,
    • Prevention of energy poverty,
    • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
    • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Quality of Life
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies
    • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Affordability
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
    • Quality of Life,
    • Strategies towards social mix
    • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies
    • Digital Inclusion,
    • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
    A3P007: Other
    A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
    A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
    • Strategic urban planning,
    • District Energy plans,
    • City Vision 2050,
    • SECAP Updates
    • Building / district Certification
    • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
    • District Energy plans
    • Strategic urban planning,
    • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
    • City Vision 2050,
    • SECAP Updates
    • City Vision 2050,
    • SECAP Updates
    • District Energy plans,
    • Building / district Certification
    A3P008: Other
    A3P009: Environmental strategies
    A3P009: Environmental strategies
    • Energy Neutral
    • Energy Neutral,
    • Net zero carbon footprint
    • Other
    • Energy Neutral,
    • Low Emission Zone
    • Net zero carbon footprint,
    • Greening strategies,
    • Sustainable Urban drainage systems (SUDS),
    • Nature Based Solutions (NBS)
    • Energy Neutral,
    • Low Emission Zone,
    • Net zero carbon footprint,
    • Carbon-free,
    • Life Cycle approach,
    • Greening strategies,
    • Nature Based Solutions (NBS)
    • Energy Neutral,
    • Low Emission Zone,
    • Pollutants Reduction,
    • Greening strategies
    A3P009: OtherCarbon free in terms of energyEnergy Positive, Low Emission Zone
    A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
    A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspectsAt national/regional/local level a legislation on PEDs development is not yet available in the Netherlands. There will be a new Environmental Act and Heat Act in the nearby future. We are working on a paper about the current legal barriers, which are in short for Groningen:  Lack of legal certainty and clarity with regard to the energy legislation.  Lack of coherence between policy and legislation from different ministries.  The planned revision of the Dutch Heat Law prevents Groningen from effectively realizing sustainable heat transition plans and goals.  Lack of capacity on the distribution grid for electricity- Energy efficiency regulations (Directive 2006/32/EC and 2009/72/EC) - EU directive 2010/31/EU on the energy performance of buildings => all new buildings should be “nearly zero-energy buildings” (nZEB) from 2021The municipality cannot demand a specific energy solution to private property owners. It has to be voluntary and market based solutions.- European Commission has legislated on Energy Community (Renewable energy directive - 2018/2001/EU and Common rules for the internal electricity market directive- 2019/944/EU). - Spanish building certification is regulated through Royal Decree 235/2013.
    B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
    B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definitionLippulaiva is a project with high level goal in terms of energy efficiency, energy flexibility and energy production.Çamlık District, unlike many other districts in Ankara, has a specific urban morphology that draws near the other pilot zones considered by the partners of PED-ACT. The site has three-storey single housing units, along with a fair amount of greenery around. Furthermore, the roof areas enable large amounts of PV installment, which results in higher amounts of local renewable energy potential. Therefore, the district is a good fit for PED development.Vision: The city as a power plant. The ultimate goal is that more energy is produced within the distric boundaries than is being used (heating, electricity & mobility). Energy efficient buildings, efficient mobility, reuse of residual heat and solar electricity are the main methods.GOOD MIX OF PUBLIC PRIVATE BUILDINGS
    B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
    B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development- Citycon’s (developer and owner of Lippulaiva) target is to be carbon neutral by 2030 - Increasing sustainability requirements from the financing, tenants, cities, other stakeholdersPED-ACT project.The aim is to build a sustainable city with minimal climate impact and maximum quality of life. PED is an important step to acheive the aims of a very ambitious city development.Replication of unique PED know how
    B1P003: Environment of the case study area
    B2P003: Environment of the case study areaRuralUrban areaSuburban areaUrban areaUrban areaRural
    B1P004: Type of district
    B2P004: Type of district
    • New construction
    • New construction
    • Renovation
    • New construction
    • New construction,
    • Renovation
    B1P005: Case Study Context
    B1P005: Case Study Context
    • New Development
    • Re-use / Transformation Area,
    • New Development
    • Retrofitting Area
    • New Development
    • Retrofitting Area
    B1P006: Year of construction
    B1P006: Year of construction20221986
    B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
    B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential0
    B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
    B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential18000
    B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
    B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential2000
    B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
    B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential22000
    B1P011: Population density before intervention
    B1P011: Population density before intervention00000000
    B1P012: Population density after intervention
    B1P012: Population density after intervention00000.026666666666667000
    B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
    B1P013: Residentialnononoyesnononono
    B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]50800
    B1P013: Officenonononoyesnonono
    B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]60000
    B1P013: Industry and Utilitynononononononono
    B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Commercialnonoyesnonononono
    B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Institutionalnononononononono
    B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Natural areasnoyesyesnoyesnonono
    B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]2000000
    B1P013: Recreationalnononononononono
    B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Dismissed areasnononononononono
    B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Othernonononoyesnonono
    B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]Outdoor parking: 100000
    B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
    B1P014: Residentialnoyesyesyesyesnonono
    B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]50800600000
    B1P014: Officenoyesnonoyesnonono
    B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]650000
    B1P014: Industry and Utilitynononononononono
    B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Commercialnonoyesnonononono
    B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Institutionalnonononoyesnonono
    B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]50000
    B1P014: Natural areasnoyesnononononono
    B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Recreationalnonononoyesnonono
    B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]400000
    B1P014: Dismissed areasnononononononono
    B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Othernononononononono
    B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
    B2P001: PED Lab concept definitionGroningen was selected as Lighthouse City for the MAKING-CITY project. MAKING-CITY is a 60-month Horizon 2020 project launched in December 2018. It aims to address and demonstrate the urban energy system transformation towards smart and low-carbon cities, based on the Positive Energy District (PED) concept. The PED operational models developed in MAKING-CITY will help European and other cities around the world to adopt a long-term City Vision 2050 for energy transition and sustainable urbanisation whilst turning citizens into actors of this transformation. Groningen works with two PED districts in two completely different neighbourhoods in terms of structure and buildings. This is why we see this as a lab: to see wat works and what doesn’t. In order to be able to implement this in the rest of the city.
    B2P002: Installation life time
    B2P002: Installation life timeThe MAKING-CITY project lasts from November 2018 – November 2023. By that time PED North and PED South East are a fact.CEDER will follow an integrative approach including technology for a permanent installation.
    B2P003: Scale of action
    B2P003: ScaleDistrictDistrictDistrict
    B2P004: Operator of the installation
    B2P004: Operator of the installationThe Municipality of Groningen is Manager of the lab but works closely with other parties such as the university, university of applied sciences, research institute TNO and several other parties.CIEMAT. Data detail in contact: mariano.martin@ciemat.es and oscar.izquiedo@ciemat.es
    B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
    B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materialsGroningen does not have a strategy to reuse and recyle materials
    B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
    B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?NoYesNo
    B2P006: Other
    B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
    B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
    • Civic
    • Strategic
    • Strategic
    B2P007: Other
    B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
    B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED LabMunicipalityMunicipalityResearch center/University
    B2P008: Other
    B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
    B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
    • Academia,
    • Private,
    • Industrial,
    • Other
    • Academia,
    • Private,
    • Industrial,
    • Citizens, public, NGO
    • Academia,
    • Industrial
    B2P009: Otherresearch companies, monitoring company, ict company
    B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
    B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activitiesThe operation of the laboratory with all the components of the energy networks requires a collaborative work between various departments and entities. On the one hand, it is necessary to optimize the operation of renewable systems based on the weather conditions, forecast of the demand side and the flexibility of the generation systems. On the other hand, the optimization of the energy demands through a more sustainable behaviour of both the building and the users want to be acquired. For this, it is necessary to take into account technical aspects but also market, comfort and encourage the user participation, creating a decision-making matrix that allows optimizing the operation of the global system.
    B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
    B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
    • Buildings,
    • Demand-side management,
    • Energy storage,
    • Energy networks,
    • Waste management,
    • Lighting,
    • E-mobility,
    • Information and Communication Technologies (ICT),
    • Social interactions,
    • Business models
    • Buildings,
    • Demand-side management,
    • Prosumers,
    • Renewable generation,
    • Efficiency measures,
    • Waste management,
    • Water treatment,
    • Lighting,
    • E-mobility,
    • Green areas,
    • Circular economy models
    • Buildings,
    • Demand-side management,
    • Prosumers,
    • Renewable generation,
    • Energy storage,
    • Energy networks,
    • Efficiency measures,
    • Information and Communication Technologies (ICT),
    • Ambient measures,
    • Social interactions
    B2P011: Other
    B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
    B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
    • Tools for prototyping and modelling
    • Monitoring and evaluation infrastructure
    • Monitoring and evaluation infrastructure,
    • Tools for prototyping and modelling
    B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
    B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
    B2P014: Monitoring measures
    B2P014: Monitoring measures
    • Execution plan,
    • Available data,
    • Type of measured data,
    • Equipment,
    • Level of access
    • Available data
    • Equipment
    B2P015: Key Performance indicators
    B2P015: Key Performance indicators
    • Energy,
    • Social,
    • Economical / Financial
    • Energy
    • Energy,
    • Environmental,
    • Economical / Financial
    B2P016: Execution of operations
    B2P016: Execution of operations
    B2P017: Capacities
    B2P017: Capacities- Innovative grid configuration to connect bio boilers and solar thermal on buildings. - Environmental & air quality evaluation. - Testing and evaluation of high efficient heating & cooling systems: Gas, biomass, geothermal and absorption H&C pumps … - Definition and implementation of the different regulation modes for the global system. Using the data from the research focused-partners, several regulation modes for the DH network could be defined and implemented in order to obtain an optimal operation of the network. - Innovation in MPC control to enable harvesting 100% renewables in the most efficient way. - Physical integration of the technologies with the existing facilities at the living lab. - Connection between the solar thermal collectors to achieve the lowest heat losses, providing the possibility to use the grid as high or low temperature DH, according to the demand schedule of the buildings. - Test the bio-boiler of the last generation and ultra-low emissions biomass condensing boiler in order to increase efficiency and reduce GHG and air pollutant emissions of the DH plant. - Control of the supply temperature of the DH grid to enable 100% renewables harvesting in the most efficient way. - Research of the incidence of a normal building or a bioclimatic building in the DH grid demand. - Methodologies for concept validation: Definition of the minimum requirements to verify the suitability of the solutions proposed. - Tests campaign: Experimental operation and characterization in a relevant environment, to exploit the technologies at their best and test different demand profiles, different configuration and loads, with real time monitoring and continuous commissioning to control the performance of the technology. - Validation and upgrading recommendation for the DH&C at district level. - Evaluation of innovation actions for potential energy interventions with demand response in buildings. - The complete available infrastructure (MV and LV electric systems, transformation hubs, end consumption, generation sources, communication elements, etc.) belongs to CEDER-CIEMAT, making this the perfect scenario to test and try the performance of “Smart Grid” and “Microgrid” projects. - The type of electric grid, its voltage levels (MV or LV), its variety of real loads (different buildings with different profiles: industrial buildings, offices and so on) and its sources of renewable generation and storage, mean it is ideal for intermediate tests between a small-scale laboratory and final deployment of the real product.
    B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
    B2P018: Relations with stakeholdersCEDER - CIEMAT is a public research body assigned to the Ministry of Science and Innovation under the General Secretariat for Research, focusing on energy and environment. To develop this lab CIEMAT has relations with private renewable companies, research centers and academia institutions.
    B2P019: Available tools
    B2P019: Available tools
    • Energy modelling,
    • Social models,
    • Business and financial models
    • Energy modelling
    B2P019: Available tools
    B2P020: External accessibility
    B2P020: External accessibilityCIEMAT is a public body, so it´s open to any institution according the actual regulation and agreements.
    C1P001: Unlocking Factors
    C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)
    C1P002: Driving Factors
    C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P002: Economic growth need2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)Earthquakes due to gas extraction
    C1P003: Administrative barriers
    C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P003: Lack of public participation1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)
    C1P004: Policy barriers
    C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)
    C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
    C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P005: Regulatory instability3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P005: Non-effective regulations3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
    C1P006: Environmental barriers
    C1P006: Environmental barriers- Climate Variability: 5 - Topographical Constraints: 4 - Sunlight Availability: 5 - Air and Water Pollution: 2 - Water Scarcity: 1 - Environmental Regulations: 3 - Zoning Restrictions: 2 - Natural Disasters: 1?3 - Moderately important
    C1P007: Technical barriers
    C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Deficient planning2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P007: Lack of well-defined process3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)
    C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
    C1P008: Inertia2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P008: Rebound effect2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
    C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
    C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
    C1P010: Financial barriers
    C1P010: Hidden costs2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P010: Economic crisis1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P010: Risk and uncertainty3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
    C1P011: Market barriers
    C1P011: Split incentives5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P011: Energy price distortion4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
    C1P012: Stakeholders involved
    C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Research & Innovation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • Design/demand aggregation
    C1P012: Financial/Funding
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    • Construction/implementation
    • None
    • None
    C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • None
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Business process management
    • Planning/leading
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    • None
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Urban Services providers
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • None
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • None
    • Planning/leading
    C1P012: Real Estate developers
    • Construction/implementation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • None
    • None
    C1P012: Design/Construction companies
    • Construction/implementation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    • None
    • Construction/implementation
    C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
    • None
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • None
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    • None
    • None
    • None
    C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • None
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Other
    • None
    C1P012: Other (if any)
    Summary

    Authors (framework concept)

    Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

    Contributors (to the content)

    Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

    Implemented by

    Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
    Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)

    Join the Action

    PED-EU-NET is an open, interdisciplinary and growing network welcoming academics, practitioners and relevant stakeholders to contribute to the activities of the work plan.
    Join Now

    COST

    COST is an EU funding programme that enables researchers to set up their interdisciplinary research networks in Europe and beyond. We provide funds for organising conferences, meetings, training schools, short scientific exchanges or other networking activities in a wide range of scientific topics. By creating open spaces where people and ideas can grow, we unlock the full potential of science.

    PED-EU-NET

    The COST Action Positive Energy Districts European Network (PED-EU-NET) aims to mobilise researchers and other relevant stakeholders across different domains and sectors to drive the deployment of Positive Energy Districts (PEDs) in Europe through open sharing of knowledge, exchange of ideas, pooling of resources, experimentation of new methods and co-creation of novel solutions.

    Action Details

    Grant Holder
    Department of Planning, Design, Technology of Architecture, Sapienza University of Rome

    Start of Action: 10 September 2020
    End of Action: 09 September 2024
    CSO approval date: 24/03/2020

    © 2021-2023 PED-EU-NET COST Action CA19126. All rights reserved.