| A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab |
|
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
|
| |
City of Espoo, Leppävaara district – Sello center [only section A1]
|
| A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet |
|
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
|
| |
|
| A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site |
|
PED case study
|
| |
|
| A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab |
|
Climate neutrality
|
| |
|
|
Maximise self-sufficiency
|
| |
- Maximise self-sufficiency
|
| A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab |
|
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED Lab
|
| |
Implementation Phase
|
| A1P006: Start Date |
|
A1P006: Start date
|
| |
09/19
|
| A1P007: End Date |
|
A1P007: End date
|
| |
10/22
|
| A1P009: Data availability |
|
A1P009: Data availability
|
| |
- Monitoring data available within the districts
- General statistical datasets
|
| A1P010: Sources |
|
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
|
| |
- M. Hukkalainen, F. Zarrin, K. Klobut, O. Lindholm, M. Ranta, P. Hajduk, T. Vainio-Kaila, E. Wanne, J. Tartia, H. Horn, K. Kontu, J. Juhmen, S. Santala, R. Turtiainen, J. Töyräs, T. Koljonen. (2020). Deliverable D3.1 Detailed plan of the Espoo smart city lighthouse demonstrations. Available online: https://www.sparcs.info/sites/default/files/2020-09/SPARCS_D3.1_Detailed_plan_Espoo.pdf
- Hukkalainen, Zarrin Fatima, Krzysztof Klobut, Kalevi Piira, Mikaela Ranta, Petr Hajduk, Tiina Vainio-Kaila , Elina Wanne, Jani Tartia, Angela Bartel, Joni Mäkinen, Mia Kaurila, Kaisa Kontu, Jaano Juhmen, Merja Ryöppy, Reetta Turtiainen, Joona Töyräs, Timo Koljonen (2021) Deliverable 3.2 Midterm report on the implemented demonstrations of solutions for energy positive blocks in Espoo. Available online: https://www.sparcs.info/sites/default/files/2022-02/SPARCS_D3.2.pdf
|
| A1P011: Geographic coordinates |
|
X Coordinate (longitude):
|
| |
24.8101
|
|
Y Coordinate (latitude):
|
| |
60.2179
|
| A1P012: Country |
|
A1P012: Country
|
| |
Finland
|
| A1P013: City |
|
A1P013: City
|
| |
Espoo
|
| A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification). |
|
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).
|
| |
Dfb
|
| A1P015: District boundary |
|
A1P015: District boundary
|
| |
Geographic
|
| A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure: |
|
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:
|
| |
Multiple Owners
|
| A1P018: Number of buildings in PED |
|
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
|
| |
5
|
| A1P019: Conditioned space |
|
A1P019: Conditioned space
|
| |
267,956
|
| A1P020: Total ground area |
|
A1P020: Total ground area
|
| |
53,000
|
| A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area |
|
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
|
| |
5
|
| A1P022: Financial schemes |
|
A1P022i: Financing – RESEARCH FUNDING – EU
|
| |
- Financing – RESEARCH FUNDING – EU
|
|
A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available
|
| |
629,000
|
| A1P023: Economic Targets |
|
A1P023: Economic Targets
|
| |
- Job creation
- Positive externalities
- Boosting local businesses
|
| A1P024: More comments: |
|
A1P024: More comments:
|
| |
The centre of Leppävaara district is the largest and most active of the Espoo city centres with great connections all around the metropolitan area. It is a major transport node. The bus terminal and train station are located at the junction of the Kehä I ringroad, City Railway and Jokeri Light Rail Line. Now, 65,000 people live in the Leppävaara area, and the number is estimated to grow to 100,000 by 2050. In the midst of Leppävaara lies the shopping centre Sello, the second largest in Finland measured by yearly visitors of approximately 23 million. It received the LEED environmental rating system’s platinum classification for its operations in 2015. District heating demand (space heating and DHW) is covered by renewable district heating. District electricity needs are covered by renewable energy produced locally by PV (750 kW) and is purchased via virtual power plant supplies green electricity. Sello shopping block and the hotel are being developed into a micro-grid with BESS and other flexible assets. The battery energy storage system has a power capacity of 2 MW, and a storage capacity of 2.1 MWh. The Microgrid is able to control flexible electrical load of 3.6 MW and heat flexibility of 3MW in total 6.6MW. In the Sello block, smart charging infrastructure will be upgraded with active power management with a strong operation security for customers and commuter parking. The city of Espoo has committed to organising the fast charging infrastructure for the electric buses and Leppävaara will get its first fast charging bus stations. The main objectives of the demonstrations include increasing controllable flexibility load, both for electricity and heat of Sello block, developing data model for fast integration of systems to energy platform, energy optimization on region and city district level, decentralized energy production and management including Virtual Power Plant/VPP configurations. Total net energy need covered by RES, including heating and electricity, is 100.2%.
|
| Contact person for general enquiries |
|
A1P026: Name
|
| |
Jaano Juhmen
|
|
A1P027: Organization
|
| |
SIEMENS – Data Center Forum
|
|
A1P028: Affiliation
|
| |
SME / Industry
|
|
A1P029: Email
|
| |
Jaano.juhmen@siemens.com
|
| Pursuant to the General Data Protection Regulation: Do you agree to have the information disclosed in this form, processed, stored and made publicly available by the COST Action PED-EU-NET? The names and contact information (name of the contact person, contact-email of the contact person, name of the project manager and contact e-mail of the project manager) may be used by PED-EU-NET members and external partners (Annex 83 and JPI UE) for further clarifications and updates. It is not possible to continue without providing consent. |
|
Pursuant to the General Data Protection Regulation
|
| |
Yes
|
| A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary |
|
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
|
| |
0
|
| B1P011: Population density before intervention |
|
B1P011: Population density before intervention
|
| |
0
|
| B1P012: Population density after intervention |
|
B1P012: Population density after intervention
|
| |
0
|
| C1P001: Unlocking Factors |
|
C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
| C1P002: Driving Factors |
|
C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P002: Economic growth need
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
| C1P003: Administrative barriers |
|
C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P003: Lack of public participation
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
| C1P004: Policy barriers |
|
C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entiies
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
| C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers |
|
C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P005: Regulatory instability
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P005: Non-effective regulations
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
| C1P007: Technical barriers |
|
C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P007: Deficient planning
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P007: Lack of well-defined process
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
| C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers |
|
C1P008: Inertia
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P008: Rebound effect
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
| C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers |
|
C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
| C1P010: Financial barriers |
|
C1P010: Hidden costs
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P010: Economic crisis
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P010: Risk and uncertainty
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
| C1P011: Market barriers |
|
C1P011: Split incentives
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P011: Energy price distortion
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
