PED DB: Case Studies – PED-EU-NET

Filters:

Name	Project	Type	Compare
Cerdanyola del Valles, School of Engineering, Campus Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona	OPEN4CEC	PED Lab	Compare
Bucharest, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies (ASE) PED Lab	OPEN4CEC	PED Lab	Compare
Pamplona	OPEN4CEC	PED Lab	Compare
Trondheim, Svartlamon	OPEN4CEC	PED Lab	Compare
Savona, The University of Genova, Savona Campus	OPEN4CEC	PED Lab	Compare
Torres Vedras, Encosta de São Vicente	COPPER	PED Lab	Compare
Malmö, Stadium area (Stadionområdet)	PED StepWise	PED Case Study	Compare
Utrecht, Utrecht Science Park	PED StepWise	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Vienna, Kriegerheimstätten	PED StepWise	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Vienna, 16. District, Leben am Wilhelminenberg	HeatCOOP	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Vienna, Laxenburgerstraße AH	HeatCOOP	PED Lab	Compare
Tartu, Annelinn	V2G-QUESTS	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Utrecht, Kanaleneiland	V2G-QUESTS	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Aveiro, Aradas district	V2G-QUESTS	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project		PED Relevant Case Study	Uncompare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
SmartEnCity, Lecce	SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
STARDUST, Trento	STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities	PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern		PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Compare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
REPLICATE (pilot action in the Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings), Firenze		PED Relevant Case Study	Uncompare
Sinfonia, Bolzano		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0,		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres		PED Relevant Case Study	Uncompare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo		PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Compare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna		PED Case Study	Compare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento		PED Case Study	Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna		PED Case Study / PED Lab	Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB)	ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities	PED Case Study	Compare
Võru +CityxChange		PED Case Study	Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim	ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities	PED Case Study	Compare
Furuset project, Oslo	ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities	PED Case Study	Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights		PED Case Study	Compare
Ydalir project	ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities	PED Case Study	Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport)	ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities	PED Case Study	Compare
Fornebu, Bærum	ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities	PED Case Study	Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou		PED Case Study	Compare
Smart Energy Åland		PED Case Study	Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED	ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts	PED Case Study	Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED	InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts	PED Case Study	Compare
Munich, Harthof district		PED Case Study	Compare
Lublin	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Case Study	Compare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran	CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116	CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Findhorn, the Park	InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts	PED Case Study	Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED	ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities	PED Case Study	Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau	PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district	PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation	PED Case Study	Compare
Aalborg East		PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Uncompare
Ankara, Çamlık District	PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation	PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Trenčín	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Case Study	Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf	LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis	NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts	PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Compare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Case Study	Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen	Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods	PED Case Study	Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat	Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Zaragoza, Actur	NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand	BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts	PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Uncompare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city	ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins	PED Case Study	Compare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka	PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation	PED Case Study	Compare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus	LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Espoo, Kera	SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS	PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio	PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Freiburg, Waldsee	PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district	PED Case Study	Compare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe		PED Case Study	Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad	ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Case Study	Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district		PED Case Study	Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark		PED Case Study	Compare
Évora, Portugal	POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework	PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Uncompare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium	SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Groningen, PED South	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Lab	Compare
Groningen, PED North	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Lab
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing	SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS	PED Lab	Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT		PED Lab	Compare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district	STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Case Study	Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Case Study	Compare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center	SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS	PED Case Study	Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block	SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS	PED Case Study	Compare
Salzburg, Gneis district	Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods	PED Case Study	Compare
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet	Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods	PED Case Study	Compare
Tartu, City centre area	SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe	PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district	GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab		PED Lab	Compare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district	SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS	PED Case Study	Compare
Kifissia, Energy community	SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare

Title	Groningen, PED North	Évora, Portugal «×»	REPLICATE (pilot action in the Novoli-Cascine district on "le PIagge" buildings), Firenze «×»	Aarhus, Brabrand «×»	District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres «×»	Aalborg East, Aalborg Municipality, Region of Northern Jutland, Denmark «×»	Győr Geothermal District Heating Project «×»
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab	Groningen, PED North	Évora, Portugal	REPLICATE (pilot action in the Novoli-Cascine district on "le PIagge" buildings), Firenze	Aarhus, Brabrand	District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres	Aalborg East, Aalborg Municipality, Region of Northern Jutland, Denmark	Győr Geothermal District Heating Project
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet	https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2022/09/netherlands.JPG, https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2022/09/netherlands2.jpg	https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2022/11/PEDs-POCITYF-Evora.jpg	https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/10/02.JPG, https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/10/01.JPG	https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/07/Screenshot-2024-06-27-at-09.25.33.png, https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/07/8220-Brabrand-Denmark.png, https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/07/Aarhus-map-final-compressed26.png	https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/10/1961203.jpeg	https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/07/Picture.png	https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/10/gyor-geotermia.jpg
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case study	no	no	no	yes	no	no	no
PED relevant case study	no	yes	yes	yes	yes	yes	yes
PED Lab.	yes	yes	no	yes	no	yes	no
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutrality	yes	no	yes	yes	yes	yes	yes
Annual energy surplus	yes	yes	no	yes	no	no	no
Energy community	yes	yes	no	yes	no	no	no
Circularity	yes	no	no	no	no	no	no
Air quality and urban comfort	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
Electrification	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
Net-zero energy cost	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
Net-zero emission	yes	no	no	yes	no	no	no
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
Maximise self-sufficiency	no	no	no	no	no	yes	no
Other	no	no	yes	no	yes	no	yes
Other (A1P004)			Social aspects/affordability; The technological choice about RES exploitation, has been made also taking into account the local air quality issue in the urban centre (no biomass, no CHP)		Energy efficient; Carbon-free		Energy efficient; Carbon-free
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED Lab	Implementation Phase	Implementation Phase	Completed	Planning Phase	Completed	Planning Phase	Completed
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date	12/18	10/19	01/17	01/24	12/17	11/22	12/13
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date	12/23	09/24	12/21	12/26	04/19	11/25	10/18
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future,	POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework,		BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts,
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability	Monitoring data available within the districts, Open data city platform – different dashboards, GIS open datasets	Open data city platform – different dashboards		Open data city platform – different dashboards, General statistical datasets, GIS open datasets		Monitoring data available within the districts, GIS open datasets
A1P009: Other
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab	TNO, Hanze, RUG, Ped noord book	https://pocityf.eu/, https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/864400	https://replicate-project.eu/community/partners/comune-di-firenze/, https://replicate-project.eu/cities/florence/	https://www.bi-ped.eu	https://www.districtenergyaward.org/barredo-collery-district-heating-mieres-asturias-spain/, https://www.interempresas.net/Climatizacion/Articulos/245867-District-Heating-geotermicos-en-Mieres-y-Langreo.html	https://greenhubdenmark.dk/en/flexposts/	https://pannergy.com/en/projects/gyor/, https://www.rhc-platform.org/content/uploads/2019/10/RHC-VISION-2050-WEB.pdf
A1P011: Geographic coordinates
X Coordinate (longitude):	6.535121	-7.909377	11.230539	10.213405	-5.774971	10.007	17.868124
Y Coordinate (latitude):	53.234846	38.570804	43.792711	56.149628	43.243142	57.041028	47.651452
A1P012: Country
A1P012: Country	Netherlands	Portugal	Italy	Denmark	Spain	Denmark	Hungary
A1P013: City
A1P013: City	Groningen	Évora	Firenze	Aarhus	Mieres	Aalborg	Győr
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).	Cfa	Csa	Cfa	Cfb	Csb	Dfb	Cfb
A1P015: District boundary
A1P015: District boundary	Functional	Geographic		Geographic		Virtual
Other
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:	Mixed	Mixed	Mixed	Mixed	Private	Public	Mixed
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:	Multiple Owners	Multiple Owners	Multiple Owners	Single Owner	Single Owner	Multiple Owners	Multiple Owners
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED	7
A1P019: Conditioned space
A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]	1.01
A1P020: Total ground area
A1P020: Total ground area [m²]	17.132					31308000
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
A1P022: Financial schemes
A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estate	yes	no	no	no	no	no	no
A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO scheme	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Other	yes	no	no	no	no	no	no
A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural funding	no	no	yes	no	no	no	yes
A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National funding	yes	no	yes	no	no	no	no
A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional funding	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal funding	yes	no	yes	no	yes	no	no
A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]					25000000
A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Other	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EU	yes	yes	no	yes	no	no	no
A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]		19998275
A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - National	no	no	no	no	no	yes	no
A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regional	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Other	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022: Other
A1P023: Economic Targets
A1P023: Economic Targets	Boosting local businesses, Boosting local and sustainable production			Boosting local and sustainable production		Positive externalities, Boosting local businesses, Boosting local and sustainable production
A1P023: Other
A1P024: More comments:
A1P024: More comments:
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]
Contact person for general enquiries
A1P026: Name	Jasper Tonen, Elisabeth Koops	João Bravo Dias	Christoph Gollner	Johanne Bräuner Nygaard Hansen	Christoph Gollner	Kristian Olesen	Christoph Gollner
A1P027: Organization	Municipality of Groningen	EDP Labelec	FFG	ITK, the city of Aarhus	FFG	Aalborg University	FFG
A1P028: Affiliation	Municipality / Public Bodies	SME / Industry	Other	Municipality / Public Bodies	Other	Research Center / University	Other
A1P028: Other
A1P029: Email	Jasper.tonen@groningen.nl	joao.bravodias@edp.pt	christoph.gollner@ffg.at	hjobr@aarhus.dk	christoph.gollner@ffg.at	Kristian@plan.aau.dk	christoph.gollner@ffg.at
Contact person for other special topics
A1P030: Name						Alex Søgaard Moreno
A1P031: Email						asm@aalborg.dk
Pursuant to the General Data Protection Regulation	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
A2P001: Fields of application
A2P001: Fields of application	Energy efficiency, Energy flexibility, Energy production, E-mobility, Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.), Waste management	Energy efficiency, Energy flexibility, Energy production, E-mobility, Digital technologies, Waste management, Construction materials	Energy production, E-mobility, Digital technologies	Energy efficiency, Energy flexibility, Digital technologies	Energy efficiency	Energy efficiency, Energy flexibility, Energy production, Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.), Digital technologies	Energy efficiency, Energy production
A2P001: Other
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields	Energy efficiency: - buildings energy retrofit supported by tax bonuses - replacing heat supply technologies Energy production: - installation of new (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; - presence of a large PV plant in the South East (2 solar parks: 12MW and 107MW) and North area (0,4 MW) Energy flexibility: - energy storage solutions, battery storage and possible hydrogen production - GRID balancing services E-mobility - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; Urban Management - make use of the organizational structure Waste Management - circular use of municipal waste streams					Stakeholder engagement, expert energy system analysis, future scenarios
A2P003: Application of ISO52000
A2P003: Application of ISO52000	No	No				No
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance	No	Yes		No		No
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance	No	Yes		Yes		No
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation	Mobility, till now, is not included in the energy model.			Not determined yet		Large combined industrial, residential, and commercial area with complex flows of in- and outgoing traffic.
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]	2.3					218
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]	0.33					148
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
A2P011: PV	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Wind	no	no	no	no	no	yes	no
A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Hydro	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Biomass_el	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Biomass_peat_el	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: PVT_el	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Other	no	no	no	no	no	yes	no
A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
A2P012: Geothermal	yes	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Solar Thermal	yes	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Biomass_heat	yes	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]	0.1
A2P012: Waste heat+HP	yes	no	no	no	no	yes	no
A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]						300
A2P012: Biomass_peat_heat	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: PVT_th	yes	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Biomass_firewood_th	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Other	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes	Geothermal heatpump systems, Waste heat from data centers					Very little wind production currently exists in the area. The electricity production of the waste incineration plant will be included at a later date. Aalborg East is partly a remarkable area for hosting a Portland cement factory that accounts for a substantial share of Denmark’s total CO2 emissions. In turn, it also provides waste heat to the district heating grid for all of Aalborg city and some of the smaller towns that are connected to the same DH grid.
A2P014: Annual energy use
A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]						620
A2P015: Annual energy delivered
A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]						399
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
A2P017: Gas	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Coal	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Oil	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Other	no	no	no	no	no	yes	no
A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]						300
A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
A2P018: PV	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Wind	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Hydro	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Biomass_el	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Biomass_peat_el	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: PVT_el	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Other	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
A2P019: Geothermal	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Solar Thermal	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_heat	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Waste heat+HP	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_peat_heat	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: PVT_th	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_firewood_th	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Other	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]
A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
A2P022: Safety & Security
A2P022: Health
A2P022: Education
A2P022: Mobility
A2P022: Energy
A2P022: Water
A2P022: Economic development
A2P022: Housing and Community
A2P022: Waste
A2P022: Other
A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
A2P023: Photovoltaics	yes	yes	yes	no	no	yes	no
A2P023: Solar thermal collectors	yes	yes	yes	no	no	yes	yes
A2P023: Wind Turbines	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P023: Geothermal energy system	yes	no	no	no	yes	no	yes
A2P023: Waste heat recovery	yes	no	no	no	no	yes	no
A2P023: Waste to energy	yes	no	no	no	no	yes	no
A2P023: Polygeneration	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P023: Co-generation	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P023: Heat Pump	yes	no	yes	no	no	yes	no
A2P023: Hydrogen	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P023: Hydropower plant	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P023: Biomass	no	no	no	no	no	yes	no
A2P023: Biogas	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P023: Other
A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)	yes	yes	yes	no	no	no	no
A2P024: Energy management system	yes	yes	no	no	no	yes	no
A2P024: Demand-side management	yes	no	no	no	no	yes	no
A2P024: Smart electricity grid	no	yes	yes	no	no	yes	no
A2P024: Thermal Storage	yes	yes	no	no	no	yes	no
A2P024: Electric Storage	yes	yes	no	no	no	yes	no
A2P024: District Heating and Cooling	yes	no	no	no	yes	yes	yes
A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systems	yes	yes	yes	no	no	yes	no
A2P024: P2P – buildings	no	yes	no	no	no	no	no
A2P024: Other
A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
A2P025: Deep Retrofitting	no	no	yes	no	no	yes	no
A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildings	yes	yes	no	no	no	no	no
A2P025: High-performance new buildings	yes	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)	yes	no	yes	no	no	no	no
A2P025: Urban data platforms	yes	yes	no	no	no	no	no
A2P025: Mobile applications for citizens	no	yes	yes	no	no	no	no
A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)	no	yes	no	no	no	no	no
A2P025: Smart irrigation	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposal	no	yes	no	no	no	no	no
A2P025: Smart surveillance	no	yes	no	no	no	yes	no
A2P025: Other
A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P026: e-Mobility	yes	yes	yes	no	no	no	no
A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutions	no	yes	no	no	no	no	no
A2P026: Car-free area	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P026: Other
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates	Yes	No				Yes
A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes	Energy Performance Certificate
A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
A2P029: Any other building / district certificates		No				No
A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy	Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.), New development strategies, National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality	Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.), Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC), Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract), National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality	Smart cities strategies	Smart cities strategies	Urban Renewal Strategies	Smart cities strategies, Urban Renewal Strategies, New development strategies, National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy						Reduction of 1018000 tons CO2 by 2030
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid	Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps, Electrification of Cooking Methods, Biogas					Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps, Biogas
A3P003: Other
A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities						Decarbonize part of Aalborg city as a way of working incrementally towards being a zero-emission city.
A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
A3P005: Sustainable behaviour	In Groningen we are working with different sustainable behaviours approaches and also developed the Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA). Currently, there are two different approaches in use in the municipality of Groningen: the District energy approach (Wijkgerichte aanpak, developed by the Municipality of Groningen) and the Cooperative approach (Coöperative Aanpak, developed by Grunneger Power). Based upon those approaches and knowledge that is gained through social research executed by TNO and HUAS the new Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA) has been developed.					- Stakeholder engagement; - Focus on implementing renewable energy production where possible; - Rretrofitting and energy optimization of existing buildings.
A3P006: Economic strategies
A3P006: Economic strategies	Innovative business models, Blockchain				Innovative business models	Life Cycle Cost, Circular economy models
A3P006: Other
A3P007: Social models
A3P007: Social models	Strategies towards (local) community-building, Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies, Citizen Social Research, Prevention of energy poverty, Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance		Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies			Strategies towards (local) community-building, Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies, Policy Forums, Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
A3P007: Other
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies	Strategic urban planning, District Energy plans, City Vision 2050, SECAP Updates					Strategic urban planning, District Energy plans
A3P008: Other			“zero volumes” structural plan (2015), Covenant of Mayors Sustainable Energy Action Plan (2011)
A3P009: Environmental strategies
A3P009: Environmental strategies	Energy Neutral				Carbon-free	Energy Neutral, Net zero carbon footprint	Energy Neutral, Carbon-free
A3P009: Other
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects	At national/regional/local level a legislation on PEDs development is not yet available in the Netherlands. There will be a new Environmental Act and Heat Act in the nearby future. We are working on a paper about the current legal barriers, which are in short for Groningen:  Lack of legal certainty and clarity with regard to the energy legislation.  Lack of coherence between policy and legislation from different ministries.  The planned revision of the Dutch Heat Law prevents Groningen from effectively realizing sustainable heat transition plans and goals.  Lack of capacity on the distribution grid for electricity					Current energy tariffs disincentivize both individual and collective PV systems – meaning energy communities are not economically feasible, housing associations and public buildings struggle with finding a secure RoI for solar panels, and citizens and local industry lack an incentive to install solar panels on their own
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition		The PED main objective is to achieve the energy transition while preserving cultural heritage and improving citizen’s quality of life.				The large scale provides interesting opportunities for both urban development and strategic energy planning; the diverse mix of buildings and functions also allow for interesting discussions regarding PEDs. Another interesting facet is that the district heating grid is almost fully supplied by waste heat.
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development		POCITYF brings together eight cities (Lightouse and Fellow cities), all having cultural heritage areas in their territory. All are intrinsically motivated to participate in the necessary energy transition not only for their conventional city districts of mixed-used, but also for districts with individually specificities as those belonging in their cultural heritage, which at the moment may be acting as barriers for their further environmental sustainability, but after POCITYF will be acting as a promising building retrofits roadmap for similar and other EU cities.				The area has an interesting history of development and has recently undergone several urban improvements. This is coupled with a strong local network of business owners and other stakeholders, all with an interest in developing the area in the best way possible. This made for an interesting case from a planning perspective to investigate how this network would pick up on the concept of PED and whether they could see any potential utility in relation to their everyday experiences.
B1P003: Environment of the case study area
B2P003: Environment of the case study area		Urban area	Urban area		Suburban area	Suburban area	Urban area
B1P004: Type of district
B2P004: Type of district		Renovation	Renovation		Renovation	Renovation	New construction
B1P005: Case Study Context
B1P005: Case Study Context		Preservation Area	Retrofitting Area		Retrofitting Area	Retrofitting Area	New Development
B1P006: Year of construction
B1P006: Year of construction
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential						16.931
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
B1P011: Population density before intervention
B1P011: Population density before intervention	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
B1P012: Population density after intervention
B1P012: Population density after intervention	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
B1P013: Residential	no	no	yes	no	no	no	no
B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]			20200
B1P013: Office	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Industry and Utility	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Commercial	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Institutional	no	no	no	no	yes	no	no
B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Natural areas	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Recreational	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Dismissed areas	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Other	no	no	no	no	yes	no	no
B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
B1P014: Residential	no	no	yes	no	no	no	no
B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]			20200
B1P014: Office	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Industry and Utility	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Commercial	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Institutional	no	no	no	no	yes	no	no
B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Natural areas	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Recreational	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Dismissed areas	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Other	no	no	no	no	yes	no	no
B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
B2P001: PED Lab concept definition	Groningen was selected as Lighthouse City for the MAKING-CITY project. MAKING-CITY is a 60-month Horizon 2020 project launched in December 2018. It aims to address and demonstrate the urban energy system transformation towards smart and low-carbon cities, based on the Positive Energy District (PED) concept. The PED operational models developed in MAKING-CITY will help European and other cities around the world to adopt a long-term City Vision 2050 for energy transition and sustainable urbanisation whilst turning citizens into actors of this transformation. Groningen works with two PED districts in two completely different neighbourhoods in terms of structure and buildings. This is why we see this as a lab: to see wat works and what doesn’t. In order to be able to implement this in the rest of the city.					An ongoing process and dialogue with local stakeholders to determine the future development of the area.
B2P002: Installation life time
B2P002: Installation life time	The MAKING-CITY project lasts from November 2018 – November 2023. By that time PED North and PED South East are a fact.					No new installation will be made throughout the project. Rather the project will attempt to establish a local PED network with the aim of empowering the stakeholders to better engage with sustainable technologies.
B2P003: Scale of action
B2P003: Scale	District	District	District	District	District	District
B2P004: Operator of the installation
B2P004: Operator of the installation	The Municipality of Groningen is Manager of the lab but works closely with other parties such as the university, university of applied sciences, research institute TNO and several other parties.					Kristian Olesen
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials	Groningen does not have a strategy to reuse and recyle materials					Replication is primarily focused on the establishment of a local network with an interest in and understanding of PED.
B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?	No					No
B2P006: Other
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab	Civic			Strategic		Civic
B2P007: Other
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab	Municipality			Research center/University		Research center/University
B2P008: Other
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab	Academia, Private, Industrial, Other			Academia, Private, Citizens, public, NGO		Academia, Private
B2P009: Other	research companies, monitoring company, ict company
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab	Buildings, Demand-side management, Energy storage, Energy networks, Waste management, Lighting, E-mobility, Information and Communication Technologies (ICT), Social interactions, Business models	Buildings, Demand-side management, Prosumers, Renewable generation, Energy storage, Energy networks, Waste management, E-mobility, Social interactions, Circular economy models
B2P011: Other
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab	Tools for prototyping and modelling	Monitoring and evaluation infrastructure, Tools for prototyping and modelling, Tools, spaces, events for testing and validation
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
B2P014: Monitoring measures
B2P014: Monitoring measures	Execution plan, Available data, Type of measured data, Equipment, Level of access
B2P015: Key Performance indicators
B2P015: Key Performance indicators	Energy, Social, Economical / Financial	Energy		Energy, Environmental, Sustainability, Social, Economical / Financial
B2P016: Execution of operations
B2P016: Execution of operations
B2P017: Capacities
B2P017: Capacities
B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
B2P019: Available tools
B2P019: Available tools	Energy modelling, Social models, Business and financial models			Energy modelling, Decision making models
B2P019: Available tools
B2P020: External accessibility
B2P020: External accessibility
C1P001: Unlocking Factors
C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production	3 - Moderately important	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock	3 - Moderately important	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts	4 - Important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration	4 - Important	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials	5 - Very important	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits	5 - Very important	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant
C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits	3 - Moderately important	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant
C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts	3 - Moderately important	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)	5 - Very important	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)	3 - Moderately important	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)	4 - Important	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration	2 - Slightly important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects	3 - Moderately important	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)	4 - Important	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders	3 - Moderately important	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)
C1P002: Driving Factors
C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need	2 - Slightly important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)	3 - Moderately important	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment	4 - Important	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Economic growth need	2 - Slightly important	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness	2 - Slightly important	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence	2 - Slightly important	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)	Earthquakes due to gas extraction
C1P003: Administrative barriers
C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners	3 - Moderately important	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Lack of public participation	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information	2 - Slightly important	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant
C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities	4 - Important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement	3 - Moderately important	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)	5 - Very important	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)
C1P004: Policy barriers
C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities	2 - Slightly important	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)
C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies	4 - Important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Regulatory instability	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Non-effective regulations	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives	3 - Moderately important	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples	2 - Slightly important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
C1P006: Environmental barriers
C1P006: Environmental barriers
C1P007: Technical barriers
C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel	4 - Important	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Deficient planning	2 - Slightly important	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state	2 - Slightly important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Lack of well-defined process	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)
C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
C1P008: Inertia	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies	2 - Slightly important	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Rebound effect	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers	3 - Moderately important	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities	2 - Slightly important	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant
C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation	4 - Important	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
C1P010: Financial barriers
C1P010: Hidden costs	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Economic crisis	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Risk and uncertainty	3 - Moderately important	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
C1P011: Market barriers
C1P011: Split incentives	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant
C1P011: Energy price distortion	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant
C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)	4 - Important	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
C1P012: Stakeholders involved
C1P012: Government/Public Authorities	Planning/leading, Design/demand aggregation, Construction/implementation
C1P012: Research & Innovation	Planning/leading, Design/demand aggregation, Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Financial/Funding	Design/demand aggregation, Construction/implementation
C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data	Design/demand aggregation, Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Business process management	Planning/leading
C1P012: Urban Services providers	Design/demand aggregation, Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Real Estate developers	Construction/implementation
C1P012: Design/Construction companies	Construction/implementation
C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens	None
C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs	Planning/leading, Design/demand aggregation
C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce	Planning/leading, Design/demand aggregation, Construction/implementation, Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Other
C1P012: Other (if any)
Summary

Authors (framework concept)

Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

Contributors (to the content)

Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

Implemented by

Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)

Join the Action

COST

PED-EU-NET

Action Details