| A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab |
|
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
|
| |
Loopkantstraat in Uden, the Netherlands
|
| A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet |
|
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
|
| |
|
| A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site |
|
PED relevant case study
|
| |
|
| A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab |
|
Climate neutrality
|
| |
|
|
Annual energy surplus
|
| |
|
|
Electrification
|
| |
|
| A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab |
|
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED Lab
|
| |
In operation
|
| A1P006: Start Date |
|
A1P006: Start date
|
| |
06/17
|
| A1P007: End Date |
|
A1P007: End date
|
| |
05/23
|
| A1P008: Reference Project |
|
A1P008: Reference Project
|
| |
- Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods
|
| A1P010: Sources |
|
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
|
| |
- Inger Andresen, Tonje Healey Trulsrud, Luca Finocchiaro, Alessandro Nocente, Meril Tamm, Joana Ortiz, Jaume Salom, Abel Magyari, Linda Hoes-van Oeffelen, Wouter Borsboom, Wim Kornaat, Niki Gaitani, Design and performance predictions of plus energy neighbourhoods – Case studies of demonstration projects in four different European climates, Energy and Buildings, Volume 274, 2022, 112447, ISSN 0378-7788, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112447. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778822006181)
- Deliverable, Report: Integrated Energy Design for Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods (syn.ikia)
- Deliverable, Report: DEMONSTRATION CASE OF SUSTAINABLE PLUS ENERGY NEIGHBOURHOODS IN MARINE CLIMATE (syn.ikia)
- https://www.synikia.eu/no/bibliotek/
|
| A1P011: Geographic coordinates |
|
X Coordinate (longitude):
|
| |
5°37'46.5"E
|
|
Y Coordinate (latitude):
|
| |
51°39'20.2"N
|
| A1P012: Country |
|
A1P012: Country
|
| |
Netherlands
|
| A1P013: City |
|
A1P013: City
|
| |
Uden
|
| A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification) |
|
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).
|
| |
Cfb
|
| A1P015: District boundary |
|
A1P015: District boundary
|
| |
Geographic
|
| A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab |
|
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:
|
| |
Private
|
| A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure |
|
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:
|
| |
Single Owner
|
| A1P018: Number of buildings in PED |
|
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
|
| |
1
|
| A1P019: Conditioned space |
|
A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]
|
| |
2,360
|
| A1P020: Total ground area |
|
A1P020: Total ground area [m²]
|
| |
3,860
|
| A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area |
|
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
|
| |
1
|
| A1P022: Financial schemes |
|
A1P022a: Financing – PRIVATE – Real estate
|
| |
- Financing – PRIVATE – Real estate
|
|
A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
|
| |
7,804,440
|
| A1P024: More comments: |
|
A1P024: More comments:
|
| |
The project is a follow-up from the “Social Beautiful” concept which was developed in collaboration between Labyrint (Support in sheltered housing), Area (housing company), the municipality of Uden, and Hendriks Coppelmans (developer). The concept aims to provide an answer to changes in various policy areas and the changing demands of society. The Social Beautiful concept consists of the following elements:
1. Living, working, and community services are brought together in one location. A multifunctional residential and service centre is being realized at the location.
2. Housing is shaped by the realization of financially accessible homes suitable for the target group. The housing design is tailored to the target group. it may also include sheltered / protected living.
3. Work takes place at the location or from the same location. The work has a social function within the neighbourhood. Wage-related work must contribute to providing structure in the daily activities of the residents.
4. Neighbourhood management is organized from the location in the surrounding neighbourhood. A service package is provided from the residential and service centre that contributes to the ability of neighbourhood residents to live independently for longer, to strengthen the social network, and to improve the quality of life and safety in the neighbourhood.
5. The houses are suitable for use at all times for regular rental. Communal facilities must be realized within the contours of a regular apartment.
The objective is to offer a suitable living and working situation to a group of vulnerable citizens. In this way they become a fully-fledged part of society. They not only make use of the facilities themselves, but also give substance to the level of facilities in the municipality. Due to the integrated approach, they experience a greater sense of well-being and security.
|
| A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs |
|
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]
|
| |
7,804,440
|
| Contact person for general enquiries |
|
A1P026: Name
|
| |
Tonje Healey Trulsrud
|
|
A1P027: Organization
|
| |
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)
|
|
A1P028: Affiliation
|
| |
Research Center / University
|
|
A1P029: Email
|
| |
tonje.h.trulsrud@ntnu.no
|
| Contact person for other special topics |
|
Pursuant to the General Data Protection Regulation
|
| |
Yes
|
| A2P001: Fields of application |
|
A2P001: Fields of application
|
| |
- Energy efficiency
- Energy flexibility
- Energy production
- Waste management
- Indoor air quality
- Construction materials
|
| A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields |
|
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
|
| |
Energy efficiency: Energy efficient envelope, with good insulation, triple glazing windows and airtight envelope. (EPC = 0)
Energy Flexibility: MCP controls for the heat pump in the apartments.
Energy production: PV panels on the roof, Ground source heat pumps
Waste management: construction waste was kept to a minimum and sorted and collected separately as much as possible.
Indoor air quality: Exhaust ventilation and opening of windows
Construction materials: low carbon emission building materials
|
| A2P003: Application of ISO52000 |
|
A2P003: Application of ISO52000
|
| |
Yes
|
| A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance |
|
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
|
| |
No
|
| A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance |
|
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
|
| |
No
|
| A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation |
|
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
|
| |
not included
|
| A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand |
|
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]
|
| |
0.148
|
| A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand |
|
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]
|
| |
0.109
|
| A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year |
|
A2P011: PV
|
| |
|
|
A2P011: PV – specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
|
| |
0.058
|
| A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year |
|
A2P012: Geothermal
|
| |
|
| A2P013: Renewable resources on-site – Additional notes |
|
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site – Additional notes
|
| |
*Annual energy use below is presentedin primary energy consumption
|
| A2P014: Annual energy use |
|
A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]
|
| |
0.194
|
| A2P015: Annual energy delivered |
|
A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]
|
| |
0.0368
|
| A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary |
|
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
|
| |
0
|
| A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED |
|
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]
|
| |
-0.00043
|
| A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab |
|
A2P022: Safety & Security
|
| |
Personal Safety
|
|
A2P022: Health
|
| |
Healthy community
|
|
A2P022: Mobility
|
| |
Sustainable mobility
|
|
A2P022: Energy
|
| |
NOn-renewable primary energy balance, renewable energy ratio, grid purchase factor, load cover factor/self-generation, supply cover factor/self-consumption, net energy/net power, peak delivered/peak expoted, total greenhouse gas emission
|
|
A2P022: Economic development
|
| |
capital costs, operational cots, overall economic performance (5 KPIs)
|
|
A2P022: Housing and Community
|
| |
demographic composition, diverse community, social cohesion
|
|
A2P022: Other
|
| |
Smartness and flecibility, Indoor Environmental Quality, Social performance – Equity (affordable housing, access to servicees and amenitioes, afforability of energy, living conditions, sustinable mobility, universal design)
|
| A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations – Energy Generation |
|
A2P023: Photovoltaics
|
| |
|
|
A2P023: Geothermal energy system
|
| |
|
|
A2P023: Heat Pump
|
| |
|
| A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations – Energy Flexibility |
|
A2P024: Energy management system
|
| |
|
|
A2P024: Demand-side management
|
| |
|
|
A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systems
|
| |
- Smart metering and demand-responsive control systems
|
| A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations – Energy Efficiency |
|
A2P025: High-performance new buildings
|
| |
- High-performance new buildings
|
|
A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)
|
| |
- Building services (HVAC & Lighting)
|
| A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates |
|
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
|
| |
Yes
|
|
A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes
|
| |
EPC = 0, energy neutral building
|
| A2P029: Any other building / district certificates |
|
A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
|
| |
No
|
| A3P007: Social models |
|
A3P007: Social models
|
| |
- Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies
- Social incentives
- Quality of Life
|
| B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition |
|
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
|
| |
The demonstration projects is a new residential development, which consists of an apartment complex which includes 39 apartments spread over 3 floors. It is a sustainble plus energy neighbouhood, and has reached a plus energy balance on its first year in operation. It has MPC controls on the individual heat pumps to improve the energy flexibility of the apartments. It includes the "social beatiful" concepts with a strong emphasis on the social sustainability of the project.
|
| B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development |
|
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
|
| |
The need for social housing and the ambition to create a great living environment with a high-performance apartment complex, supplied with renewable energy. It results in lower energy bills for the tenants and high-quality homes.
|
| B1P003: Environment of the case study area |
|
B2P003: Environment of the case study area
|
| |
Suburban area
|
| B1P004: Type of district |
|
B2P004: Type of district
|
| |
|
| B1P005: Case Study Context |
|
B1P005: Case Study Context
|
| |
|
| B1P011: Population density before intervention |
|
B1P011: Population density before intervention
|
| |
0
|
| B1P012: Population density after intervention |
|
B1P012: Population density after intervention
|
| |
0
|
| B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention |
|
B1P014: Residential
|
| |
|
|
B1P014 – Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]
|
| |
2,394
|
| C1P001: Unlocking Factors |
|
C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production
|
| |
3 – Moderately important
|
|
C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts
|
| |
3 – Moderately important
|
|
C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration
|
| |
4 – Important
|
|
C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials
|
| |
4 – Important
|
|
C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits
|
| |
3 – Moderately important
|
|
C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits
|
| |
3 – Moderately important
|
|
C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts
|
| |
3 – Moderately important
|
|
C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)
|
| |
3 – Moderately important
|
|
C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)
|
| |
4 – Important
|
|
C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans
|
| |
3 – Moderately important
|
|
C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders
|
| |
4 – Important
|
|
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
| C1P002: Driving Factors |
|
C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment
|
| |
4 – Important
|
|
C1P002: Economic growth need
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness
|
| |
2 – Slightly important
|
|
C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
| C1P003: Administrative barriers |
|
C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P003: Lack of public participation
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER
|
| |
4 – Important
|
|
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)
|
| |
Delay in the Environmental Dialogue processing in the municipality
|
| C1P004: Policy barriers |
|
C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
| C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers |
|
C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P005: Regulatory instability
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P005: Non-effective regulations
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
| C1P007: Technical barriers |
|
C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P007: Deficient planning
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P007: Lack of well-defined process
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
| C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers |
|
C1P008: Inertia
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P008: Rebound effect
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
| C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers |
|
C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
| C1P010: Financial barriers |
|
C1P010: Hidden costs
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P010: Economic crisis
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P010: Risk and uncertainty
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
| C1P011: Market barriers |
|
C1P011: Split incentives
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P011: Energy price distortion
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
| C1P012: Stakeholders involved |
|
C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
|
| |
- Planning/leading
- Design/demand aggregation
|
|
C1P012: Research & Innovation
|
| |
- Design/demand aggregation
- Construction/implementation
- Monitoring/operation/management
|
|
C1P012: Real Estate developers
|
| |
- Planning/leading
- Construction/implementation
- Monitoring/operation/management
|
|
C1P012: Design/Construction companies
|
| |
- Planning/leading
- Design/demand aggregation
|
|
C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
|
| |
- Design/demand aggregation
- Construction/implementation
- Monitoring/operation/management
|
