| A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab |
|
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
|
| |
Çamlık District, Ankara, Türkiye
|
| A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet |
|
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
|
| |
|
| A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site |
|
PED case study
|
| |
|
|
PED relevant case study
|
| |
|
| A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab |
|
Climate neutrality
|
| |
|
|
Annual energy surplus
|
| |
|
|
Energy community
|
| |
|
|
Electrification
|
| |
|
|
Net-zero energy cost
|
| |
|
|
Net-zero emission
|
| |
|
|
Maximise self-sufficiency
|
| |
- Maximise self-sufficiency
|
| A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab |
|
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED Lab
|
| |
Planning Phase
|
| A1P006: Start Date |
|
A1P006: Start date
|
| |
10/22
|
| A1P007: End Date |
|
A1P007: End date
|
| |
09/25
|
| A1P008: Reference Project |
|
A1P008: Reference Project
|
| |
|
| A1P009: Data availability |
|
A1P009: Data availability
|
| |
- Open data city platform – different dashboards
- Meteorological open data
- General statistical datasets
|
| A1P010: Sources |
|
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
|
| |
|
| A1P011: Geographic coordinates |
|
X Coordinate (longitude):
|
| |
39.881812
|
|
Y Coordinate (latitude):
|
| |
32.795369
|
| A1P012: Country |
|
A1P012: Country
|
| |
Turkey
|
| A1P013: City |
|
A1P013: City
|
| |
Ankara
|
| A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification) |
|
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).
|
| |
Dsb
|
| A1P015: District boundary |
|
A1P015: District boundary
|
| |
Geographic
|
| A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab |
|
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:
|
| |
Private
|
| A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure |
|
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:
|
| |
Multiple Owners
|
| A1P018: Number of buildings in PED |
|
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
|
| |
257
|
| A1P019: Conditioned space |
|
A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]
|
| |
22,600
|
| A1P020: Total ground area |
|
A1P020: Total ground area [m²]
|
| |
50,800
|
| A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area |
|
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
|
| |
0
|
| A1P022: Financial schemes |
|
A1P022i: Financing – RESEARCH FUNDING – EU
|
| |
- Financing – RESEARCH FUNDING – EU
|
|
A1P022j: Financing – RESEARCH FUNDING – National
|
| |
- Financing – RESEARCH FUNDING – National
|
| A1P023: Economic Targets |
|
A1P023: Economic Targets
|
| |
- Boosting local and sustainable production
|
| A1P024: More comments: |
|
A1P024: More comments:
|
| |
The urban morphology of Çamlık District differs in several ways, compared with the typical urban fabric in Türkiye, along with the capital city of Ankara. The houses on the site are composed of three-story attached single-housing units with multiple rows, creating a total of 257 housing units in total. Low-rise buildings coupled with suitably oriented rooftop surfaces brings about significant advantages in the site. Dense greenery in the site also results in reduced cooling energy demand in the buildings.
|
| Contact person for general enquiries |
|
A1P026: Name
|
| |
Prof. Dr. İpek Gürsel DİNO
|
|
A1P027: Organization
|
| |
Middle East Technical University
|
|
A1P028: Affiliation
|
| |
Research Center / University
|
|
A1P029: Email
|
| |
ipekg@metu.edu.tr
|
| Contact person for other special topics |
|
A1P030: Name
|
| |
Assoc. Prof. Onur Taylan
|
|
A1P031: Email
|
| |
otaylan@metu.edu.tr
|
|
Pursuant to the General Data Protection Regulation
|
| |
Yes
|
| A2P001: Fields of application |
|
A2P001: Fields of application
|
| |
- Energy efficiency
- Energy production
- Construction materials
|
| A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields |
|
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
|
| |
The energy consumption and efficiency of the energy model of Çamlık Site, created using EnergyPlus software, have been evaluated under the scenarios specified below. At each stage, a new system was incorporated to explore the potential of the area becoming a PED. In this context, four scenarios were created to compare different energy scenarios for the Ankara pilot area and to observe the impact of the included systems on energy efficiency: V_base; V_ER; V_ER,HP; V_ER,HP,PV.
The basic scenario (V_base) was created using the current state without any improvement to the building envelope. This scenario was developed to determine the annual energy needs of the entire site without any intervention and serves as a reference point for the other developed models.
The second scenario (V_ER) was created to improve the building envelopes of all residential units in the area, altering the U-values according to Türkiye's current building standards (TS-825).
The third scenario (V_ER,HP) primarily includes a heat pump model that can use electrical energy to produce higher thermal energy and is added on top of the improvements in the second scenario.
Finally, the V_ER,HP,PV scenario combines building envelope improvements, the heat pump, and the solar PV system.
|
| A2P003: Application of ISO52000 |
|
A2P003: Application of ISO52000
|
| |
Yes
|
| A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance |
|
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
|
| |
Yes
|
| A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance |
|
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
|
| |
No
|
| A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation |
|
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
|
| |
Mobility is not included in the calculations.
|
| A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand |
|
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]
|
| |
3.446
|
| A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand |
|
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]
|
| |
0.528
|
| A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year |
|
A2P011: PV
|
| |
|
|
A2P011: PV – specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
|
| |
3.4240
|
| A2P014: Annual energy use |
|
A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]
|
| |
3.976
|
| A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year |
|
A2P017: Gas
|
| |
|
| A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary |
|
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
|
| |
0
|
| A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations – Energy Generation |
|
A2P023: Photovoltaics
|
| |
|
|
A2P023: Heat Pump
|
| |
|
| A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations – Energy Efficiency |
|
A2P025: Deep Retrofitting
|
| |
|
|
A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)
|
| |
- Building services (HVAC & Lighting)
|
| A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates |
|
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
|
| |
No
|
| A2P029: Any other building / district certificates |
|
A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
|
| |
No
|
| A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy |
|
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
|
| |
- Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract)
- National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
|
| A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid |
|
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
|
| |
- Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
|
| A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities |
|
A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
|
| |
According to the model developed for the district, the electrification of heating and cooling is necessary with heat pumps. Rooftop photovoltaic panels also have the potential for renewable energy generation. Through net-metering practices, the district is expected to reach energy positivity through this scenario.
|
| A3P007: Social models |
|
A3P007: Social models
|
| |
- Strategies towards (local) community-building
- Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies
- Affordability
|
| A3P008: Integrated urban strategies |
|
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
|
| |
- Digital twinning and visual 3D models
- District Energy plans
|
| A3P009: Environmental strategies |
|
A3P009: Environmental strategies
|
| |
- Energy Neutral
- Low Emission Zone
|
|
A3P009: Other
|
| |
Energy Positive, Low Emission Zone
|
| B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition |
|
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
|
| |
Çamlık District, unlike many other districts in Ankara, has a specific urban morphology that draws near the other pilot zones considered by the partners of PED-ACT. The site has three-storey single housing units, along with a fair amount of greenery around. Furthermore, the roof areas enable large amounts of PV installment, which results in higher amounts of local renewable energy potential. Therefore, the district is a good fit for PED development.
|
| B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development |
|
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
|
| |
PED-ACT project.
|
| B1P003: Environment of the case study area |
|
B2P003: Environment of the case study area
|
| |
Suburban area
|
| B1P004: Type of district |
|
B2P004: Type of district
|
| |
|
| B1P005: Case Study Context |
|
B1P005: Case Study Context
|
| |
|
| B1P006: Year of construction |
|
B1P006: Year of construction
|
| |
1,986
|
| B1P011: Population density before intervention |
|
B1P011: Population density before intervention
|
| |
0
|
| B1P012: Population density after intervention |
|
B1P012: Population density after intervention
|
| |
0
|
| B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention |
|
B1P013: Residential
|
| |
|
|
B1P013 – Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]
|
| |
50800
|
| B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention |
|
B1P014: Residential
|
| |
|
|
B1P014 – Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]
|
| |
50,800
|
| C1P001: Unlocking Factors |
|
C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock
|
| |
2 – Slightly important
|
|
C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits
|
| |
4 – Important
|
|
C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits
|
| |
4 – Important
|
|
C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts
|
| |
4 – Important
|
|
C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)
|
| |
2 – Slightly important
|
|
C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)
|
| |
4 – Important
|
|
C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration
|
| |
4 – Important
|
|
C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)
|
| |
4 – Important
|
|
C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
| C1P002: Driving Factors |
|
C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions
|
| |
4 – Important
|
|
C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P002: Economic growth need
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)
|
| |
3 – Moderately important
|
|
C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
| C1P003: Administrative barriers |
|
C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities
|
| |
4 – Important
|
|
C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P003: Lack of public participation
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information
|
| |
4 – Important
|
|
C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
| C1P004: Policy barriers |
|
C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies
|
| |
3 – Moderately important
|
|
C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
| C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers |
|
C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P005: Regulatory instability
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P005: Non-effective regulations
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies
|
| |
4 – Important
|
|
C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation
|
| |
3 – Moderately important
|
|
C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples
|
| |
2 – Slightly important
|
|
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
| C1P006: Environmental barriers |
|
C1P006: Environmental barriers
|
| |
– Climate Variability: 5
– Topographical Constraints: 4
– Sunlight Availability: 5
– Air and Water Pollution: 2
– Water Scarcity: 1
– Environmental Regulations: 3
– Zoning Restrictions: 2
– Natural Disasters: 1
|
| C1P007: Technical barriers |
|
C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P007: Deficient planning
|
| |
2 – Slightly important
|
|
C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P007: Lack of well-defined process
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability
|
| |
2 – Slightly important
|
|
C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability
|
| |
3 – Moderately important
|
|
C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries
|
| |
4 – Important
|
|
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
| C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers |
|
C1P008: Inertia
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies
|
| |
4 – Important
|
|
C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P008: Rebound effect
|
| |
3 – Moderately important
|
|
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism
|
| |
3 – Moderately important
|
|
C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups
|
| |
3 – Moderately important
|
|
C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration
|
| |
2 – Slightly important
|
|
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
| C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers |
|
C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers
|
| |
3 – Moderately important
|
|
C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities
|
| |
4 – Important
|
|
C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
| C1P010: Financial barriers |
|
C1P010: Hidden costs
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
|
C1P010: Economic crisis
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P010: Risk and uncertainty
|
| |
4 – Important
|
|
C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models
|
| |
3 – Moderately important
|
|
C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
| C1P011: Market barriers |
|
C1P011: Split incentives
|
| |
5 – Very important
|
|
C1P011: Energy price distortion
|
| |
4 – Important
|
|
C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)
|
| |
3 – Moderately important
|
|
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER
|
| |
1 – Unimportant
|
