| A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab |
|
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
|
| |
TOKI Apartments Case Study: located in Zübeyde Hanım Neighbourhood, District of Karşıyaka, City of İzmir
|
| A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet |
|
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
|
| |
|
| A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site |
|
PED case study
|
| |
|
| A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab |
|
Climate neutrality
|
| |
|
|
Annual energy surplus
|
| |
|
|
Air quality and urban comfort
|
| |
- Air quality and urban comfort
|
|
Net-zero energy cost
|
| |
|
|
Maximise self-sufficiency
|
| |
- Maximise self-sufficiency
|
| A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab |
|
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED Lab
|
| |
Planning Phase
|
| A1P006: Start Date |
|
A1P006: Start date
|
| |
10/22
|
| A1P007: End Date |
|
A1P007: End date
|
| |
10/25
|
| A1P008: Reference Project |
|
A1P008: Reference Project
|
| |
|
| A1P009: Data availability |
|
A1P009: Data availability
|
| |
- Monitoring data available within the districts
|
|
A1P009: Other
|
| |
Other
|
| A1P010: Sources |
|
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
|
| |
- https://ped-act.com/
- https://www.linkedin.com/in/ped-act/
- https://www.youtube.com/@PED-ACT
|
| A1P011: Geographic coordinates |
|
X Coordinate (longitude):
|
| |
38.496054
|
|
Y Coordinate (latitude):
|
| |
27.110049
|
| A1P012: Country |
|
A1P012: Country
|
| |
Turkey
|
| A1P013: City |
|
A1P013: City
|
| |
İzmir
|
| A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification) |
|
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).
|
| |
Csa
|
| A1P015: District boundary |
|
A1P015: District boundary
|
| |
Geographic
|
| A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab |
|
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:
|
| |
Private
|
| A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure |
|
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:
|
| |
Multiple Owners
|
| A1P018: Number of buildings in PED |
|
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
|
| |
21
|
| A1P019: Conditioned space |
|
A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]
|
| |
102,795
|
| A1P020: Total ground area |
|
A1P020: Total ground area [m²]
|
| |
32,600
|
| A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area |
|
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
|
| |
3
|
| A1P022: Financial schemes |
|
A1P022i: Financing – RESEARCH FUNDING – EU
|
| |
- Financing – RESEARCH FUNDING – EU
|
|
A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
|
| |
1,193,355
|
|
A1P022j: Financing – RESEARCH FUNDING – National
|
| |
- Financing – RESEARCH FUNDING – National
|
| A1P023: Economic Targets |
|
A1P023: Economic Targets
|
| |
- Positive externalities
- Boosting local and sustainable production
|
| Contact person for general enquiries |
|
A1P026: Name
|
| |
Ozlem Senyol
|
|
A1P027: Organization
|
| |
Karsiyaka Municipality
|
|
A1P028: Affiliation
|
| |
Municipality / Public Bodies
|
|
A1P029: Email
|
| |
ozlemkocaer2@gmail.com
|
| Contact person for other special topics |
|
A1P030: Name
|
| |
Hasan Burak Cavka
|
|
A1P031: Email
|
| |
hasancavka@iyte.edu.tr
|
|
Pursuant to the General Data Protection Regulation
|
| |
Yes
|
| A2P001: Fields of application |
|
A2P001: Fields of application
|
| |
- Energy efficiency
- Energy flexibility
- Energy production
- Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.)
|
| A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields |
|
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
|
| |
Methods involve studying the feasibility of digital PED references for the case cities about their energy, environmental, and economic performance by EnergyPlus tool. In case of insufficient energy data and the need of high resolution data, ‘Gaussian mixture model and expectation-maximization algorithm’ and ‘time-series decomposition-recombination’ method will be used to supplement data to EnergyPlus. The feasibility results will be returned to stakeholders for iterative discussion, and the iterative results will be used to update digital references. Replication plans are developed based on such a cooperation process for strategies to implement PEDs. If a PED is demonstrated during the project period, the measured data will be used to verify the feasibility model to optimize previous results (WP7– R3 & R4).
In the MAKING-CITY project, the overall PED design method is developed, which will be further optimised in this project. In addition, PED-ACT will use the methods and knowledge, including how to choose a suitable PED in a city, energy balance calculation, and technologies available for PED. The RUGGEDISED project outputs the governance model into the replication plan in PED-ACT. Its ‘smart city open-data decision platform’ will illustrate an excellent example for the database in PED-ACT. The IEA EBC Annex 83 and Cost Action 19126 create the basis for data collection, developing existing PED databases, characterization of PED, and review of regulations of PED, as well as development of simulation tools. The UBEM project further enables a detailed high-resolution energy balance calculation of PED.
|
| A2P003: Application of ISO52000 |
|
A2P003: Application of ISO52000
|
| |
Yes
|
| A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance |
|
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
|
| |
Yes
|
| A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance |
|
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
|
| |
No
|
| A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation |
|
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
|
| |
Mobility is not included in the calculations.
|
| A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand |
|
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]
|
| |
3.862
|
| A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand |
|
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]
|
| |
1.226
|
| A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year |
|
A2P011: PV
|
| |
|
|
A2P011: PV – specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
|
| |
1.028
|
| A2P014: Annual energy use |
|
A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]
|
| |
5.088
|
| A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year |
|
A2P017: Gas
|
| |
|
| A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year |
|
A2P018: PV
|
| |
|
|
A2P018 – PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
|
| |
0.707
|
| A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary |
|
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
|
| |
1.4540311173975
|
| A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations – Energy Generation |
|
A2P023: Photovoltaics
|
| |
|
|
A2P023: Heat Pump
|
| |
|
| A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations – Energy Efficiency |
|
A2P025: Deep Retrofitting
|
| |
|
|
A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)
|
| |
- Building services (HVAC & Lighting)
|
| A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates |
|
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
|
| |
No
|
| A2P029: Any other building / district certificates |
|
A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
|
| |
No
|
| A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy |
|
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
|
| |
- Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.)
- Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract)
- National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
|
| A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy |
|
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
|
| |
Karşıyaka Municipality is the first local government in Turkey to sign the Covenant of Mayors in 2011. During this period, the greenhouse gas inventory of the district was carried out three times and reduction targets were set for 2020 and 2030. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan prepared as of the end of 2021, Karşıyaka Municipality has targeted a 40% reduction in its emissions for 2030 compared to the base year 2018. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan, Karşıyaka Municipality aims to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions from 3.96 tCO2e / person in 2018 to 2.37 tCO2e / person in 2030.
System solutions such as the use of renewable energy sources, air, ground or water source heat pump, cogeneration and microcogeneration are analysed by designers in order to fully or partially meet the energy requirements for heating, cooling, ventilation, hot water, electricity and lighting for all buildings with a floor area of less than 20,000 square metres. If at least 50% of the building's total energy consumption costs are covered by one or more of these applications, the points are taken in the assessment table in the Building and housing estate business certification guide of 2023.
|
| A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid |
|
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
|
| |
- Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
|
| A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities |
|
A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
|
| |
According to the model developed for the district, the electrification of heating and cooling is necessary.Therefore, there needs to be the implementation of a heat pump. The building-integrated photovoltaic panelsshould follow. Through net-metering practices, the district is expected to reach energy positivity throughthis scenario.
|
| A3P007: Social models |
|
A3P007: Social models
|
| |
- Strategies towards (local) community-building
- Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies
- Affordability
|
| A3P008: Integrated urban strategies |
|
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
|
| |
- Digital twinning and visual 3D models
- District Energy plans
- SECAP Updates
|
| A3P009: Environmental strategies |
|
A3P009: Environmental strategies
|
| |
- Energy Neutral
- Low Emission Zone
- Pollutants Reduction
|
| B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition |
|
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
|
| |
The pilot area was selected on the basis of several criteria: its location within areas prioritised by Karşıyaka Municipality for combating climate change, compliance with the building regulations set out in the Green Building-Site-Operation (2023) guide, which are in line with Municipality's energy policy, the presence of open spaces that allow various applications for renewable energy, proximity to public facilities such as schools and municipal services, the availability of data on energy consumption (e.g. electricity and natural gas bills) and architectural features, the potential for community building, the suitability for solar energy systems, considering orientation and roof structure, and the potential for future building renovations. The aim of the initiative is to explore the feasibility of transforming the district into a Positive Energy District (PED).
|
| B1P003: Environment of the case study area |
|
B2P003: Environment of the case study area
|
| |
Urban area
|
| B1P004: Type of district |
|
B2P004: Type of district
|
| |
|
| B1P005: Case Study Context |
|
B1P005: Case Study Context
|
| |
|
| B1P006: Year of construction |
|
B1P006: Year of construction
|
| |
2,005
|
| B1P011: Population density before intervention |
|
B1P011: Population density before intervention
|
| |
0
|
| B1P012: Population density after intervention |
|
B1P012: Population density after intervention
|
| |
0
|
| B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention |
|
B1P013: Residential
|
| |
|
|
B1P013 – Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]
|
| |
102795
|
| B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention |
|
B1P014: Residential
|
| |
|
|
B1P014 – Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]
|
| |
102,795
|
| C1P001: Unlocking Factors |
|
C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock
|
| |
4 – Important
|
|
C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits
|
| |
4 – Important
|
|
C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits
|
| |
4 – Important
|
|
C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts
|
| |
4 – Important
|
|
C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)
|
| |
2 – Slightly important
|
|
C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration
|
| |
4 – Important
|
|
C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
| C1P002: Driving Factors |
|
C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions
|
| |
3 – Moderately important
|
|
C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment
|
| |
3 – Moderately important
|
|
C1P002: Economic growth need
|
| |
4 – Important
|
|
C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
| C1P003: Administrative barriers |
|
C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities
|
| |
4 – Important
|
|
C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners
|
| |
3 – Moderately important
|
|
C1P003: Lack of public participation
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information
|
| |
4 – Important
|
|
C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities
|
| |
3 – Moderately important
|
|
C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
| C1P004: Policy barriers |
|
C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term
|
| |
4 – Important
|
|
C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
| C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers |
|
C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P005: Regulatory instability
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P005: Non-effective regulations
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives
|
| |
4 – Important
|
|
C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation
|
| |
3 – Moderately important
|
|
C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples
|
| |
3 – Moderately important
|
|
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
| C1P006: Environmental barriers |
|
C1P006: Environmental barriers
|
| |
– Climate Variability: 5
– Topographical Constraints: 4
– Sunlight Availability: 5
– Environmental Regulations: 3
– Zoning Restrictions: 2
– Air and Water Pollution: 2
– Natural Disasters: 1
– Water Scarcity: 1
|
| C1P007: Technical barriers |
|
C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P007: Deficient planning
|
| |
4 – Important
|
|
C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P007: Lack of well-defined process
|
| |
4 – Important
|
|
C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability
|
| |
4 – Important
|
|
C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability
|
| |
3 – Moderately important
|
|
C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment
|
| |
3 – Moderately important
|
|
C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment
|
| |
4 – Important
|
|
C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries
|
| |
4 – Important
|
|
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
| C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers |
|
C1P008: Inertia
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements
|
| |
4 – Important
|
|
C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors
|
| |
4 – Important
|
|
C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P008: Rebound effect
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism
|
| |
3 – Moderately important
|
|
C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups
|
| |
3 – Moderately important
|
|
C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors
|
| |
4 – Important
|
|
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration
|
| |
3 – Moderately important
|
|
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
| C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers |
|
C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers
|
| |
3 – Moderately important
|
|
C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts
|
| |
4 – Important
|
|
C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities
|
| |
4 – Important
|
|
C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors
|
| |
4 – Important
|
|
C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
| C1P010: Financial barriers |
|
C1P010: Hidden costs
|
| |
4 – Important
|
|
C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities
|
| |
3 – Moderately important
|
|
C1P010: Economic crisis
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P010: Risk and uncertainty
|
| |
4 – Important
|
|
C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models
|
| |
4 – Important
|
|
C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
| C1P011: Market barriers |
|
C1P011: Split incentives
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P011: Energy price distortion
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)
|
| |
3 – Moderately important
|
|
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
